10.1007/s40095-022-00507-3

The effect of biomass separation method on the efficiency of hydrogen production by Platymonas subcordiformis

  1. Department of Environment Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, 10-720, PL
  2. Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Białystok, 15-351, PL

Published in Issue 2022-06-03

How to Cite

Dudek, M., Nowicka, A., Zieliński, M., Kazimierowicz, J., & Dębowski, M. (2022). The effect of biomass separation method on the efficiency of hydrogen production by Platymonas subcordiformis. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 14(2 (June 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00507-3

Abstract

Abstract Platymonas subcordiformis may be deemed a prospective species in terms of its hydrogen production capacity. The efficiency of hydrogen production by these microalgae is affected by the method of sulfur compounds removal from the culture medium, which urges the search for effective separation methods. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of harnessing membrane vacuum filtration (MVF) for P. subcordiformis microalgae biomass separation from the culture medium to boost the hydrogen yield. Its results proved a positive impact of the filtration method on hydrogen production. Higher technological performance due to the use of MVF was recorded in the variants with biomass concentration in respirometers ensured at 5.0 g ODM /dm 3 . In the most effective variant, hydrogen yield after biomass concentration using MVF reached 156.3 ± 11.0 cm 3 H 2 at the mean production rate of r  = 1.38 ± 0.1 cm 3 /h, whereas after centrifugation the respective values were at 138.3 ± 12.8 cm 3 H 2 and r  = 1.09 ± 0.09 cm 3 /h. Hydrogen production efficiency was also found to significantly depend on the initial biomass concentration in respirometers and culture medium composition at the stage of biomass cultivation.

Keywords

  • Platymonas subcordiformis,
  • Microalgae,
  • Biohydrogen,
  • Biomass separation,
  • Membrane vacuum filter

References

  1. Weimann et al. (2021) Optimal hydrogen production in a wind-dominated zero-emission energy system https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100032
  2. Singla et al. (2022) Hydrogen production technologies-membrane based separation, storage and challenges https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113963
  3. Lux and Pfluger (2020) A supply curve of electricity-based hydrogen in a decarbonized European energy system in 2050 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115011
  4. Tashie-Lewis and Nnabuife (2021) Hydrogen production, distribution, storage and power conversion in a hydrogen economy: a technology review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100172
  5. Aziz et al. (2021) Hydrogen production from biomasses and wastes: a technological review 46(68) (pp. 33756-33781) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.189
  6. Dębowski et al. (2021) Microalgal hydrogen production in relation to other biomass-based technologies—a review https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196025
  7. Łukajtis et al. (2018) Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation (pp. 665-694) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.043
  8. Kumar et al. (2021) An overview of conventional and non-conventional hydrogen production methods 46(11) (pp. 5353-5359) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.793
  9. Chozhavendhan et al. (2020) A review on feedstock, pretreatment methods, influencing factors, production and purification processes of bio-hydrogen production https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100038
  10. Saha et al. (2022) Enhanced production of biohydrogen from lignocellulosic feedstocks using microorganisms: a comprehensive review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100153
  11. Zuorro et al. (2021) The application of catalytic processes on the production of algae-based biofuels: a review https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010022
  12. Show et al. (2018) Hydrogen production from algal biomass—advances, challenges and prospects (pp. 290-300) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.105
  13. Dudek et al. (2022) The effect of autotrophic cultivation of Platymonas subcordiformis in waters from the natural aquatic reservoir on hydrogen yield https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11030031
  14. Goswami et al. (2021) Advanced microalgae-based renewable biohydrogen production systems: a review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124301
  15. Ni et al. (2006) An overview of hydrogen production from biomass (pp. 461-472) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.11.003
  16. Zhang et al. (2002) Biochemical and morphological characterization of sulfur-deprived and H2-producing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (green alga) (pp. 552-561) https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250100660
  17. Chen et al. (2015) Dewatering and drying methods for microalgae (pp. 443-454) https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.997881
  18. Dębowski et al. (2020) The effects of microalgae biomass co-substrate on biogas production from the common agricultural biogas plants feedstock https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092186
  19. Grechanik et al. (2021) Recent advances in microalgal hydrogen production Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67407-6_22
  20. Fasaei et al. (2018) Techno-economic evaluation of microalgae harvesting and dewatering systems (pp. 347-362) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.11.038
  21. Shao et al. (2015) Algae-dewatering using rotary drum vacuum filters: process modeling, simulation and techno-economics (pp. 67-75) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.029
  22. Guan et al. (2004) Two-stage photo-biological production of hydrogen by marine green alga Platymonas subcordiformis 19(1) (pp. 69-73) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2003.10.006
  23. Qi et al. (2019) Application of an in situ CO2–bicarbonate system under nitrogen depletion to improve photosynthetic biomass and starch production and regulate amylose accumulation in a marine green microalga Tetraselmis subcordiformis https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1523-7
  24. Xie et al. (2001) Mixotrophic cultivation of Platymonas subcordiformis (pp. 343-347) https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017532302360
  25. Faraloni et al. (2011) Enhanced hydrogen production by means of sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures grown in pretreated olive mill wastewater (pp. 5920-5931) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.007
  26. Deng et al. (2019) Glucose addition-induced changes in the growth and chemical compositions of a freshwater microalga Chlorella kessleri 94(4) (pp. 1202-1209) https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5870
  27. Chong et al. (2022) Anaerobic digestate as a low-cost nutrient source for sustainable microalgae cultivation: a way forward through waste valorization approach https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150070
  28. Tejido-Nuñez et al. (2020) Co-cultivation of microalgae in aquaculture water: interactions, growth and nutrient removal efficiency at laboratory- and pilot-scale https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101940
  29. Mahlia et al. (2020) Patent landscape review on biodiesel production: technology updates https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109526
  30. Singh and Patidar (2018) Microalgae harvesting techniques: a review (pp. 499-508) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.010
  31. Wicaksana et al. (2012) Microfiltration of algae (Chlorella sorokiniana): critical flux, fouling and transmission (pp. 83-92) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.013
  32. Milledge and Heaven (2013) A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production 12(2) (pp. 165-178) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-012-9301-z
  33. Castro-Muñoz and García-Depraect (2021) Membrane-based harvesting processes for microalgae and their valuable-related molecules: a review https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080585
  34. Marbelia et al. (2016) Polyacrylonitrile membranes for microalgae filtration: influence of porosity, surface charge and microalgae species on membrane fouling (pp. 128-137) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.08.004
  35. Molina Grima et al. (2002) Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics (pp. 491-515) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00050-2
  36. Menegazzo and Fonseca (2019) Biomass recovery and lipid extraction processes for microalgae biofuels production: a review (pp. 87-107) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.064
  37. Knuckey et al. (2006) Production of microalgal concentrates by flocculation and their assessment as aquaculture feeds 35(3) (pp. 300-313) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2006.04.001
  38. Hahn et al. (2007) Immobilized algal cells used for hydrogen production 37(1) (pp. 75-79) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.03.010
  39. Laurinavichene et al. (2002) Dilution methods to deprive Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures of sulfur for subsequent hydrogen photoproduction (pp. 1245-1249) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00101-5
  40. Rashid et al. (2009) Characteristics of hydrogen production by immobilized cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa through cycles of photosynthesis and anaerobic incubation 15(4) (pp. 498-503) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2008.12.013
  41. Sharma and Arya (2017) Hydrogen from algal biomass: a review of production process (pp. 63-69) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.06.001
  42. Dudek et al. (2018) Water from the Vistula Lagoon as a medium in mixotrophic growth and hydrogen production by Platymonas subcordiformis 43(20) (pp. 9529-9534) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.039
  43. Rashid et al. (2011) Bio-hydrogen production by Chlorella vulgaris under diverse photoperiods 102(2) (pp. 2101-2104) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.032
  44. Van Ginkel and Logan (2005) Inhibition of biohydrogen production by undissociated acetic and butyric acids 39(23) (pp. 9351-9356) https://doi.org/10.1021/es0510515
  45. Tamburic et al. (2011) Parameters affecting the growth and hydrogen production of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (pp. 1-5) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.074
  46. Vigneswaran, S.: Vacuum filtration. In: Water, Wastewater, and Sludge Filtration. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, pp. 225–236 (1989)
  47. Goh, A.: Production of microalgae using pig waste as a substrate: presented... at Algal Biomass Workshop, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA, 5–7 Apr 1984
  48. Alam et al. (2017) Generation and harvesting of microalgae biomass for biofuel production Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1950-0_3