10.57647/jee.2026.0901.02

The Model of Women's Research Management Strategy in the Higher Education

PDF
  • Shirin Khorshidzadehhaghighi1,
  • Reza Zarei*1,
  • Nader Shahamat1,
  • Mozhgan Amirianzadeh1,
  1. Department of Educational Administration, Marv.C. Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

Received: 2025-05-14

Revised: 2025-08-17

Accepted: 2025-08-18

Published in Issue 2026-03-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Shirin Khorshidzadehhaghighi, Reza Zarei, Nader Shahamat, Mozhgan Amirianzadeh (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Khorshidzadehhaghighi, S., Zarei, R., Shahamat, N., & Amirianzadeh, M. (2026). The Model of Women’s Research Management Strategy in the Higher Education. Journal of Education Experiences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/jee.2026.0901.02
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 30

Abstract

The purpose of this research is the model of women's research management strategy in the higher education centers of Fars province with an emphasis on the qualitative approach. This research was conducted using a qualitative method. In the qualitative method, data were collected and analyzed through semi-structured interviews with experts and research managers. The results show that the key elements of the model include research policy, management of financial resources, commercialization of research results, development of research infrastructure and equipment, and improvement of skills and knowledge of employees and students. The proposed research management strategy model can be used as an operational framework to improve research management in Fars province's higher education centers. This model has the ability to increase the quality and effectiveness of scientific research by emphasizing coherent policy making, optimal use of financial resources, commercialization of research results, and development of research skills and infrastructure.

Keywords

  • Higher Education Centers,
  • Research Management,
  • Research Development,
  • Strategic Model
PDF

References

  1. Al Abri, M. H., Bannan, B., & Dabbagh, N. (2022). The design and development of an open educational resources intervention in a college course that manifests in open educational practices: A design-based research study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 154–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09286-0
  2. Antchak, V. (2017). Portfolio of major events in Auckland: Characteristics, perspectives and issues. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 9(3), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2017.1335066
  3. Bai, X.-J., Li, Z.-Y., & Zeng, J. (2020). Performance evaluation of China's innovation during the industry-university-research collaboration process-an analysis basis on the dynamic network slacks-based measurement model. Technology in Society, 62, 101310.
  4. Hallonsten, O. (2020). Research infrastructures in Europe: The hype and the field. European Review, 28(4), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798720000277
  5. Hazelkorn, E., Coates, H., & McCormick, A. C. (Eds.). (2018). Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  6. Jamaludin, R., McKay, E., & Ledger, S. (2020). Are we ready for Education 4.0 within ASEAN higher education institutions? Thriving for knowledge, industry and humanity in a dynamic higher education ecosystem? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0157
  7. Kim, M. S. (2010). Information asymmetry and incentives for active management. Available at SSRN 1719462.
  8. Langford, C. H., Hall, J., Josty, P., Matos, S., & Jacobson, A. (2006). Indicators and outcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? Research Policy, 35(10), 1586–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.021
  9. Malekinia, A., Malekinia, Z., & Faizi, P. (2017). Strategies needed by Iran's higher education system in the age of globalization. Strategic and Macro Policies, 6(24), 518–545.
  10. Molazhi, M., Selajgeh, S., Hosni Ahmadieh, S., Firouzabadi, A., & Jalali Javaran, R. (2020). Designing and validating the digital leadership model in the country's education system (case study: education and training in Sistan and Baluchistan province). Strategic Management Research, 27(81). https://doi.org/10.22059/SMR.2021.319376.1070
  11. Pryor, K. N., & Barringer, S. N. (2022). Reaffirming or challenging boundaries? Exploring hybrid academic units in modern research university hierarchies. Innovative Higher Education, 47(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09573-4
  12. Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates' approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170-179.‏
  13. Ryahi, M. (2010). Quality management in research and research centers of the country. First Conference on Quality Management in Universities and Higher Education and Research Institutes of the Country, Tehran. .[In Persian]
  14. Sá, C. M. (2008). ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537-552.
  15. Schaeffer, P. R., Fischer, B., & Queiroz, S. (2018). Beyond education: the role of research universities in innovation ecosystems. Форсайт, 12(2 (eng)).
  16. Serpell, R. (2018). Situated understanding of human development in Africa: Systematic inquiries at the nexus of psychology, social science and history. Culture & Psychology, 24(3), 382-397.‏
  17. Yemeni Dozi Sorkhabi, M., & Turkzadeh, J. (2009). Investigating the development planning status of public universities in Iran. Iran Higher Education, 1(4), 1–19.
  18. Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212