10.1007/s40095-022-00522-4

Influence of architectural space layout and building perimeter on the energy performance of buildings: A systematic literature review

HTML PDF
  • Harsha Latha1,
  • Shantharam Patil*1,
  • Pradeep G. Kini1,
  1. Manipal School of Architecture and Planning, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, IN
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2022-09-08

How to Cite

Latha, H., Patil, S., & Kini, P. G. (2022). Influence of architectural space layout and building perimeter on the energy performance of buildings: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 14(3 (September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00522-4
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 42

PDF views: 355

Abstract

Abstract The space layout is very essential in building design development and can significantly influence the energy performance of the built environment. Space layout design, which occurs during the early stages of scheme conception and design development, is one of the most important tasks in architectural design. This systematic literature review focused on the investigation of space layout and perimeter design variables on the energy performance of the buildings and the study of major energy performance indicators, such as lighting, ventilation, heating, and cooling load considering climatic factors. The Scopus database was used for a thorough investigation of the publications using space layout relevant keywords to study building energy performance. About 55 primary articles were assessed based on the impact of different variables concerned with space layout design mainly building perimeter variables on the energy performance of the building. From the review, we can conclude that by enhancing the perimeter design variables and spatial configuration substantial amount of energy can be saved. The orientation of the building, climate occupancy, and building form have a major role in the energy consumption investigation. According to the study, hospitals consumes more energy due to specific functional requirement than other buildings, and studies on the spatial configuration of the hospital is comparatively less where further studies can consider this issue along with the combination of multiple performance indicators. Well-configured space layout design may prevent unreasonable energy consumption and enhance the overall sustainability of the building and contribute to climate change mitigation.

Keywords

  • Sustainable built environment,
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Building envelope,
  • Cooling load,
  • Lighting,
  • Ventilation
HTML PDF

References

  1. Rahman et al. (2021) A literature review of naturally ventilated public hospital wards in tropical climate countries for thermal comfort and energy saving improvements https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020435
  2. Mirabella et al. (2018) Strategies to improve the energy performance of buildings: a review of their life cycle impact 8(8) https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8080105
  3. Global Energy and CO2 Status Report 2019, IEA, Paris (2019)
  4. Santamouris, M., Vasilakopoulou, K.: Present and future energy consumption of buildings: challenges and opportunities towards decarbonisation. e-Prime. 100002 (2021).
  5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2021.100002
  6. Pérez-Lombard et al. (2008) A review on buildings energy consumption information (pp. 394-398) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007
  7. Sun et al. (2021) Multi-objective optimization design for windows and shading configuration: consenergy consumption, thermal environment, visual performance and sound insulation effect (pp. 805-836) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00413-0
  8. Du et al. (2020) Effects of architectural space layouts on energy performance: a review 12(5) https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051829
  9. Forcael et al. (2019) Architectural and management strategies for the design, construction and operation of energy efficient and intelligent primary care centers in Chile https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020464
  10. Du, T., Jansen, S., Turrin, M., van den Dobbelsteen, A.: Impact of space layout on energy performance of office buildings coupling daylight with thermal simulation. In: CLIMA 2019At: Bucharest, Romania. (2019).
  11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2019111030
  12. Coakley et al. (2014) A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data (pp. 123-141) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.007
  13. Wright, J.: Factors influencing the design of spatial layouts in healthcare buildings. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ARCOM Conference (ARCOM 2009), Nottingham, UK, vol. 2 (2009)
  14. García-Sanz-Calcedo (2014) Analysis on energy efficiency in healthcare buildings (pp. 361-374) https://doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.5.3.361
  15. Zhang, A., Huang, Q., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q.: Multi-objective window optimization of school buildings for thermal and daylight performance in the cold climate of China. In: Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017, pp. 4461–4468 (2017)
  16. Musau and Steemers (2007) Space planning and energy efficiency in laboratory buildings: the role of spatial, activity and temporal diversity (pp. 281-292) https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5034
  17. Musau and Steemers (2008) Space planning and energy efficiency in office buildings: the role of spatial and temporal diversity (pp. 133-145) https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5117
  18. Bano and Sehgal (2018) Evaluation of energy-efficient design strategies: comparison of the thermal performance of energy-efficient office buildings in composite climate, India (pp. 506-519) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.057.(2018)
  19. Du et al. (2021) Effect of space layouts on the energy performance of office buildings in three climates https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102198
  20. Shahzad et al. (2017) A study of the impact of individual thermal control on user comfort in the workplace: Norwegian cellular vs. British open plan offices (pp. 49-61) https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1235544
  21. Gärtner et al. (2020) Assessment of the impact of HVAC system configuration and control zoning on thermal comfort and energy efficiency in flexible office spaces https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109785
  22. Zhang et al. (2017) Optimization of thermal and daylight performance of school buildings based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the cold climate of China (pp. 371-384) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.048z
  23. Short and Al-Maiyah (2009) Design strategy for low-energy ventilation and cooling of hospitals (pp. 264-292) https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210902885156
  24. Aldawoud (2013) The influence of the atrium geometry on the building energy performance (pp. 1-5) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.038
  25. Delgarm et al. (2016) Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: a simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO) (pp. 293-303) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.141
  26. Lavy, S., Kiss, C.W., Fernandez-Solis, J.L.: Linking design and energy performance in U.S. military hospitals. Archit. Eng. Des. Manage.
  27. Raghu and Rodrigues (2020) Behavioral aspects of solid waste management: a systematic review 70(12) (pp. 1268-1302) https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1823524
  28. Skoczek-Rubińska et al. (2018) Effects of fruit and vegetables intake in periodontal diseases: a systematic review https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/99072
  29. Borgstein et al. (2016) Evaluating energy performance in non-domestic buildings: a review (pp. 734-755) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.018
  30. Aksoy and Inalli (2006) Impacts of some building passive design parameters on heating demand for a cold region (pp. 1742-1754) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.011
  31. Tzempelikos and Athienitis (2007) The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand (pp. 369-382) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.015
  32. Yang et al. (2008) Energy performance of building envelopes in different climate zones in China (pp. 800-807) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.11.002
  33. Aldawoud and Clark (2008) Comparative analysis of energy performance between courtyard and atrium in buildings (pp. 209-214) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.02.017
  34. Poirazis et al. (2008) Energy simulations for glazed office buildings in Sweden (pp. 1161-1170) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.011
  35. Sozer (2010) Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope (pp. 2581-2593) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.05.004
  36. Nielsen et al. (2011) Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight (pp. 757-768) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.01.010
  37. García Sanz-Calcedo et al. (2011) Influence of the number of users on the energy efficiency of health centres (pp. 1544-1548) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.012
  38. Pisello et al. (2012) A building energy efficiency optimization method by evaluating the effective thermal zones occupancy (pp. 5257-5278) https://doi.org/10.3390/en5125257
  39. Adamu et al. (2012) Performance evaluation of natural ventilation strategies for hospital wards—a case study of Great Ormond Street Hospital (pp. 211-222) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.011
  40. Ascione et al. (2013) Rehabilitation of the building envelope of hospitals: achievable energy savings and microclimatic control on varying the HVAC systems in Mediterranean climates (pp. 125-138) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.021
  41. Schulze and Eicker (2013) Controlled natural ventilation for energy efficient buildings (pp. 221-232) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.07.044
  42. Zhou and Zhao (2013) Optimum combinations of building envelop energy-saving technologies for office buildings in different climatic regions of China (pp. 103-109) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.019
  43. Tulsyan et al. (2013) Potential of energy savings through implementation of Energy Conservation Building Code in Jaipur city, India (pp. 123-130) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.015
  44. Susorova et al. (2013) The effect of geometry factors on fenestration energy performance and energy savings in office buildings (pp. 6-13) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.035
  45. García-Sanz-Calcedo et al. (2014) Quantitative analysis on energy efficiency of health centers according to their size (pp. 7-12) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.01.021
  46. Rajagopalan and Elkadi (2013) Energy performance of medium-sized healthcare buildings in Victoria, Australia—a case study 5(2) (pp. 247-260) https://doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.5.2.247
  47. Wang and Greenberg (2015) Window operation and impacts on building energy consumption (pp. 313-321) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.060
  48. Chedwal et al. (2015) Energy saving potential through energy conservation building code and advance energy efficiency measures in hotel buildings of Jaipur city, India (pp. 282-295) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.066
  49. Méndez Echenagucia et al. (2015) The early design stage of a building envelope: multi-objective search through heating, cooling, and lighting energy performance analysis (pp. 577-591) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.090
  50. Zahiri and Altan (2016) The effect of passive design strategies on thermal performance of female secondary school buildings during warm season in a hot and dry climate https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2016.00003
  51. Taleb (2016) Enhancing the skin performance of hospital buildings in the UAE (pp. 300-311) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.07.006
  52. Yang et al. (2016) Building occupancy diversity and HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) system energy efficiency (pp. 641-649) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.099
  53. Amaral et al. (2016) A thermal performance parametric study of window type, orientation, size and shadowing effect (pp. 456-465) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.014
  54. Goia (2016) Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential (pp. 467-492) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.031
  55. Harmathy et al. (2016) Multi-criterion optimization of building envelope in the function of indoor illumination quality towards overall energy performance improvement (pp. 302-317) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.162
  56. Morgenstern et al. (2016) Benchmarking acute hospitals: Composite electricity targets based on departmental consumption intensities? (pp. 277-290) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.052
  57. Lu et al. (2016) The performance and analysis of office building energy consumption in the west of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China (pp. 499-511) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.008
  58. Shahzad et al. (2017) Energy and comfort in contemporary open plan and traditional personal offices (pp. 1542-1555) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.100
  59. Ma et al. (2017) Analysis of typical public building energy consumption in northern China (pp. 139-150) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.037
  60. Alhuwayil et al. (2019) Impact of external shading strategy on energy performance of multi-story hotel building in hot-humid climate (pp. 1166-1174) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.069
  61. Wagdy et al. (2017) Daylighting simulation for the configuration of external sun-breakers on south oriented windows of hospital patient rooms under a clear desert sky (pp. 164-175) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.009
  62. Bayoumi (2017) Impacts of window opening grade on improving the energy efficiency of a façade in hot climates (pp. 31-43) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.04.008
  63. Prieto et al. (2018) Passive cooling and climate responsive façade design exploring the limits of passive cooling strategies to improve the performance of commercial buildings in warm climates (pp. 30-47) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.016
  64. González González et al. (2018) A quantitative analysis of final energy consumption in hospitals in Spain (pp. 169-175) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.029
  65. Omar et al. (2018) Optimization of daylight utilization in energy saving application on the library in faculty of architecture, design and built environment Beirut Arab University (pp. 3921-3930) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.006
  66. Bawaneh et al. (2019) Energy consumption analysis and characterization of healthcare facilities in the United States https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193775
  67. Guo and Bart (2020) Optimization of design parameters for office buildings with climatic adaptability based on energy demand and thermal comfort https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12093540
  68. William et al. (2020) Energy-efficient retrofitting strategies for healthcare facilities in hot-humid climate: parametric and economical analysis (pp. 4549-4562) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.011
  69. Cesari et al. (2020) The energy saving potential of wide windows in hospital patient rooms, optimizing the type of glazing and lighting control strategy under different climatic conditions https://doi.org/10.3390/en13082116
  70. Fang and Cho (2019) Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance (pp. 7-18) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.039
  71. Kyritsi and Michael (2020) An assessment of the impact of natural ventilation strategies and window opening patterns in office buildings in the Mediterranean basin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106384
  72. Pilechiha et al. (2020) Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356
  73. Aunión-Villa et al. (2021) Study of the energy intensity by built areas in a medium-sized Spanish hospital (pp. 1-15) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09944-1
  74. Zou et al. (2021) A comprehensive method for optimizing the design of a regular architectural space to improve building performance (pp. 981-996) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.097
  75. Dorrah and Marzouk (2021) Integrated multi-objective optimization and agent-based building occupancy modeling for space layout planning https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101902
  76. Noshin, S., Kanwal, H., Aslam, M.S., Mushtaq, U.: Evaluation of daylight performance on the selected design parameters of light shelves. Int. J. Eng. Res.
  77. 9
  78. (2018)
  79. Hafiz, D.: Daylighting, space, and architecture: a literature review. J. Archit.
  80. 12
  81. (2015).
  82. https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v12i1.391
  83. Edwards L., Torcelliniv, P.: Literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants. In: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (2002)
  84. Haq et al. (2014) A review on lighting control technologies in commercial buildings, their performance and affecting factors (pp. 268-279) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.090
  85. Bhatnagar et al. (2019) Development of reference building models for India (pp. 267-277) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.027
  86. Darwish (2007) Building air conditioning system using fuel cell: case study for Kuwait (pp. 2869-2876) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.06.001
  87. Solgi et al. (2017) The impact of phase change materials assisted night purge ventilation on the indoor thermal conditions of office buildings in hot-arid climates (pp. 488-497) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.035
  88. Artmann et al. (2007) Climatic potential for passive cooling of buildings by night-time ventilation in Europe (pp. 187-201) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2006.05.004
  89. Haase and Amato (2009) An investigation of the potential for natural ventilation and building orientation to achieve thermal comfort in warm and humid climates (pp. 389-399) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.08.015
  90. Hemsath and Alagheband Bandhosseini (2015) Sensitivity analysis evaluating basic building geometry’s effect on energy use (pp. 526-538) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.044
  91. Raji et al. (2017) Early-stage design considerations for the energy-efficiency of high-rise office buildings https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040623
  92. Xu et al. (2018) Performance-based evaluation of courtyard design in China’s cold-winter hot-summer climate regions https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113950
  93. Halawa et al. (2018) A review on energy conscious designs of building façades in hot and humid climates: lessons for (and from) Kuala Lumpur and Darwin 82(3) (pp. 2147-2161) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.061
  94. Luo et al. (2019) Active building envelope systems toward renewable and sustainable energy (pp. 470-491) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.005
  95. Hammad and Abu-Hijleh (2010) The energy savings potential of using dynamic external louvers in an office building (pp. 1888-1895) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.024
  96. Gan et al. (2019) Energy-saving design of building envelope based on multiparameter optimization (pp. 1-11) https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5261869
  97. Kheiri (2018) A review on optimization methods applied in energy-efficient building geometry and envelope design (pp. 897-920) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.080
  98. Minne et al. (2015) Influence of climate on the environmental and economic life cycle assessments of window options in the United States (pp. 293-306) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.05.039
  99. Lee et al. (2013) Optimization of building window system in Asian regions by analyzing solar heat gain and daylighting elements (pp. 522-531) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.029
  100. Guan (2012) The influence of glass types on the performance of air-conditioned office buildings in Australia (pp. 34-39) https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.346.34
  101. Gustavsen et al. (2001) Natural convection effects in three-dimensional window frames with internal cavities 107(2) (pp. 527-537)
  102. Jia et al. (2021) Interaction between thermal comfort, indoor air quality and ventilation energy consumption of educational buildings: a comprehensive review https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120591
  103. Lee et al. (2015) Development of climate indices using local weather data for shading design (pp. 1884-1899) https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021884
  104. Lim and Kim (2010) Predicted performance of shading devices for healthy visual environment (pp. 486-496) https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X10376440
  105. ISO 50006:2014: Energy management systems—general principles and guidance (2014)
  106. Nourdine, B., Saad, A.: Energy consumption in hospitals. In: 2020 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies, ICEIT 2020. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2020)
  107. Bahar et al. (2013) A thermal simulation tool for building and its interoperability through the building information modeling (BIM) platform 3(2) (pp. 380-398) https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings3020380
  108. Bencheikh and Bederina (2020) Assessing the duality of thermal performance and energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot arid climate of Laghouat, Algeria (pp. 143-162) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-00318-z
  109. Weytjens et al. (2012) The ‘Architect-friendliness’ of six building performance simulation tools: a comparative study (pp. 237-244) https://doi.org/10.5390/SUSB.2011.2.3.237
  110. Kirimtat et al. (2016) Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings (pp. 23-49) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020
  111. Ji and Qu (2019) Investigation and evaluation of energy consumption performance for hospital buildings in China https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061724