10.1186/2228-5326-2-36

Realistic confinement potential for a square-patterned two-dimensional semiconductor quantum dot and its approximated circular counterpart

  1. Department of Physics, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX, 77446, US
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2012-11-22

How to Cite

Ciftja, O. (2012). Realistic confinement potential for a square-patterned two-dimensional semiconductor quantum dot and its approximated circular counterpart. International Nano Letters, 2(1 (December 2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2228-5326-2-36

HTML views: 75

PDF views: 106

Abstract

Abstract Abstract Two-dimensional semiconductor quantum-dot systems are typical nanoscale structures in which a few number of electrons is confined in a small region of space by applying external electric gate potentials. While the detailed form of the confining potential depends on the specific experimental setup, the parabolic confinement model has commonly been used because of its simplicity. Clearly, on those instances in which the experimental setup involves placement of gate potentials with sharp geometric features, the area depleted of electrons; thus, the quantum-dot region cannot be considered circular. If, for simplicity, we consider the confinement region of the electrons as square in shape, then an accurate calculation of the properties of such square-patterned quantum dot should be made using a realistic confinement potential originating from that particular configuration. We calculated exactly such a confinement potential for a square quantum dot. The particular analytic form of this realistic potential is complicated given its dependence on the two-dimensional position coordinates, rather than simply the distance from the center of the quantum dot. In this work, we choose to substitute the realistic confinement potential for a square-patterned quantum dot with an approximated circular symmetric potential. We assess the quality of this approximation and discuss instances in which one can reliably use the approximated simplified potential instead of the computationally unyielding exact one.

Keywords

  • Semiconductor quantum dots,
  • Confinement potential,
  • Coulomb interaction

References

  1. Knoss (2008) Nova Science Publishers
  2. Jacak et al. (1998) Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72002-4
  3. Michler (2003) Springer
  4. Bird (2003) Kluwer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0437-5
  5. Ciftja (2009) Classical behavior of few-electron parabolic quantum dots https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.01.036
  6. Tavernier et al. (2003) Four-electron quantum dot in a magnetic field https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.205305
  7. Ciftja and Faruk (2005) Two-dimensional quantum-dot helium in a magnetic field: variational theory https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.205334
  8. Pfannkuche et al. (1993) Theory of quantum dot helium https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90141-R
  9. Kainz et al. (2002) Quantum dots in high magnetic fields: calculation of ground-state properties https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.115305
  10. Ciftja (2009) A Jastrow correlation factor for two-dimensional parabolic quantum dots https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984909021120
  11. Merkt et al. (1991) Energy spectra of two electrons in a harmonic quantum dot https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.7320
  12. Tarucha et al. (1996) Shell filling and spin effects in a few electron quantum dot https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3613
  13. Sasaki et al. (1998) Spin states in circular and elliptical quantum dots https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(98)00486-4
  14. Tsui et al. (1982) Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559
  15. Laughlin (1983) Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged quasiparticles https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395
  16. Ciftja (2009) Exact results for systems of electrons in the fractional quantum Hall regime II https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.04.018
  17. Ciftja (2009) Exact results for systems of electrons in the fractional quantum Hall regime https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2008.10.036
  18. MacDonald and Johnson (1993) Magnetic oscillations of a fractional Hall dot https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3107
  19. Ciftja (1999) Effective hypernetted-chain study of even-denominator-filling state of the fractional quantum Hall effect https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.10194
  20. Kastner (1993) Artificial atoms 46(1) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881393
  21. Ashoori (1996) Electrons in artificial atoms https://doi.org/10.1038/379413a0
  22. Kouwenhoven and Marcus (1998) Quantum dots (pp. 35-39)
  23. Ciftja (2007) Generalized description of few-electron quantum dots at zero and nonzero magnetic field https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/4/046220
  24. Taut (1994) Two electrons in a homogeneous magnetic field: particular analytic solutions https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/27/3/040
  25. Maksym and Chakraborty (1990) Quantum dots in a magnetic field: role of electron-electron interactions https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.108
  26. Yannouleas and Landman (2000) Collective and independent-particle motion in two-electron artificial atoms https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1726
  27. Adamowski et al. (2000) Electron pair in a Gaussian confining potential https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4234
  28. De Filippo and Salerno (2000) Spectral properties of a model potential for quantum dots with smooth boundaries https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4230
  29. Abramowitz and Stegun (1970) Dover
  30. Ciftja (2007) An experimentally justified confining potential for electrons in two-dimensional semiconductor quantum dots https://doi.org/10.1007/s10820-006-9035-8
  31. Ciftja and Wexler (2003) Monte Carlo simulation method for Laughlin-like states in a disk geometry https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.075304
  32. Ciftja and Faruk (2006) Two interacting electrons in a one-dimensional quantum-dot: exact numerical diagonalization https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/9/002