10.1007/s40095-018-0259-7

Assessment of the wave potential at selected hydrology and coastal environments around a tropical island, case study: Mauritius

  1. Physical Oceanography Unit, Mauritius Oceanography Institute, Albion, MU
  2. Physical Oceanography/Marine Geoscience Unit, Department of Continental Shelf and Maritime Zones Administration and Exploration, Prime Minister’s Office, Port-Louis, MU
  3. Technical Unit, Mauritius Oceanography Institute, Albion, MU
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2018-01-18

How to Cite

Doorga, J. R. S., Chinta, D., Gooroochurn, O., Rawat, A., Ramchandur, V., Motah, B. A., Sunassee, S., & Samyan, C. (2018). Assessment of the wave potential at selected hydrology and coastal environments around a tropical island, case study: Mauritius. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 9(2 (June 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-018-0259-7

HTML views: 69

PDF views: 113

Abstract

Abstract Waves are the dominant influence on coastal morphology and ecosystem structure of tropical islands. The geographical positioning of Mauritius near to the Tropic of Capricorn ensures that the eastern regions benefit from the persistent southeast trade winds which influence the incoming surface waves. In this study, we present the high dependence of the wave regimes of windward offshore site on the trade winds. The higher occurrence of incoming waves in the winter season directed in the southeast direction indicates that the trade winds are more prevalent in the winter season. Storms within the extratropical South Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans generally propagate towards the east such that extratropical South Atlantic swell energy spreads through the entire Indian Ocean. Since waves are very directional and tend to get shadowed by land masses, Mauritius situated in the line of sight from those sources end up in the shadow region due to the geographical location of Reunion island. In this study, we support the explanation on how the western region of the island gets influenced by episodic swell events. A detailed wave energy resource assessment is provided for different targeted coastal environments around the island. It is revealed that the mean wave power observed in the summer season at one of the sites can attain 28.8 kW/m and is found to be lower as compared to the winter season (31.7 kW/m).

Keywords

  • Wave climate,
  • Wave energy,
  • Tropical Island,
  • Statistical analysis,
  • Resource assessment,
  • Indian Ocean

References

  1. SM: Population and Vital Statistics—Year 2016.
  2. http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/Publications/Pages/Pop_and_Vital_Stats_Yr16.aspx
  3. (2017a). Accessed 7 April 2017
  4. SM: Energy and Water Statistics—Year 2016.
  5. http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/StatsbySubj/Pages/Energy_Water_Stats_Year_2016.aspx
  6. (2017b). Accessed 9 April 2017
  7. MPU: Long-Term Energy Strategy 2009–2025.
  8. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1245mauritiusEnergy%20Strategy.pdf
  9. (2009). Accessed 10 April 2017
  10. Lannoye (2015) Renewable energy integration: practical management of variability, uncertainty, and flexibility in power grids [book reviews] 13(6) (pp. 106-107) https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2015.2458758
  11. Neill et al. (2014) Inter-annual and inter-seasonal variability of the Orkney wave power resource (pp. 339-348) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.023
  12. Ram et al. (2014) In situ near-shore wave resource assessment in the Fiji Islands (pp. 170-178) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.09.002
  13. Bernardino et al. (2017) Evaluation of the wave energy resources in the Cape Verde Islands (pp. 316-326) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.040
  14. Iglesias and Carballo (2011) Wave resource in El Hierroan island towards energy self-sufficiency 36(2) (pp. 689-698) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.021
  15. Nordstrom (1992) Springer Science & Business Media
  16. Ludwick, J. C.: Mechanisms of sand loss from an estuarine groin system following an artificial sand fill. In: Technical Report 87-2 Department of Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA (1987)
  17. Lutz and Wils (1994) (pp. 75-97) Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03061-5
  18. ASCLME: National Marine Ecosystem Diagnostic Analysis, Mauritus.
  19. http://www.asclme.org/reports2013/National%20MEDAs/MEDA%20Mauritius/_MauritiusMEDAProof.pdf
  20. (2012). Accessed 19 April 2017
  21. JICA: The Project for Capacity Development on Coastal Protection NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. and Rehabilitation in the Republic of Mauritius. http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12237327.pdf (2015). Accessed 2 May 2017
  22. Anthony, A., Atwood, J., August, P., Byron, C., Cobb, S., Foster, C., Fry, C., Gold, A., Hagos, K., Heffner, L., Kellog, Q., Lellis, K.,
  23. Opaluch, J., Oviatt, C., Pfeiffer-Herbert, A., Rohr, N., Smith, L.,
  24. Smyth, T., Swift, J., Vinhateiro, N.: Coastal lagoons and climate change: ecological and social ramifications in US Atlantic and Gulf Coast ecosystems. Ecol. Soc.
  25. 14
  26. (1), 8 (2009)
  27. Nordstrom and Jackson (1990) Migration of swash zone, step and microtopographic features during tidal cycles on an estuarine beach, Delaware Bay, New Jersey, USA 92(1–2) (pp. 147-154) https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(90)90033-G
  28. Nordstrom (1977) Bayside beach dynamics: implications for simulation modeling on eroding sheltered tidal beaches 25(4) (pp. 333-342) https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(77)90061-5
  29. Warshaw (2005) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  30. IOC: IOC-UNEP-WMO-SAREC Planning Workshop on an Integrated Approach to Coastal Erosion, Sea Level Changes and their Impacts.
  31. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001001/100138eo.pdf
  32. (1994). Accessed 15 May 2017
  33. Ashton and Johanning (2015) On errors in low frequency wave measurements from wave buoys (pp. 11-22) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.11.033
  34. Joosten (2006) Directional wave buoys and their elastic mooring 10(4) (pp. 18-21)
  35. Sierra et al. (2016) Wave energy potential along the Atlantic coast of Morocco (pp. 20-32) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.071
  36. Rusu and Soares (2012) Wave energy pattern around the Madeira Islands 45(1) (pp. 771-785) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.013
  37. Cornett, A. M.: A global wave energy resource assessment. In The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. In: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (2008)
  38. Baird Report: Proposal for Controlling Severe Erosion and Beach Improvement works in front of The Grand Mauritian Hotel, Balaclava. http://environment.govmu.org/English/eia/Documents/Reports/blueocean/grand/chapt2.pdf(2003). Accessed 20 June 2017
  39. Alves (2006) Numerical modeling of ocean swell contributions to the global wind-wave climate 11(1) (pp. 98-122) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.11.007
  40. Samiksha et al. (2012) Propagation of Atlantic Ocean swells in the north Indian Ocean: a case study (pp. 3605-3615) https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3605-2012
  41. Nelson and Starcher (2015) CRC press
  42. Sims, R. E., Schock, R. N., Adegbululgbe, A., Fenhann, J. V., Konstantinaviciute, I., Moomaw, W., Uchiyama, Y.: Energy supply. In Climate change 2007: Mitigation. In: Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press (2007)
  43. Rinaldi et al. (2016) On the analysis of a wave energy farm with focus on maintenance operations 4(3) https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse4030051
  44. Cruz (2007) Springer Science & Business Media
  45. Sahnoun, M. H., Baudry, D., Mustafee, N., Louis, A., Smart, P. A., Godsiff, P., Mazari, B.: Modelling and simulation of operation and maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms based on multi-agent system. J. Intell. Manuf.
  46. 1
  47. , 1–17 (2015)
  48. Van Haaren and Fthenakis (2011) GIS-based wind farm site selection using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA): evaluating the case for New York State 15(7) (pp. 3332-3340) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.010
  49. Wengenmayr and Buhrke (2011) Wiley
  50. Astariz and Iglesias (2015) Enhancing wave energy competitiveness through co-located wind and wave energy farms. A review on the shadow effect 8(7) (pp. 7344-7366) https://doi.org/10.3390/en8077344
  51. Castano, M.: Sistema de Monitorización y Supervisión de Una Boya Para Generación de Energía Undimotriz. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain (2011)
  52. OWET: Economic Impact Analysis of Wave Energy: Phase One. https://oregonwave.org/oceanic/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Economic-Impact-Analysis-of-Wave-Energy-Phase-One%E2%80%94September-2009.pdf(2009). Accessed 15 Dec 2017
  53. Antonio (2010) Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies 14(3) (pp. 899-918) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.003
  54. TidalEnergyToday: Mutriku wave plant generates over 1 GWh of clean power.
  55. https://tidalenergytoday.com/2016/07/19/mutriku-wave-plant-generates-over-1gwh-of-clean-power/
  56. (2016). Accessed 16 Dec 2017
  57. McCormick and Ertekin (2009) Renewable sea power 131(5)
  58. OPERA: Wave Energy Measurement Methodologies for IEC Technical Specifications.
  59. http://opera-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/OPERA_D5.1_IEC_TS_Application_UCC_20161129_v2.1.pdf
  60. (2016). Accessed 18 Dec 2017