10.57647/ijc.2026.1601.10

The effect of the shapes of Zinc oxide nanoparticles on antibacterial and photocatalytic activity via an eco-friendly method

  1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Received: 2025-10-29

Revised: 2025-12-10

Accepted: 2025-12-18

Published in Issue 2026-03-31

Published Online: 2025-12-24

How to Cite

Samadi, H., Gholipour Shahraki, M., & Zarei Mohgadam , R. (2026). The effect of the shapes of Zinc oxide nanoparticles on antibacterial and photocatalytic activity via an eco-friendly method. Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 16(1 (March 2026). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijc.2026.1601.10

PDF views: 79

Abstract

Mitigating the environmental risks associated with the chemical fabrication of nanoparticles is a pressing necessity. The green synthesis approach is considered a more secure alternative for nanoparticle production due to its cost efficiency, non-toxic nature, and eco-friendliness. Numerous elements influence the efficacy of nanoparticles; notably, the shape of these particles plays a crucial role, as their geometry can dictate their interactions with external factors, including biological organisms and water pollutants. For synthesizing Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnOn), Fig leaf extract was employed, which possesses antifungal, anti-helminthic, and acetylcholinesterase-inhibitory properties. For the first time in his work, he created different shapes of ZnOn with the same co-precipitation procedure and different calcination temperatures (200 °C, 400 °C, and 600 °C). To explore the impact of nanoparticle shape, a range of analytical methods has been utilized. The crystallite sizes of ZnOn were measured using the Debye-Scherrer method at forms of nanoflake, cylinder, and sphere, yielding 25.34 nm, 42.49 nm, and 43.52 nm, respectively. Moreover, UV-vis spectroscopy has identified a peak absorption wavelength of around 380, and characterizes the optical properties of ZnOn. Spherical nanoparticles exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity efficiency, reaching 88% in the first 60 min for ZnOn. The investigation focuses on the degradation process of methylene orange. Anti-microbial characteristics against the gram-negative (E. coli) and gram-positive (S. aureus) are examined by the MIC test for three samples of ZnOn.

Keywords

  • Anti-microbial activity, Fig leaf extract, Green synthesis, Photocatalytic activity, Zinc oxide nanoparticles

References

  1. V. Despotović, N. Finčur, S. Bognar, D. Šojić Merkulov, et al. Separations. 10 (2023) 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10040258.
  2. M. P. Monopoli, C. Aberg, A. Salvati, K. A. Dawson, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. (2020) 205-229. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429399039.
  3. Q. Saquib, et al. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: Applications prospects, First ed, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5179-6.
  4. M. Hamza, S. Muhammad, S. Zahoor, Acta Sci Appl. Phys. 2 (2022) 3-10.
  5. M. F. Ramadan, Fig : Production, processing, and properties. First ed, Springer Nature, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16493-4.
  6. A. A. Barzinjy, S. M. Hamad, S. Aydın, et al. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 31 (2020) 11303. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-020-03679-Y.
  7. N. Bala, S. Saha, M. Chakraborty, M. Maiti, S. Das, R. Basu, P. Nandy, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 4993. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra12784f.
  8. D. Saravanakkumar, S. Sivaranjani, K. Kaviyarasu, et al. J. Semicond. 39 (2018) 033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/39/3/033001.
  9. T. U. D. Thi, T. T. Nguyen, Y. D. Thi, K. H. T. Thi, B. T. Phan, K. N. Pham, RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 23899. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04926c.
  10. S. Khoso, S. Mehar, I. Anam, N. Naheed, et al. JAPS: J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 32 (2022) 229-237. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2022.1.0418.
  11. J. Ghosh, N. S. Rupanty, T. Noor, T. R. Asif, T. Islam, V. Reukov, RSC Adv. 15 (2025) 10984. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra01429h.
  12. R. Abbasi, G. Shineh, M. Mobaraki, S. Doughty, L. Tayebi, J. Nanoparticle Res. 25 (2023) 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05690-w.
  13. C. V. Restrepo, C. C. Villa, Environ. Nanotechnol., Monit. Manage. 15 (2021) 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100428.
  14. S. Sharma, K. Kumar, N. Thakur, S. Chauhan, M. Chauhan, Bull. Mater. Sci. 43 (2020) 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1986-y.
  15. A. McLaren, T. Valdes-Solis, G. Li, S. C. Tsang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 12540. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9052703.
  16. S. Salatin, S. Maleki Dizaj, A. Yari Khosroushahi, Cell Biol. Int. 39 (2015) 881. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.10459.
  17. F. A-Z. Sayed, N. G. Eissa, Y. Shen, D. A. Hunstad, et al. J. Nanobiotechnology. 20 (2022) 536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01733-x.
  18. K. Öztürk, M. Kaplan, S. Çalış, Int. J. Pharm. 666 (2024) 124799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124799.
  19. Z. Nuri, M. S. Uddin, J. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2 (2021) 07. https://www.doi.org/10.22271/foodsci.
  20. M. F. Fazel, I. F. Abu, M. H. N. Mohamad, et al. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 31 (2024) 1947-1968. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S436446.
  21. M. F. Kurniawan, S. Apriliyanti, J Pharm Sci Community. 22 (2025) 30. https://doi.org/10.24071/jpsc.006449.
  22. I. Fu. Rasool, A. Aziz, W. Khalid, H. Koraqi, et al. Molecules 28 (2023) 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28030960.
  23. Y. I. ElAchaouia, J. Fakhfakh, M. Adhar, M. Affes, S. Tounsi, N. Allouche, Chem. Afr. 6 (2023) 1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-023-00600-y.
  24. A. El. Ghouizi, D. Ousaaid, H. Laaroussi, M. Bakour, A. Aboulghazi, et al. Foods. 12 (2023) 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12040759.
  25. S. Mawa, K. Husain, I. Jantan, J. evid.-based complement. altern. med. 2013 (2013) 974256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/974256.
  26. A. Dewi, F. Rahmayanti, H. Bagir, A. F. Jannah, A. Winanta, Online J. Biol. Sci. 23 (2023) 71. https://doi.org/10.3844/OJBSCI.2023.71.80.
  27. M. Y. Al-darwesh, S. S. Ibrahim, L. L. Hamid, Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects. 38 (2024) 101163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2024.101163.
  28. F. F. Soleimani, T. Saleh, S. A. Shojaosadati, R. Poursalehi, Bionanoscience. 8 (2018) 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-017-0423-1.
  29. S. Anjum, M. Hashim, S. A. Malik, M. Khan, J. M. Lorenzo, et al. Cancers. 13 (2021) 4570. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184570.
  30. S. Mustapha, M. Ndamitso, A. Abdulkareem, et al. Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. 10 (2019) 045013. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/ab52f7.
  31. M. T. Ulhakim, S. Sukarman, K. Khoirudin, et al. Indones. J. Appl. Phys. 14 (2024) 141-150. https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v14i1.79195.
  32. V. Venu Gopal, S. Kamila, Appl. Nanosci. 7 (2017) 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-017-0553-3.
  33. P. Mahmoodi, A. Motavalizadehkakhky, et al. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 46 (2023) 1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-023-02888-z.
  34. M. A. Irshad, M. Latif, I. Nasim, R. Nawaz, et al. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 281 (2024) 116616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116616.
  35. N. Abbes, I. Bekri, M. Cheng, N. Sejri, M. CHEIKHROUHOU, X. Jun, Mater. Sci. 28 (2022) 144. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.ms.28314.
  36. N. Sedefoglu, Ceram. Int. 50 (2024) 9884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.01.387.
  37. P. Luque, C. Soto-Robles, O. Nava, et al. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 29 (2018) 9764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9015-2.
  38. S. Pasieczna-Patkowska, M. Cichy, J. Flieger, Molecules. 30 (2025) 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030684.
  39. A. R. Mendes, C. M. Granadeiro, A. Leite, E. Pereira, P. Teixeira, F. Poças, J. Nanomater. 14 (2024) 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14070638.
  40. J. Osuntokun, D. C. Onwudiwe, E. E. Ebenso, Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 12 (2019) 444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2019.1687761.
  41. U. Pachauri, D. P. Joshi, N. Arora, Appl. Phys. A. 126 (2020) 253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-3411-1.
  42. L. Umaralikhan, M. J. M. Jaffar, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 28 (2017) 7677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6461-1.
  43. M. Singh, M. Goyal, K. Devlal, J. Taibah Univ. SCI. 12 (2018) 470. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2018.1473946.
  44. K. Baishya, J. S. Ray, P. Dutta, P. P. Das, S. K. Das, Appl. Phys. A. 124 (2018) 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-2097-0.
  45. J. Klein, L. Kampermann, B. Mockenhaupt, et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (2023) 2304523. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202304523.
  46. B. J. Abdullah, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 137 (2022) 106214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106214.
  47. N. Sedefoglu, Optik. 288 (2023) 171217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171217.
  48. D. Zhou, A. A. Keller, Water Res. 44 (2010) 2948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.025.
  49. N. Torres-Gómez, O. Nava, L. Argueta-Figueroa, et al. J. Nanomater. 2019 (2019) 7921273. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7921273.
  50. R. Z. Moghadam, H. R. Dizagi, H. Agren, M. H. Ehsani, J. Sci. Rep. 13 (2023) 17556. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44947-1.
  51. C. Qi, S. Musetti, L-H. Fu, Y-J. Zhu, L. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 2698. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00489G.
  52. M. Jothibas, E. Paulson, A. Mathivanan, et al. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 8 (2023) 511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-023-00310-3.
  53. M. M. Ba-Abbad, A. Benamour, D. Ewis, A. W. Mohammad, E. Mahmoudi, Jom. 74 (2022) 3531. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11837-022-05380-3.
  54. X. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, et al. Nat. Mater. 8 (2009) 76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2317.
  55. M. Naushad, S. Rajendran, E. Lichtfouse, Green photocatalysts. first ed, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15608-4.
  56. M. Rezaei, E. Heydari-Bafrooei, A. A. Ensafi, J. Alloys Compd. (2025) 181214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.181214.
  57. E. Heydari-Bafrooei, M. Sabet, Z. Alizadeh, et al. Mater. Chem. Phys. 332 (2025) 130254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.130254.
  58. M. Rezaei, A. A. Ensafi, E. Heydari-Bafrooei, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 146 (2025) 589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.11.043.
  59. M. Rezaei, A. A. Ensafi, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 188 (2025) 109162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2024.109162.
  60. H. Ahmad, A. B. Siddique, S. Zaheer, R. Sattar, et al. J. Water Process Eng. 74 (2025) 107855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107855.
  61. M. Rezaei, A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieha, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 45 (2020) 24749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.258.
  62. S. Ghaffar, A. Abbas, M. Naeem-ul-Hassan, N. Assad, et al. Antioxidants. 12 (2023) 1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12061201.
  63. S. Cao, J. Jiang, B. Zhu, J. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (2016) 19457. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP02832B.
  64. Y-F. Li, Z-P. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 15743. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja206153v.
  65. A. Abbas, S. Mansoor, M. H. Nawaz, A. A. Chaudhry, K. Ijaz, S. Riaz, A. Hayat, RSC Adv. 13 (2023) 11537. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA01268A.
  66. A. Zheng, C. Abdullah, E. Chung, Y. Andou, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20 (2023) 5753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04354-x.
  67. W. Yu, J. Zhang, T. Peng, Appl. Catal., B. 181 (2016) 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.031.
  68. L. A. Wali, A. M. Alwan, A. B. Dheyab, D. A. Hashim, Optik. 179 (2019) 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.011.
  69. N. Assad, A. Abbas, M. F. ur Rehman, M. Naeem-ul-Hassan, RSC adv. 14 (2024) 22344. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA03573A.
  70. A. B. Siddique, M. A. Shaheen, A. Abbas, Y. Zaman, et al. Heliyon. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/S2405-8440(24)16710-2.
  71. B. Akram, K. Ahmad, J. Khan, B. A. Khan, J. Akhtar, New J Chem. 42 (2018) 10947. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ02317D.
  72. S. Rajendran, Green photocatalysts for energy and environmental process. First, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17638-9.
  73. A. Rani, R. Reddy, U. Sharma, P. Mukherjee, etal. J. Nanostructure Chem. 8 (2018) 255. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40097-018-0278-1.
  74. Y. C. Liu, J. Li, J. Ahn, J. Pu, E. J. Rupa, Y. Huo, D. C. Yang, Optik. 218 (2020) 165245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165245.
  75. Y. Zheng, L. Fu, F. Han, A. Wang, et al. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 8 (2015) 59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2015.1075069.
  76. P. Nethravathi, G. Shruthi, D. Suresh, et al. Ceram. Int. 41 (2015) 8680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.084.
  77. A. Ekennia, D. Uduagwu, O. Olowu, O. Nwanji, O. Oje, et l. Micron. 141 (2021) 102964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2020.102964.
  78. M. Uribe-López, et al. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 404 (2021) 112866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112866.
  79. A. Bhosale, K. Abitkar, P. Sadalage, et al. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 32 (2021) 20510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06563-5.
  80. S. Ullah, M. Shaban, A. B. Siddique, A. Zulfiqar, et al. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12 (2024) 113350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113350.
  81. Q. Gao, Z. Feng, J. Wang, F. Zhao, C. Li, J. Ju, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 65 (2025) 4327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2024.2387327.
  82. C. R. Mendes, G. Dilarri, C. F. Forsan, V. D. M. R. Sapata, et al. J. Sci. Rep. 12 (2022) 2658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06657-y.
  83. V. Lakshmi Prasanna, R. Vijayaraghavan, Langmuir. 31 (2015) 9155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02266.
  84. L-E. Shi, Z-H. Li, W. Zheng, Y-F. Zhao, Y-F. Jin, Z-X. Tang, Food Addit. Contam. 31 (2014) 173. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2013.865147.
  85. I. Ul Haq, R. Pinto Vieira, W. G. Lima, et al. Arab j. basic appl. sci. 31 (2024) 325. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2024.2366543.
  86. F. S. Mustafa, A. A. Oladipo, J. Water Process Eng. 42 (2021) 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102132.
  87. A. Biswas, U. Kar, N. R. Jana, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 (2022) 13965. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP00301E.
  88. N. H. Alshraiedeh, O. F. Ammar, M. M. Masadeh, et al. Curr. Nanosci. 18 (2022) 758. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413718666220303153123.
  89. S. Sharma, K. Kumar, N. Thakur, S. Chauhan, M. Chauhan, Bull. Mater. Sci. 43 (2020) 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1986-y.
  90. F. Y. Rezaei, G. Pircheraghi, V. S. Nikbin, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7 (2024) 15242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c02046.
  91. B. Akram, K. Ahmad, J. Khan, B. A. Khan, J. Akhtar, New J Chem. 42 (2018) 10947. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ02317D.
  92. H. Samadi, R. Z. Mohgadam, M. G. Shahraki, . Mater. Chem. Phys. 345 (2025) 131161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.131161.
  93. A. K. Tiwari, S. Jha, S. K. Tripathi, R. Shukla, et al. Discov. appl. sci. 6 (2024) 399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06049-z.
  94. M. R. Khaleel, F. S. Hashim, A. H. O. Alkhayatt, Ceram. Int. 50 (2024) 40161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.283.
  95. Y. H. I. Mohammed, S. Alghamdi, et al. ACS omega. 8 (2023) 32027. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03908.
  96. W. Mushtaq, M. Ishtiaq, M. Maqbool, et al. Plants. 12 (2023) 2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112130.
  97. D. Manyasree, P. Kiranmayi, R. K. Venkata, Int J App Pharm. 10 (2018) 224. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2018v10i6.29376.
  98. M. S. Alsaggaf, A. M. Diab, B. E. ElSaied, A. A. Tayel, S. H. Moussa, J. Nanomater. 11 (2021) 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020385.