10.71877/ijamad.2024.8440

Qualitative Analysis and Prioritize the Challenges of Sustainable Agricultural Development through Grounded Theory and AHP in Iran

  1. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran
  2. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran

Received: 10/16/2021

Accepted: 04/17/2022

Published in Issue 12/01/2024

How to Cite

Torfi, K. ., Ommani, A. ., Noorollah Noorivandi, A. ., & Sabouri, M. S. . (2024). Qualitative Analysis and Prioritize the Challenges of Sustainable Agricultural Development through Grounded Theory and AHP in Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 14(4), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.71877/ijamad.2024.8440

PDF views: 233

Abstract

The purpose of this research is qualitative analysis and prioritize the challenges of sustainable agricultural development in Iran. In this research, using a qualitative method, an attempt has been made to identify the challenges of sustainable agricultural development in Khuzestan province. Qualitative research involves in-depth evaluation, collection, and analysis of non-numerical data to identify and understand phenomena, concepts, ideas, or experiences. This research has been conducted from January to September 2021 to provide a comprehensive, and practical model to understand the challenges through grounded theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Khuzestan province. This research is an applied type of research, and (systematic) grounded theory is used. The data were collected by performing in-depth semi-structured interviews with the 30 agricultural experts in this field. Data analysis was done by using MAX qualitative data analysis version 12 software (maxqda12) in three steps: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The results of this study by grounded theory identified 29 initial codes and six main following challenges were categorized and by AHP prioritized: weakness in management and planning, weakness in human resources, shortage of attention to environmental studies, shortage of infrastructure facilities, shortage of credit and financial capital and weakness in legislation and sustainability policy. A model was finally designed based on the results of the study.

Keywords

  • Iran,
  • analytic hierarchy process,
  • Grounded Theory,
  • Sustainable Agricultural Development

References

  1. Abdeshahi, A., Mardani Najafabadi, M., & Zeinali, M. (2020). Determining the optimal cropping pattern of agricultural crops in Mollasani County of Iran: Application of robust multi-objective optimization model. Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(3), 175-203. https://doi.org/10.30490/aead.2020.304989.1090
  2. Abro, A., & Awan, N. W. (2020). Comparative analysis of profitability of major and minor crops in Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 19(7), 476-481.
  3. AgNews. (2020). Iran pesticide production up 31% in eight months. Retrieved January 20, 2020, from http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---33612.htm
  4. Amanpour, S., Abiyat, M., & Abiyat, M. (2021). Investigation of the effect of land use change on soil erosion and sediment production in Ramhormoz Basin using object-oriented classification and RUSLE model. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(3), 635-649. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2021.316628.668863
  5. Asimeh, M., Nooripoor, M., Azadi, H., Eetvelde, V., Sklenička, P., & Witlox, F. (2020). Agricultural land use sustainability in Southwest Iran: Improving land leveling using consolidation plans. Land Use Policy, 94, 104555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104555
  6. Ataei, P., Sadighi, H., Aenis, T., Chizari, M., & Abbasi, E. (2021). Challenges of applying conservation agriculture in Iran: An overview on experts’ and farmers’ perspectives. Air, Soil and Water Research, 14, 1–12.
  7. Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
  8. Fang, J., & Partovi, F. Y. (2021). Criteria determination of analytic hierarchy process using a topic model. Expert Systems with Applications, 169, 114306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114306
  9. FAO. (2020). World food and agriculture - Statistical yearbook 2020. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1329en
  10. Hartmann, T. E., Guzman-Bustamante, I., Ruser, R., & Müller, T. (2020). Turnover of urea in a soil from the North China Plain as affected by the urease inhibitor NBPT and wheat straw. Agronomy, 10, 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060857
  11. Hesampour, R., Hassani, M., Hanafiah, M. M., & Heidarbeigi, K. (2021). Technical efficiency, sensitivity analysis, and economic assessment applying data envelopment analysis approach: A case study of date production in Khuzestan State of Iran. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.08.003
  12. IFA. (2021). Public summary medium-term fertilizer outlook 2021 – 2025, Market Intelligence Service. International Fertilizer Association. https://www.ifastat.org/market-outlooks
  13. Kaabi, A., Roosta, K., Mohammadzadeh, S., & Baradaran, R. (2021). Solutions to reduce the vulnerability of farmers and beneficiaries of the agricultural sector to climate change. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 11(1), 137-159.
  14. Kalantaryan, S., Scipioni, M., Natale, F., & Alessandrini, A. (2021). Immigration and integration in rural areas and the agricultural sector: An EU perspective. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.017
  15. Maleksaeidi, H., Jalali, M., & Eskandari, F. (2021). Challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in the West of Iran: Viewpoint of agricultural experts. Sustainability, 13, 3537. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063537
  16. Moridsadat, P., & Roknoddin Eftekhari, A. (2018). Strategic analysis of sustainable agriculture with entrepreneurial approach (Case study: Khuzestan Province). Regional Planning, 8(30), 31-50.
  17. Mujumdar, A., Tiwari, A., Agarwal, A., & Prajapat, A. (2021). A new case of rank reversal in analytic hierarchy process due to aggregation of cost and benefit criteria. Operations Research Perspectives, 8, 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2021.100185
  18. Ommani, A. R. (2019). Analysis of sustainable water resources management (SWRM) in agriculture in Khuzestan Province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(5), 1-6.
  19. Rani, L., Thapa, K., Kanojia, N., Sharma, N., Singh, S., Grewal, A. S., Srivastav, A. L., & Kaushal, J. (2021). An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657
  20. Skrimizea, E., Lecuyer, L., Bunnefeld, N., Butler, J., Fickel, T., Hodgson, I., Holtkamp, C., et al. (2020). Sustainable agriculture: Recognizing the potential of conflict as a positive driver for transformative change. In D. A. Bohan & A. J. Vanbergen (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research, 63, 255-311. Academic Press.
  21. Vogel, G., Joelsson-Alm, E., Forinder, U., Svensen, C., & Sandgren, A. (2021). Stabilizing life: A grounded theory of surviving critical illness. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103096
  22. Wang, T., Wang, Z., Guo, L., Zhang, J., Li, W., He, H., Zong, R., Wang, D., Jia, Z., & Wen, Y. (2021). Experiences and challenges of agricultural development in an artificial oasis: A review. Agricultural Systems, 193, 103220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103220
  23. Yu, M., & Smith, S. M. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for a new generation of researchers. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 553-568. https://doi.org/10.28945/4836
  24. Zhang, X., Yao, G., Vishwakarma, S., Dalin, C., Komarek, A., Kanter, D., Davis, K. F., Pfeifer, K., Zhao, J., et al. (2021). Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earth, 4(9), 1262-1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.015