10.1007/s40095-021-00407-y

Development and testing of a novel geothermal wall system

HTML PDF
  • Matteo Baralis*1,
  • Marco Barla1,
  1. Department of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico Di Torino, Torino, IT
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2021-07-04

How to Cite

Baralis, M., & Barla, M. (2021). Development and testing of a novel geothermal wall system. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12(4 (December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00407-y
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 16

PDF views: 97

Abstract

Abstract Shallow geothermal energy systems have the potential to contribute to the decarbonization of heating and cooling demands of buildings. These systems typically present drawbacks as high initial investments and occupancy of wide areas. In this study, a novel energy wall system is proposed to overcome the limitations of conventional geothermal applications in urban areas. The system is characterized by ease of installation, low initial costs and applicability to existing buildings undergoing energy retrofitting. The paper illustrates the implementation of the prototype of such a system to an existing structure in Torino (Italy). An overview of the components is given together with the interpretation of an illustrative test carried out in heating mode. The data from both heating and cooling experimental campaigns allow us to highlight the potential of the proposed technology. The results suggest that an average thermal power of about 17 W per unit area can be exchanged with the ground in heating mode, while an average of 68 W per unit area is exchanged in cooling operations. The negligible impact on the stress–strain state of the wall and the surrounding soil thermal and hygrometric regime is also testified by the results collected. These aspects are associated with a reduced probability of interferences with other installations in highly urbanized areas, easiness of installation and affordable cost.

Keywords

  • Ground heat exchanger,
  • Energy geostructures,
  • Shallow geothermal energy system
HTML PDF

References

  1. Commission (2016) Publication office of the European Union
  2. Neirotti et al. (2020) Towards the electrification of buildings heating - Real heat pumps electricity mixes based on high resolution operational profiles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116974
  3. Brandl (2006) Energy foundations and other thermo-active ground structures (pp. 81-122) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.2.81
  4. Adam and Markiewicz (2009) Energy from earth-coupled structures, foundations, tunnels and sewers (pp. 229-236) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2009.59.3.229
  5. Barla and Perino (2015) Energy from geo-structures: a topic of growing interest (pp. 3-7) https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00106
  6. Laloui and Di Donna (2013) John Wiley & Sons Inc https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118761809
  7. Asgari et al. (2020) Assessment and comparison of different arrangements of horizontal ground heat exchangers for high energy required applications https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114770
  8. McCartney et al. (2016) Energy geotechnics: Advances in subsurface energy recovery, storage, exchange, and waste management (pp. 244-256) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.002
  9. Di Donna, A., Barla, M., Amis, T.: Energy geostructures: a collection of data from real applications. In: 15th IACMAG proceedings, p. 9. , Wuhan, China (2017)
  10. Bourne-Webb et al. (2009) Energy pile test at Lambeth College, London: geotechnical and thermodynamic aspects of pile response to heat cycles (pp. 237-248) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2009.59.3.237
  11. Pahud, D., Fromentin, A., Hubbuch, M.: Heat Exhchanger Pile System of the Dock Midfield at Zürich Airport Detailed Simulation and Optimisation of the Installation. (1999)
  12. Dupray et al. (2014) Heat-exchanger piles for the de-icing of bridges (pp. 413-423) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0307-2
  13. Alberdi-Pagola et al. (2018) Comparing heat flow models for interpretation of precast quadratic pile heat exchanger thermal response tests (pp. 721-733) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.104
  14. Amatya et al. (2012) Thermo-mechanical behaviour of energy piles (pp. 503-519) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.116
  15. Luo et al. (2016) Thermo-economic analysis of four different types of ground heat exchangers in energy piles (pp. 11-19) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.085
  16. Barla and Di Donna (2018) Energy tunnels: concept and design aspects (pp. 268-276) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2018.03.003
  17. Barla et al. (2019) A novel real-scale experimental prototype of energy tunnel (pp. 1-14) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.024
  18. DiDonna et al. (2016) Energy performance of diaphragm walls used as heat exchangers (pp. 1-14)
  19. Baralis, M., Insana, A., Barla, M.: Energy Tunnels for Deicing of a Bridge Deck in Alpine Region. In: Barla M., Di Donna A., Sterpi D. (eds) Challenges and Innovations in Geomechanics. IACMAG 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 126 (2021). Springer, Cham.
  20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64518-2_126
  21. Barla et al. (2016) Application of energy tunnels to an urban environment (pp. 104-113) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.01.014
  22. Tinti et al. (2017) Exploitation of geothermal energy using tunnel lining technology in a mountain environment: A feasibility study for the Brenner Base tunnel – BBT (pp. 182-203) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.011
  23. Insana and Barla (2020) Experimental and numerical investigations on the energy performance of a thermo-active tunnel (pp. 781-792) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.086
  24. Sterpi, D., Angelotti, A., Habibzadeh Bigdarvish, O., Jalili, D.: On the modelling of thermo-active diaphragm walls based on monitoring data. In: 15th IACMAG proceedings. Wuhan (2017)
  25. Barla et al. (2020) Energy and mechanical aspects on the thermal activation of diaphragm walls for heating and cooling (pp. 2654-2663) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.074
  26. Buhmann et al. (2016) Tunnel geothermics—a German experience with renewable energy concepts in tunnel projects (pp. 1-7) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2016.10.006
  27. Brandl (2016) Geothermal Geotechnics for Urban Undergrounds (pp. 747-764) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.773
  28. Antoinet, E., Bernard, J.-B., Berthelot, P., Borely, C., Brule, S., Capinteiro, L., Cosson, A., Darmond, E., Delerablee, Y., Demongodin, L., Frechin, N., Gauthey, J.-R., Habert, J., Housse, P.-J., Jandin, P., Manirakiza, R., Nibel, D., Okyay, U., Pierson D’Autrey, L., Pozzi, N., Quirin, L., Reiffsteck, P., Utter, N., Vasilescu, R., Volcke, J.-P.: Recommandations pour la conception , le dimensionnement et la mise en œuvre des géostructures thermiques, (2017)
  29. Tsagarakis et al. (2018) A review of the legal framework in shallow geothermal energy in selected European countries: need for guidelines (pp. 2556-2571) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.007
  30. Baralis, M.: Optimisation of geothermal resources in urban areas, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy, (2020)
  31. http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2842491
  32. Tsagarakis (2020) Shallow geothermal energy under the microscope: Social, economic, and institutional aspects (pp. 2801-2808) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.004
  33. Barla, G., Barla, M.: Assessing design parameters for tunnelling in a cemented granular soil by continuum and discontinuum modelling. In: Proceedings of 11th Iacmag Conference. pp. 475–484. , Torino, Italy (2005)
  34. Barla and Barla (2012) Torino subsoil characterization by combining site investigations and numerical modelling / Charakterisierung des Turiner Untergrunds mithilfe von Feldstudien und numerischer Modellierungen (pp. 214-232) https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201200008
  35. Bove, A., Casaccio, D., Destefanis, E., De Luca, D.A., Lasagna, M., Masciocco, L.: Piezometria della falda superficiale nel territorio di pianura della Regione Piemonte. In: Regione Piemonte (ed.) Idrogeologia della pianura piemontese. p. 10. Mariogros Industrie grafiche S.p.A. (2005)
  36. Aiassa, S., Antolini, F.: Technical report on site investigations for “Digital revolution House” (in Italian:
  37. Relazione tecnica sulle indagini “Digital revolution House.”)
  38. , Geosolving srl, Torino, Italy, Tech. Rep. 2301GEO.RT.04, 257 pp, (2019)
  39. Lavezzo, M., Monti, S.: Progettazione della residenza universitaria “Cesare Codegone” nell’area delimitata dalle vie borsellino - Relazione geologica e geotecnica. , Torino (2012)
  40. Bourne-Webb et al. (2016) Thermal and mechanical aspects of the response of embedded retaining walls used as shallow geothermal heat exchangers (pp. 130-141) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.075
  41. Sterpi et al. (2020) Energy performance of ground heat exchangers embedded in diaphragm walls: Field observations and optimization by numerical modelling (pp. 2748-2760) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.102
  42. Baehr and Stephan (2011) Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20021-2