10.57647/jee.2026.0902.15

Design and Validation of a Web-Based Technology-Enriched Learning Environment Model for Skill-Oriented Universities

XML PDF
  • Farzaneh Erami*1,
  • Mojgan Amirianzadeh1,
  • Reza Zarei1,
  • Ahmad Reza Ojinejad1,
  1. Department of Educational Studies, Marv.C. Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

Published in Issue 2026-12-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Farzaneh Erami, Mojgan Amirianzadeh, Reza Zarei, Ahmad Reza Ojinejad (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Erami, F., Amirianzadeh, M., Zarei, R., & Ojinejad, A. R. (2026). Design and Validation of a Web-Based Technology-Enriched Learning Environment Model for Skill-Oriented Universities. Journal of Education Experiences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/jee.2026.0902.15
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to design and validate a model for enriching web-based technology learning environments at Fars National Skill University. The research employed an exploratory mixed-methods design, utilizing thematic analysis in the qualitative phase and a descriptive survey method in the quantitative phase. In the qualitative phase, participants included university faculty members and expert educational technology specialists, selected through purposive sampling based on the principle of theoretical saturation, resulting in a sample of 22 individuals. Data collection was conducted using semi-structured interviews, and the data were analyzed using Attride-Stirling's (2001) thematic analysis method. In the quantitative phase, the statistical population comprised faculty members and information technology experts. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire, the validity and reliability of which were confirmed. The quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings from the qualitative phase resulted in the formation of 110 basic themes, 30 organizing themes, and 7 overarching themes. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the model for enriching web-based technology learning environments in skill-oriented universities is founded on five main pillars: Educational Strategies, including: intelligent application of technology, educational equity, personalized learning experiences, active learning, and learning system management. Interactivity and Participation, achieved through: effective participation, community building, communication tools, and active collaboration. Standardization, focusing on: educational quality, continuous improvement, formative assessment, and effective feedback. Content Management, utilizing: instructional design, learning analytics, educational modeling, digital tools, and constructive learning. Inclusivity and Flexibility, considering: diversity, accessibility, relevance, technological authenticity, and flexibility in time and content. Statistical analysis results demonstrated that the proposed model has an adequate fit (GOF = 0.637), and its internal components all possess acceptable validity and reliability. This model can serve as a scientific and practical framework for designing, developing, and evaluating web-based technology learning environments in skill-oriented universities, contributing to the enhancement of learning quality, student motivation, and the achievement of the university's professional objectives.

Keywords

  • Enrichment, Learning Environment, Web-Based Technology, National Skill University
PDF

References

  1. Adelia, V., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Doorman, M. (2025). The development of web-based learning environment to enhance students’ numeracy and reasoning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 651–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp651-670
  2. Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Athabasca University Press.
  3. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  4. Barana, A., Boffo, S., Gagliardi, F., Garuti, R., & Marchisio, M. (2020). Empowering engagement in a technology-enhanced learning environment. In M. Rehm, J. Saldien, & S. Manca (Eds.), Smart innovation, systems and technologies: Vol. 158. Project and design literacy as cornerstones of smart education: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development (1st ed., Vol. 158, pp. 75–77). Springer Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9652-6_7
  5. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. Springer.
  6. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  7. Dai, Z., Xiong, J., Zhao, L., & Zhu, X. (2023). Smart classroom learning environment preferences of higher education teachers and students in China: An ecological perspective. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e16845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16845
  8. Dede, C. (2014). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
  9. Durnali, M., & Limon, İ. (Eds.). (2020). Enriching teaching and learning environments with contemporary technologies. IGI Global. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3375-8
  10. González Pérez, A. (2018). Social networks as tools to enrich learning environments in higher education.
  11. Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x
  12. Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 1-11.
  13. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. Springer.
  14. Jameh Bozorg, Z., Jafarkhani, F., & Heydarian, M. R. (2023). Designing a web-based project-based learning environment and its impact on the creativity of fifth-grade elementary school students in science course. Psychology Development, 12(6), 13-24.
  15. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Routledge.
  16. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.
  17. Kutluca, T., Tum, A., & Mut, A. İ. (2020). Evaluation of enriched learning environment in the context of mathematical reasoning from the perspective of the students and their teacher. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 85-105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0017
  18. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. Routledge.
  19. Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
  20. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  21. Moradi Mukhlis, H., Hajiloui Mohib, M. M., & Amouie Razani, A. H. (2025). Discovering the dimensions of meta-ethics in artificial intelligence-based learning environments: A meta-synthesis study. Culture in Islamic University, 15(55), 61-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/ciu.2025.55.61
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Innovating education and educating for innovation. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en
  23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). The future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
  24. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  25. Puertas-Aguilar, M. Á., Álvarez-Otero, J., & De Lázaro Torres, M. (2025). Promoting transdisciplinarity and competency-based learning using Web GIS in the Spanish secondary school classroom. European Journal of Geography, 16(2), 335-349.
  26. Reigeluth, C. M., Beatty, B. J., & Myers, R. D. (Eds.). (2017). Instructional-design theories and models, volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education. Routledge.
  27. Taib, E. N., Hamama, S. F., & Harahap, N. (2025). The evolution and trend of the use of digital assessment instruments in project-based learning in online learning environment. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 179-189. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.10945
  28. Toofaninejad, E. (2018). Designing an educational model for an enriched learning environment with a virtual social network and its impact on learning .Doctoral dissertation.
  29. Tshuma, L. S., & Chasokela, D. (2025). The rise of online learning and the technological revolution in higher education. In G. B. (Ed.), Insights into international higher education leadership and the skills gap (pp. 447–470). IGI Global.
  30. UNESCO. (2015). Media and information literacy: Curriculum for teachers.
  31. UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Achieving sustainability with equity.
  32. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Technical and vocational education and training policy review. UNESCO. DOI: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000234895
  33. Van Beek, J. A., de Jong, F. P. C. M., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Wubbels, T. (2014). Teacher practice in secondary vocational education: Between teacher-regulated activities of student learning and student self-regulation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.005
  34. Wheelahan, L., & Moodie, G. (2016). Global trends in TVET: A framework for social justice. UNESCO.
  35. Zulaiha, Z., Hartono, H., & Siahaan, S. M. (2025). Needs analysis for the development of web-based learning multimedia context climate change issues environmental issues content to support junior high school students' literacy. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(3), 1481–1490.