10.1007/s40095-021-00440-x

Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a combined Allam generation system and absorption cooling system

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, IR
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IR

Published in Issue 2021-10-20

How to Cite

Dokhaee, E., Saraei, A., Mohsenimonfared, H., & Yousefi, P. (2021). Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of a combined Allam generation system and absorption cooling system. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 13(1 (March 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00440-x

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the use of Allam cycle based on the closed cycle of carbon dioxide has been considered by researchers due to its high efficiency and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the environment. In the present study, the combined system including Allam cycle and absorption cycle has been investigated from the perspective of energy, exergy and exergy–economy. The use of the absorption cycle is to use the waste heat of the power cycle and increase energy efficiency. The simulation results show that the total exergy efficiency of the cogeneration cycle is 0.72. Turbine, compressor and absorption cycle are introduced as primary components that should be considered from the exergy–economic point of view because they account for the highest cost rate of exergy efficiency. Also, the results of parametric analysis indicate that increasing the compressor pressure ratio has a negative effect on the cycle performance, thus reducing the overall work and efficiency of the exergy as well as increasing the cost rate. Similarly, changing the compressor pressure ratio has the greatest impact on the performance of the combined cycle, so that changing the pressure ratio in the range of 2 to 10 resulted in reducing the exergy efficiency by 63%. The key assessment is that the performance of the system increases as the temperature of the cooled water in the evaporator rises. Exergy efficiency works in contrast to the system performance coefficient and the main reason for the return of imperfections in the absorption cooling system is the undesirable heat transfer in the system heat exchangers.

Keywords

  • Combined production cycle,
  • Allam cycle,
  • Absorption cooling cycle,
  • Exergy–economic analysis

References

  1. Allam, R. J., Scott Martin, Brock Forrest, Jeremy Fetvedt, Xijia Lu, David Freed, G. William Brown Jr.a, Takashi Sasaki, Masao Itohb, James Manningc (2017) Demonstration of the Allam Cycle: An update on the development status of a high efficiency supercritical carbon dioxide power process employing full carbon capture, 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-13, 14–18 November 2016, Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. Magalhães P., Martins J., Joyce A., Coelho L., Tavares N., Pereira R.: Solar trigeneration system model for off-grid residential applications. In: Camarinha-Matos L.M., Shahamatnia E., Nunes G. (eds) Technological Innovation for Value Creation. DoCEIS 2012. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 372. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2012).
  3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28255-3_41
  4. Abbaspour and Saraei (2014) An innovative design and cost optimization of a trigeneration (combined cooling, heating and power) system 8(4) (pp. 971-978)
  5. Abbaspour and Saraei (2015) Thermoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a LiBr-water absorption refrigeration system 9(1) (pp. 61-68)
  6. Klimenko, A.V., Agababov, V.S., Il’ina, I.P. et al. Layouts of trigeneration plants for centralized power supply. Therm. Eng. 63, 414–421 (2016).
  7. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601516060045
  8. Kialashaki (2018) A linear programming optimization model for optimal operation strategy design and sizing of the CCHP systems (pp. 225-238) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9560-1
  9. Luo et al. (2018) A robust optimization method for energy management of CCHP microgrid (pp. 132-144) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-017-0290-3
  10. Yang et al. (2019) Optimal dispatch for a combined cooling, heating and power microgrid considering building virtual energy storage (pp. 581-594) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-018-00055-z
  11. Iranfar, A., Saraei, A.: Numerical study of nanoencapsulated phase change material inside double pipe heat exchanger. Heat Transfer—Asian Research. 48(8), 3466–3476 (2019).
  12. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.21549
  13. Hong et al. (2019) Performance analysis of combined cooling heating and power (CCHP) exhaust waste heat coupled air source heat pump system (pp. 563-571) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0520-x
  14. Chen et al. (2020) Optimization of operation strategies for a combined cooling, heating and power system based on adiabatic compressed air energy storage (pp. 1135-1148) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1170-0
  15. Alimohammadi and Saraei (2020) Energy analysis of a CCHP-GSHP hybrid system 1(1) (pp. 47-70)
  16. Alimohammadi and Saraei (2020) Economic analysis of CCHP-GSHP hybrid system 1(1) (pp. 82-99)
  17. Marques, A.d., Carvalho, M., Lourenço, A.B. et al. Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic evaluations of a micro-trigeneration system. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.
  18. 42
  19. , 324 (2020).
  20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02399-y
  21. Wang et al. (2021) A multi agent-based optimal control method for combined cooling and power systems with thermal energy storage (pp. 1709-1723) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0768-9
  22. Song et al. (2021) Application and development of ground source heat pump technology in China https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-021-00195-x
  23. Kumar et al. (2021) Integration of renewable energy based trigeneration cycle: a review (pp. 851-865) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00690-y
  24. Golchoobian et al. (2021) Exergetic and economic evaluation of a novel integrated system for trigeneration of power, refrigeration and freshwater using energy recovery in natural gas pressure reduction stations (pp. 1467-1483) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-10607-7
  25. Sanaye et al. (2021) Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis and multi-criteria optimization of an innovative high-efficiency trigeneration system for a residential complex using LINMAP and TOPSIS decision-making methods https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10517-0
  26. Yanbolagh, D.J., Mazaheri, H., Saraei, A., Mehrabadi, S.J.: Experimental study on the performance of three identical solar stills with different heating methods and external condenser fully powered by photovoltaic: energy, exergy, and economic analysis. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization Environ. Effects (2021).
  27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1817187
  28. Dokhaee, E., Saraei, A., Jafari Mehrabadi, S. et al.: Simulation of the Allam cycle with carbon dioxide working fluid and comparison with Brayton cycle. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng.
  29. 12
  30. , 543–550 (2021).
  31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00401-4
  32. Nazarzadehfard et al. (2021) Exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of the combined MED desalination system and the Allam power generation system https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00409-w
  33. Ahmadi, A., Noorpoor, A.R., Kani, A.R., Saraei, A.: Modeling and economic analysis of MED-TVC desalination with Allam power plant cycle in Kish Island. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (2021).
  34. https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2020.117914.3851
  35. Riyahi et al. (2021) Energy analysis and optimization of a hybrid system of reverse osmosis desalination system and solar power plant (case study: Kish Island) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00418-9