10.57647/amc.2026.100110

Providing an Adaptive Model for Pricing Option Contracts in Iran's Capital Market

  1. Department of Financial Engineering, Isl.C. Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
  2. Department of Accounting, Isl.C. Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran

Received: 2026-02-08

Revised: 2026-03-08

Accepted: 2026-04-13

Published in Issue 2026-06-30

How to Cite

Miri, M., Seifoddini, J., Nemati Koshteli, R., Rajabi Khanghah, A., & Naghshineh, N. (2026). Providing an Adaptive Model for Pricing Option Contracts in Iran’s Capital Market. Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/amc.2026.100110

PDF views: 6

Abstract

This research aims to provide an adaptive framework for pricing option contracts in Iran’s capital market by comparing several widely recognised option pricing models, including the Black–Scholes, Heston, Bi-Heston, Binomial Tree, and Trinomial Tree models. These models were selected because they represent the most frequently applied frameworks in both developed and emerging markets, with the Heston and Bi-Heston models incorporating stochastic volatility features that make them suitable for economies experiencing inflation and market instability, such as Iran. The need for this comparative analysis stems from the increasing volume of option trading and the inadequacy of the currently used Black–Scholes model in reflecting Iran’s economic and inflationary conditions. The proposed adaptive approach, presented in the Methodology section, tests these models on data from the Tehran Stock Exchange (2018–2023) and evaluates their performance using RMSE and MAPE error metrics to identify the model that produces the most accurate price estimates. Data related to selected call option symbols (Shesta, Khodro, Khsapa, and Ahrom), filtered based on the highest trading volume and value, were analyzed using Python software and its NumPy and Pandas libraries. Based on the results obtained from the data analysis of the selected symbols, the Trinomial Tree model and the Badestein model showed significantly less error compared to the Black-Scholes model in estimating the market price of option contracts. The research findings indicate the significant superiority of the Trinomial Tree and Badestein models over the commonly used Black-Scholes model in Iran's capital market. Employing these more accurate models can lead to more efficient pricing of option contracts and reduce the gap between theoretical value and market price.

Keywords

  • Option Contracts,
  • Pricing Model,
  • Black-Scholes Model,
  • Badestein Model,
  • Trinomial Tree

References

  1. Amini, P. H., Hassani, S., Kharazmi, M., & Saljoughi, R. S. . (2025). Breaking Boundaries, Exploring the Unseen Dynamics of Sports Brand Globalization and Its Impact on Human Health in Emerging Markets: A Systematic Review. Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization, 9(1), 57-63. .
  2. Black, F., & Scholes, M. . (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of political economy, 81(3), 637-654.
  3. Brigo, D., Dalessandro, A., Neugebauer, M., & Triki, F. (2008). A stochastic processes toolkit for risk management. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0812.4210
  4. Chowdhury, R., Mahdy, M. R. C., Alam, T. N., Al Quaderi, G. D., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). Predicting the stock price of frontier markets using machine learning and modified Black–Scholes Option pricing model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 555, 124444. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124444
  5. Daneshzad, A., Zadeh, E. N., Kakaei, H., & Keshideh, M. D. . (2024). Asset markets and real efficiency of facilities granted by banking network: an application of Simultaneous Equations Approach. Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization,, 8(2), 1-17.
  6. Farahani, M. S., Babaei, S., & Esfahani. (2024). “Black-Scholes-Artificial Neural Network”: A novel option pricing model. . International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 5(4), 475-509. doi: 10.35912/ijfam.v5i4.1684
  7. Hassani, S., & Saljoughi, R. S. (2024). Local Development, Over-Tourism and Sustainable Environment: The Case of Mount Everest. Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization, 8(2), 190-204.
  8. Kebriyayee, M., Basiri, A., Pourgholi, R., & Hasani Moghadam, R. (2025). Solving The Black-Scholes Problem Using a Combined Numerical Method (A Case Study of Tehran Stock Exchange). Journal of Mathematics and Modeling in Finance, 5(2), 13-33.
  9. Paulin, C., & Lindström, M. . (2020). Option pricing models: A comparison between models with constant and stochastic volatilities as well as discontinuity jumps.
  10. Peymany Foroushani, M., Dehghan Dehnavi, M. A., & Kouhkan, M. (2024). Option Pricing Based on Modular Neural Network. . Financial Research Journal, 26(4), 904-939.
  11. Rahayu, R. A., Agustina, F., & Sidarto, K. A. (2025). Pricing Modified Barrier Options Using the Bino-Trinomial Tree Model: A Strategy for Loss Minimization. CAUCHY. Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi, 10(2), 556-570. .
  12. Seifi, M. H., Dastranj, E., Abdolbaghi, A., & Lamei, S. (2023). Option Pricing Error: Evidence from Nonlinear Markets based on Probabilistic Neural Networks and Multilayer Perceptron. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 11(4), 47-64.
  13. Sofla, H. V. I., Sharif, M. A., Nasrolahnia, M. N., & Ashtiani, P. G. (2025). Interactive Marketing Model Based on Contextual and Intervening Variables in the Steel Industry. . Agricultural Marketing and Commercialization, 9(1), 57-63.
  14. Wu, H. F. (2019). From constant to stochastic volatility: Black-Scholes versus Heston option pricing models.
  15. Xiang, S. (2025). Research on Option Pricing Method Based on the Black-Scholes Model. . Economics and Management Innovation, 2(1), 69-77. doi: 10.71222/k8mkc798