10.57647/j.ap.2025.0902.24

Studying the Effects of Irrigation Levels, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Azsperilum Bacteria on Environmental Traits and Physiological Performance of Agricultural Products

  1. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Mi.C., Islamic Azad University, Miyaneh, Iran

Received: 2025-07-29

Accepted: 2025-09-15

Published in Issue 2025-12-31

How to Cite

Olumi Somarin, S., Ajali, J., Faramarzi, A., Abdi, M., & Nazari, N. (2025). Studying the Effects of Irrigation Levels, Mycorrhizal Fungi and Azsperilum Bacteria on Environmental Traits and Physiological Performance of Agricultural Products. Anthropogenic Pollution, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ap.2025.0902.24

PDF views: 25

Abstract

Environmental pollution is one of the fundamental challenges of today's world that has significant impacts on agriculture and food security. The use of water resource management methods and biofertilizers as strategies to reduce the effects of environmental stresses is of interest to researchers. Facilitating the use of water resources in agriculture is one of the key strategies in improving crop yield and maintaining environmental quality. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different irrigation levels and the use of biofertilizers such as Azospirillum lipoferum and mycorrhizal fungi on environmental traits and quantitative and qualitative performance of barley cultivars. This study was conducted during two crop years (2018-2019) in a farm located at kilometer 4 of the Ardabil-Khalkhal road as a factorial experiment in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main objective of this study was to reduce the negative effects of water stresses on the yield and yield components of barley cultivars using biofertilizers. The results showed that under normal irrigation conditions, Kavir cultivar showed the highest grain yield with 7755.5 kg/ha, while Valfajr cultivar showed the lowest yield with 5650 kg/ha. Under water stress conditions (irrigation only up to 50% of the spike stage), Nosrat cultivar showed the best yield with 6209.4 kg/ha, while Kavir cultivar showed the lowest yield with 4167.7 kg. The results showed that Nosrat cultivar has the highest stress tolerance, while Valfajr cultivar showed the lowest stress tolerance. In the second year, the application of Azospirillum growth-promoting bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi increased grain yield by 2.02, 2.38 and 3.31 percent, respectively, compared to the control group (without the application of mycorrhizal and bacteria). Full irrigation during the plant growth period increased grain yield by 4.43 and 10.04 percent compared to the limited irrigation and rainfed treatments. Principal component analysis showed that the first three components with eigenvalues higher than one explained 99.6% of the total variation in physiological traits. This first component included traits such as plant height, peduncle length, number of grains per spike, and grain weight per spike, which had a positive effect on grain yield. Therefore, the Valfajr cultivar is recommended due to its ability to increase grain yield.

Keywords

  • Biofertilizers,
  • Drought Stress,
  • Physiological Characteristics,
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Yield,
  • Barley

References

  1. Arab Khadri M and Kamali K. 2017. Sar Dam: Traditional Method of Soil and Water Conservation for Flooded Agriculture, Nashr-e-Amoosh publication,(Institute of Agricultural Education and Extension), 70 p., https://agrilib.areeo.ac.ir/book_3827.html
  2. Baghaei, N. (2004). Investigation of the effect of water shortage stress on different stages of development, yield, and yield components of three pinto bean cultivars (Master’s thesis). Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch.
  3. Belimov AA, Kojemiakov PA and Chuvarliyeva CV. 1995. Interaction between barley and mixed cultures of nitrogen fixing and phosphatesolubilizing bacteria. Plant and Soil, 173: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155515
  4. Chance, B. and Maehly, A.C. 1955. Assay of Catalase and Peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 764-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8
  5. Chang, C. W., Fridman, E., & Mascher, M. (2022). Physical geography, isolation by distance, and environmental variables shape genomic variation of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. spontaneum) in the Southern Levant. Heredity, 128, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-021-00494-x
  6. Egamberdiyevaa D and Hoflich G. 2003. Influence of growth-promoting bacteria on the growth of wheat in different soils and temperatures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 973–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(03)00158-5
  7. Falahatzadeh, A. (2007). Investigation of selenium in improving drought resistance of wheat (Master’s thesis). Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch.
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). FAOSTAT statistical database. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
  9. Gianinazzi, S., Schuepp, H., Barea, J. M., and Haselwandter, K. 2001. Mycorrhizal technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts. Birkhauser, Basel. ISBN: 376436858. Also in: Mycorrhiza. 13, 53-54. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20210424181
  10. Farshadfar, M., Moradi, F., Safari, H., & Rezaei, I. (2014). Evaluation of yield diversity and forage quality in ecotypes of Festuca arundinacea under rainfed conditions of Kermanshah Province. Applied Agricultural Research, 28(107), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2015.105684
  11. Isaaczadeh, M., Ahmadzadeh, H., & Fred, F. A. (2014). Meteorological drought deterioration zones of the country based on the Herbst index using Kriging methods. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Water Crisis. 562-571.
  12. Kate Maxwell, Giles N. Johnson, Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide, Journal of Experimental Botany, Volume 51, Issue 345, April 2000, Pages 659–668,https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
  13. Kazemi Nasab, A., Khodabandeh, N., Habibi, D., Ilkai, M., & Bankesaz, A. (2005). Investigation of the effect of cycocel and different plant densities on the stability of cytoplasmic membranes and pigment content in maize. First Iranian Conference on Biological Sciences. Tehran, Iran.
  14. Khalvati MA, Hu Y, Mozafar A and Schmidhalter U. 2005. Quantification of water uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and its significance for leaf growth, water relations, and gas exchange of barley subjected to drought stress. Plant Biol 7:706–712. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872893
  15. Molasadeghi V and R. Shahryari, 2011. Grouping Bread Wheat Genotypes under Terminal Drought in the Presence of Humic Fertilizer by Use of Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Advances in Environmental Biology 5 (3), 510-515. https://www.aensiweb.com/old/aeb/2011/510-515.pdf
  16. Michigan State University. (1993). MSTAT-C: A microcomputer program for the design, arrangement, and analysis of agronomic research experiments [Computer software].
  17. Nakano Y and Asada K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22: 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232
  18. Pérez-Montano F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, del Cerro P, Espuny MR, Jiménez-Guerrero I, López-Baena FJ, Ollero FJ and Cubo T. 2014. Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: From microorganism capacities to crop production . Microbiological Research, 169: 325- 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011
  19. Portaghi, A. (2010). Study of physiological responses of sunflower to dehydration stress (PhD dissertation). Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.
  20. Ryan, J., Singh, M. and Pala, M. (2008) Long-Term Cereal-Based Rotation Trials in the Mediterranean Region: Implications for Cropping Sustainability. Advances in Agronomy, 97, 273-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(07)00007-7
  21. Sadeghzadeh, B., Abedi Asl, G., & Sadeghzadeh Ahri, D. (2012). Study of some agronomic characteristics related to grain yield in native stands of durum wheat under cold rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Sciences, 1(1), 40–62. https://dari.areeo.ac.ir/fa-IR/AREEO/4825/news/view/30715/23507/Staging/3
  22. Seiedi, F. (2007). Effect of cycocel and some micronutrients on drought resistance of wheat (Master’s thesis). Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch.
  23. Siddiqui Y, Munusamy U, Naidu, Y and Khairulmazmi A. 2020. Integrated effect of plant growth-promoting compost and NPK fertilizer on nutrient uptake, phenolic content, and antioxidant properties of Orthosiphon stamineus and Cosmos caudatus. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 61, 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-020-00277-z
  24. Soleimani, A. (2016). Evaluation of drought tolerance in barley genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) using drought tolerance indices. Crop Physiology, 8(31), 95–110. http://cpj.iauahvaz.ac.ir/article-1-729-en.html
  25. Swarnalakshmi, K., Prasanna, R., Kumar, A., Pattnaik, S., Chakravarty, K., & Shivay, Y. S. (2013). Evaluating the influence of novel cyanobacterial biofilmed biofertilizers on soil fertility and plant nutrition in wheat. European Journal of Soil Biology, 55, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.12.008
  26. Tanaka R and Nakano H. 2019. Barley Yield Response to Nitrogen Application under Different Weather Conditions. Sci Rep 9, 8477 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44876-y
  27. Turner-Hissong SD, Mabry ME, Beissinger TM, Ross-Ibarra J and Pires JC. 2020. Evolutionary insights into plant breeding J.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 54:93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.03.003
  28. Zahravai M, Taghinejad A, Afzalifar A, Bihamta M, Mozaffari J and Shafauddin S. 2011. Evaluation of genetic diversity of agromorphological traits in spermatozoa of barley germplasm of Iran. Iranian Journal of Genetic Research and Breeding of Range and Forest Plants, Volume 19, Number 1, Pages: 70-55. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrfpbgr.2011.7440
  29. Zare chahouki MA. 2010. Methods of multivariate analysis in SPSS software. Publications of Tehran University. 35 pages.