10.1007/s40095-017-0244-6

Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland

  1. Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DK
  2. Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, IS
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2017-09-07

How to Cite

Atlason, R. S., Oddsson, G. V., & Unnthorsson, R. (2017). Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 8(4 (December 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0244-6

HTML views: 103

PDF views: 119

Abstract

Abstract Heat pumps use the temperature difference between inside and outside areas to modify a refrigerant, either for heating or cooling. Doing so can lower the need for external heating energy for a household to some extent. The eventual impact depends on various factors, such as the external source for heating or cooling and the temperature difference. The use of heat pumps, and eventual benefits has not been studied in the context of subarctic areas, such as in Iceland. In Iceland, only remote areas do not have access to district heating from geothermal energy where households may, therefore, benefit from using heat pumps. It is the intent of this study to explore the observed benefits of using heat pumps in Iceland, both financially and energetically. This study further elaborates on incentives provided by the Icelandic government. Real data were gathered from the Icelandic energy authority for the analysis. It was found for the study database of 128 households that the annual electricity use was reduced from 37.8 to 26.7 kWh (an average 29.3% reduction) after installation of heat pumps. Large pumps (9.0–14.4 kW) and small pumps (5.0–9.0 kW) saved an average of 31.4 and 26.0% (95% confidence intervals), respectively. On average, households used approximately 26 MWh after installing a heat pump. When installing a small pump (5–9 kW), the mean annual saving (and 95% confidence intervals) was 10.6 ( ±\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\pm }$$\end{document} 2.7) MWh (approximately 26%). However, when installing a larger pump, mean annual savings were 11.3 ( ±\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\pm }$$\end{document} 1.6) MWh (Approximately 31%).

Keywords

  • Energy efficiency,
  • Heat transfer,
  • Sustainability

References

  1. Shafiee and Topal (2009) When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? 37(1) (pp. 181-189) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.016
  2. Conti (2016) Dimensionless maps for the validity of analytical ground heat transfer models for gshp applications 9(11) https://doi.org/10.3390/en9110890
  3. Yang et al. (2010) Current status of ground-source heat pumps in china 38(1) (pp. 323-332) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.021
  4. Bayer et al. (2012) Greenhouse gas emission savings of ground source heat pump systems in europe: a review 16(2) (pp. 1256-1267) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.027
  5. Tester et al. (2012) MIT Press
  6. Blanchard (1980) Coefficient of performance for finite speed heat pump 51(5) (pp. 2471-2472) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328020
  7. Orkurannsóknir, Í.: Varmadælur, hagkvæmni á íslandi, report prepared by ragnar k. Ásmundsson, Orkustofnun (2005)
  8. Lee (2009) Current status of ground source heat pumps in korea 13(6) (pp. 1560-1568) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.10.005
  9. Sanner et al. (2003) Current status of ground source heat pumps and underground thermal energy storage in europe 32(4) (pp. 579-588) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00060-9
  10. Staffell et al. (2012) A review of domestic heat pumps 5(11) (pp. 9291-9306) https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22653g
  11. Stevens, V., Marsik, T., Hammer, C.: Air source heat pump potential in Alaska. Technical report, Cold Climate Housing Research Center (2015)
  12. Palsson, O., Jonasson, T., Bardadottir, H., Sturludóttir, L.K., et al.: Orkutolur. Technical report, Icelandic Energy Authority (2005)
  13. Arnalds (2008) Soils of Iceland (pp. 409-421)
  14. Arnalds (2015) Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9621-7
  15. Icelandic Meteorological Office. Temperatures in reykjavik (2016).
  16. http://www.vedur.is/Medaltalstoflur-txt/Stod_001_Reykjavik.ManMedal.txt
  17. . Accessed 2 May 2017
  18. Stjornartidindi. Auglysing um nidurgreidslur hushitunarkostnadar (2011).
  19. http://www.stjornartidindi.is/Advert.aspx?ID=80085729-441f-42fa-974c-95825247eef0
  20. Accessed 5 May 2017
  21. Orkustofnun. Varmadælur.
  22. http://os.is/jardhiti/varmadaelur/
  23. . Accessed 20 Aug 2016
  24. Lofttaekni. Panasonic loft/loft.
  25. http://lofttaekni.se/panasonic%20/index.html
  26. . Accessed 15 Jul 2017
  27. Lofttaekni. Panasonic loft/vatn.
  28. http://lofttaekni.se/panasonic%20loft%20i%20vatn.html
  29. . Accessed 2 Jul 2017
  30. Bakirci (2010) Evaluation of the performance of a ground-source heat-pump system with series ghe (ground heat exchanger) in the cold climate region 35(7) (pp. 3088-3096) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.054
  31. Blum et al. (2010) Co2documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
  32. usepackage{amsmath}
  33. usepackage{wasysym}
  34. usepackage{amsfonts}
  35. usepackage{amssymb}
  36. usepackage{amsbsy}
  37. usepackage{mathrsfs}
  38. usepackage{upgreek}
  39. setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
  40. begin{document}$$_2$$end{document} savings of ground source heat pump systems-a regional analysis 35(1) (pp. 122-127) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.03.034
  41. Esen and Yuksel (2013) Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse (pp. 340-351) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.018
  42. Peel et al. (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification 4(2) (pp. 439-473) https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007
  43. Stevens, V., Craven, C., Garber-Slaght, R.: Air source heat pumps in southeast alaska. Technical report, Cold Climate Housing Research Center (2013)