10.1007/s40095-022-00487-4

A modified FOGI-FLL feature-based control algorithm for single-stage grid-interfaced solar PV system

  • Subhranshu Sekhar Puhan1,
  • Renu Sharma*1,
  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, ITER, SOA Deemed To Be University, Bhubaneswar, IN

Published in Issue 2022-03-19

How to Cite

Puhan, S. S., & Sharma, R. (2022). A modified FOGI-FLL feature-based control algorithm for single-stage grid-interfaced solar PV system. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 13(4 (December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-022-00487-4
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents an overview of power quality improvement of the distributed network by using a novel robust control algorithm. The novel robust control algorithm is modified fourth-order generalized integral action with frequency-locked loop feature (Mod.FOGI-FLL) for a three-phase grid-interfaced single-stage solar photovoltaic (PV) system with distribution static compensator capabilities. The functions taken into features for robust control algorithm (Mod.FOGI-FLL) are load balancing, reactive power compensation, power factor correction with active power generation for proposed topology, and behavior of proposed control with different faults at point of common coupling (PCC). The perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm is used to extract maximum power from the PV array under variable atmospheric conditions. To adapt with variation in terminal voltage at the point of common contact (PCC), PV feed-forward term is also added in the control algorithm to make fewer oscillations in grid current. Test results demonstrate satisfactory response for steady-state and dynamic conditions at load unbalancing, variations in insolation level, and fault profile at VSC. The DC rejection capabilities of a proposed control methodology obtained are around 60 decibel which is 22 decibel more than FOGI-FLL techniques with the same gain parameters 38 decibel. The distortion in grid currents and voltages is obtained from MATLAB/SIMULINK within limits IEEE-519 standard.

References

  1. Agarwal et al. (2018) Application of LMS-Based NN structure for power quality enhancement in a distribution network under abnormal conditions 29(5) (pp. 1598-1607) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2677961
  2. Dave, M. K.: Modeling of PV arrays based on datasheet. In: 2016 IEEE 1st international conference on power electronics, intelligent control and energy systems (ICPEICES), pp. 1–4 (2016)
  3. Kumar et al. (2017) MPPT in dynamic condition of partially shaded PV system by using WODE technique 8(3) (pp. 1204-1214) https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2669525
  4. Liu, C., Wu, B., Cheung, R.: Advanced algorithm for MPPT controlofphotovoltaic systems.
  5. Proc.
  6. Canadian solar buildings conference montreal, August 20–24 (2004)
  7. Singh et al. (2017) Damped-SOGI-based control algorithm for solar pv power generating system 53(3) (pp. 1780-1788) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2017.2677358
  8. Arfeen et al. (2019) Control of distributed generation systems for microgrid applications: a technological review
  9. Singh et al. (1998) Active power filter for harmonic and reactive power compensation in three-phase, four-wire systems supplying non-linear loads (pp. 139-145) https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.4450080210
  10. Barik et al. (2020) Power quality assessment of microgrid using fuzzy controller aided modified SRF based designed SAPF
  11. Labeeb and Lathika (2011) Design and analysis of DSTATCOM using SRFT and ANN-fuzzy based control for power quality improvement (pp. 274-279)
  12. Rezkallah et al. (2017) Lyapunov function and sliding mode control approach for the solar-PV grid interface system 64(1) (pp. 785-795) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2607162
  13. Luo and Wu (2017) Improved two-phase stationary frame EPLL to eliminate the effect of input harmonics, unbalance and DC offsets 13(6) (pp. 2855-2863) https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2679132
  14. Reza et al. (2014) Accurate estimation of single-phase grid voltage parameters under distorted conditions 29(3) (pp. 1138-1146) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2303482
  15. Kumar Agarwal et al. (2017) Three-phase single-stage grid tied solar PV ECS using PLL-less Fast CTF control technique 10(2) (pp. 178-188) https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2016.0067
  16. Barnes et al. (2012) Selection of converter topologies for distributed energy resources (pp. 1418-1423)
  17. Subudhi and Pradhan (2013) A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic power systems 4(1) (pp. 89-98) https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202294
  18. Varma et al. (2009) Nighttime application of PV solar farm as STATCOM to regulate grid voltage 24(4) (pp. 983-985) https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2009.2031814
  19. Matas et al. (2014) An adaptive prefiltering method to improve the speed/accuracy tradeoff of voltage sequence detection methods under adverse grid conditions 61(5) (pp. 2139-2151) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2274414
  20. Nicastri and Nagliero (2010) Comparison and evaluation of the PLL techniques for the design of the grid-connected inverter systems (pp. 3865-3870)
  21. Singh and Arya (2014) Back-propagation control algorithm for power quality improvement using DSTATCOM 61(3) (pp. 1204-1212) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2258303
  22. Shah et al. (2018) A novel fourth-order generalized integrator based control scheme for multifunctional SECS in the distribution system 33(3) (pp. 949-958) https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2018.2806191
  23. IEEE Recommended practice and requirements for harmonic control in electric power systems. in IEEE Std 519–1992 , vol., no., pp.1–29, 11 (2014)