10.1007/s40095-017-0239-3

Structural assessment of a lattice tower for a small, multi-bladed wind turbine

PDF HTML
  • Redeemer Axisa1,
  • Martin Muscat*1,
  • Tonio Sant1,
  • Robert N. Farrugia2,
  1. Faculty of Engineering, University of Malta, Msida, MSD2080, MT
  2. Institute for Sustainable Energy, University of Malta, Marsaxlokk, MXK1531, MT
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2017-06-08

How to Cite

Axisa, R., Muscat, M., Sant, T., & Farrugia, R. N. (2017). Structural assessment of a lattice tower for a small, multi-bladed wind turbine. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 8(4 (December 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0239-3
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 97

HTML views: 82

Abstract

Abstract This paper deals with a limit load assessment and preliminary experimental testing of a lattice-type steel tower used to support a newly designed, prototype small wind turbine having nine blades and a rotor diameter of 3.4 m. Small wind turbine and structural engineering codes of standards were followed with the purpose of implementing a system that meets European Union countries’ legislation. The supporting lattice tower structure was subjected to a full-scale load test. This test verified that the structure can withstand the design loads. The finite element software ANSYS Mechanical was used to model and analyse the actual structure, and to determine the possible failure modes and their associated load levels. The most probable mode of failure for such a structure was found to be elastic buckling of the main corner posts. A number of finite element lattice tower models utilising different modelling strategies and solution methods are presented and analysed. The paper highlights the importance of using non-linear analyses as opposed to linear analyses and gives recommendations on the most reliable available modelling technique. Computational analyses’ results are compared with measurements from a full-scale test on the tower structure.

Keywords

  • Small wind turbine,
  • Lattice tower structure,
  • Buckling,
  • Field testing
PDF HTML

References

  1. ANSYS Mechanical Academic Research, Canonsburg, USA, Release 15
  2. Muscat M., Sant T., Farrugia R.N., Caruana C., Axisa R.: Design and construction of a small multi-bladed wind turbine for the suburban and rural environment, Europe and the Mediterranean, towards a sustainable built environment—SBE16, Malta (2016)
  3. Martin and Purkiss (2008) Butterworth Heinmann
  4. Coates et al. (1988) Chapman & Hall
  5. Fang, S.J., Roy, S. and Kramer, J.: Transmission structures, In: Chapter 15—handbook of structural engineering, CRC Press, New York (1999)
  6. Lee and McClure (2007) Elastoplastic large deformation analysis of a lattice steel tower structure and comparison with full-scale tests (pp. 709-717) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.041
  7. Zhangqi et al. (2014) Theoretical and experimental research on joint slippage effects of lattice angle steel tower (pp. 660-665) https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.608-609.660
  8. Zhuge et al. (2012) Modelling of steel lattice tower angle legs reinforced for increased load capacity (pp. 160-168) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.017
  9. Junior, P.A.A.M, et al.: Design of lattice wind turbine towers with structural optimization. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. ISSN: 224-9622, 4(8), (Version 5), August 2014, pp 38–51
  10. Adhikari et al. (2014) Design procedure for tubular lattice towers for small wind turbines 38(4) (pp. 359-376) https://doi.org/10.1260/0309-524X.38.4.359
  11. del Coz Diaz (2010) A study of the collapse of a WWII communications antenna using numerical simulations based on design of experiments by FEM (pp. 1792-1800) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.011
  12. Jiang (2011) Accurate modelling of joint effects in lattice transmission towers (pp. 1817-1827) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.022
  13. Rao et al. (2012) Studies on failure of transmission line towers in testing (pp. 55-70) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.017
  14. Stamatopoulos, G.N.: Assessment of strength and measures to upgrade a telecommunication steel tower. Int. J. Steel Struct. doi:10.1007/s13296-013-2011-8
  15. Lu et al. (2015) Modeling of retrofitted steel transmission towers (pp. 138-154) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.005
  16. Szafran (2015) An experimental investigation into failure mechanism of a full-scale 40 m high steel telecommunication tower (pp. 131-145) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.04.017
  17. Szafran and Rykaluk (2016) A full scale experiment of a lattice telecommunication tower under breaking load (pp. 160-175) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.006
  18. Baran et al. (2016) Experimental and numerical analysis of a bolted connection in steel transmission towers (pp. 253-260) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.02.009
  19. Asgarian et al. (2016) Progressive collapse analysis of power transmission towers (pp. 31-40) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.04.021
  20. Kroeker (2001) University of Manitoba Winnipeg
  21. da Silva et al. (2005) Structural assessment of current steel design models for transmission and telecommunication towers (pp. 1108-1134) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.02.009
  22. Taillon et al. (2012) Variation of damping and stiffness of lattice towers with load level (pp. 111-118) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.018
  23. Nezamolmolki and Shooshtari (2016) Investigation of nonlinear dynamic behaviour of lattice structure wind turbines (pp. 33-46) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.070
  24. Solari and Calotescu (2016) Along wind load effects on free-standing lattice towers (pp. 182-196) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.06.004
  25. Brockenbrough and Merritt (1999) (pp. 13.35-13.49) McGraw-Hill
  26. EN1993-1-1, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-1: general structural rules and rules for buildings, Standards and Metrology Institute, Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (MCCAA), Blata l-Bajda, Malta (2005)
  27. Leea and McClureb (2007) Elastoplastic large deformation analysis of a lattice steel tower structure and comparison with full-scale tests 63(5) (pp. 709-717) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.041
  28. Albermani, F. and Kitipornchai, S.: Numerical simulation of structural behaviour of transmission towers, Journal of Thin-Walled Structures, 41 (2003)
  29. Rao and Kalyanaraman (2001) Non-linear behaviour of lattice panel of angle towers (pp. 1337-1357) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00054-2
  30. Albermani et al. (2009) Failure analysis of transmission towers (pp. 1922-1928) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.10.001
  31. Rao et al. (2010) Investigation of transmission line tower failures (pp. 1127-1141) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.01.008
  32. IEC61400—2, Wind turbines—part 2: design requirements for small wind turbines: Standards and Metrology Institute, Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority (MCCAA), Blata l-Bajda, Malta (2006)
  33. Stoman (1988) Stability criteria for X-bracing systems 114(8) (pp. 1426-1434) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:8(1426)
  34. Micro-Measurements, Tech Tip TT-612—the three-wire quarter-bridge circuit, Vishay precision group, 951 Wendell Blvd., Wendell, NC 27591, USA
  35. O. E. Inc., Practical strain gauge measurements.
  36. www.Omega.com
  37. (1999)
  38. Vaughan, J.: Application of B & K equipment to strain measurements, Bruel and Kjaer (1975)