10.1007/s40095-016-0202-8

Numerical and experimental analysis of micro HAWTs designed for wind tunnel applications

XML HTML PDF
  • R. Lanzafame1,
  • S. Mauro*1,
  • M. Messina1,
  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Catania, Catania, 95125, IT
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2016-02-05

How to Cite

Lanzafame, R., Mauro, S., & Messina, M. (2016). Numerical and experimental analysis of micro HAWTs designed for wind tunnel applications. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 7(2 (June 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-016-0202-8
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 29

PDF views: 127

Abstract

Abstract In this paper the authors describe a design and optimization process of micro HAWTs using a numerical and experimental approach. An in-house 1D BEM model was used to obtain a first geometrical draft. It allowed to quickly optimize blade geometry to maximize energy production as well. As these models are quite sensitive to airfoil coefficients, above all at low Reynolds numbers, an accurate 3D CFD model was developed to support and validate the 1D BEM design, analyzing and fixing the discrepancies between model output. The 3D CFD model was developed and optimized using ANSYS Fluent solver and a RANS transition turbulence model. This allowed to correctly reproduce the transition and stall phenomena that characterize the aerodynamic behavior of micro wind turbines, solving the issues related to low Reynolds flows. The procedure was completed, thus building two micro HAWTs with different scales, testing them in the subsonic wind tunnel of the University of Catania. Wind tunnel features, experimental set-up and testing procedures are presented in the paper. Through the comparison of numerical CFD and experimental test results, a good compatibility was found. This allowed the authors to analyze and compare numerical calculation results and verify blockage effects on the prototypes as well.

Keywords

  • HAWT design,
  • CFD transition modeling,
  • Wind tunnel experiments,
  • BEM theory
HTML PDF

References

  1. Lanzafame and Messina (2007) Fluid dynamics wind turbine design: critical analysis, optimization and application of BEM theory 32(4) (pp. 2291-2305) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.12.010
  2. Lanzafame and Messina (2009) Design and performance of a double-pitch wind turbine with non-twisted blades 34(5) (pp. 1413-1420) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.09.004
  3. Lanzafame and Messina (2009) Optimal wind turbine design to maximize energy production 223(A2) (pp. 93-101) https://doi.org/10.1243/09576509JPE679
  4. Lanzafame, R., Messina, M.: Power curve control in micro wind turbine design. Energy Elsevier Sci.
  5. 35
  6. (2), 556–561 (2010). ISSN 03605442. doi:
  7. 10.1016/j.energy.2009.10.025
  8. Lanzafame and Messina (2010) Horizontal axis wind turbine working at maximum power coefficient continuously (pp. 301-306) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.06.020
  9. Lanzafame and Messina (2012) BEM theory: how to take into account the radial flow inside of a 1D numerical code (pp. 440-446) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.008
  10. Lanzafame et al. (2013) Wind turbine CFD modeling using a correlation-based transitional model (pp. 31-39) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.007
  11. Torresi et al. (2014) Performance and flow field evaluation of a Savonius rotor tested in a wind tunnel (pp. 207-216) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.023
  12. Lindenburg, C.: Analysis of the stationary measurements on the UAE phase-VI rotor in the NASA-Ames wind tunnel. ECN-C-03-025
  13. Hansen et al. (2006) Madsen State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity Elsevier - (pp. 285-330) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2006.10.002
  14. Sumner et al. (2010) CFD in wind energy: the virtual, multiscale wind tunnel (pp. 989-1013) https://doi.org/10.3390/en3050989
  15. Hartwanger, D., Horvat, A.: 3D modelling of a wind turbine using CFD. In: Proceedings of NAFEMS Conference; NAFEMS: Cheltenham, UK (2008)
  16. Gòmez-Iradi et al. (2009) Development and validation of a CFD technique for the aerodynamic analysis of HAWT 131(3) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3139144
  17. Bechmann, A., Sørensen, N.: CFD simulation of the MEXICO rotor wake. In: Proceedings of EWEC 2009; EWEA: Marseille, France (2009)
  18. Benjanirat, S., Sankar, L.N.: Evaluation of turbulence models for the prediction of wind turbine aerodynamics. AIAA-2003-0517
  19. Miller et al. (2013) Review of computer-aided numerical simulation in wind energy (pp. 122-134) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.059
  20. Wilcox, D.C.: Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DWC Industries, La Canada, California, pp. 143–163
  21. Davidson, P.A.: Turbulence, 1st edn. pp. 107–145. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
  22. Villalpando, F., Reggio, M., Ilinca, A.: Assessment of turbulence models for flow simulation around a wind turbine airfoil. Model. Simul. Eng.
  23. 2011
  24. , 714146 (2011). doi:
  25. 10.1155/2011/714146
  26. Menter et al. (2006) Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes (pp. 277-303) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-006-9047-1
  27. Langtry, R.B., Gola, J., Menter, F.R.: Predicting 2D airfoil and 3D wind turbine rotor performance using a transition model for general CFD codes. In: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 Jan 2006 (2006)
  28. Sørensen, N.N.: 3D CFD computations of transitional flows using DES and a correlation based transition model. Risø-R-1692(EN). ISBN 978-87-550-3749-6
  29. Langtry, R.B., Menter, F.R., Likki, S.R., Suzen, Y.B., Huang, P.G., Völker, S.: A correlation-based transition model using local variables—part I: model formulation. In: Vienna, ASME Paper No. ASME-GT2004-53452 (2006)
  30. Langtry et al. (2006) A correlation-based transition model using local variables—part II: test cases and industrial applications 128(3) (pp. 423-434) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2184353
  31. Reuss, R.L., Hoffmann, M.J., Gregorek, G.M.: Effects of Surface Roughness and Vortex Generators on the NACA 4415 Airfoil. The Ohio State University, Columbus, NREL/TP-442-6472 (1995)
  32. Saliveros, E.: The Aerodynamic Performance of the NACA 4415 Aerofoil Section at Low Reynolds Numbers. Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow (1988)
  33. Brusca, S., Lanzafame, R., Messina, M.: Low speed wind tunnel: design and build. In: Pereira, J.D. (ed.) Wind Tunnels: Aerodynamics, Models and Experiments, chap 7, pp. 189–220. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY. ISBN: 978-1-61209-204-1 (2011)
  34. Barlow et al. (1999) Wiley-Interscience
  35. Sørensen et al. (2006) Wall Correction Model for Wind Tunnels with Open Test Section 44(8) (pp. 1890-1894) https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15656
  36. Bell, J.H., Metha, R.D.: Contraction design for small low-speed wind tunnels. In: NASA—CR—182747, April (1988)
  37. Zell, P.: Performance and test section flow characteristics of the national full-scale aerodynamics complex 80-by 120-foot wind tunnel. In: NASA TM 103920 (1993)
  38. Eckert, W., Mort, K., Pope, J.: Aerodynamic design guidelines and computer program for estimation of subsonic wind tunnel performance. In: NASA TN D—8243, Washington, D.C., October (1976)
  39. Metha, R.D., Bradshaw P.: Design rules for small low speed wind tunnels. Aeronaut. J. R. Aeronaut. Soc. 442–449 (1979)
  40. Shen et al. (2009) Determination of the angle of attack on rotor blades (pp. 91-98) https://doi.org/10.1002/we.277
  41. Johansen and Sørensen (2004) Aerofoil characteristics from 3D CFD rotor computations (pp. 283-294) https://doi.org/10.1002/we.127