10.1007/s40095-017-0245-5

Experimental investigation of the influences of different liquid types on acoustic emission energy levels during the bubble formation process

  1. School of Energy, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Beds, MK43 0AL, GB
  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Azzaytuna University-Libya, Bani Walid, LY
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2017-09-08

How to Cite

Alhashan, T., Addali, A., Teixeira, J. A., & Naid, A. (2017). Experimental investigation of the influences of different liquid types on acoustic emission energy levels during the bubble formation process. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 9(1 (March 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0245-5

HTML views: 43

PDF views: 123

Abstract

Abstract Bubble formation phenomena in a two-phase gas/liquid system occur in many industries that involve boiling; such as desalination stations, nuclear reactors, chemical plants, and fluid piping transportation and processes. Bubble formation phenomena cause problems, such as a decrease in equipment efficiency, vibration, noise, and solid surface erosion. Applications of the acoustic emission (AE) technique for monitoring bubble formation and burst stages in boiling processes are marginal in terms of extension in comparison to other applications of the AE technique. The use of the AE technique in this experimental investigation covers the frequency range between 100 and 1000 kHz, showing that the AE sensor can detect acoustic emissions from an occurrence of bubble formation. Statistically, it was found that the best AE parameter indicator for bubble formation was AE-RMS (root mean square).

Keywords

  • Acoustic emission,
  • Bubble formation,
  • Pool boiling vessel

References

  1. Neill et al. (1979) Detection of incipient cavitation in pumps using acoustic emission 211(4) (pp. 267-277) https://doi.org/10.1243/0954408971529737
  2. Rydberg, K.E.: Energy efficient water hydraulic systems. In: The fifth international conference on fluid power transmission and control, HangZhou, China, 2001, pp 44–46
  3. Weninger et al. (1999) Energy focusing in a converging fluid flow: implications for sonoluminescence 83(10) (pp. 2081-2084) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2081
  4. Naveen N. Sinha, Los Alamos N. Characterization of liquids using gas bubbles. United States (12), Patent Application Publication (10). 2004; 1(19). http://file:///C:/Users/s218245/Downloads/US20040144175.pdf
  5. Brennen, C.E.: Cavitation and bubble dynamics, pp. 145-185. Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1995). doi:
  6. 10.1017/CBO9781107338760
  7. Jazi and Rahimzadeh (2009) Waveform analysis of cavitation in a globe valve 49(6–7) (pp. 577-582) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2009.02.004
  8. Brennen, C.: Hydrodynamics of Pumps. NREC, Oxford University Press (1994). doi:
  9. 10.1017/CBO9780511976728
  10. Alssayh, M.A.: Slug velocity measurement and flow regime recognition using acoustic emission technology. PHD Thesis. Cranfield University; 2013
  11. FDIS ISO. International Standards Organization Documents 22096. Documents. ISO, Generic, R.T. (eds.) Condition monitoring and diagnosis of machines. Acoust Emiss; 2007
  12. Alhashan et al. (2016) Monitoring of bubble formation during the boiling process using acoustic emission signals 2(4) (pp. 66-72)
  13. Benes and Uher (2009) Identification of liquid boiling by acoustic emission (pp. 1396-1401)
  14. Carmi, R., Bussiba, A., AI and HI. Detection of transient zones during water boiling by acoustic emission. Acoust Emiss. 2011; 29: 89–97
  15. Alhashan and Addali (2016) 13(5) (pp. 51-56) https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1305085156
  16. Addali, A.: Monitoring gas void fraction in two-phase flow with acoustic emission. PHD Thesis. Cranfield University; 2010
  17. Husin, S., Mba, D.: Acoustic emission of a single bubble activities. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010 Vol. II. London UK; 2010. pp. 0–5
  18. Jaubert, L., Maillard, S., Sulis, V.: Monitoring of fluidic systems by acoustic emission. In: European conf. AE Testing. France; 2008. pp. 334–339
  19. Husin, S.: An experimental investigation into the correlation between Acoustic Emission (AE) and bubble dynamics. Cranfield University (2011). ISBN: 9789881821072
  20. Leighton and Walton (1987) An experimental study of the sound emitted from gas bubbles in a liquid. (pp. 98-104) https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/8/2/005
  21. Minnaert (1933) On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water (pp. 235-248) https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443309462277
  22. Pumphrey, H. C., Crum, L.: Sources of ambient noise in the ocean and experimental investigation. PhD thesis. University of Mississippi (1989)
  23. Leighton, T.G.: The acoustic bubble: Oceanic bubble acoustics and ultrasonic cleaning. In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics. 2015; 24: 1–5. doi:
  24. 10.1121/2.0000121
  25. Strasberg (1956) Gas bubbles as sources of sound in liquids 28(1) (pp. 20-26) https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908212
  26. Plesset, M. S.: Shockwaves from cavity collapse. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 260, pp. 241–244. Royal Society (1966)
  27. Strasberg (1956) Gas bubbles as source of sound in liquids (pp. 20-26) https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908212
  28. Husin et al. (2013) Feasibility study on the use of the acoustic emission technology for monitoring flow patterns in two phase flow (pp. 251-256) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2013.07.011
  29. Lauterborn and Ohl (1997) Cavitation bubble dynamics 4(2) (pp. 65-75) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(97)00009-6
  30. Derakhshan and Houghton (1989) Cavitation monitoring of hydro turbines with RMS acoustic emission measurements
  31. Blanchard and Woodcock (1957) Bubble formation in modification in the sea and its meteorological signifcance (pp. 145-158)
  32. Ceccio et al. (1997) The effects of salt water on bubble cavitation (pp. 155-163) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2819102