10.57647/ijc.2026.1602.13

Environmental Hazards of Catalysts: A Critical Review on their Impact and Sustainable Alternatives

PDF
  • Nastaran Parsafard*1,
  1. Kosar University of Bojnord, Department of Applied Chemistry, North Khorasan, Iran

Received: 2025-11-09

Revised: 2025-12-30

Accepted: 2026-01-11

Published in Issue 2026-06-30

Published Online: 2026-05-10

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Parsafard, N. (2026). Environmental Hazards of Catalysts: A Critical Review on their Impact and Sustainable Alternatives. Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijc.2026.1602.13
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 25

Abstract

Catalysts are essential in industrial, chemical, and environmental applications, enabling efficient, selective, and sustainable chemical transformations. While conventional and nanostructured catalysts have significantly improved reaction rates and product yields, their use raises environmental concerns due to the presence of heavy metals and engineered nanoparticles, which can persist in soil and water, bio accumulate, and disrupt ecosystems. Improper disposal, limited recycling infrastructure, and insufficient regulatory frameworks exacerbate these risks. This review critically examines the environmental hazards of catalysts across their life cycle, including leaching, bioaccumulation, Eco toxicity, and airborne particulate release. It also highlights emerging low-impact strategies, such as TiO2-alternative photo catalysts, biocatalysts, and earth-abundant metal-based systems, reporting representative performance metrics like reaction efficiency, selectivity, and recyclability. By integrating life cycle assessment, eco-design principles, and circular economy approaches, these strategies demonstrate potential for reducing environmental footprint while maintaining high catalytic performance. The article provides insights for researchers, industry, and policymakers aiming to develop sustainable, low-risk catalytic technologies, bridging catalysis science with environmental management and regulatory frameworks.

Highlights

·         Evaluates environmental risks of conventional and nanostructured catalysts.

·         Highlights pathways of catalyst-derived contamination in soil and water systems.

·         Reviews current challenges in catalyst disposal, recycling, and regulation.

·         Discusses green and bio-based catalysts as sustainable alternatives.

·         Proposes strategies for circular economy and eco-friendly catalyst design.

Keywords

  • Bioaccumulation; Catalysts; Environmental impact; Heavy metals; Sustainable catalysis
PDF

References

  1. X. Chen, Y. Chen, C. Song, P. Ji, N. Wang, W. Wang, and L. Cui, Front. Chem. 8 (2020) 709. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00709
  2. M. Nasrollahzadeh, M. Sajjadi, S. Iravani, and R. S. Varma, J. Hazard. Mater. 401 (2021) 123401. doi: https://doi.org/j.jhazmat.2020.123401
  3. D. Rodríguez-Padrón, A. R. Puente-Santiago, A. M. Balu, M. J. Muñoz-Batista, and R. Luque, ChemCatChem 11 (2019) 18–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201801248
  4. D. Chen, M. Sivakumar, and A. K. Ray, Dev. Chem. Eng. Miner. Process. 8 (2000) 505–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.5500080507
  5. M. Rezaei, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, and A. R. Massah, Mater. Today Energy 48 (2025) 101754. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101754
  6. M. Rezaei, A. A. Ensafi, and E. Heydari-Bafrooei, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 146 (2025) 589–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.11.043
  7. M. Rezaei and A. A. Ensafi, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 188 (2025) 109162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2024.109162
  8. M. Rezaei and A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (2020) 24749–24764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.258
  9. M. Rezaei, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, and A. R. Massah, Energy Fuels 38 (2024) 7637–7664. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00325
  10. M. Rezaei, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, and A. R. Massah, Energy Fuels 38 (2024) 8406–8436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00325
  11. F. Ferella, J. Clean. Prod. 246 (2020) 118990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118990
  12. M. Marafi and A. Stanislaus, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52 (2008) 859–873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.02.004
  13. B. J. Alloway, Heavy Metals in Soils, 3rd ed., Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4470-7_8
  14. H. B. Bradl, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 277 (2004) 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.005
  15. P. S. Tourinho, C. A. Van Gestel, S. Lofts, C. Svendsen, A. M. Soares, S. Loureiro, Environ. Sci.: Nano 4 (2017) 112–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1880
  16. A. E. Nel, L. Mädler, D. Velegol, T. Xia, E. M. Hoek, P. Somasundaran, et al., Nat. Mater. 8 (2009) 543–557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2442
  17. J. Artz et al., Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 434–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435
  18. W. A. Goddard, in Comput. Mater., Chem. Biochem., Springer, 2021, pp. 1219–1233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1_62
  19. G. A. Somorjai and Y. Li, Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
  20. F. Ferella, V. Innocenzi, and F. Maggiore, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 108 (2016) 10–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.010
  21. C. Jiang, J. Jia, and S. Zhai, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15 (2014) 13967–13992. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150813967
  22. D. Lin, X. Tian, F. Wu, and B. Xing, J. Environ. Qual. 39 (2010) 1896–1908. doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0423
  23. R. A. Sheldon and J. M. Woodley, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 801–838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203
  24. S. Rauch, M. Lu, and G. M. Morrison, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 595–599. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/es000048c
  25. L. Qi, M. F. Zhou, Z. Zhao, J. Hu, and Y. Huang, Environ. Earth Sci. 64 (2011) 1683–1692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0635-y
  26. R. A. Sheldon, Green Chem. 16 (2014) 950–963. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC41935E
  27. B. List and J. W. Yang, Science 313 (2006) 1584–1586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131945
  28. V. S. Shende, V. B. Saptal, and B. M. Bhanage, Chem. Rec. 19 (2019) 2022–2043. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201800205
  29. T. K. Das and A. Poater, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 13383. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413383
  30. A. Akcil, F. Vegliò, F. Ferella, M. D. Okudan, A. Tuncuk, Waste Manag. 45 (2015) 420–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.07.007
  31. Z. Yu, The platinum group elements in road dust (2010).
  32. M. Knight, P. van Wyk, G. Akdogan, S. Bradshaw, Minerals 14 (2024) 10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/min14100998
  33. S. Kuzuhara, M. Ota, R. Kasuya, Materials 14 (2021) 6843. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226843
  34. A. Riaz, Extraction of platinum group metals from end-of-life three-way catalyst, using deep eutectic solvents: studying the electrochemical properties that affect the leachability of the metals (Master's thesis, 2025).
  35. C. M. Park, K. H. Chu, J. Heo, N. Her, M. Jang, A. Son, Y. Yoon, J. Hazard. Mater. 309 (2016) 133–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.006
  36. K. H. Tan, Environmental Soil Science, Taylor & Francis, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439895016
  37. M. Ghosh, S. P. Singh, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 3 (2005) 1–18.
  38. Y. Qian, I.A. Khan, D. Zhao, Small 13 (2017) 1701143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201701143
  39. P. S. Tourinho, C. A. M. van Gestel, S. Lofts, C. Svendsen, A. M. V. M. Soares, S. Loureiro, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 31 (2012) 1679–1692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1880
  40. G. Pulido-Reyes, I. Rodea-Palomares, S. Das, T. S. Sakthivel, F. Leganes, R. Rosal, F. Fernández-Piñas, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 15613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15613
  41. V. Aruoja, H. C. Dubourguier, K. Kasemets, A. Kahru, Sci. Total Environ. 407 (2009) 1461–1468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.053
  42. K.H. Ek, G.M. Morrison, S. Rauch, Sci. Total Environ. 334 (2004) 21–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.027
  43. E. Navarro, A. Baun, R. Behra, N.B. Hartmann, J. Filser, A.J. Miao, et al., Ecotoxicol. 17 (2008) 372–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0214-0
  44. A. Kahru, H.C. Dubourguier, Toxicology 269 (2010) 105–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016
  45. S. Bhattacharjya, T. Adhikari, A. Sahu, A.K. Patra, Ecotoxicol. 30 (2021) 719–732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-021-02398-2
  46. A. Pronk, J. Coble, P.A. Stewart, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 19 (2009) 443–457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2009.21
  47. G. Oberdörster, E. Oberdörster, J. Oberdörster, Environ. Health Perspect. 113 (2005) 823–839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7339
  48. R. Merget, G. Rosner, Sci. Total Environ. 270 (2001) 165–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00788-9
  49. S.J. Linde, A. Franken, J.L. Du Plessis, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 30 (2017) 1778–1790. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00184
  50. IARC, Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 100C, WHO Press, (2012).
  51. M. Mirzabeygi, A. Abbasnia, M. Yunesian, R.N. Nodehi, N. Yousefi, M. Hadi, A.H. Mahvi, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 23 (2017) 1893–1905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1322895
  52. S. Kumar, A. Hussain, B. Bhushan, G. Kaul, Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 39 (2020) 1475–1486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/096032712092744
  53. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Guidelines for Hazardous Waste Management of Spent Catalysts, EPA/530-F-16-007, (2016).
  54. X. Wu, L. Li, B. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Wu, Process Saf. Environ. Prot. (2024). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.08.116
  55. C.K. Gupta, N. Krishnamurthy, Int. Mater. Rev. 37 (1992) 197–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/imr.1992.37.1.197
  56. I. Asghari, S.M. Mousavi, F. Amiri, S. Tavassoli, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19 (2013) 1069–1081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.005
  57. European Commission, Chemicals legislation – REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals), (2021).
  58. European Commission, Off. J. Eur. Union L312 (2008) 3–30.
  59. European Commission, Off. J. Eur. Union L197 (2012) 38–71.
  60. Catalyst Europe, Industry Guidance – Spent Catalyst Management, (2022).
  61. C. Trevino, Oil Gas J. 96 (1998) 62–64.
  62. R.K. Clube, M. Hazemba, Front. Sustain. 5 (2024) 1300904. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1300904
  63. Basel Convention Secretariat, Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal: Texts and Annexes, UNEP, Geneva, (2011).
  64. Johnson Matthey, The PGMs: A Circularity Success Story, (2022).
  65. I. Yakoumis, M. Panou, A.M. Moschovi, D. Panias, Cleaner Eng. Technol. 3 (2021) 100112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100112
  66. A. Pathak, H. Al-Sheeha, R. Navvamani, R. Kothari, M. Marafi, M.S. Rana, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 21 (2022) 1035–1059. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09636-x
  67. R.A. Sheldon, M. Norton, Green Chem. 22 (2020) 6310–6322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02630A
  68. PMR, Spent Catalyst Recycling Services Market – Market Analysis and Regional Disparities, (2025).
  69. S. de Haes, H. Brink, Social impacts of mining critical raw materials: Challenges and entry points for governance, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Report No. 5740, The Hague, (2025).
  70. Umicore, Spent automotive catalysts recycling solutions, (2025).
  71. P. Anastas, N. Eghbali, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 301–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/B918763B
  72. I. Bauer, H.J. Knölker, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 3170–3387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500425u
  73. A. Ahlburg, Manganese Catalysis in Radical Coupling Reactions, (2017).
  74. A. Valério, M.P. Sárria, L. Rodriguez-Lorenzo, D. Hotza, B. Espiña, S.Y.G. González, Nanoscale Adv. 2 (2020) 4951–4960. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00584C
  75. A. Hart, Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 13 (2023) 11483–11498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01942-8
  76. H. Furukawa, K.E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, Science 341 (2013) 1230444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444
  77. M.S. Khan, Y. Li, D.S. Li, J. Qiu, X. Xu, H.Y. Yang, Nanoscale Adv. 5 (2023) 6318–6348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NA00627A
  78. S. Latif, M. Imran, M.N. Ahmad, M. Franco, In: Adv. Chem. Pollut. Environ. Manag. Protect. 12 (2025) 665–687.
  79. S. Chen, Y. Teng, Y. Luo, E. Kuramae, W. Ren, Soil Biol. Biochem. 188 (2024) 109248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109248
  80. E.I. Strekalovskaya, A.I. Perfileva, K.V. Krutovsky, Agronomy 14 (2024) 1588. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071588
  81. G.M. Shah, M. Amin, M. Shahid, I. Ahmad, S. Khalid, G. Abbas, et al., Environ. Sci. Eur. 34 (2022) 106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00687-z
  82. M. Belluati, S. Tabasso, E.C. Gaudino, G. Cravotto, M. Manzoli, Green Chem. 26 (2024) 8642–8668. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4GC00606B
  83. C.A. Grande, R. Blom, A. Spjelkavik, V. Moreau, J. Payet, Sustain. Mater. Technol. 14 (2017) 11–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2017.10.002
  84. H. Suò, X. Liu, S. Chen, Q. Li, X. Liu, L. Xu, Process Biochem. 147 (2024) 440–447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2024.10.013
  85. M. Liu, L. Ma, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, et al., Mol. Catal. 563 (2024) 114241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2024.114241
  86. S. Bandikari, S.K. Nayak, V. Katiyar, R.K. Gautam, Bioresour. Technol. 249 (2018) 354–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.156
  87. A. Li, Y. Sun, T. Yao, H. Han, Chem. Eur. J. 24 (2018) 18334–18355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201803749
  88. C. Li, W.L. Zhong, Q.Z. Gou, X.K. Bai, G.S. Zhang, C.X. Lei, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 31 (2020) 3681–3694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-02927-5
  89. Z.W. Ulissi, A.J. Medford, T. Bligaard, J.K. Nørskov, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 14621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14621
  90. P.B. Jørgensen, M. Mesta, S. Shil, J.M. García Lastra, K.W. Jacobsen, K.S. Thygesen, M.N. Schmidt, J. Chem. Phys. 148 (2018) 24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023563
  91. S. Zhu, K. Jiang, B. Chen, S. Zheng, J. Mater. Chem. A 11 (2023) 3849–3870. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA09278F
  92. R. Rallo, S. Wong, Predicting Catalyst Degradation with Machine Learning, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Staff Accomplishment Report, 19 October 2023. Available online: https://www.pnnl.gov/news-media/predicting-catalyst-degradation-machine-learning (accessed 28 December 2025).
  93. D. Shin, H. Karasu, K. Jang, C. Kim, K. Kim, D. Kim, et al., ACS Catal. 15 (2025) 2158–2170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c05530
  94. Q. Qi, Z. Wang, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31 (2024) 25114–25128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32723-1
  95. S. Hariharan, S. Kinge, L. Visscher, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 65 (2024) 472–511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01212