10.1007/s40095-022-00536-y

A state-of-the-art of experimentally studied adsorption water desalination systems

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Tabbin Institute for Metallurgical Studies, Cairo, 11912, EG
  2. Department of Mechanical Power Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, EG
  3. Mechanical Department, Faculty of Technology and Education, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, EG
  4. Solar Energy Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, 12622, EG

Published in Issue 2022-09-23

How to Cite

Zohir, A. E., Ali, E. S., Farid, A. M., Elshaer, R. N., Mohammed, R. H., Alsaman, A. S., El-Ghetany, H. H., & Askalany, A. A. (2022). A state-of-the-art of experimentally studied adsorption water desalination systems. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 14(4 (December 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00536-y

Abstract

Abstract Energy, freshwater, and the environment are interrelated features that infuse all human activities. Addressing this nexus in an integrated energy conversion system is a big challenge for the research community. Adsorption desalination system, which is a good alternative to traditional desalination systems, could solve this problem because it uses eco-friendly working fluids and can be powered by renewable energy. Many experimental prototypes for the adsorption desalination cycle were built and tested in the last decades. Also, different adsorbent materials were developed and characterized. Therefore, this paper reviews adsorbent materials with water vapor utilized in experimental adsorption desalination studies, which is considered the first step in constructing an efficient system. After that, the paper comprehensively reviews all previous experimental adsorption desalination studies. It focuses on the design of the experimental test rig, the mass of adsorbent material, and system performance, such as the specific daily water production, coefficient of performance, and specific cooling power. This work also discusses the properties of heat exchangers (i.e., adsorbent beds) employed in adsorption desalination systems.

Keywords

  • Adsorption cycles,
  • Adsorbents,
  • Desalination,
  • Energy-efficient

References

  1. Harby et al. (2021) A novel combined reverse osmosis and hybrid absorption desalination-cooling system to increase overall water recovery and energy efficiency https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125014
  2. Thu et al. (2013) Numerical simulation and performance investigation of an advanced adsorption desalination cycle (pp. 209-218) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.021
  3. Sadri et al. (2018) Optimum exergoeconomic modeling of novel hybrid desalination system (MEDAD+RO) (pp. 74-83) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.006
  4. Ali et al. (2021) Solar-powered ejector-based adsorption desalination system integrated with a humidification-dehumidification system https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114113
  5. Ali et al. (2021) A daily freshwater production of 50 m3/ton of silica gel using an adsorption-ejector combination powered by low-grade heat https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124494
  6. Askalany and Ali (2020) A new approach integration of ejector within adsorption desalination cycle reaching COP higher than one https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100766
  7. Ng et al. (2017) An exergy approach to efficiency evaluation of desalination https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982628
  8. Wang and Ng (2005) Experimental investigation of an adsorption desalination plant using low-temperature waste heat (pp. 2780-2789) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.02.011
  9. Shemer and Semiat (2017) Sustainable RO desalination – Energy demand and environmental impact (pp. 10-16) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.021
  10. Ding et al. (2021) Recent advances and perspectives of nanostructured amorphous alloys in electrochemical water electrolysis (pp. 15472-15488) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02706
  11. Kim et al. (2021) Adsorption isotherm model for analyzing the adsorption characteristics of water vapor to commercially available silica gel adsorbents for adsorption desalination applications (pp. 1144-1156) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.0c00927
  12. Ali et al. (2021) Experimental adsorption water desalination system utilizing activated clay for low grade heat source applications https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103219
  13. Yang et al. (2022) Effects of particle sizes on growth characteristics of propane hydrate in uniform/nonuniform sands for desalination application (pp. 1003-1014) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03709
  14. Ali et al. (2018) Adsorption desalination-cooling system employing copper sulfate driven by low grade heat sources (pp. 169-176) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.014
  15. Alsaman et al. (2017) Performance evaluation of a solar-driven adsorption desalination-cooling system (pp. 196-207) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.010
  16. Amin and Hawlader (2015) Analysis of solar desalination system using heat pump (pp. 116-123) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.028
  17. Ali et al. (2022) Novel ultrasonic dynamic vapor sorption apparatus for adsorption drying, cooling and desalination applications (pp. 8798-8804) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.026
  18. Askalany et al. (2016) Adsorption cooling system employing activated carbon/ hfc410a adsorption pair (pp. 12253-12257)
  19. Ghazy et al. (2022) Solar powered adsorption desalination system employing CPO-27(Ni) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105174
  20. Ghazy et al. (2022) Cooling technologies for enhancing photovoltaic–thermal (PVT) performance: a state of the art https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00491-8
  21. Ghazy et al. (2021) Performance enhancement of adsorption cooling cycle by pyrolysis of Maxsorb III activated carbon with ammonium carbonate (pp. 210-221) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.12.036
  22. Askalany and Saha (2017) Towards an accurate estimation of the isosteric heat of adsorption—a correlation with the potential theory (pp. 59-63) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.040
  23. Zejli et al. (2004) A solar adsorption desalination device: first simulation results (pp. 127-135) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.178
  24. Thu et al. (2017) Performance investigation on a 4-bed adsorption desalination cycle with internal heat recovery scheme (pp. 88-96) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.09.027
  25. Thu et al. (2011) Study on an advanced adsorption desalination cycle with evaporator-condenser heat recovery circuit (pp. 43-51) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.09.065
  26. Ali et al. (2020) Innovative employing of salt hydration with adsorption to enhance performance of desalination and heat transformation systems https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115614
  27. Askalany et al. (2020) A novel cycle for adsorption desalination system with two stages-ejector for higher water production and efficiency https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114753
  28. Ali et al. (2021) A novel ejectors integration with two-stages adsorption desalination: away to scavenge the ambient energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101658
  29. Bai et al. (2020) Study of the salinity effects on the cooling and desalination performance of an adsorption cooling cum desalination system with a novel composite adsorbent https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115879
  30. Ma et al. (2018) Experimental investigation on an adsorption desalination system with heat and mass recovery between adsorber and desorber beds (pp. 42-50) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.08.022
  31. Askalany et al. (2017) High potential of employing bentonite in adsorption cooling systems driven by low grade heat source temperatures (pp. 782-791) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.171
  32. White (2012) A CFD simulation on how the different sizes of silica gel will affect the adsorption performance of silica gel (pp. 1-12) https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/651434
  33. Thu et al. (2013) Thermo-physical properties of silica gel for adsorption desalination cycle (pp. 1596-1602) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.038
  34. Robens and Wang (2004) Investigation on the isotherm of silica gel+water systems (pp. 659-669) https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jtan.0000028045.96239.7e
  35. Mohammed et al. (2018) Revisiting the adsorption equilibrium equations of silica-gel/water for adsorption cooling applications (pp. 40-47) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.10.038
  36. Alsaman et al. (2022) Composite adsorbent materials for desalination and cooling applications: a state of the art (pp. 10345-10371) https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7894
  37. Bahgaat et al. (2020) Synthesis and characterization of zeolite-Y from natural clay of Wadi Hagul Egypt (pp. 3791-3800) https://doi.org/10.21608/EJCHEM.2020.23195.2378
  38. Sayilgan et al. (2016) Effect of regeneration temperature on adsorption equilibria and mass diffusivity of zeolite 13x-water pair (pp. 9-16) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.10.041
  39. Kayal et al. (2016) Adsorption characteristics of AQSOA zeolites and water for adsorption chillers (pp. 1120-1127) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.09.060
  40. Teo et al. (2017) Water adsorption on CHA and AFI types zeolites: modelling and investigation of adsorption chiller under static and dynamic conditions (pp. 35-45) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.014
  41. Henninger et al. (2010) Water adsorption characteristics of novel materials for heat transformation applications (pp. 1692-1702) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.03.028
  42. Chaemchuen et al. (2018) Tunable metal-organic frameworks for heat transformation applications https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8090661
  43. Tatlier et al. (2018) Relation of water adsorption capacities of zeolites with their structural properties (pp. 70-75) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.12.031
  44. Furukawa et al. (2014) Water adsorption in porous metal-organic frameworks and related materials (pp. 4369-4381) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500330a
  45. Canivet et al. (2014) Structure-property relationships of water adsorption in metal-organic frameworks (pp. 3102-3111) https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj00076e
  46. Burtch et al. (2014) Water stability and adsorption in metal-organic frameworks (pp. 10575-10612) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5002589
  47. Administrator (2018) Metal-organic frameworks applied for water purification https://doi.org/10.18799/24056537/2018/1/177
  48. Taylor et al. (2012) Enhancing water stability of metal-organic frameworks via phosphonate monoester linkers (pp. 14338-14340) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja306812r
  49. Canivet et al. (2014) Water adsorption in MOFs: fundamentals and applications (pp. 5594-5617) https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00078a
  50. Jasuja et al. (2013) Kinetic water stability of an isostructural family of zinc-based pillared metal-organic frameworks (pp. 633-642) https://doi.org/10.1021/la304204k
  51. Li et al. (2016) Water purification: adsorption over metal-organic frameworks (pp. 175-185) https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.201500761
  52. Li et al. (2016) Governing metal-organic frameworks towards high stability (pp. 8501-8513) https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc02931k
  53. Towsif Abtab et al. (2018) Reticular chemistry in action: a hydrolytically stable mof capturing twice its weight in adsorbed water (pp. 94-105) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.005
  54. Reinsch et al. (2012) A new Al-MOF based on a unique column-shaped inorganic building unit exhibiting strongly hydrophilic sorption behaviour (pp. 9486-9488) https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc34909d
  55. Reinsch et al. (2013) Structures, sorption characteristics, and nonlinear optical properties of a new series of highly stable aluminum mOFs (pp. 17-26) https://doi.org/10.1021/cm3025445
  56. Akiyama et al. (2010) Highly porous and stable coordination polymers as water sorption materials (pp. 360-361) https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.2010.360
  57. Jeremias et al. (2012) MIL-100(Al, Fe) as water adsorbents for heat transformation purposes—a promising application (pp. 10148-10151) https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm15615f
  58. Wickenheisser et al. (2013) Grafting of hydrophilic ethylene glycols or ethylenediamine on coordinatively unsaturated metal sites in MIL-100(Cr) for improved water adsorption characteristics (pp. 145-152) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2013.07.024
  59. Ehrenmann et al. (2011) Water adsorption characteristics of MIL-101 for heat-transformation applications of MOFs (pp. 471-474) https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201001156
  60. Akiyama et al. (2012) Effect of functional groups in MIL-101 on water sorption behavior (pp. 89-93) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.01.015
  61. Khutia et al. (2013) Water sorption cycle measurements on functionalized MIL-101Cr for heat transformation application (pp. 790-798) https://doi.org/10.1021/cm304055k
  62. Jeremias et al. (2013) Programming MOFs for water sorption: amino-functionalized MIL-125 and UiO-66 for heat transformation and heat storage applications (pp. 15967-15973) https://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt51471d
  63. Shigematsu et al. (2011) Wide control of proton conductivity in porous coordination polymers (pp. 2034-2036) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109810w
  64. Wade et al. (2013) Postsynthetic tuning of hydrophilicity in pyrazolate MOFs to modulate water adsorption properties (pp. 2172-2177) https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40876k
  65. Liu et al. (2010) CO2/H2O adsorption equilibrium and rates on metal-organic frameworks: HKUST-1 and Ni/DOBDC (pp. 14301-14307) https://doi.org/10.1021/la102359q
  66. Schoenecker et al. (2012) Effect of water adsorption on retention of structure and surface area of metal-organic frameworks (pp. 6513-6519) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202325p
  67. Cmarik et al. (2012) Tuning the adsorption properties of uio-66 via ligand functionalization (pp. 15606-15613) https://doi.org/10.1021/la3035352
  68. Elsayed et al. (2016) Aluminium fumarate and CPO-27(Ni) MOFs: characterization and thermodynamic analysis for adsorption heat pump applications (pp. 802-812) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.129
  69. Al Dadah et al. (2020) Metal-organic framework materials for adsorption heat pumps https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116356
  70. Mohammed et al. (2021) Metal-organic frameworks in cooling and water desalination: synthesis and application https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111362
  71. Elsayed et al. (2017) Thermal energy storage using metal–organic framework materials (pp. 509-519) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.113
  72. Shi, B.: Development of an Mof based adsorption air conditioning system for automotive.
  73. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/6017
  74. (2015)
  75. Youssef et al. (2017) Experimental investigation of adsorption water desalination/cooling system using CPO-27Ni MOF (pp. 192-199) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.008
  76. Dakkama et al. (2017) Adsorption ice making and water desalination system using metal organic frameworks/water pair (pp. 53-61) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.036
  77. Rezk et al. (2013) Experimental investigation of metal organic frameworks characteristics for water adsorption chillers (pp. 992-1005) https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406212456469
  78. Kummer et al. (2015) Versatile siloxane based adsorbent coatings for fast water adsorption processes in thermally driven chillers and heat pumps (pp. 1-8) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.03.042
  79. Cheung and Hedin (2014) Zeolites and related sorbents with narrow pores for CO2 separation from flue gas (pp. 14480-14494) https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra48052f
  80. Elsayed et al. (2017) Development of MIL-101(Cr)/GrO composites for adsorption heat pump applications (pp. 180-191) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.020
  81. Jänchen et al. (2004) Studies of the water adsorption on zeolites and modified mesoporous materials for seasonal storage of solar heat (pp. 339-344) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.036
  82. Casey et al. (2014) Salt impregnated desiccant matrices for “open” thermochemical energy storage-selection, synthesis and characterisation of candidate materials (pp. 412-425) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.028
  83. Mrowiec-Białoń et al. (1997) Effective inorganic hybrid adsorbents of water vapor by the sol-gel method (pp. 2486-2490) https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9703280
  84. Wu et al. (2007) Effects of impregnating variables on dynamic sorption characteristics and storage properties of composite sorbent for solar heat storage (pp. 864-871) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.11.013
  85. Mrowiec-Bialoń et al. (1999) SiO2-LiBr nanocomposite sol-gel adsorbents of water vapor: preparation and properties (pp. 500-503) https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6406
  86. Gordeeva et al. (2003) Influence of calcium chloride interaction with silica surface on phase composition and sorption properties of dispersed salt (pp. 1843-1847)
  87. Aristov et al. (1996) Selective water sorbents for multiple applications, 2 CaCl2 confined in micropores of silica gel: sorption properties (pp. 335-342) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068131
  88. Simonova et al. (2009) Water sorption on composite “silica modified by calcium nitrate” (pp. 223-228) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.02.034
  89. Aristov et al. (2012) Reallocation of adsorption and desorption times for optimisation of cooling cycles (pp. 525-531) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.07.019
  90. Tanashev et al. (2013) Thermal conductivity of composite sorbents “salt in porous matrix” for heat storage and transformation (pp. 401-407) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.08.022
  91. Tokarev and Aristov (1997) Selective water sorbents for multiple applications, 4 CaCl2 confined in silica gel pores: sorption/desorption kinetics (pp. 143-150) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02475725
  92. Gordeeva et al. (1998) Selective water sorbents for multiple applications, 5 LiBr confined in mesopores of silica gel: sorption properties (pp. 81-88) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02475434
  93. Ristić and Logar (2019) New composite water sorbents CaCl2-PHTS for low-temperature sorption heat storage: determination of structural properties https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010027
  94. Ponomarenko et al. (2010) Synthesis and water sorption properties of a new composite “CaCl2 confined into SBA-15 pores” (pp. 243-250) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.09.023
  95. Jabbari-Hichri et al. (2016) Effect of aluminum sulfate addition on the thermal storage performance of mesoporous SBA-15 and MCM-41 materials (pp. 232-241) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.033
  96. Dong et al. (2019) Hydrothermal stability of water sorption ionogels https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116186
  97. Askalany et al. (2019) Silica-supported ionic liquids for heat-powered sorption desalination (pp. 36497-36505) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b07602
  98. Askalany et al. (2019) Supported ionic liquid water sorbent for high throughput desalination and drying (pp. 258-264) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.11.002
  99. Gordeeva et al. (2002) Water sorption on composites “LiBr in a porous carbon” 79(3) (pp. 225-231) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00186-8
  100. Yu et al. (2019) Characterization of MgCl2/AC composite adsorbent and its water vapor adsorption for solar drying system application (pp. 1087-1095) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.024
  101. Tso and Chao (2012) Activated carbon, silica-gel and calcium chloride composite adsorbents for energy efficient solar adsorption cooling and dehumidification systems (pp. 1626-1638) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2012.05.007
  102. Huang et al. (2010) Development research on composite adsorbents applied in adsorption heat pump (pp. 1193-1198) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.01.036
  103. Grekova et al. (2016) Composite sorbents “li/Ca halogenides inside multi-wall carbon nano-tubes” for thermal energy storage (pp. 176-183) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.006
  104. Grekova et al. (2018) Composite “LiCl/MWCNT” as advanced water sorbent for thermal energy storage: sorption dynamics (pp. 273-279) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.12.011
  105. Brancato et al. (2019) Water adsorption equilibrium and dynamics of LICL/MWCNT/PVA composite for adsorptive heat storage (pp. 133-140) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.01.001
  106. Hongois et al. (2011) Development and characterisation of a new MgSO4-zeolite composite for long-term thermal energy storage (pp. 1831-1837) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2011.01.050
  107. Chan et al. (2012) Performance predictions for a new zeolite 13X/CaCl2 composite adsorbent for adsorption cooling systems (pp. 3214-3224) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.054
  108. Oh et al. (2017) Adsorption equilibria of water vapor on an alumina/zeolite 13X composite and silica gel (pp. 804-811) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.6b00850
  109. Teo and Chakraborty (2017) Water adsorption on various metal organic framework https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/272/1/012019
  110. Yan et al. (2015) Adsorption isotherms and kinetics of water vapor on novel adsorbents MIL-101(Cr)@GO with super-high capacity (pp. 118-125) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.03.040
  111. Elsayed et al. (2019) MIL-101(Cr)/calcium chloride composites for enhanced adsorption cooling and water desalination (pp. 123-132) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2019.05.026
  112. Liu et al. (2020) Experimental study on salt–metal organic framework composites for water absorption https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2019.119214
  113. Sapienza et al. (2012) Adsorption chilling driven by low temperature heat: new adsorbent and cycle optimization (pp. 141-146) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.014
  114. Aristov et al. (2000) Selective water sorbents for multiple applications. 11 CaCl2 confined to expanded vermiculite (pp. 377-384) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010351815698
  115. Tokarev et al. (2002) New composite sorbent CaCl2 in mesopores for sorption cooling/heating (pp. 470-474) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1290-0729(02)01339-X
  116. Liu et al. (2015) A composite material made of mesoporous siliceous shale impregnated with lithium chloride for an open sorption thermal energy storage system (pp. 186-200) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.10.044
  117. Liu et al. (2013) Honeycomb filters made from mesoporous composite material for an open sorption thermal energy storage system to store low-temperature industrial waste heat (pp. 471-480) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.06.021
  118. Nakabayashi et al. (2011) Improvement of water vapor adsorption ability of natural mesoporous material by impregnating with chloride salts for development of a new desiccant filter (pp. 675-686) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-011-9363-1
  119. Alsaman et al. (2022) Experimental investigation of sodium polyacrylate-based innovative adsorbent material for higher desalination and cooling effects https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115818
  120. Thu et al. (2009) Operational strategy of adsorption desalination systems (pp. 1811-1816) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.10.012
  121. Wu et al. (2012) Experimental implementation and validation of thermodynamic cycles of adsorption-based desalination (pp. 190-197) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.022
  122. Ng et al. (2012) Study on a waste heat-driven adsorption cooling cum desalination cycle (pp. 685-693) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.01.008
  123. Mitra et al. (2015) Performance evaluation of a two-stage silica gel + water adsorption based cooling-cum-desalination system (pp. 186-198) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.06.018
  124. Gao et al. (2016) An experimental investigation of salt-water separation in the vacuum flashing assisted with heat pipes and solid adsorption (pp. 116-123) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.08.016
  125. Olkis et al. (2019) Cycle and performance analysis of a small-scale adsorption heat transformer for desalination and cooling applications https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122104
  126. Olkis et al. (2019) Design and experimental study of a small scale adsorption desalinator https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113584
  127. Olkis et al. (2019) A small-scale adsorption desalinator (pp. 1425-1430) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.345
  128. Olkis et al. (2021) Solar powered adsorption desalination for Northern and Southern Europe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120942
  129. Elsayed et al. (2020) Experimental testing of aluminium fumarate MOF for adsorption desalination https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114170
  130. Zhang et al. (2020) Investigation on the operating characteristics of a pilot-scale adsorption desalination system https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114196
  131. Kim et al. (2014) Water quality assessment of solar-assisted adsorption desalination cycle (pp. 144-151) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.021
  132. Shahzad et al. (2015) An experimental investigation on MEDAD hybrid desalination cycle (pp. 273-281) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.062
  133. Son et al. (2020) Pilot studies on synergetic impacts of energy utilization in hybrid desalination system: multi-effect distillation and adsorption cycle (MED-AD) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114266
  134. Askalany et al. (2021) Experimental optimization of the cycle time and switching time of a metal organic framework adsorption desalination cycle https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114558
  135. Ghazy et al. (2022) Experimental investigation of hybrid photovoltaic solar thermal collector (PV/T)-adsorption desalination system in hot weather conditions https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124370
  136. Albaik et al. (2022) Numerical and experimental investigation of multiple heat exchanger modules in cooling and desalination adsorption system using metal organic framework https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114934
  137. Saleh et al. (2022) Experimental testing of wire finned heat exchanger coated with aluminium fumarate MOF material for adsorption desalination application https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2021.101050