10.57647/inl.2026.1601.02

Distance-Based Colorimetric µPADs for Nickel Detection: Effect of Cover Materials, Reagent Loading, and Data Normalization

  • Elnaz Ghahremani1,
  • Leila Vafajoo*1,
  • Azizollah Shafiekhani2,
  1. Department of Chemical and Polymer Engineering, ST. C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  2. Department of Theoretical Physics and Nano Physics, Faculty of Physics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2025-11-12

Revised: 2025-12-27

Accepted: 2026-02-18

Published in Issue 2026-03-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Elnaz Ghahremani, Leila Vafajoo, Azizollah Shafiekhani (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ghahremani, E., Vafajoo, L., & Shafiekhani, A. (2026). Distance-Based Colorimetric µPADs for Nickel Detection: Effect of Cover Materials, Reagent Loading, and Data Normalization. International Nano Letters, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/inl.2026.1601.02
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Distance-based microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (pPADs) provide instrument-free quantification for metal ions, yet cross-study comparisons are hindered by differences in geometry, paper type, reagent loading, and sample volume. In this work, transparent-sheet-covered pPADs were fabricated on Whatman Grade 42 using a simple impregnation method, and the selective Ni–dimethylglyoxime (Ni–DMG) reaction at pH 10.2 generated a reddish-pink precipitate whose migration length represented the analyte concentration. Four Ni(II) levels (20 − 80 ppm) and three DMG loadings (20, 40, and 60 mM) were tested (???? = 10, 5 pL per sample). Band length increased with Ni(II) concentration but decreased with higher DMG, revealing a trade-off between signal and reagent excess. To compare with wax-printed pPADs in the literature, a channel-width correction and dimensionless length normalization were applied, while data were expressed in terms of Ni(II) amount (nmol). The normalized curves showed close agreement in the overlapping range despite differences in paper grade and channel width. The Wilairat model fitted the data well (????2 > 0.95), with increasing DMG elevating the reagent parameter and lowering the asymptotic distance. Overall, the reproducible, low-cost platform and the introduced normalization framework offer a practical route to harmonize distance-based colorimetric Ni(II) detection across various pPAD designs.

Keywords

  • Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices,
  • Distance-based colorimetry,
  • Nickel detection,
  • Dimethylglyoxime,
  • Normalization,
  • Dimensionless length

References

  1. Aryal P, Brack E, Alexander T, and Henry C. Capil-lary flow-driven microfluidics combined with a pa-per device for fast user-friendly detection of heavy metals in water. Analytical Chemistry (2023); 95:5820–7. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00378
  2. Pradela-Filho LA, Veloso WB, and Arantes IVS. Paper-based analytical devices for point-of-need applications. Microchimica Acta (2023); 190. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-05764-5
  3. Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature (2006); 442:368–73. doi: 10.1038/nature05058
  4. Busa L, Mohammadi S, Maeki M, Ishida M, Tani A, and Tokeshi H. Advances in microfluidic paper-based analytical devices for food and water anal-ysis. Micromachines (2016); 7:86. doi: 10.3390/ mi7050086
  5. Tang RH, Yang H, Choi JR, Gong Y, Feng S, Pingguan-Murphy B, Huang QS, Shi JL, Mei QB, and Xu F. Advances in paper-based sample pre-treatment for point-of-care testing. Critical Re-views in Biotechnology (2016); 37:411–28. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2016.1164664
  6. Singh AT, Lantigua D, Meka A, Taing S, Pand-her M, and Camci-Unal G. Paper-based sensors: Emerging themes and applications. Sensors (2018);18. doi: 10.3390/s18092838
  7. Sriram G, Bhat MP, Patil P, Uthappa UT, Jung HY, Altalhi T, Kumeria T, Aminabhavi TM, and Pai RK. Paper-based microfluidic analytical devices for colorimetric detection of toxic ions: a review. Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2017); 93:212–27. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.06.005
  8. Aydindogan E, Ceylan AE, and Timur S. Paper-based colorimetric spot test utilizing smartphone sensing for detection of biomarkers. Talanta (2020); 208:120446. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120446
  9. Khan M, Zhao B, Wu W, Zhao M, Bi Y, and Hu Q. Distance-based microfluidic assays for instrument-free visual point-of-care testing. Trends in Analyti-cal Chemistry (2023); 162:117029. doi: 10.1016/ j.trac.2023.117029
  10. Cate DM, Dungchai W, Cunningham JC, Volckens J, and Henry CS. Simple, distance-based measure-ment for paper analytical devices. Lab on a Chip (2013); 13:2397–404. doi: 10.1039/C3LC50072A
  11. Nuchtavorn N, Rypar T, Nejdl L, Vaculovicova M, and Macka M. Distance-based detection in analytical flow devices: From gas detection tubes to microfluidic chips and microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2022); 150:116581. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116581
  12. Cate DM, Noblitt SD, Volckens J, and Henry C. Multiplexed paper analytical device for quantifi-cation of metals using distance-based detection. Lab on a Chip (2015); 15:2808–18. doi: 10.1039/ C5LC00364D
  13. Hofstetter JC, Wydallis JB, Neymark G, Reilly TH, Harrington J, and Henry CS. Quantitative colorimetric paper analytical devices based on radial distance measurements for aqueous metal determination. Analyst (2018); 143:3085–90. doi: 10.1039/C8AN00632F
  14. Nguyen MP, Kelly SP, Wydallis JB, and Henry CS. Read-by-eye quantification of aluminum (III) in distance-based microfluidic paper-based ana-lytical devices. Analytica Chimica Acta (2020); 1100:156–62. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.052
  15. Gime´nez-Go´mez P, Ha¨ttestrand I, Sjo¨ berg S, Dupraz C, Richardson S, and Pamme N. Distance-based paper analytical device for the determination of dissolved inorganic carbon concentration in freshwater. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical (2023); 385:133694. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133694
  16. Carolin CF, Kumar PS, Saravanan A, Joshiba GJ, and Naushad M. Efficient techniques for the re-moval of toxic heavy metals from aquatic en-vironment: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (2017); 5:2782–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.029
  17. Rohatgi A. WebPlotDigitizer, Version 4.6. (2023). Available from: https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer
  18. Wilairat P. An equation for fitting distance-based measurements with analyte concentrations: From discrete segments simulation to closed-form solu-tion. Talanta Open (2024); 100296. doi: 10.1016/ j.talo.2024.100296
  19. Gazda DB, Fritz JS, and Porter MD. Determina-tion of nickel(II) as the nickel-dimethylglyoxime complex using colorimetric solid phase extraction. Analytica Chimica Acta (2004); 508:53–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.11.044
  20. Gehman DR. Acrylic Adhesives. In: Skeist I. (ed.) Handbook of Adhesives. (1990); Springer:437–50. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0671-9 25
  21. Hong S and Kim W. Dynamics of water imbibition through paper channels with wax boundaries. Mi-crofluidics and Nanofluidics (2015); 19:845–53. doi: 10.1007/s10404-015-1611-3
  22. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM, and Carrilho E. Diagnostics for the developing world: Paper-based microfluidic devices. Analyti-cal Chemistry (2009); 81:3699–706. doi: 10.1021/ ac901071p