10.57647/jcns.2025.1101.04

Super Absorbent Polymers and Soil Texture Affects on Zea mays L. Physiological Response, under Drought Stress Condition

PDF
  • Alireza Moeini1,
  • Ali Neshat*1,
  • Najme Yazdanpanah1,
  • Amin Pasandi Pour2,
  1. Department of Water Engineering, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
  2. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran.

Received: 2025-01-03

Revised: 2025-02-04

Accepted: 2025-03-05

Published in Issue 2025-03-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Alireza Moeini, Ali Neshat, Najme Yazdanpanah, Amin Pasandi Pour (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Moeini, A., Neshat, A., Yazdanpanah, N., & Pasandi Pour, A. (2025). Super Absorbent Polymers and Soil Texture Affects on Zea mays L. Physiological Response, under Drought Stress Condition. Journal of Crop Nutrition Science, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/jcns.2025.1101.04
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 25

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Super absorbent polymers (SAP) have been studied as soil amendments in arid and semi-arid environments, but little is known about potential use for drought stress mitigation in different soil textures.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this survey was to evaluate the role of SAP under drought stress condition on antioxidant enzymes and Corn crop production.

METHODS: Current research arranged in split-split plot experiment based on completely randomized block design with three replications. The primary plots included different types of soil, including sandy and clay-loam. The subplots were categorized into three levels of drought stress, 80, 100 and 120 mm of evaporation from the pan which is named severe drought stress, mild drought stress and well-watered conditions, respectively. Five value of SAP including 0, 10, 20, 40, and 80 kg.ha-1 were applied as the sub-subsidiary factor.

RESULT: The results illustrated that drought caused a significant decrease in net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield of Maize. Catalase (CAT), Super oxide dismutase (SOD), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), Relative electrolyte conductivity (REC), and proline were significantly elevated with increase in drought stress level. Relative to the control treatment, the moderate and severe drought conditions increased water use efficiency (WUE) on average by 5.8 and 11.7%, respectively. The maximum value of grain yield (491.8 g) was recorded for clay-loam soil texture. Applying SAP under drought condition enhanced the leaf gas exchange parameters, total chlorophyll, RWC, plant height, and grain yield, while it decreased REC, proline content, CAT, SOD, and APX activity. The highest and lowest Net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance and Chl. a+b contents were related to amounts of 80 and 10 kg.ha-1 SAP respectively. A significant increase in leaf relative water content was observed with application of 40 and 80 kg.ha-1 SAP whilst the lower amounts (10 and 20 kg.ha-1 SAP) had no significant impact on the parameter in compared with control (0 kg.ha-1 SAP).

CONCLUSION: Finally recommend using SAP at a dose of 80 kg.ha-1 for dealing with drought conditions in the sandy and clay-loam soils. 

Keywords

  • Antioxidant enzyme, Ascorbate peroxidase, Catalase, Chlorophyll, Proline, stomatal conductance.
PDF

References

  1. Abo Gamar, M. I., Kisiala, A., Emery, R. J. N., Yeung, E. C., Stone, S. L. and Qaderi M. M. 2019. Elevated carbon dioxide decreases the adverse effects of higher temperature and drought stress by mitigating oxidative stress and improving water status in Arabidopsis thali-ana. Planta, 250, pp. 1191–1214. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03213-3
  2. Abobatta, W. 2018. Impact of hydrogel polymer in agricultural sector. Advances in Agricul-ture and Environmental Science, 1, pp. 59-64. DOI: 10.30881/aaeoa.00011
  3. Ahmad, P., Jamsheed, S., Hameed, A., Rasool, S., Sharma, I., Azooz, M. and Hasanuz-zaman, M. 2014. Chapter 11- drought stress induced oxidative damage and antioxidants in plants. Oxidative Damage Plants, pp. 345-367. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-799963-0.00011-3
  4. Ashraf, M. and Foolad, M. R. 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59, pp. 206-216.
  5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
  6. Bajji, M., Kinet, J. M. and Lutts, S. 2002. The use of the electrolyte leakage method for as-sessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regulation, 36, pp. 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014732714549
  7. Bates, L. S., Waldern, S. P. and Teare, I. D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39, pp. 205-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  8. Brendan, O. 2005. Oven-Drying Characteristics of Soils of Different Origins. Drying Tech-nology, 23, pp. 1141-1149. DOI: 10.1081/DRT-200059149
  9. Buckley, T. N. and Mott, K. A. 2013. Modelling stomatal conductance in response to envi-ronmental factors. Plant, Cell and Environment, 36, pp. 1691-1699. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12140.
  10. Buezo, J., Sanz-Saez, A., Moran, J. F., Soba, D., Aranjuelo, I. and Esteban, R. 2019. Drought tolerance response of high-yielding soybean varieties to mild drought: physiological and photochemical adjustments. Physiolgia Plantarum, 166, pp. 88-104.
  11. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12864
  12. Cai, F., Zhang, Y., Mi, N., Ming, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, H. and Zhao, X. 2020. Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and re watering, and the associations with water stress degree. Agricultural Water Management, 241, 106379.
  13. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106379
  14. Cairns, J. E., Hellin, J., Sonder, K., Araus, J., MacRobert, J., Thierfelder, C. and Prasanna, B. 2013. Adapting Maize production to climate change in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Security, 5(3), pp. 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0256-x
  15. Caparrotta, S., Masi, E., Atzori, G., Diamanti, I., Azzarello, E., Mancuso, S. and Pan-dolfi, C. 2019. Growing spinach (Spinacia oleracea) with different seawater concentrations: Effects on fresh, boiled and steamed leaves. Scientia Horticulturae, 256, pp. 1-7.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.067
  17. Chen, S., Hawighorst, P., Sun, J. and Polle, A. 2014. Salt tolerance in Populus: Significance of stress signalling networks, mycorrhization, and soil amendments for cellular and whole-plant nutrition. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 107, pp. 113-124.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.001
  19. Compos, P. S., Qurtin, V., Ramalho, J. C. and Nunes, M. A. 2003. Electrolyte leakage and lipid degradation account for cold sensitivity in leaves of Coffea sp. plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 160, pp. 283-292. DOI: 10.1078/0176-1617-00833
  20. Daryanto, S., Wang, L. and Jacinthe, P. A. 2016. Global synthesis of drought effects on Maize and wheat production. Plos One, 11, pp. 1-15.
  21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156362
  22. Dhindsa, R. S., Plump-Dhindsa, P. and Thrope, T. A. 1981. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32, pp. 93-101.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.93
  24. Dong, S., Jiang, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, L., Wang, W., Ma, Z., Yan, C., Ma, C. and Liu, L. 2019. A study on soybean responses to drought stress and rehydration. Saudi Journal of Bio-logical Sciences, 26, pp. 2006-2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.08.005
  25. Dorraji, S. S., Golchin, A. and Ahmadi, S. 2010. The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. Clean Soil Air Water, 38(7), pp. 584-591.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000017
  27. Dutta, T., Neelapu, N. R. R., Wani, S. H. and Surekha, C. 2019. Chapter 30- Role and regulation of osmolytes as signalling molecules to abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Signalling Molecules, pp. 459–477. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816451-8.00029-0
  28. El-Hendawy, S., Al-Suhaibani, N., Elsayed, S., Hassan, W., Dewir, Y., Refay, Y. and Abdella, K. 2019. Potential of the existing and novel spectral reflectance indices for estimat-ing the leaf water status and grain yield of spring wheat exposed to different irrigation rates. Agricultural Water Management, 217, pp. 356-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.006
  29. Eneji, A. E., Islam, R., An, P. and Amalua, U. C. 2013. Nitrate retention and physiological adjustment of Maize to soil amendment with superabsorbent polymers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, pp. 474-480. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.027
  30. Esteban, R., Barrutia, O., Artetxe, U., Fernandez-Marin, B., Hernandez, A. and Garcia-Plazaola, J. I. 2015. Internal and external factors affecting photosynthetic pigment composi-tion in plants: a meta-analytical approach. New Phytologist, 206, pp. 268-280.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13186
  32. Farahbakhsh, H., Pasandi Pour, A. and Reiahi, N. 2017. Physiological response of henna (Lawsonia inermise L.) to salicylic acid and salinity. Plant Production Science, 20, pp. 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2017.1299581
  33. Farooq, M. A., Niazi, A. K., Akhtar, J., Saifullah, F. M., Souri, Z., Karimi, N. and Ren-gel, Z. 2019. Acquiring control: the evolution of ROS-induced oxidative stress and redox signalling pathways in plant stress responses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 141, pp. 353-369.
  34. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.04.039
  35. Feng, D., Bai, B., Ding, C., Wang, H. and Suo, Y. 2014. Synthesis and swelling behaviours of yeast-g-poly (acrylic acid) superabsorbent co-polymer. Industrial and Engineering Chemis-try Research, 53(32), pp. 12760-12769. DOI: 10.1021/ie502248n
  36. Flower, D. J. and Ludlow, M. M. 1986. Contribution of osmotic adjustment to the dehydra-tion tolerance of water stressed pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Milsp) leaves. Plant Cell and Environment, 9, pp. 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-3040.ep11589349
  37. Galeş, D. C., Trincă, L. C., Cazacu, A., Peptu, C. A. and Jităreanu, G. 2016. Effects of a hydrogel on the Cambic Chernozem soil's Hydro-physic indicators and plant Morpho-physiological parameters. Geoderma, 267, pp. 102-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.008
  38. Giannopolitis, C. N. and Ries, S. K. 1977. Superoxide dismutase. I: Occurrence in higher plant. Plant Physiology, 59, pp. 309-314. DOI: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309
  39. Gill, S. S., Khan, N. A., Anjum, N. A. and Tuteja, N. 2011. Amelioration of cadmium stress in crop plants by nutrients management: morphological, physiological and biochemical aspects. Plant Stress, 5, pp. 1-23.
  40. Heidari, M. 2012. Effects of salinity stress on growth, chlorophyll content and osmotic com-ponents of two Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11, pp. 379-384. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.2572
  41. Hong-Bo, S., Li-Ye, C., Cheruth, Aj. and Z. Chang-Xing. 2008. Water deficit stress in-duced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331, pp. 215-225.
  42. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.002.
  43. Iqbal, H., Yaning, C., Waqas, M., Shareef, M. and Raza, S. T. 2018. Differential response of quinoa genotypes to drought and foliage-applied H2O2 in relation to oxidative damage, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant capacity. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 164, pp. 344–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.004
  44. Islam, M. R., Hu, Y., Mao, S., Mao, J., Eneji, A. E. and Xue, X. 2011. Effectiveness of a water-saving super-absorbent polymer in soil water conservation for Corn (Zea mays L.) based on eco-physiological parameters. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91, pp. 1998-2005. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4408
  45. Ismail, H., Irani, M. and Ahmad, Z. 2013. Starch-based hydrogels: present status and appli-cations. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 62(7), pp. 411-420. DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2012.719141
  46. Junttila, S., Sugano, J., Vastaranta, M., Linnakoski, R., Kaartinen, H., Kukko, A., Hol-opainen, M., Hyyppa, H. and Hyyppa, J. 2018. Can leaf water content Be estimated using multispectral terrestrial laser scanning? a case study with Norway spruce seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 299. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00299.
  47. Kapoor, D., Singh, S., Kumar, V., Romero, R., Prasad, R. and Singh, J. 2019. Antioxi-dant enzymes regulation in plants in reference to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Plant Gene, 19, 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2019.100182
  48. Khadem, S. A., Galavi, M., Ramordi, M., Mousavi, S. R., Rousta, M. J., Rezvani-Moghadam, P. 2010. Effect of animal manure and superabsorbent polymer on corn leaf rela-tive water content, cell membrane stability and leaf chlorophyll content under dry condition. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(8), pp. 642-647.
  49. Li, Y., Song, H., Zhou, L., Xu, Z. and Zhou, G. 2019a. Vertical distributions of chlorophyll and nitrogen and their associations with photosynthesis under drought and re watering re-gimes in a Maize field. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 272-273, pp. 40–54.
  50. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.026
  51. Li, Y., Song, H., Zhou, L., Xu, Z. and Zhou, G. 2019b. Tracking chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of drought and re watering across the entire leaf lifespan in a Maize field. Ag-ricultural Water Management. 211: 190-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.050
  52. Liang, J., Shi, W., He, Z., Pang, L. and Zhang, Y. 2019. Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid on water use efficiency, cotton yield, and Fiber quality in the sandy soil of southern Xinjiang, China. Agricultural Water Management, 218, pp. 48-59.
  53. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.009
  54. Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic bio membranes. Methods in Enzymology, 148, pp. 350-382.
  55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
  56. Mao, S., Islam, M. R., Hu, Y., Qian, X., Chen, F. and Xue, X. 2011. Antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in Maize (Zea mays L.) following soil application of super-absorbent polymer at different fertilizer regimes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, pp. 1000–1008. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.1348
  57. Mazloom, N., Khorassani, R., Zohury, G. H., Emami, H. and Whalen, J. 2020. Lignin-based Hydrogel alleviates drought stress in Maize. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 175, 104055. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104055
  58. Mishra, N. P., Mishra, R. K. and Singhal, G. S. 1993. Change in the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible light at different temperatures in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors. Plant Physiology, 102, pp. 903-910.
  59. DOI: 10.1104/pp.102.3.903
  60. Montesano, F. F., Parente, A., Santamaria, P., Sannino, A. and Serio, F. 2015. Biode-gradable superabsorbent hydrogel increases water retention properties of growing media and plant growth. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 4, pp. 451-458.
  61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.03.052
  62. Moslemi, Z., Habibi, D., Asgharzadeh, A., Ardakani, M. R., Mohammadi, A. and Mo-hammadi, M. 2011. Response of Phytohormones and biochemical markers of Maize to super-absorbent polymer and plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria under drought stress. Ameri-can-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 10(5), pp. 787-796.
  63. Nakano, Y. and Asada, K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific pe-roxidase in Spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology, 22: 867-880.
  64. Nazarli, H., Zardashti, M. R., Darvishzadeh, R. and Najafi, S. 2010. The effect of water stress and polymer on water use efficiency, yield and several morphological traits of Sun-flower under greenhouse condition. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2(4), pp. 53-58.
  65. DOI: 10.15835/nsb.2.4.4823
  66. Orikiriza, L. J., Agaba, H., Eilu, G., Kabasa, J. D., Worbes, M. and Hüttermann, A. 2013. Effects of hydrogels on tree seedling performance in temperate soils before and after water stress. Journal of Environmental Protection, 4(7), pp. 713-721.
  67. DOI: 10.4236/jep.2013.47082
  68. Parvathy, P. C., Jyothi, A. N., John, K. S. and Sreekumar, J. 2014. Cassava starch based superabsorbent polymer as soil conditioner: Impact on soil Physico-Chemical and biological properties and plant growth. Clean Soil Air Water, 42, pp. 1610-1617.
  69. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300143
  70. Ramezanifar, H., Yazdanpanah, N., Golkar Hamzee Yazd, H. R., Tavousi, M. and Mahmoodabadi, M. 2022a. Spinach growth regulation due to interactive salinity, water and Nitrogen stresses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41, pp. 1654-1671.
  71. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-021-10407-1
  72. Ramezanifar, H., Yazdanpanah, N., Golkar Hamzee Yazd, H. R., Tavousi, M. and Mahmoodabadi, M. 2022b. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of soil water potential and osmotic potential linked to nitrogen fertilization on spinach traits and water use efficien-cy. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 45(3), pp. 389-412.
  73. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2021.1952222
  74. Saha, A., Rattan, B., Sreedeep, S. and Manna, U. 2020. Effect of water absorbing polymer amendment on water retention properties of Cohesionless soil. Advances in Computer Meth-ods and Geomechanics, pp. 185-195. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_15
  75. Salek Mearaji, H., Tavakoli, A. and Sepahvand, N. A. 2020. Evaluating the effect of cyto-kinin foliar application on morphological traits and yield of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under optimal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiolo-gy, 14(4), pp. 479-498. DOI: 10.30495/jcep.2021.679976
  76. Sayyari, M. and F. Ghanbari. 2012. Effects of super absorbent polymer A200 on the growth, yield and some physiological responses in Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) un-der various irrigation regimes. International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 1(1), pp. 1-11.
  77. DOI: 10.24102/ijafr.v1i1.123
  78. Schutz, M. and E. Fangmeir. 2001. Growth and yield response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Minaret) to elevated CO2 and water limitation. Environmental Pollution, 11, pp. 187-194. DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00215-3.
  79. Sharma, S. and Verslues, P. E. 2010. Mechanisms independent of abscisic acid (ABA) or proline feedback have a predominant role in transcriptional regulation of proline metabolism during low water potential and stress recovery. Plant Cell and Environment, 33, pp. 1838-1851.
  80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02188.x.
  81. Silva, E. N., Ferreira-Silva, S. L., Fontenele Ade, V., Ribeiro, R. V., Viegas, R. A. and Silveira, J. A. 2010. Photosynthetic changes and protective mechanisms against oxidative damage subjected to isolated and combined drought and heat stresses in Jatropha curcas plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167, pp. 1157–1164.
  82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.03.005
  83. Song, H., Li, Y., Zhou, L., Xu, Z. and Zhou, G. 2018. Maize leaf functional responses to drought episode and re watering. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 249, pp. 57-70.
  84. DOI: 10.1101/170258
  85. Sreenivasulu, N., Grimm, B., Wobus, U. and Weschke, W. 2000. Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt tolerant and salt sensitive seedlings of Foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Physiolgia Plantarum, 109, pp. 435-442.
  86. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100410.x
  87. Sun, Y., Liu, F., Bendevis, M., Shabala, S. and Jacobsen, S. E. 2014. Sensitivity of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties to progressive drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 200(1), pp. 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12042
  88. Waititu, J. K., Zhang, X., Chen, T., Zhang, C., Zhao, Y. and Wang, H. 2021. Transcrip-tome analysis of tolerant and susceptible Maize genotypes reveals novel insights about the molecular mechanisms underlying drought responses in leaves. International Journal of Mo-lecular Science, 22(13), pp. 6980-7011. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22136980
  89. Xingyang, S., Guangsheng, Z., Qijing, H. and Huailin, Z. 2020. Stomatal limitations to photosynthesis and their critical Water conditions in different growth stages of Maize under water stress. Agricultural Water Management, 241, 106330.
  90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106330
  91. Yang, X., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z. and Chen, S. 2021. Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae, 7, pp. 50-86.
  92. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030050
  93. Yang, Y., Tong, Z., Geng, Y., Li, Y. and Zhang, M. 2013. Bio-based polymer composites derived from Corn Stover and feather Meals as Double-Coating materials for Controlled-Release and Water-Retention Urea fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 61, pp. 8166-8174. DOI: 10.1021/jf402519t
  94. Zhang, J., Liu, J., Yang, C., Du, S. and Yang, W. 2016. Photosynthetic performance of soybean plants to water deficit under high and low light intensity. South African Journal of Botany, 105, pp. 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.04.011