10.1007/s40089-018-0252-4

Effect of chemical vapor deposition parameters on the diameter of multi-walled carbon nanotubes

  1. Centre for Materials Joining and Research (CEMAJOR), Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, 608 002, IN
  2. Department of Chemistry, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, 608 002, IN
  3. VB Ceramic Research Centre (VBCRC), Chennai, 600 041, IN
  4. Naval Materials Research Laboratory (NMRL), Shil Badlapur Rd., MIDC Area, Ambernath, Maharashtra, IN
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2018-11-01

How to Cite

Venkatesan, S., Visvalingam, B., Mannathusamy, G., Viswanathan, V., & Rao, A. G. (2018). Effect of chemical vapor deposition parameters on the diameter of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. International Nano Letters, 8(4 (December 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-018-0252-4

HTML views: 38

PDF views: 172

Abstract

Abstract The multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with controlled diameter distribution are useful in the fabrication of composite materials as reinforcement, due to their superior strength and toughness. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a viable process to synthesize MWCNTs. In this investigation, an attempt has been made to study the effect of CVD process parameters (reaction temperature, flow rate of precursor gas, process time) on the mean diameter of MWCNTs. The MWCNTs of controlled diameter distribution was selectively grown on NiO catalyst supported by Al 2 O 3 nano particles. The argon and acetylene were used as carrier and carbon precursor gas, respectively. The catalyst and carbon samples were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis. From this investigation, it is understood that the increase in reaction temperature and flow rate of precursor gas increased the mean diameter of MWCNTs but increase in process time decreased the diameter. The diameter distribution and quality of MWCNTs are strongly influenced by the diameter of the catalyst particles.

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology,
  • Carbon nanotubes,
  • Chemical vapor deposition,
  • Mean diameter

References

  1. Iijima (1991) Helical micro tubules of graphitic carbon https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0
  2. Atthipalli et al. (2011) The effect of temperature on the growth of carbon nanotubes on copper foil using a nickel thin film as catalyst https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.02.046
  3. Peng et al. (2008) Measurements of near-ultimate strength for multiwalled carbon nanotubes and irradiation-induced crosslinking improvements (pp. 626-631) https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.211
  4. De Volder et al. (2013) Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222453
  5. Hutchison et al. (2001) Double-walled carbon nanotubes fabricated by a hydrogen arc discharge method https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00187-1
  6. Chrzanowska et al. (2015) Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by the laser ablation method: effect of laser wavelength https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201451614
  7. Kumar and Ando (2005) Controlling the diameter distribution of carbon nanotubes grown from camphor on a zeolite support https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.10.014
  8. Yousefi et al. (2016) Growth of well-oriented VACNTs using thermal chemical vapor deposition method https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948856
  9. Kumar and Ando (2010) Chemical vapor deposition of carbon nanotubes: a review on growth mechanism and mass production https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2939
  10. MacKenzie et al. (2010) An updated review of synthesis parameters and growth mechanisms for carbon nanotubes in fluidized beds https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9019787
  11. Kong et al. (1998) Chemical vapor deposition of methane for single-walled carbon nanotubes https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00745-3
  12. Zhang et al. (2017) Weakening effect of nickel catalyst particles on the mechanical strength of the carbon nanotube/carbon fiber junction https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.042
  13. He et al. (2009) Fabrication of carbon nanomaterials by chemical vapor deposition (pp. 6-11) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.088
  14. Yemini et al. (2017) Nickel overlayers modify precursor gases to pattern forests of carbon nanotubes https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00801
  15. Nagaraju et al. (2002) Alumina and silica supported metal catalysts for the production of carbon nanotubes https://doi.org/10.1016/s1381-1169(01)00375-2
  16. Satishkumar et al. (1998) Single-walled nanotubes by the pyrolysis of acetylene-organometallic mixtures https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00727-1
  17. Cao et al. (2007) Effect of acetylene flow rate on morphology and structure of carbon nanotube thick films grown by thermal chemical vapor deposition https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-007-0017-x
  18. Tewari and Sharma (2015) Effect of different carrier gases and their flow rates on the growth of carbon nanotubes https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4916057
  19. Shukrullah et al. (2016) Effect of ethylene flow rate and CVD process time on diameter distribution of MWCNTs https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1090588
  20. He et al. (2010) An approach for obtaining the structural diversity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on Ni/Al catalyst with low Ni content https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.067
  21. Inami et al. (2007) Synthesis-condition dependence of carbon nanotube growth by alcohol catalytic chemical vapor deposition method https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2007.02.009
  22. Lolli et al. (2006) Tailoring (n, m) structure of single-walled carbon nanotubes by modifying reaction conditions and the nature of the support of CoMo catalysts https://doi.org/10.1021/jp056095e
  23. Mubarak et al. (2011) The production of carbon nanotubes using two-stage chemical vapor deposition and their potential use in protein purification (pp. 461-469) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.045
  24. Allaedini et al. (2015) Synthesis of Fe-Ni-Ce trimetallic catalyst nanoparticles via impregnation and co-precipitation and their application to dye degradation https://doi.org/10.1515/chempap-2015-0190
  25. Makris et al. (2005) CNT growth on alumina supported nickel catalyst by thermal CVD https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2004.11.001
  26. Guan et al. (2011) Purification of carbon nanotubes synthesized by catalytic decomposition of methane using bimetallic Fe-Co catalysts supported on MgO https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/17/1/012025
  27. Zheng et al. (2016) Microwave purification of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in gas phase https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2016.06.006
  28. Ling et al. (2013) The effect of different order of purification treatments on the purity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.056
  29. Lehman et al. (2011) Evaluating the characteristics of multiwall carbon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.028
  30. Kim et al. (1991) The interaction of hydrocarbons with coppernickel and nickel in the formation of carbon filaments https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(91)90323-v
  31. Kukovitsky et al. (2002) Correlation between metal catalyst particle size and carbon nanotube growth https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(02)00283-x
  32. He et al. (2008) Characterization of bamboo-shaped CNTs prepared using deposition-precipitation catalyst https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.048
  33. Tripathi et al. (2015) Fine-tuning control on CNT diameter distribution, length and density using thermal CVD growth at atmospheric pressure: an in-depth analysis on the role of flow rate and flow duration of acetylene (C2H2) gas https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-013-0288-8
  34. Navas et al. (2017) Unveiling the evolutions of nanotube https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b00077
  35. Rajavel et al. (2014) Enhanced vacuum sensing performance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: role of defects and carboxyl functionalization https://doi.org/10.1039/x0xx00000x
  36. Kumar et al. (2014) Photon avalanche upconversion and pump power studies in LaF 3: Er 3 +/Yb 3 + phosphor https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-011-4673-2