10.1007/s40095-021-00453-6

Co-pyrolysis and HTC refined biomass-biosolid-mixes: combustion performance and residues

  • Sebastian Weihrich1,
  • Xianjun Xing*2,
  • Xuefei Zhang3,
  1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, 230009, CN
  2. School of Automobile and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, 230009, CN Institute of Advanced Energy Technology & Equipment, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, 230009, CN
  3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, 230009, CN

Published in Issue 2022-02-07

How to Cite

Weihrich, S., Xing, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). Co-pyrolysis and HTC refined biomass-biosolid-mixes: combustion performance and residues. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 13(2 (June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00453-6
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract Corn stover (CS) and biosolids (BS), two easily accessible biomass (BM) resources, were combined in Co-pyrolysis (Co-Pyr) and Co-hydrothermal carbonization (Co-HTC) processes. The beneficial or catalytic effects of BS on CS in this process were identified by characterizing the following measured parameters of the produced char: ultimate and proximate analysis, higher heating value (HHV), van-Krevelen-diagram, activation energy ( A E ), and combustibility index S . The influence of the BS on CS was indicated by comparing the stated values of the CS/BS-mixed samples with the results of the pure BS- and CS-samples and the values of the unprocessed original BS and CS. The following developments were recognized: HHV of pure CS increased to 21–23 MJ/kg, that of pure BS was reduced to 7–9 MJ/kg, and for the mixed samples, one CS:BS-ratio showed beneficial interactions and resulted in 20–21 MJ/kg. The carbonization rate was advanced for the Pyr samples, ranging in the areas of coal and lignite, and most HTC samples in the area of peat and the original BM. The A E decreased from 65 and 41 kJ/g for the starting materials to an average of 30–40 kJ/g for most samples, and several samples reached 20–25 kJ/g. Hydrochars made from combined BM presented advanced combustibility index S values, passed 1 × 10 –6 , compared to Co-Pyr, and its biochar did not reach this combustibility index. CS and BS in pure and mixed forms, treated with Pyr or HTC, led to advanced solid fuels for different aspects of the analysis focus and depending on the composition of the sample.

Keywords

  • Biochar pellets,
  • Co-HTC,
  • TGA,
  • Combustibility index

References

  1. Bai et al. (2014) Kinetic investigation on partially oxidized huadian oil shale by thermogravimetric analysis 31(4) (pp. 377-393) https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2014.4.06
  2. Channiwala and Parikh (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels (pp. 1051-1063) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4
  3. Deng et al. (2017) Investigation on the fast co- pyrolysis of sewage sludge with biomass and the combustion reactivity of residual char (pp. 302-310) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.067
  4. Flynn and Wall (1966) A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data 4(5) (pp. 323-328) https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1966.110040504
  5. Gollakota et al. (2018) A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass 81(1) (pp. 1378-1392) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.178
  6. Graham Solomons et al. (2016) John Wiley & Sons
  7. He et al. (2008) Feasibility analysis of application of Hefei City's sewage sludge to soil
  8. He et al. (2013) Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior (pp. 257-266) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.084
  9. Itoh et al. (2018) A new approach to stabilize waste biomass for valorization using an oxidative process at 90 °C 13(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196249
  10. Kang et al. (2012) Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of lignin, cellulose, d-Xylose, and wood meal (pp. 9023-9031) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300565d
  11. Karampinis, E., Grammelis, P., Zethraeus, B., Andrijvskaja, J., Kask, Ü., Kask, L., Hoyne, S., Phelan, P., Casini, L., Picchi, G., Sandak, A., Sandak, J.: BISYPLAN: The Bioenergy System Planners Handbook. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, pp. 2462–2464. Bisyplan, Milan (2012)
  12. Lee and Choi (2014) Wastewater treatment transfer-operate-transfer (TOT) projects in China: the case of hefei wangxiaoying wastewater treatment TOT project 19(4) (pp. 831-840) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0095-5
  13. Long et al. (2012) Release characteristics of alkali and alkaline eath metallic species during biomass pyrolysis and steam gasification process (pp. 278-284) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.051
  14. Mohammed IY, Kazi FK, Yusuf SB, Alshareef I, Chi SA (2014) Higher heating values (HHV) prediction model from biomass proximate analysis data. In: ICCE 2014 Proceedings: October Quebec, Quebec, Canada,pp. 20–22,
  15. Ozawa (1965) A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data (pp. 1881-1886) https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.38.1881
  16. Raheem et al. (2018) Opportunities and challenges in sustainable treatment and resource reuse of sewage sludge: a review (pp. 616-641) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.149
  17. Urych and Smolinski (2016) Kinetics of sewage sludge pyrolysis and air gasification of its chars (pp. 4869-4878) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00332
  18. Yang et al. (2015) Current state of sludge production, management, treatment and disposal in China (pp. 60-73) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.002
  19. Yu et al. (2008) Thermal analysis studies on combustion characteristics of seaweed 93(2) (pp. 611-617) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8274-6
  20. Zhai et al. (2017) Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge for char production with different waste biomass: effects of reaction temperature and energy recycling (pp. 167-174) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.116
  21. Zhang et al. (2014) Hydrothermal carbonization of corncob residues for hydrochar production (pp. 872-876) https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502462p
  22. Zhang et al. (2017) Hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust for nutrient-rich hydrochar production: synergistic effects and products characterization (pp. 52-62) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.018
  23. Zhu et al. (2017) Demethanation trend of hydrochar induced by organic solvent washing and its influence on hydrochar activation 51(18) (pp. 10756-10764) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06594