10.1007/s40095-021-00395-z

Geometrical nonlinearities and shape effects in electromechanical models of piezoelectric bridge structures

  1. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SE Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, SE RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB, Gothenburg, SE
  2. RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB, Gothenburg, SE
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2021-05-26

How to Cite

Ohlsson, F., Johannisson, P., & Rusu, C. (2021). Geometrical nonlinearities and shape effects in electromechanical models of piezoelectric bridge structures. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12(4 (December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00395-z

HTML views: 20

PDF views: 130

Abstract

Abstract We consider nonlinear shape effects appearing in the lumped electromechanical model of a bimorph piezoelectric bridge structure due to the interaction between the electromechanical constitutive model and the geometry of the structure. At finite proof-mass displacement and electrode voltage, the shape of the beams is no longer given by Euler-Bernoulli theory which implies that shape effects enter in both the electrical and mechanical domains and in the coupling between them. Accounting for such effects is important for the accurate modelling of, e.g., piezoelectrical energy harvesters and actuators in the regime of large deflections and voltages. We present a general method, based on a variational approach minimizing the Gibbs enthalpy of the system, for computing corrections to the nominal shape function and the associated corrections to the lumped model. The lowest order correction is derived explicitly and is shown to produce significant improvements in model accuracy, both in terms of the Gibbs enthalpy and the shape function itself, over a large range of displacements and voltages. Furthermore, we validate the theoretical model using large deflection finite element simulations of the bridge structure and conclude that the lowest order correction substantially improve the model, obtaining a level of accuracy expected to be sufficient for most applications. Finally, we derive the equations of motion for the lowest order corrected model and show how the coupling between the electromechanical properties and the geometry of the bridge structure introduces nonlinear interaction terms.

References

  1. Cottone et al. (2009) Nonlinear energy harvesting https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.080601
  2. Marzencki et al. (2009) MEMS vibration energy harvesting devices with passive resonance frequency adaptation capability (pp. 1444-1453) https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2009.2032784
  3. Zhu et al. (2010) Strategies for increasing the operating frequency range of vibration energy harvesters: a review https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/2/022001
  4. Tang et al. (2010) Toward broadband vibration-based energy harvesting (pp. 1867-1897) https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X10390249
  5. Hajati, A., Xu, R., Kim, S.-G.: Wide bandwidth piezoelectric micro energy harvester based on nonlinear resonance. Proc. PowerMEMS 3–6 (2011)
  6. Gafforelli (2014) Modeling of a bridge-shaped nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester (pp. 179-187) https://doi.org/10.1515/ehs-2014-0005
  7. Xu and Kim (2015) Low-frequency, low-g MEMS piezoelectric energy harvester https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/660/1/012013
  8. Xu and Kim (2016) Modeling and experimental validation of bi-stable beam based piezoelectric energy harvester (pp. 313-321) https://doi.org/10.1515/ehs-2015-0022
  9. Gross et al. (2003) Lead-zirconate-titanate-based piezoelectric micromachined switch (pp. 174-176) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1589192
  10. Qui (2010) Large displacement vertical translational actuator based on piezoelectric thin films https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/7/075016
  11. Bahrami et al. (2014) Modeling and nonlinear analysis of a micro-switch under electrostatic and piezoelectric excitations with curvature and piezoelectric nonlinearities (pp. 263-272) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0961-6
  12. Ohlsson et al. (2018) Shape effects in doubly clamped bridge structures at large deflections https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1052/1/012109
  13. Roundy and Wright (2004) A piezoelectric vibration based generator for wireless electronics (pp. 1131-1142) https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/5/018
  14. Xu and Jia (2007) Electromechanical coupled nonlinear dynamics for microbeams (pp. 485-502) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-007-0110-8
  15. Xie et al. (2003) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of MEMS switches by nonlinear modal analysis (pp. 243-256) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022914020076
  16. Mahmoodi and Jalilib (2009) Piezoelectrically actuated microcantilevers: An experimental nonlinear vibration analysis (pp. 131-136) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.12.013
  17. Alexeev and Hafez (2017) Semi-implicit numerical simulations of geometrically nonlinear beam, plate and shell dynamical systems Int (pp. 514-522) https://doi.org/10.1080/15502287.2016.1247121
  18. Sahoo (2019) Active control of geometrically nonlinear vibrations of laminated composite beams using piezoelectric composites by element-free Galerkin method (pp. 514-522) https://doi.org/10.1080/15502287.2019.1566285
  19. Dineva (2014) Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03961-9