10.1007/s40095-022-00519-z

Comparison of dense optical flow and PIV techniques for mapping surface current flow in tidal stream energy sites

HTML PDF
  • J. McIlvenny*1,
  • B. J. Williamson1,
  • I. A. Fairley2,
  • M. Lewis3,
  • S. Neill3,
  • I. Masters2,
  • D. E. Reeve2,
  1. Environmental Research Institute, North Highland College, University of the Highlands and Islands, Thurso, KW14 7EE, GB
  2. Swansea University, Swansea, GB
  3. Bangor University, Bangor, GB
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2022-09-02

How to Cite

McIlvenny, J., Williamson, B. J., Fairley, I. A., Lewis, M., Neill, S., Masters, I., & Reeve, D. E. (2022). Comparison of dense optical flow and PIV techniques for mapping surface current flow in tidal stream energy sites. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 14(3 (September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00519-z
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 26

PDF views: 168

Abstract

Abstract Marine renewable energy site and resource characterisation, in particular tidal stream energy, require detailed flow measurements which often rely on high-cost in situ instrumentation which is limited in spatial extent. We hypothesise uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV) offer a low-cost and low-risk data collection method for tidal stream environments, as recently techniques have been developed to derive flow from optical videography. This may benefit tidal and floating renewable energy developments, providing additional insight into flow conditions and complement traditional instrumentation. Benefits to existing data collection methods include capturing flow over a large spatial extent synchronously, which could be used to analyse flow around structures or for site characterisation; however, uncertainty and method application to tidal energy sites is unclear. Here, two algorithms are tested: large-scale particle image velocimetry using PIVlab and dense optical flow. The methods are applied on video data collected at two tidal stream energy sites (Pentland Firth, Scotland, and Ramsey Sound, Wales) for a range of flow and environmental conditions. Although average validation measures were similar (~ 20–30% error), we recommend PIVlab processed velocity data at tidal energy sites because we find bias (underprediction) in optical flow for higher velocities (> 1 m/s).

Keywords

  • Tidal stream,
  • Remote sensing,
  • Energy,
  • Drones,
  • UAV,
  • Optical flow
HTML PDF

References

  1. Garrett and Cummins (1998) The power potential of tidal currents in channels (pp. 2563-2575) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2005.1494
  2. Bryden and Couch (2006) ME1-marine energy extraction: tidal resource analysis (pp. 133-139) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.08.012
  3. Coles et al. (2021) A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream resource (pp. 20210469-20210469) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0469
  4. Goddijn-Murphy et al. (2013) Current patterns in the Inner Sound, Pentland Firth from underway ADCP Data 30(1) (pp. 96-111) https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00223.1
  5. Togneri and Masters (2016) Micrositing variability and mean flow scaling for marine turbulence in Ramsey Sound (pp. 35-46) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-015-0036-0
  6. Coles, D., Greenwood, C., Vogler, A., Walsh, T., Taaffe, D.: Assessment of the turbulent flow upstream of the MeyGen Phase 1A tidal stream turbines. Presented at the 4th Asian Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, Taipei (2018)
  7. Guerra et al. (2021) Turbulent flow mapping in a high-flow tidal channel using mobile acoustic Doppler current profilers (pp. 759-772) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.133
  8. McCann D.L., Bell P.S.: Marine Radar Derived Current Vector Mapping at a Planned Commercial Tidal Stream Turbine Array in the Pentland Firth, U.K. MTS/IEEE Oceans 2014 Conference, St Johns, Newfoundland, Canada, 14–19 September (2014),
  9. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2014.7003186
  10. Johnston (2019) Unoccupied aircraft systems in marine science and conservation (pp. 1439-463) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095323
  11. Slingsby et al. (2021) Surface characterisation of Kolk-boils within tidal stream environments Using UAV imagery https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9050484
  12. Lindken et al. (2009) Micro-particle image velocimetry (PIV): Recent developments, applications, and guidelines (pp. 2551-2567) https://doi.org/10.1039/B906558J
  13. Mendes, L.P.N., Ricardo, A.M.C., Bernardino, A.J.M., Ferreira, R.L.M.: Comparison of PIV and optical flow for river flow applications. In: Uijttewaal, W., Mário J., Valero, F.D., Chavarrias, V., Arbós, C.R., Schielen, R., Crosato (Eds.). A River Flow 2020, Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, Delft, Netherlands, 7–10 July (2020)
  14. Sun et al. (2010) Discharge estimation in small irregular river using LSPIV 163(5) (pp. 247-254) https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2010.163.5.247
  15. Lewis and Rhoads (2018) LSPIV measurements of two-dimensional flow structure in streams using small unmanned aerial systems: 2. Hydrodynamic mapping at river confluences (pp. 7981-7999) https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022551
  16. Muste et al. (2008) Large-scale particle image velocimetry for measurements in riverine environments https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006950
  17. Fujita et al. (1998) Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications 36(3) (pp. 397-414) https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498626
  18. Liu et al. (2021) Large-scale particle image velocimetry to measure streamflow from videos recorded from unmanned aerial vehicle and fixed imaging system https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142661
  19. Khalid et al. (2019) Optical flow for image-based river velocity estimation (pp. 110-121) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.11.009
  20. Leitão et al. (2018) Urban overland runoff velocity measurement with consumer-grade surveillance cameras and surface structure image velocimetry (pp. 791-804) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.001
  21. Thielicke and Sonntag (2021) Particle Image Velocimetry for MATLAB: Accuracy and enhanced algorithms in PIVlab https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.334
  22. Thielicke, W.: The Flapping Flight of Birds - Analysis and Application. PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (2017)
  23. http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/382783069
  24. Accessed 21 October 2021
  25. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18656.94728
  26. Thielicke and Stamhuis (2014) PIVlab – towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB 2(1) (pp. e30-e30) https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.bl
  27. Tauro et al. (2017) Streamflow observations from cameras: large-scale particle image velocimetry or particle tracking velocimetry? 53(12) (pp. 374-394) https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020848
  28. Detert et al. (2021) Proof-of-concept for low-cost and non-contact synoptic airborne river flow measurements 38(8–10) (pp. 2780-2807) https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1294782
  29. Lewis and Rhoads (2018) LSPIV measurements of two-dimensional flow structure in streams using small unmanned aerial systems: 1. Accuracy assessment based on comparison with stationary camera platforms and in-stream velocity measurements (pp. 8000-8018) https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022550
  30. Koutalakis et al. (2019) UAVs for hydrologic scopes: application of a low-cost UAV to estimate surface water velocity by using three different image-based methods https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3010014
  31. Pearce et al. (2020) An Evaluation of image velocimetry techniques under low flow conditions and high seeding densities using unmanned aerial systems https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020232
  32. Legleiter et al. (2017) Remote measurement of river discharge using thermal particle image velocimetry (PIV) and various sources of bathymetric information (pp. 490-506) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.004
  33. Kinzel and Legleiter (2019) sUAS-based remote sensing of river discharge using thermal particle image velocimetry and bathymetric lidar https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192317
  34. Fairley et al. (2022) Drone-based large-scale particle image velocimetry applied to tidal stream energy resource assessment https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.030
  35. Fairley, I., Williamson, B., McIlvenny, J., Lewis, M., Neill, S., Masters, I., Williams, A.J., Reeve, D.E.: A preliminary assessment of the use of drones to quantify current velocities at tidal stream sites. In: European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference 2021. Plymouth (2021)
  36. Jung et al. (2019) High temporal and spatial resolutions of sea surface current from low-altitude remote sensing (pp. 282-288) https://doi.org/10.2112/SI90-035.1
  37. Farneback, G.: Two-Frame Motion Estimation Based on Polynomial Expansion. J. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci, 363–370 (2003)
  38. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45103-X_50
  39. Farneback, G.: Fast and accurate motion estimation using orientation. In: Proceedings of the 15th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, 3–8 September. 32 (2000)
  40. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2000.905291
  41. Farneback, G.: Very high accuracy velocity estimation using orientation tensors, parametric motion, and simultaneous segmentation of the motion field. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Cambridge, MA, USA, 6 August (2002)
  42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2001.937514
  43. Dérian, P., Almar. R. 2007 Wavelet-Based Optical Flow Estimation of Instant Surface Currents From Shore-Based and UAV Videos. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
  44. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2714202
  45. Brouwer et al. (2015) Surfzone monitoring using rotary wing unmanned aerial vehicles 32(4) (pp. 855-863) https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00122.1
  46. Fairley et al. (2015) Evaluation of tidal stream resource in a potential array area via direct measurements (pp. 70-78) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.024
  47. Evans et al. (2015) Constraints on extractable power from energetic tidal straits (pp. 707-722) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.085
  48. Streßer et al. (2017) Video-based estimation of surface currents using a low-cost quadcopter 14(11) (pp. 2027-2031) https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2749120
  49. Lee, S.H., Lee, J.Y., Choi, J.S.: Lens distortion correction using a checkerboard pattern. in:Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, Singapore, 44. (2008)
  50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1477862.1477917
  51. Zuiderveld, K..: Contrast Limited Adaptive Histograph Equalization. Graphic Gems IV. San Diego: Academic Press Professional. 474–485 (1994)
  52. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-336156-1.50061-6
  53. Wu et al. (2019) Measuring surface velocity of water flow by dense optical flow method https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112320
  54. Nemade, N. & Gohokar, V. V. 2019. Comparative Performance Analysis of Optical Flow Algorithms for Anomaly Detection (May 18, 2019). Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Information Processing ICCIP (2019) http://dx.doi.org/
  55. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3419775
  56. Liao et al. (2021) Optical flow estimation combining with illumination adjustment and edge refinement in livestock UAV videos https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105910