10.1007/s40095-021-00394-0

Flow mapping using 3D full-scale CFD simulation and hydrodynamic experiments of an ultra-supercritical turbine’s combined valve for nuclear power plant

  1. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, KR Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, US
  2. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, KR

Published in Issue 2021-04-27

How to Cite

Bhowmik, P. K., & Suh, K. Y. (2021). Flow mapping using 3D full-scale CFD simulation and hydrodynamic experiments of an ultra-supercritical turbine’s combined valve for nuclear power plant. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12(3 (September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-021-00394-0

Abstract

Abstract In a typical steam turbine generator system, electrical power output is related to the steam flow regulated by a control valve. Hence, to ensure adequate electrical load as well as the proper stability of the turbine, a linear operation of the control valve is desired. However, in reality, the control valve exhibits different flow characteristics (FCs), both linear and nonlinear, which stem from its complex shape of plug and stem lift. Therefore, precise estimation of FCs is of utmost importance for better controllability, reliability, and safety of the turbine system. In this study, experiments and CFD simulations were carried out to evaluate the hydrodynamic FCs of a combined emergency stop and control valve to be employed in an ultra-supercritical (USC) turbine system for power plant. A full-scale prototype valve was designed, fabricated, and tested for a vendor company. Experiments were performed in the so-called VELO (Valve Engineering Layout Operation) test bench, and CFD simulations were conducted using a commercial code STAR CCM+. Air was used for experiments and simulations for simple economic and safe operation. Hydrodynamic characteristics were analyzed, and the theoretical mass flow rate of the valve was estimated. Finally, the valve coefficient of the turbine system was determined from the obtained FC curves. The simulation and test data showed a scale deviation of 15–16% for the original model valve and the simplified test valve. The test valve required such scaled modification to match with the test bench and fabrication. The prospective future research and improvement were recommended. This study's findings would support improving the turbine system performance to ensure safer, reliable, and modular power conversion systems for nuclear and conventional fossil fuel-based power plants.

Keywords

  • Energy,
  • Power,
  • Conversion,
  • Turbine,
  • Valve,
  • Experiment,
  • CFD simulation

References

  1. IEA, International Energy Agency: World Energy Outlook 2012 Executive Summary. OECD/IEA-Paris France (2012)
  2. Brouwer et al. (2015) Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems (pp. 107-128) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.065
  3. Hutchison (1976) Instrument Society of America
  4. Johnson et al. (1983) General Electric Company
  5. Mirandola, A., Stoppato, A., Benato, A.: Steam power generation. In: Handbook of Clean Energy Systems, pp. 1–18 (2015)
  6. Saito et al. (2017) Development of 700 °C class steam turbine technology 54(3) (pp. 10-15)
  7. Cziesla, F., Bewerunge, J., Senzel, A.: Luenen—state-of-the-art ultra supercritical steam power plant under construction. PowerGen Europe 2009, 26–29 May 2009 Cologne, Germany
  8. Bhowmik (2016) Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University
  9. Quinkertz et al. (2008) USC Steam Turbine technology for maximum efficiency and operational flexibility
  10. Emerson Process Management Control Valve Handbook. 4th edn. Fisher; Control Valve Selection and Sizing. North America, Marshalltown, Iowa, USA (2005)
  11. Halimi and Suh (2012) Engineering nonlinearity characteristic compensation for commercial steam turbine control valve using linked MARS code and Matlab Simulink (pp. 360-370) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.12.014
  12. Zhang et al. (2004) Experimental study of steam turbine control valves (pp. 493-507) https://doi.org/10.1243/095440604323052283
  13. Kostyuk et al. (2000) An experimental analysis of pressure pulsations in the steam admission elements of a turbine installation (pp. 529-537)
  14. Oberle, A.: Combined emergency stop and governor valve for controlling fluid flow to a turbo-machine, Patents US3809126A.
  15. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3809126
  16. (1974)
  17. Araki, T., Kuwashima, H.: Combined valve, Patents US4481776A.
  18. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4481776A/en
  19. (1984)
  20. Gerdes, R., Padfield, R., Suter, F.: Valve arrangement for a power plant. Google Patents (2003)
  21. Clark, R.B., Kure-Jensen, J., Miyayashiki, H., Ofuji, T.: Combined valve configuration for steam cycle units. New York, USA, Pat. US005870896A (1997)
  22. Davis, D.H., Mossey, J.G.: Combined stop and intercept valve for steam turbines, Patents US4020869A.
  23. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4020869A/en
  24. (1977)
  25. Zaryankin et al. (2009) Some ways for improving vibration reliability of balanced control valves for steam turbines (pp. 644-648) https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601509080047
  26. Steenburgh, J.H., Clark, R.B., Porteous, N.D.: Combined stop and control valve for supplying steam, Patents US6655409B1 (2003)
  27. Yoo and Suh (2011) Engineering analysis of mass flow rate for turbine system control and design (pp. 4061-4078) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.014
  28. Bhowmik, P.K., Shamim, J.A., Suh, K.Y.: Flow characteristics analysis of control valve for turbine system. In: International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP), PI: 14359, Charlotte, NC, USA, 6–9 April 2014
  29. Bhowmik, P., Shamim, J., Gairola, A., Arif, M., Suh, K.Y.: Numerical analysis of combined valve hydrodynamic characteristics for turbine system. In: Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 29–30, 2014
  30. Halimi et al. (2013) Engineering of combined valve flow for power conversion system (pp. 448-455) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.09.012
  31. Bhowmik, P., Shamim, J., Gairola, A., Suh, K.: Flow characteristics analysis of ultra supercritical overload turbine control valve for power plant. In: The 2nd IEEE Conference on Power Engineering and Renewable Energy (ICPERE) 2014. IEEE, pp. 85–90, Bali, Indonesia, 9–11 December 2014.
  32. Zeß, J.-P., Polkas, T., Joos, F.: Experimental investigation of flow in a control valve of an industrial steam turbine. In: ASME Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition 2016, GT2016–57215, New York, NY (2016)
  33. Kang et al. (2016) Program development for performance analysis of a steam turbine system with the use of overload valve (pp. 5759-5769) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1146-x
  34. Domnick and Brillert (2018) Flow-induced steam valve vibrations—A literature review of excitation mechanisms, preventive measures, and design improvements 141(5) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041253
  35. Kollross, P., Tajč, L.: AIP Conference Proceedings 2189, 020012 (2019);
  36. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138624
  37. Slama et al. (2021) Flow analysis in a steam turbine control valve with through-flow valve chamber 7(2) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049055
  38. Hajsman, M., Kovandova, D., Matas, R.: Some aspects of numerical simulation of control valves for steam turbines. In: EPJ Web Conferences, vol. 25, p. 01052 (2012)
  39. Amirante et al. (2006) Evaluation of the flow forces on an open centre directional control valve by means of a computational fluid dynamic analysis (pp. 1748-1760) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.005
  40. Song et al. (2009) Fluid and structural analysis of a large diameter butterfly valve (pp. 81-88) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686709001663
  41. Domnick et al. (2015) Numerical investigation on the time-variant flow field and dynamic forces acting in steam turbine inlet valves 137(8) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029309
  42. Morita et al. (2007) CFD simulations and experiments of flow fluctuations around a steam control valve (pp. 48-54) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2375123
  43. Lisowski and Filo (2016) CFD analysis of the characteristics of a proportional flow control valve with an innovative opening shape (pp. 15-28) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.025
  44. Lisowski and Filo (2017) Analysis of a proportional control valve flow coefficient with the usage of a CFD method (pp. 269-278) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.12.009
  45. Wang and Liu (2017) Influence of a circular strainer on unsteady flow behavior in steam turbine control valves (pp. 463-476) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.12.073
  46. Wang et al. (2018) Computational fluid dynamics of steam flow in a turbine control valve with a bell-shaped spindle (pp. 1333-1347) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.104
  47. Wang et al. (2019) Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Extended-Proper Orthogonal Decomposition analysis of pressure fluctuations and vortex structures inside a steam turbine control valve 141(4) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040903
  48. Qian et al. (2020) Valve core shapes analysis on flux through control valves in nuclear power plants 52(10) (pp. 2173-2182) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.03.008
  49. Bhowmik et al. (2021) Rod bundle thermal-hydraulics experiment with water and water-Al2O3 nanofluid for small modular reactor https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107870
  50. Bhowmik et al. (2021) Design of condensation heat transfer experiment to evaluate scaling distortion in small modular reactor safety analysis https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050211
  51. ANSI/ ISA-75.02-1996: Control Valve Capacity Test Procedures. ISA (1996)
  52. ANSI/ISA-75.01.01-2002. Flow Equations for Sizing Control Valves. ISA (2002)
  53. STAR CCM+ (ver. 9.06.011), and Training Manual, version 05/14, CD-Adapco
  54. CADCIM Technologies, Tickoo S, Raina V. CATIA V5R17 for designers
  55. Barma et al. (2017) A review on boilers energy use, energy savings, and emissions reductions (pp. 970-983) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.187
  56. Liu and Cui (2018) Economic model predictive control of boiler-turbine system (pp. 59-67) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.02.010
  57. AbouAl-Sood et al. (2013) Optimum parametric performance characterization of an irreversible gas turbine Brayton cycle https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-37
  58. Mollenhauer et al. (2016) Evaluation of an energy- and exergy-based generic modeling approach of combined heat and power plants (pp. 167-176) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-016-0204-6
  59. Bhowmik, P.K., Dey, M.: Protection and control of steam turbine generator using PLC. In: First International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Renewable Energy 2011 (ICMERE2011), Chittagong, Bangladesh, 22–24 December 2011
  60. Bhowmik, P.K., Dhar, S.: Boiler gas burner management system automation using PLC. In: 2012 7th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 925–928. IEEE (2012)
  61. Bloch and Singh (2008) McGraw-Hill
  62. Bhowmik, P.K, Dhar, S., Dey, M., Shamim, J.: Sizing and selection of control valve for process control loop. In: International Conference on Engineering Research, Innovation & Education (2013)
  63. Bhowmik, P.K.: Sizing and selection of pressure relief safety valve. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Mechanical Engineering Conference & 14th Annual Paper Meet (6IMEC&14APM), 28–29 September 2012, Dhaka, Bangladesh (2012)
  64. Anderson et al. (2013) Springer
  65. Mazur et al. (2004) Improvement of the turbine main stop valves with flow simulation in erosion by solid particle impact CFD (pp. 747943-747952) https://doi.org/10.1155/S1023621X04000077
  66. Ahmed et al. (2021) CFD validation with optimized mesh using benchmarking data of pebble-bed high-temperature reactor https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103653
  67. Hellström, F.: Numerical computations of the unsteady flow in turbochargers. Ph. D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH (2010)
  68. Dulau, M., Bica, D.: Mathematical modelling and simulation of the behaviour of the steam turbine. In: The 7th International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, INTER-ENG 2013, Elsevier, Procedia Technology, vol. 12, pp. 723–729 (2014)
  69. Miller, N., Sanchez-Gasca, J., Price, W., Delmerico, R.: Dynamic modeling of GE 1.5 and 3.6 MW wind turbine-generators for stability simulations. In: 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491), Toronto, ON, Canada, vol. 3, pp. 1977–1983 (2003).
  70. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2003.1267470
  71. .