10.57647/mathsci.2025.1904.20

Improvement of the Population Mean Using Cosine Robust Regression Estimator

  1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan
  2. Mathematics Department, Al-Lith University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Al-Lith 21961, Saudi Arabia.

Received: 2025-09-25

Revised: 2025-11-16

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published in Issue 2025-12-31

How to Cite

Ijaz, M., Slaeem, M., & Aljeddani, S. M. (2025). Improvement of the Population Mean Using Cosine Robust Regression Estimator. Mathematical Sciences, 19(4 (December 2025). https://doi.org/10.57647/mathsci.2025.1904.20

PDF views: 89

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel family of cos-robust regression-type estimators along with special members to estimate the finite population mean under SRSWOR. The new family of estimators is produced by hybridizing the auxiliary information with the cos function. To reduce the impact of outliers, various robust regression techniques, namely Huber’s M- estimation, Mallows’ GM-estimation, Schweppe’s GM-estimation, and SIS GM-estimation, are employed and theoretically compared with the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method. Simulated and actual data are used to generate and validate theoretical properties, such as bias and Mean Square Error (MSE). According to the findings, the robust estimators perform better than the conventional OLS approach in terms of MSE and PRE.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2020). 62D05,62G05, 62G35, 62J05

Keywords

  • Auxiliary information,
  • Comparison,
  • Cos function,
  • MSE,
  • Robust statistics,
  • Variance

References

  1. J. Cheng, J. Nakagawa, M. Yamamoto, T. Yamazaki, Uniqueness in an inverse problem for a one-dimensional fractional diffusion equation, Inverse problems, 25 (2009) 115002.
  2. M. Ijaz, A. U. Khan, S. M. Asim, et al., “A new ratio type estimator to estimate the population mean using auxiliary information,” Adv. Appl. Statist., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 2020.
  3. M. Subzar, S. Maqbool, and T. A. Raja, “A class of efficient ratio type estimators for the estimation of population mean using the auxiliary information in survey sampling,” Int. J. Eng. Dev. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, 2017.
  4. J. Subramani and G. Kumarapandiyan, “Estimation of population mean using coefficient of variation and median of an auxiliary variable,” Int. J. Probab. Statist., vol. 1, pp. 111–118, 2012.
  5. M. Subzar, A. I. Al-Omari, and A. R. A. Alanzi, “The robust regression methods for estimating of finite population mean based on SRSWOR in case of outliers,” CMC: Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 125–138, 2020.
  6. M. Ijaz, S. M. Asim, A. Ullah, and I. Mahariq, “Flexible robust regression-ratio type estimators and its applications,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2022, Article ID 8977392, 2022.
  7. C. Kadilar and H. Cingi, “Ratio estimators in simple random sampling,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 893–902, 2004.
  8. Z. Yan and B. Tian, “Ratio method to the mean estimation using coefficient of skew- ness of auxiliary variable,” in Inf. Comput. Appl., vol. 106, pp. 103–110, 2010.
  9. J. Subramani and G. Kumarapandiyan, “Estimation of population mean using known median and coefficient of skewness,” Amer. J. Math. Statist., vol. 2, pp. 101–107, 2012.
  10. J. Subramani and G. Kumarapandiyan, “Modified ratio estimators using known me- dian and coefficient of kurtosis,” Amer. J. Math. Statist., vol. 2, pp. 95–100, 2012.
  11. S. K. Yadav, S. S. Mishra, A. K. Shukla, S. Kumar, and R. S. Singh, “Use of non- conventional measures of dispersion for improved estimation of population mean,” Amer. J. Oper. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 69–75, 2006.
  12. D. S. Robson, “Applications of multivariate polykays to the theory of unbiased ratio- type estimation,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., vol. 52, no. 280, pp. 511–522, 1957.
  13. M. Kumar, R. Singh, A. K. Singh, and F. Smarandache, “Some ratio type estimators under observational errors,” World Appl. Sci. J., vol. 14, pp. 272–276, 2011.
  14. S. Mohanty, “Combination of regression and ratio estimate,” J. Indian Statist. Assoc., vol. 5, pp. 16–19, 1967.
  15. M. Jeelani, S. Maqbool, and S. A. Mir, “Modified ratio estimators of population mean using linear combination of coefficient of skewness and quartile deviation,” Int.
  16. J. Mod. Math. Sci., vol. 6, pp. 174–183, 2013.
  17. L. N. Upadhyaya and H. P. Singh, “Use of transformed auxiliary variable in estimating the finite population mean,” Biometrical J., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 627–636, 1999.
  18. R. Mukerjee, T. J. Rao, and K. Vijayan, “Estimators using multiple auxiliary in regression type formation,” Aust. J. Statist., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 244–254, 1987.
  19. M. Z. Hasan, M. Sultana, K. Fatema, Md. A. Hossain, and M. M. Hossain, “A new regression type estimator and its application in survey sampling,” Open J. Statist., vol. 10, pp. 1010–1019, 2020.
  20. U. Shahzad, “Mean estimation using robust quantile regression with two auxiliary variables,” Scientia Iranica, 2023.
  21. N. Ali, I. Ahmad, M. Hanif, and U. Shahzad, “An improved regression type estimator of population mean with two auxiliary variables and its variant using robust regression method,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 382, Art. no. 113072, 2019.
  22. H. Ertaş, S. Toker, and S. Kaçıranlar, “Robust two-parameter ridge M-estimator for linear regression,” J. Appl. Stat., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1490–1502, 2015.
  23. W. Babayemi, G. I. Onwuka, and A. B. Isah, “A Generalized Class of Log-Type Estimators of Finite Population Mean Based on Correlation Coefficient,” Int. J. Sci. Glob. Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 85–91, 2023.
  24. A. Adejumobi, M. A. Yunusa, Y. A. Erinola, and K. Abubakar, “An Efficient Log- arithmic Ratio Type Estimator of Finite Population Mean under Simple Random Sampling,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Phys., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 700–705, 2023.
  25. G. R. V. Triveni, F. Danish, and M. Alrasheedi, “Application of Log-Type Estimators for Addressing Non-Response in Survey Sampling Using Real Datasets,” Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 7, Art. 1089, 2025.