Using Task-based Instruction to Develop EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Oral Fluency
- Department of English Language Teaching, Arv.C., Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran
Received: 2025-07-25
Revised: 2025-09-26
Accepted: 2025-09-27
Published in Issue 2025-09-30
Copyright (c) 2025 Bahman Gorjian, Farzaneh Mir (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PDF views: 155
Abstract
Learning speech acts is a vital ability in successful conversations. English language learners need not only to know how to construct grammatical structures, but they also need to know the pragmatic functions of those utterances. The objective of the current research is to instruct learners in mastering the pragmatic functions of language, which is a significant challenge for Iranian learners. The current research investigates the efficacy of task-based instruction (TBI) in developing the pragmatic competence of oral fluency among advanced Iranian EFL learners. A quasi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test was adopted to examine learners' problems in using pragmatic oral fluency through task-based exercises. The sample comprised 64 students selected from the research population in an English language institute. They were randomly assigned to a control group (CG) receiving a conventional approach (i.e., Presentation, practice, production, PPP), and an experimental group (EG) acquiring pragmatic competence of oral fluency. In a pretest, they passed conversation tests. Then they participated in intervention sessions of text-based exercises in the CG and TBI in the EG for a whole semester. Parametric statistics showed the outperformance of TBI over the PPP in the post-test. Implications of the study suggest the effective impact of TBI on students' pragmatic oral fluency.
Keywords
- Oral Fluency,
- Presentation-Practice-Production,
- Pragmatic Competence,
- Task Based Instruction
References
- Ahmed, E. A. M. (2022) The effects of pragmatics competence in EFL university learners. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 12, 1618-1631. Doi.org/10.4236/ojapps. 2022.1210110
- https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2022.1210110
- Alavi, S. M., Shasavar, M., & Norouzi, M. H. (2020). Diagnosing EFL learners' development of pragmatic competence implementing computerized dynamic assessment. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 9(1), 117-149. Doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2020.42653.400.
- Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.108
- Cindy, S. (2012). Introduction to fluency disorders. Retrieved, from http://www.d.umn.edu/~cspiller/csd4200/starkweatherdfs.htm.
- Cohen, A. (2010). Coming to terms with pragmatics. In N. Ishihara and A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 3-21). Malaysia: Pearson.
- Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Edition). Sage.
- Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
- Ellis, R. (2009) Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
- Esfandiari, M., Knight, P., Molinari, J. & Zacharias, S. (2012). Task-based learning applied. The Nottingham Jubilee Press.
- Eslami, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(2), 199-208.
- https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci039
- Fazilatfar, A. M. & Cgeraghi, M. (2013). Exploring the effects of instruction on EFL learners' pragmatic development. TELL, 7(2),1-25.
- Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325-353.
- https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.3.325
- González-Lloret, M. (2022). Technology-mediated tasks for the development of L2 pragmatics. Language Teaching Research, 26(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064930
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064930
- Herraiz-Martínez, A. (2018). Technology and task-based language teaching (TBLT): Exploring pragmatics. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 14(2), 38-61.
- Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Pearson Education.
- Kasper, G., & Rose, K.R. (eds.) (2002). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
- https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.003
- Khadangi Barani, A. & Mousapour Negari, G. (2023). Fostering EFL learners' pragmatics awareness, incidental pragma-linguistic learning, and speaking ability through video-based pragmatic tests. Teaching English Language, 17(1), 81-106. Doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2022.163130
- Kim, Y. & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656-677.
- https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12273
- Mahdavi, M. (2022). Concept-based instruction for EFL learners' pragmatic development: The case of compliment and compliment-response speech acts. Interdisciplinary studies in English Language Teaching,1(2), 225-245.
- Malihah, N. (2010). The Effectiveness of Speaking Instruction through Task-Based Language Teaching. REGISTER 3(1), 85-101.
- https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v3i1.85-101
- Masuram, J., & Nagini Sripada, P. (2020). Developing spoken fluency through task-based teaching. Procedia-Computer Science, 172, 623-630
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.080
- Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
- Omar, F. R., & Razi, Ö. (2022) Impact of instruction based on movie and TV series clips on EFL learners' pragmatic competence: Speech acts in focus. Front. Psychol. 13(974757), 1-14. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974757
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974757
- Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Rossiter, M. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395-412.
- https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
- Rossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Manimtim, L. G., & Thomson, R. I. (2010). Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(4), 583-606.
- https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583
- Ruso, N. (2007). The influence of task-based learning on EFL classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efljournal.com/profession_teaching_articles.php Vol. 18.
- Samuda, V. & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
- https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429
- Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2017). Top Notch 3 A & B. Longman.
- Soler, E. A. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417-435.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
- Tajeddin, Z., Keshavarz, M. H., & Zan-Moghadam, A. (2012). The effect of task-based language teaching on EFL learners' pragmatic production, metapragmatic awareness, and pragmatic self-assessment. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL),15(2),139-166.
- Vahid Dastjerdi, V. & Rezvani, E. (2010). The impact of instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' production of requests in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 782-790.
- https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.782-790
- Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
- Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2009) Task-based language teaching: some questions and answers. The Language Teacher, 33(3), 3-8.
- Yan, Y. (2022). The effect of pragmatic competence on the communicative competence of second language learners. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 673, 368-372.
- https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220706.074
10.57647/jals.2025.0501.12