10.57647/ijc.2026.1602.17

Optimization of Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Turquoise Blue G (TBG) Using a Cu-N:ZnO/TiO2 Nano-Heterojunction Photocatalyst via Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

PDF
  • Mangesh K. Lanjewar1,
  • Omprakash K. Mahadwad*2,
  • Pritam Patil3,
  1. Research Scholar, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad 382424, India
  2. Department of Chemical Technology, UPL University of Sustainable Technology, Ankleshwar 393135, India
  3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Shri S'ad Vidya Mandal Institute of Technology, Bharuch 392001, India

Received: 2026-01-01

Revised: 2026-02-07

Accepted: 2026-03-03

Published in Issue 2026-06-30

Published Online: 2026-05-08

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Lanjewar, M. K., Mahadwad, O. K., & Patil, P. (2026). Optimization of Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Turquoise Blue G (TBG) Using a Cu-N:ZnO/TiO2 Nano-Heterojunction Photocatalyst via Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijc.2026.1602.17
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 32

Abstract

A novel Cu-N co-doped ZnO/TiO2 (7% Cu-N:ZnO/TiO2) modified Type-II nano-heterojunction photocatalyst was synthesized using a cost effective room temperature sol-gel (RTSG) method to enhance dye degradation performance. Nitrogen doping levels (1-5 wt%) were optimized relative to the 7% Cu doped ZnO/TiO2 system. Structural, morphological, optical, and surface chemical properties were systematically characterized using XRD, FE-SEM, UV-Vis, XPS and FTIR. Among all, the 3 wt% N-doped catalyst, 7% Cu-N(3%):ZnO/TiO2, exhibited the significant red shift (388.71 → 417.5 nm) and notable band-gap reduction from 3.19 eV (pure TiO2) to 2.97 eV, enabling superior visible-light absorption. For the first time, this optimized photocatalyst was applied for the photocatalytic degradation of Turquoise Blue G (TBG) dye, achieving an excellent degradation efficiency of 98.07% within 150 minutes-1.57 times higher than pure TiO2 and reducing COD to a level 5.5 times lower than untreated wastewater, confirming effective mineralization. Compared with our earlier Cu doped ZnO/TiO2 system, nitrogen incorporation further enhanced charge separation and reaction kinetics. Additionally, RSM using Central Composite Design (CCD) was employed to model, analyze, and optimize key process parameters, showing strong predictive accuracy. This study demonstrates that Cu-N co-doping provides a highly efficient and scalable strategy for sustainable photocatalytic treatment of dye wastewater.

Highlights

1)       A novel 7% Cu-N:ZnO/TiO₂ modified type-II heterojunction photocatalyst was successfully synthesized using a cost-effective room-temperature sol-gel (RTSG) method.

2)       Nitrogen co-doping (1–5 wt%) induced a strong red shift, reducing the band gap to 2.97 eV, significantly enhancing visible-light absorption.

3)       For the first time, the 7% Cu-N(3%):ZnO/TiO₂ photocatalyst achieved an outstanding 98.07% degradation efficiency toward Turquoise Blue G (TBG) dye.

4)       RSM-CCD optimization identified nitrogen doping (2.887 wt%) and degradation time (2.494 h) as the optimal conditions for maximum efficiency.

5)       The developed quadratic model (R² = 0.9923) exhibited excellent predictive accuracy, confirming the effectiveness of Cu–N co-doping with RSM optimization for dye wastewater treatment.

Keywords

  • Modified type II heterojunction; Photocatalytic degradation; RSM-CCD, Sol-gel method; Turquoise blue G (TBG) dye
PDF

References

  1. B. Yaou Balarabe, M.N. Illiassou Oumarou, A.S. Koroney, I. Adjama, A.R. Ibrahim Baraze, J. Nanotechnol. 2023 (2023) 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1292762.
  2. S. Dutta, S. Adhikary, S. Bhattacharya, D. Roy, S. Chatterjee, A. Chakraborty, D. Banerjee, A. Ganguly, S. Nanda, P. Rajak, J. Environ. Manage. 353 (2024) 120103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120103.
  3. Kusumlata, B. Ambade, A. Kumar, S. Gautam, Limnol. Rev. 24 (2024) 126–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev24020007.
  4. S. Sarkar, N.T. Ponce, A. Banerjee, R. Bandopadhyay, S. Rajendran, E. Lichtfouse, Environ. Chem. Lett. 18 (2020) 1569–1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01021-w.
  5. D. Titus, E.J.J. Samuel, J. Clust. Sci. 30 (2019) 1335–1345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-019-01585-w.
  6. D. Glažar, B. Simončič, Tekstilec. 66 (2023) 178–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14502/tekstilec.66.2023045.
  7. M. Paiu, D. Lutic, L. Favier, M. Gavrilescu, Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 15 (2025) 5681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105681.
  8. A.M. Sescu, L. Favier, D. Lutic, N. Soto-Donoso, G. Ciobanu, M. Harja, Water (Switzerland). 13 (2021) 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010019.
  9. B.J. Kim, J.H. Jeong, E.Y. Jung, T.Y. Kim, S. Park, J.A. Hong, K.M. Lee, W. Jeon, Y. Park, S.J. Kang, RSC Adv. 11 (2021) 12051–12057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra00801c.
  10. Y. Zhang, X. Bo, T. Zhu, W. Zhao, Y. Cui, J. Chang, Nanomaterials. 14 (2024) 1802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14221802.
  11. D. Chen, Y. Cheng, N. Zhou, P. Chen, Y. Wang, K. Li, S. Huo, P. Cheng, P. Peng, R. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Liu, R. Ruan, J. Clean. Prod. 268 (2020) 121725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725.
  12. A. Pi, Atkowska, M. Janus, K. Szymá Nski, S. Mozia, Catalysts. 11 (2021) 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010144.
  13. R. Cheng, J. Xia, J. Wen, P. Xu, X. Zheng, Nanomaterials. 12 (2022) 1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12081335.
  14. M. Jiang, K. Nozaki, T. Mokudai, Y. Nakano, M. Uo, K. Yamashita, S. Ohara, N. Wakabayashi, ACS Appl. Nano. Mater. 8 (2025) 11568–11581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.5c01768.
  15. A.S.S. Bilal, G. Rodríguez-Ortiz, M. Shahid, S. Ballal, H. Hassan, A. Vashisht, N. Banik, T. Eshchanov, B. Madaminov, M.U.A. Khan, R. Fatima, Results. Chem. 17 (2025) 102561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102561.
  16. W. Navarra, I. Ritacco, O. Sacco, L. Caporaso, M. Farnesi Camellone, V. Venditto, V. Vaiano, J. Phys. Chem. C. 126 (2022) 7000–7011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00152.
  17. N. Omrani, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Sep. Purif. Technol. 235 (2020) 116228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116228
  18. S. Ghattavi, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (2020) 24636–24656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.207.
  19. V.U. Siddiqui, A. Ansari, M.T. Ansari, M.K. Akram, W.A. Siddiqi, A.M. Alosaimi, M.A. Hussein, M. Rafatullah, Catalysts. 11 (2021) 1509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121509.
  20. H. Dihom, R.M.S.R. Mohamed, A. Al-Gheethi, W.A.B.W. Mohamed, Water Pract. Technol. 19 (2024) 2279–2305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.132.
  21. M.K. Lanjewar, O.K. Mahadwad, P. Patil, Iran. J. Catal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57647/ijc.2026.1601.05.
  22. M. Rezaei, A.A. Ensafi, E. Heydari-Bafrooei, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 146 (2025) 589–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.11.043.
  23. N. Omrani, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Iran. J. Catal.15 (2025) 152515–152516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ijc.2025.1502.15.
  24. R. Ahmadiasl, G. Moussavi, S. Shekoohiyan, F. Razavian, Catalysts. 12 (2022) 1310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12111310.
  25. M. Mersal, A.F. Zedan, G.G. Mohamed, G.K. Hassan, Sci Rep. 13 (2023) 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31625-5.
  26. X. He, T. Kai, P. Ding, Springer Int. Publ. 19 (2021) 4563-4601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01295-8.
  27. S. Khammarnia, H. Hassani, Iran. J. Catal.15 (2025) 152514–152515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ijc.2025.1502.14.
  28. V. Thongpool, A. Phunpueok, S. Jaiyen, T. Sornkwan, Results Phys. 16 (2020) 102948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.102948.
  29. H. Derikvandi, M. Vosough, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (2020) 27582–27597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08817-x.
  30. P.L. Meena, A.K. Surela, L.K. Chhachhia, J. Meena, R. Meena, Nanoscale Adv. 7 (2025) 1335–1352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4na00890a.
  31. Q. Chen, A. Ozkan, B. Chattopadhyay, K. Baert, C. Poleunis, A. Tromont, R. Snyders, A. Delcorte, H. Terryn, M.P. Delplancke-Ogletree, Y.H. Geerts, F. Reniers, Langmuir. 35 (2019) 7161–7168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00784.
  32. A.B. Anik, M. Hossen Akash, M.A. Alam, M.Z. Alam, D. Sarker, N. Sultana, RSC Adv. 15 (2025) 45874–45888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra06656e.
  33. N. Nazari, M.M. Golzan, K. Mabhouti, Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 6407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57045-7.
  34. A.K.M.A. Habib, K.M.R. Rifat, M.E. Kabir, J.N. Khan, S.M.N. Rokon, M.A. Rabbi, Results Mater. 22 (2024) 100581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2024.100581.
  35. V. Thongpool, A. Phunpueok, S. Jaiyen, T. Sornkwan, Results Phys. 16 (2020) 102948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.102948.
  36. S. Sharafzadeh, J. Zolgharnein, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, S. Dermanaki Farahani, Surf. Interfaces 59 (2025) 105917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2025.105917.
  37. B.A. Lemecho, F.K. Sabir, D.M. Andoshe, N.S. Gultom, D.H. Kuo, X. Chen, E. Mulugeta, T.D. Desissa, O.A. Zelekew, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2022 (2022) 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8081494.
  38. Z. Zhao, A.A. Omer, Z. Qin, S. Osman, L. Xia, R.P. Singh, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (2020) 17530–17540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05787-7.
  39. Y.T. Gaim, G.M. Tesfamariam, G.Y. Nigussie, M.E. Ashebir, J. Compos. Sci. 3 (2019) 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3040093.
  40. S. Krishnan, A. V. Karim, A. Shriwastav, Water Sci. Technol. 86 (2022) 1527–1539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.266.
  41. Y.S. Kurniawan, L. Yuliati, Bull. Chem. React. Eng. Catal. 16 (2021) 310–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.16.2.10319.310-319.
  42. A. Negi, S. Ringwal, M. Pandey, M. Taha Yassin, Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 7955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57392-5.
  43. S.B. Deshmukh, K.H. Deshmukh, M.L. Mane, D. V. Mane, Macromol. Symp. 400 (2021) 2100071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202100071.
  44. T.T. Khan, G.A.K.M. Rafiqul Bari, H.J. Kang, T.G. Lee, J.W. Park, H.J. Hwang, S.M. Hossain, J.S. Mun, N. Suzuki, A. Fujishima, J.H. Kim, H.K. Shon, Y.S. Jun, Catalysts. 11 (2021) 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010109.
  45. R.T. Konatu, D.D. Domingues, R. França, A.P.R. Alves, J. Funct. Biomater. 14 (2023) 353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070353.
  46. Y. Sun, Y. Gao, B. Zhao, S. Xu, C. Luo, Q. Zhao, Mater. Res. Express. 7 (2020) 085010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abaea4.
  47. N. Mintcheva, S. Yamaguchi, S.A. Kulinich, Materials. 13 (2020) 719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030719.
  48. K. Prajapat, U. Mahajan, M. Dhonde, K. Sahu, P. Sakthivel, S. Vyas, P.M. Shirage, Mater. Adv. 6 (2025) 2371–2384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ma01297f.
  49. J.A. Rengifo-Herrera, P. Osorio-Vargas, C. Pulgarin, J. Hazard Mater. 425 (2022) 127979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127979.
  50. T.S. Natarajan, V. Mozhiarasi, R.J. Tayade, Photochem. 1 (2021) 371–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photochem1030024.
  51. I. Aadnan, O. Zegaoui, A. El, H. Moussout, J.C.G. Esteves, Arab. J. Chem. 17 (2024) 105336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105336.
  52. M. Elias, M.N. Uddin, J.K. Saha, M.A. Hossain, D.R. Sarker, S. Akter, I.A. Siddiquey, J. Uddin, Molecules. 26 (2021) 1470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051470.
  53. M.T. Uddin, M.E. Hoque, M. Chandra Bhoumick, RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 23554–23565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra03233f.
  54. M. Rezaei, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A.R. Massah, Energy and Fuels. 38 (2024) 8406–8436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00160.
  55. M. Rezaei, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A.R. Massah, ACS Omega. 9 (2024) 6093–6127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c07560.
  56. O. Sacco, A. Mancuso, V. Venditto, S. Pragliola, V. Vaiano, Catalysts. 12 (2022) 1208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12101208.
  57. S. Sharafzadeh, J. Zolgharnein, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, S.D. Farahani, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 106 (2025) 1429–1442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.031.
  58. H.D. Tran, D.Q. Nguyen, P.T. Do, U.N.P. Tran, RSC Adv. 13 (2023) 16915–16925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra01970e.
  59. A. Yousefi, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Iran. J. Catal. 11 (2021) 247-259. DOI: https://oiccpress.com/ijc/article/view/3600
  60. W. Bahnemann, V.K. Landge, C.-M. Huang, V.S. Hakke, S.H. Sonawane, S. Manickam, M.-C. Hsieh, Catalysts 12 (2022) 605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12060605.
  61. S. Yang, T. Wu, K. Li, P. Huang, W. Li, Y. Zhuo, K. Liu, Z. Yang, D. Han, Molecules 29 (2024) 5418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225418.
  62. Y. Zhang, X. Bo, T. Zhu, W. Zhao, Y. Cui, J. Chang, Nanomaterials 14 (2024) 1802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14221802.
  63. D.C. Ashiegbu, H.J. Potgieter, Heliyon 9 (2023) e20674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20674.
  64. M. Malik, S.M. Ibrahim, M.A. Nazir, A.A. Tahir, M.K. Tufail, S.S.A. Shah, A. Anum, M.A. Wattoo, A. ur Rehman, Catalysts 13 (2023) 813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13050813.
  65. N. Ahmia, M. Benamira, L. Messaadia, H. Lahmar, M. Trari, I. Avramova, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 322 (2025) 118626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118626.
  66. N.Y. Donkadokula, A.K. Kola, D. Saroj, Sustain. Environ. Res. 30 (2020) 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-020-00050-y.
  67. V. Gadore, A.K. Singh, S.R. Mishra, M. Ahmaruzzaman, Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51618-2.
  68. M. Berkani, M.K. Bouchareb, M. Bouhelassa, Y. Kadmi, Top. Catal. 63 (2020) 964–975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01320-0.
  69. L. Montazerghaem, M. Keramatifarhodbonab, A. Naeimi, Heliyon. 10 (2024) e24789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24789.
  70. K. Nelson, A.C. Mecha, A. Kumar, Discover Chem. Eng. 4 (2024) 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-024-00072-7.
  71. H. Ashebir, S. Babaee, A. Worku, P. Diale, T. Msagati, J.F. Nure, Sci. Rep. 15 (2025) 31795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03330-y.
  72. S. Sharafzadeh, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, J. Zolgharnein, Chem. Phys. Impact 11 (2025) 100963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2025.100963.