10.1007/s40095-022-00542-0

Negative impact of constant RPM control strategy on ship NOx emission in waves

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Institute of Ocean Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, 80-233, PL
  2. Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, IR
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2022-10-03

How to Cite

Ghaemi, M. H., & Zeraatgar, H. (2022). Negative impact of constant RPM control strategy on ship NOx emission in waves. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 14(4 (December 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00542-0

HTML views: 4

PDF views: 58

Abstract

Abstract In severe wave conditions, the ship propulsion system is loaded with high fluctuations due to external disturbances. The highly fluctuating loads enforce radical changes in the main engine torque, which in turn demands variation of the fuel rate injected into the cylinders if a constant rotational speed strategy is applied. Therefore, the temperature of gases varies to a large extent during the combustion process in the cylinders. The emitted NOx is a function of this highly fluctuating temperature. The main goal of this study is to investigate NOx emission under the aforementioned conditions when a usual constant RPM control strategy is applied in waves similar to the calm water condition. The paper presents a mathematical model of the whole system, which is applied to a selected ship both in regular waves and in calm water conditions. The results show that the sea waves, in comparison with the calm water condition, can radically increase the emitted NOx under the constant rotational speed strategy. This change can reach even 10 14 times more, averagely. The results also show that the higher the wave height the higher the emitted NOx. It is concluded that the control strategy of keeping the engine rotational speed in waves at a constant level is the most important reason for the significantly increased NOx emission in waves in comparison with the calm water condition.

Keywords

  • NOx emission,
  • Ship control strategy,
  • Marine diesel engine,
  • Ship operation,
  • Sea waves,
  • Governor

References

  1. Vasilescu (2018) Advantages and disadvantages of different types of modern marine propulsions (pp. 57-63)
  2. Reşitoğlu et al. (2015) The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust aftertreatment systems (pp. 15-27) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0793-9
  3. Lawrence and Crutzen (1999) Influence of NO(x) emissions from ships on tropospheric photochemistry and climate 402(6758) (pp. 167-170) https://doi.org/10.1038/46013
  4. Contini and Merico (2021) Recent advances in studying air quality and health effects of shipping emissions 12(1) https://doi.org/10.3390/ATMOS12010092
  5. Joung et al. (2020) The IMO initial strategy for reducing Greenhouse Gas(GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050 4(1) (pp. 1-7) https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2019.1707938
  6. Bouman et al. (2017) State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – a review (pp. 408-421) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
  7. Lamas and Rodriguez (2012) Emissions from marine engines and NOx reduction methods (pp. 77-81)
  8. Park et al. (2013) Prediction of real-time NO based on the in-cylinder pressure in Diesel engines 34(2) (pp. 3075-3082) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.170
  9. Lu et al. (2020) NOx emission reduction technology for marine engine based on tier-III: a review 29(5) (pp. 1242-1268) https://doi.org/10.1007/S11630-020-1342-Y
  10. Liang et al. (2019) Computational study of NOx reduction on a marine diesel engine by application of different technologies (pp. 4447-4452) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.770
  11. Deng et al. (2021) A review of NOx and SOx emission reduction technologies for marine diesel engines and the potential evaluation of liquefied natural gas fuelled vessels https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144319
  12. Jeevahan et al. (2017) Various strategies for reducing NOx emissions of biodiesel fuel used in conventional diesel engines: a review 204(10) (pp. 1202-1223) https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2017.1353500
  13. Cakir (1974) Nitric oxide formation in diesel engines 188(46) (pp. 477-483) https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1974_188_057_02]
  14. Way (1976) Methods for determination of composition and thermodynamic properties of combustion products for internal combustion engine calculations 190(60) (pp. 686-697) https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1976_190_073_02
  15. Miller and Bowman (1989) Mechanism and modelling of nitrogen chemistry in combustion 15(4) (pp. 287-338) https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(89)90017-8
  16. Correa (1993) A review of NOx formation under gas-turbine combustion conditions 87(1–6) (pp. 329-362) https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209208947221
  17. Chikahisa et al. (1994) Analysis of NO formation characteristics and its control concepts in diesel engines from NO reaction kinetics 15(4) (pp. 297-303) https://doi.org/10.1016/0389-4304(94)90210-0
  18. Kikuta et al. (2000) Study on predicting combustion and NOx formation in diesel engines from scale model experiments 43(1) (pp. 89-96) https://doi.org/10.1299/JSMEB.43.89
  19. Rausen et al. (2005) A mean-value model for control of homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engines 127(3) (pp. 355-362) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1985439
  20. Merker (2006) Springer
  21. Asprion et al. (2013) A fast and accurate physics-based model for the NOx emissions of diesel engines (pp. 221-233) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2012.09.038
  22. Arregle, J., Lopez, J.J., Guardiola, C., Monin, C.: Sensitivity Study of a NOx Estimation Model for On-board Applications. SAE Technical Papers, SAE International (2008).
  23. https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0640
  24. Egnell, R.: Combustion Diagnostics by Means of Multizone Heat Release Analysis and NO Calculation. SAE Technical Papers, SAE International (1998).
  25. https://doi.org/10.4271/981424
  26. Lamaris et al. (2010) Development and validation of a multi-zone combustion model for predicting performance characteristics and NOx emissions in large scale two-stroke diesel engines (pp. 317-327) https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2009-11382
  27. Mocerino et al. (2021) Validation of an emission model for a marine diesel engine with data from sea operations https://doi.org/10.1007/S11804-021-00227-W/FIGURES/13
  28. Papagiannakis et al. (2010) Emission characteristics of high speed, dual fuel, compression ignition engine operating in a wide range of natural gas/diesel fuel proportions 89(7) (pp. 1397-1406) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2009.11.001
  29. Benvenuto et al. (2013) (pp. 591-598) CRC Press
  30. Stoumpos et al. (2017) Marine dual fuel engine modelling and parametric investigation of engine settings effect on performance-emissions trade-offs (pp. 376-386) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2018.03.059
  31. Scappin et al. (2012) Validation of a zero-dimensional model for prediction of NOx and engine performance for electronically controlled marine two-stroke diesel engines (pp. 344-352) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2011.11.047
  32. Hountalas, D.T., Zovanos, G.N., Sakellarakis, D., Antonopoulos A.K.: Validation of multi-zone combustion model ability to predict two stroke diesel engine performance and NOx emissions using on board measurements. In: Proceedings of the Spring Technical Conference of the ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, pp. 47—60 (2012).
  33. https://doi.org/10.1115/ICES2012-81100
  34. Savva and Hountalas (2014) Evolution and application of a pseudo-multi-zone model for the prediction of NOx emissions from large-scale diesel engines at various operating conditions (pp. 373-388) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.103
  35. Raptotasios et al. (2015) Application of a multi-zone combustion model to investigate the NOx reduction potential of two-stroke marine diesel engines using EGR (pp. 814-823) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2014.12.041
  36. Larsen et al. (2015) Development of a model for the prediction of the fuel consumption and nitrogen oxides emission trade-off for large ships (pp. 545-555) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2014.12.009
  37. Cooper (2001) Exhaust emissions from high-speed passenger ferries https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00192-3
  38. Kowalski and Tarelko (2009) NOx emission from a two-stroke ship engine Part 1: modeling aspect 29(11–12) (pp. 2153-2159) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.06.032
  39. Zeraatgar and Ghaemi (2019) The analysis of overall ship fuel consumption in acceleration manoeuvre using hull-propeller-engine interaction principles and governor features (pp. 162-173) https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2019-0018
  40. Ghaemi and Zeraatgar (2020) Analysis of hull, propeller and engine interactions in regular waves by a combination of experiment and simulation https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00734-5
  41. Ghaemi (2021) Performance and emission modelling and simulation of marine diesel engines using publicly available engine data 28(4) (pp. 63-87) https://doi.org/10.2478/POMR-2021-0050
  42. Heywood (2018) McGraw-Hill Education Ltd
  43. MAN-B&W: Computerized Engine Application System (CEAS).
  44. https://www.man-es.com/marine/products/planning-tools-and-downloads/ceas-engine-calculations
  45. . Accessed 05 Apr 2022
  46. MAN B&W S65ME-C8.5-TII Project Guide Electronically Controlled Two-stroke Engines,
  47. https://www.academia.edu/35674638/MAN_B_and_W_S90ME_C8_TII_Project_Guide_Electronically_Controlled_Two_stroke_Engine
  48. . Accessed 03 Apr 2022
  49. Fossen (2016) Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control [bookshelf] (pp. 78-79) https://doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2015.2495095