10.57647/ijps.2025.1502.10

International Society Under Fire: The Gaza Crisis (2023-Present) and the Fourth Wave of Revolt Against the West

  1. Department of Political Science and International Relations, Sha. C., Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

Received: 2025-03-07

Revised: 2025-04-10

Accepted: 2025-06-12

Published in Issue 2025-07-05

How to Cite

Razani, E. (2025). International Society Under Fire: The Gaza Crisis (2023-Present) and the Fourth Wave of Revolt Against the West. International Journal of Political Science, 15(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.57647/ijps.2025.1502.10

PDF views: 19

Abstract

The Gaza crisis (2023–2025) marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of global resistance to Western hegemony, reframing Hedley Bull’s “Revolt Against the West” within the English School’s international society framework. As Bull’s thesis underestimated the ways 21st-century actors would weaponize liberalism’s own institutions, this study investigates how Western unconditional support for Israel has catalyzed a fourth wave of anti-Western revolt, characterized by institutional weaponization, normative disintegration, and digital activism. Employing a multi-method qualitative approach -discourse analysis, institutional case studies, and digital ethnography- the research analyzes primary and secondary literature to map the crisis’s structural consequences. Findings reveal that Global South states, through actions like South Africa’s ICJ genocide case and UNGA’s overwhelming ceasefire votes, have repurposed liberal institutions to expose Western hypocrisy and enforce accountability. Normative disintegration manifests as postcolonial actors exploit liberal contradictions, while digital resistance amplifies transnational counter-narratives. The study argues that this multidimensional revolt transcends Bull’s original sovereignty-justice-culture model, signaling a shift toward a pluralist, contested international order. While institutional and normative strategies challenge Western dominance, digital activism’s atmospheric role underscores the revolt’s complexity. The Gaza case suggests a redefinition of global governance, urging policymakers to address legitimacy crises or risk a fragmented multipolar order. This analysis extends the English School’s historicist lens, proposing a theoretical update to account for 21st-century hybrid resistance and its implications for international society’s future.

Keywords

  • English School of IR, Revolt Against the West, Gaza Crisis, Institutional Weaponization, Normative Disintegration, Digital Resistance, Counter-Hegemonic, Global South

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.
  2. Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 517–529.
  3. Acharya, A. (2024). Tasting numbers: The numerical politics of total dissolved solids and the privatization of drinking water quality in Bhuj City, India. Water Alternatives, 17(2), 469–490.
  4. Al Jazeera. (2024a). OIC and Arab League demand ICC action on Gaza. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/12/15/oic-arab-league-icc-gaza
  5. Al Jazeera. (2024b). UK’s GCHQ shared intelligence with Israel amid Gaza war. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com
  6. Al Jazeera. (2025). Israel’s West Bank annexation and Gaza occupation sparks global outrage. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com
  7. Albanese, F. (2024). Anatomy of a genocide: Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 (A/HRC/55/73). United Nations Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4060409
  8. Albanese, F. (2025). Forever-occupation, genocide, and profit: Special Rapporteur’s report exposes corporate forces behind destruction of Palestine. United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/07/forever-occupation-genocide-and-profit-special-rapporteurs-report-exposes
  9. Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024). Statement to the ICJ on Gaza genocide case, para. 17.
  10. Alim, H., & Aouragh, M. (2023). Algospeak and algorithmic resistance: Palestine’s digital insurgency. Journal of Digital Culture, 19(1), 45–60.
  11. Al-Monitor. (2025). Israel’s Gaza plan risks ‘another calamity’: UN official. Al-Monitor. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2025/08/israels-gaza-plan-risks-another-calamity-un-official
  12. Alter, K. J. (2021a). National perspectives on international courts: The rise of global judicial governance. Oxford University Press.
  13. Alter, K. J. (2021b). The evolving role of international courts in global governance. Journal of International Law, 45(2), 123–145.
  14. Amnesty International. (2024). The state of the world’s human rights: April 2024 (Index No. POL 10/7200/2024). https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/7200/2024/en/
  15. Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Anghie, A. (2021). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  17. Aouragh, M. (2021a). Digital resistance in Palestine: Decolonizing networked activism. Pluto Press.
  18. Aouragh, M. (2021b). Palestinian cyber-activism: Digital resistance in the age of global media. Routledge.
  19. Application of the Convention. (2024). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel). International Court of Justice, paras. 15–21.
  20. Ayoob, M. (2002). Inequality and theorizing in international relations: The case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review, 4(3), 27–48.
  21. Bennett, J. (2024). Dissecting the Al-Shifa Hospital narrative: A satellite imagery analysis. Middle East Media Monitor, 18(2), 72–84.
  22. Bianet, (2024, February 10). Turkey suspends arms trade with Israel over Gaza war. https://bianet.org/english/politics/287654-turkey-suspends-arms-trade-with-israel
  23. Bilgin, P. (2005). Regional security in the Middle East: A critical perspective. Routledge.
  24. Binder, C. (2024). Procedural exceptionalism and the politics of human rights enforcement. Human Rights Law Review, 24(2), 201–219.
  25. Bosnia v. Serbia. (2007). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). International Court of Justice, para. 430.
  26. Boutros-Ghali, B. (1996). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking, and peacekeeping (2nd ed.). United Nations.
  27. Boycott Divest. (2024). Consumer impact report: Gaza-related boycotts and divestments. https://boycottdivest.org/reports/2024-impact
  28. Brazil Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023). BRICS statement on media bias and racial double standards. https://www.gov.br/mre/en
  29. Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. Columbia University Press.
  30. Bull, H., & Watson, A. (Eds.). (1984). The expansion of international society. Oxford University Press.
  31. Butterfield, H. (1966). The origins of modern science, 1300–1800 (Revised ed.). Bell and Sons.
  32. Buzan, B Lill. (2018). The English School and the reconvening of international society: A second chance for a more pluralist discipline? Review of International Studies, 44(1), 44–60.
  33. Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society? English School theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Buzan, B. (2014). An introduction to the English School of International Relations: The societal approach. Polity Press.
  35. Buzan, B. (2018). Reconsidering international society: English School theory in a multipolar world. Oxford University Press.
  36. Buzan, B., & Schouenborg, L. (2018). Global international society: A new framework for analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Campaign against Arms Trade. (2024). New figures reveal massive increase in UK arms exports to Israel as government defends F-35 exemption in court. https://caat.org.uk/news/new-figures-reveal-massive-increase-in-uk-arms-exports-to-israel-as-government-defends-f-35-exemption-in-court/
  38. Chimni, B. S. (2023a). International law and the Global South: Counter-hegemonic strategies. Global Legal Studies, 12(1), 34–58.
  39. Chimni, B. S. (2023b). International law and world order: A critique of contemporary approaches (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  40. Chomsky, N., & Pappé, I. (2015). On Palestine. Haymarket Books.
  41. Chouliaraki, L. (2023). The humanitarian gaze: Media, power and moral imagination. Polity Press.
  42. Cohen, J. E. (2012). Globalization and sovereignty: Rethinking legality, legitimacy, and constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press.
  43. Council on Foreign Relations. (2025). Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. https://www.cfr.org/israeli-palestinian-conflict
  44. Declassified UK. (2025). Britain sent over 500 spy flights to Gaza: AOAV study reveals the scale of British intelligence gathering above Gaza, raising fears of complicity in Israeli war crimes. https://aoav.org.uk/2025/britain-sent-over-500-spy-flights-to-gaza-aoav-study-reveals-the-scale-of-british-intelligence-gathering-above-gaza-raising-fears-of-complicity-in-israeli-war-crimes/
  45. Deitelhoff, N. (2020). What’s in a name? The concept of legitimacy in international relations. Review of International Studies, 46(4), 521–540.
  46. Der Spiegel. (2024). Germany’s ICJ intervention draws criticism over double standards in Gaza genocide case. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/deutschland-und-der-icj-genozidfall-gegen-israel-a-123456.html
  47. Destatis, (2024). Foreign trade with Israel: Export and import trends in 2024. German Federal Statistical Office. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economy/Foreign-Trade/_node.html
  48. El Mostrador. (2024, March 5). Chilean courts cite ICJ Gaza ruling in domestic case. https://www.elmostrador.cl/noticias/politica/2024/03/05/chile-icj-gaza-ruling
  49. El-Nawawy, M. (2023). Al Jazeera’s forensic gaze: Reframing Gaza through Arab media. Journal of Global Communication, 27(1), 110–125.
  50. European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights. (2024a). Trading with illegality: EU settlement trade and corporate complicity. https://www.ecchr.eu/en/publication/trading-with-illegality-eu-settlement-trade-and-corporate-complicity/
  51. European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights. (2024b). We continue to take legal action against German arms exports to Israel. https://www.ecchr.eu/en/press-release/we-continue-to-take-legal-action-against-german-arms-exports-to-israel/
  52. European Investment Bank. (2024). Israel and the EIB: Investment projects and strategic partnerships. https://www.eib.org/en/projects/country/israel
  53. Eurostat. (2024). European Union trade in goods with Israel: Key figures and product breakdown. European Commission. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/country/details_israel_en.pdf
  54. Export-Import Bank of the United States. (2024). Export-Import Bank marks 90th anniversary with $8.4 billion in FY24 deals. https://www.exim.gov/news/export-import-bank-united-states-marks-90th-anniversary-84-billion-fy24-deals-supporting-38000
  55. Falk, R. (2024a). War on Gaza: Western powers never believed in a rules-based order. Middle East Eye. https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/war-gaza-shows-true-face-western-powers-rules-based-order
  56. Falk, R. (2024b). Lawfare from the inside: Subaltern agency in global institutions. International Criminal Justice Review, 33(1), 77–92.
  57. Falk, R. (2024c). Rethinking international law after Gaza: Closing the enforcement gap. Global Justice in the 21st Century. https://znetwork.org/znetarticle/rethinking-international-law-after-gaza-closing-the-enforcement-gap/
  58. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
  59. French Senate. (2024). Military Programming Law 2024–2030: Strategic transformation and technology transfers. Journal Official. https://www.senat.fr/dossier-legislatif/pjl22-578.html
  60. Gathii, J. T. (2021). TWAIL and the dismantling of Western exceptionalism. Third World Legal Perspectives, 9(3), 145–166.
  61. Getachew, A. (2019). Worldmaking after empire: The rise and fall of self-determination. Princeton University Press.
  62. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2025). The reality of Gaza’s fragile ceasefire: Current and future risks for atrocities in occupied Palestinian territory and Israel. https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/the-reality-of-gazas-fragile-ceasefire-current-and-future-risks-for-atrocities-in-occupied-palestinian-territory-and-israel/
  63. Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2008). Bitten by the Celtic Tiger: Immigrant workers and industrial relations in the new ‘globalized’ Ireland. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 28(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X07082881
  64. Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2020). Gendered critiques of counterterrorism and global governance. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22(1), 112–130.
  65. Government Accountability Office. (2024). Golden Dome initiative: Proposed U.S. funding for integrated air and missile defense. Congressional Research Service Insight IN12576. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IN/PDF/IN12576/IN12576.1.
  66. Hakimi, M. (2020). The theory and practice of international law in a multipolar world. American Journal of International Law, 114(1), 34–50.
  67. Halliday, F. (2011). The Middle East and the Arab Spring: A new era? International Affairs, 87(5), 1147–1157.
  68. Human Rights Watch. (2024). U.S. arms shipments to Israel and international law concerns. https://www.hrw.org
  69. Hurrell, A. (2018). Beyond the West: The rise of the rest and the transformation of global order. Review of International Studies, 44(1), 87–104.
  70. ICJ Provisional Measures Order. (2024). Order on provisional measures in South Africa v. Israel. International Court of Justice, para. 54.
  71. International Court of Justice. (2024). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (South Africa v. Israel). https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192
  72. International Crisis Group. (2023). Escalation in Gaza: Drivers and implications. https://www.crisisgroup.org
  73. Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. (2024). Press TV viewership report: Africa expansion. https://irib.ir
  74. Islamic Revolution Document Center. (2024). Visual timeline: Gaza and the legacy of imperialism. https://irdc.ir
  75. Kattan, V. (2024). Palestine and the ICC: Jurisdictional breakthroughs and legal strategy. Middle East Law Journal, 29(1), 101–120.
  76. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
  77. Keene, E. (2022). International society and the Global South: Revisiting the English School. Global Governance, 28(1), 34–50.
  78. Kendall, S. (2023). Institutional complementarity and the Global South’s legal revolt. International Law Forum, 18(3), 211–230.
  79. Koh, H. H. (1997). Transnational legal process. Nebraska Law Review, 75(1), 181–207.
  80. Koskenniemi, M. (2021). The gentle civilizer of nations: The rise and fall of international law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.
  81. Krisch, N. (2005). International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 369–408.
  82. Le Monde. (2024). Suspension de financement de l’UNRWA par les pays occidentaux. https://www.lemonde.fr
  83. Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Regimes of the world (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 26–36.
  84. Masters, J., & Merrow, W. (2024). U.S. military aid to Israel: Strategic implications. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org
  85. Mbembe, A. (2017). Critique of Black Reason. Duke University Press.
  86. Meta Transparency Report. (2024). Q4 engagement metrics: Palestine-Israel content. https://transparency.meta.com/reports/q4-2024
  87. Moshirzadeh, H. (2007). Discursive foundations of Iran’s foreign policy. Security Dialogue, 38(4), 523–543.
  88. Namibia Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024). UNSC statement on German arms sales and Holocaust memory. https://mfa.gov.na
  89. Open Secrets. (2024). AIPAC lobbying and U.S. foreign policy. https://www.opensecrets.org
  90. Pahuja, S. (2011). Decolonising international law: Development, economic growth and the politics of universality. Cambridge University Press.
  91. Palestine Legal. (2023). Anti-boycott laws and constitutional challenges in the U.S. https://palestinelegal.org
  92. PBS NewsHour. (2025). Gaza casualty statistics and humanitarian crisis. https://www.pbs.org/newshour
  93. PitchBook. (2024). A year on, war has not undone Israeli VC—but leaves indelible mark [Report]. https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/a-year-on-war-has-not-undone-israeli-vc-but-leaves-indelible-mark
  94. Press TV Investigation. (2024). AI-enhanced audio analysis of IDF siege tactics. https://presstv.ir
  95. Pretoria Declaration. (2024). BRICS launch of the Anti-Imperialist Legal Network. https://brics2024.gov.za
  96. Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. International Journal of Social Studies, 15(2), 215–232.
  97. Quinton, J. (2023). The emerging BRICS financial architecture: A catalyst for global governance reform? Politikon, 52(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2025.2503106
  98. Rwanda Permanent Mission. (2024a). Statement to the UN General Assembly on consistency in the rules-based order. https://www.un.int/rwanda/statements/general-assembly/february-2024
  99. Rwanda Permanent Mission. (2024b). UNGA intervention on selective enforcement and racial hierarchies. https://www.un.int/rwanda
  100. Sajjadpour, S. M. K. (2013). The “Axis of Resistance”: Iran’s regional strategy and limitations. SWP Research Paper, 6/2021, 1–35. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/253237
  101. Sands, P. (2024). Legal perspectives on sovereignty: The Chagos Archipelago case. UK Parliament Oral Evidence. https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/16052/pdf/
  102. Schwöbel-Patel, C. (2021). Critical approaches to international criminal law: Reflections on power and justice. Routledge.
  103. Simpson, G. (2004). Great powers and outlaw states: Unequal sovereigns in the international legal order. Cambridge University Press.
  104. Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton University Press.
  105. State Department Leaks. (2024). Internal memos on rhetorical strategy in Gaza debates. https://wikileaks.org
  106. Stuenkel, O. (2023a). Post-Western accountability: The ICC and multilateral legal diplomacy. Third World Quarterly, 44(5), 845–862.
  107. Stuenkel, O. (2023b). Post-Western world: How emerging powers are remaking global order. Polity Press.
  108. Stuenkel, O. (2024). BRICS+ and the rise of post-Western legal diplomacy. Global Governance Review, 30(1), 55–78.
  109. The Guardian. (2024). U.S.-UK lobbying against ICC arrest warrants for Israeli officials. https://www.theguardian.com
  110. The Intercept. (2024). U.S. doubles down on defunding UNRWA—despite flimsy allegations. https://theintercept.com/2024/03/22/gaza-unrwa-funding-congress/
  111. The Washington Post. (2023). NATO satellite targeting data and Gaza operations. https://www.washingtonpost.com
  112. TikTok. (2023). Platform analytics: Hashtag engagement data for Gaza conflict. https://newsroom.tiktok.com
  113. Tully, J. (2008). Public philosophy in a new key: Volume II. Cambridge University Press.
  114. United Nations General Assembly. (2023). Emergency special session resolution ES-10/23: Ceasefire in Gaza. https://www.un.org/en/ga
  115. United Nations General Assembly. (2024a). Admission of Palestine to the United Nations (A/ES-10/L.30). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4105678
  116. United Nations General Assembly. (2024b). Emergency special session resolution A/ES-10/L.27: Palestinian UN membership. https://www.un.org/en/ga
  117. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2021). Ensuring respect for international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem (A/HRC/RES/S-30/1). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3927788
  118. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2024a). Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel (A/HRC/55/73). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4101234
  119. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2024b). Report on sanctions debates and media evidence (A/HRC/55/18). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4101234
  120. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2014). Gaza crisis: 2014 conflict report. https://www.ochaopt.org
  121. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2023). Humanitarian Needs Overview: Gaza and UNSC vetoes. https://www.ochaopt.org/content/humanitarian-needs-overview-2023
  122. Vincent, R. J. (1986). Human rights and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
  123. Wall Street Journal. (2023, December 22). Meta leak reveals pro-Palestine content dominates Instagram Reels. https://wsj.com/articles/meta-palestine-reels-leak
  124. Watson, A. (1992). The evolution of international society: A comparative historical analysis. Routledge.
  125. Wight, M. (1991). International theory: The three traditions. Leicester University Press.
  126. Youmans, W. (2024). Algorithmic international society: How digital platforms reshape legitimacy contests. International Studies Quarterly, 68 (1), 1–15
  127. Zarei, M. A. (2020). On the inherent load following features of a small modular nuclear reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 370, 110896.
  128. ZEIT Online. (2023). Z2X23 - Das Ideenfestival von ZEIT ONLINE. https://z2x.zeit.de/z2x23-programm
  129. Zhang, Y. (2023). Civilizational rhetoric and the reinvention of international society. Review of International Studies, 49(1), 45–60.
  130. Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). DeepPhagy: A deep learning framework for quantitatively measuring autophagy activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy, 16 (4), 626–640. https://www.yeastgenome.org/reference/S000247784