10.1007/s40095-020-00351-3

Effect of reduced gas pressure on yield of biogas and other physicochemical parameters

  1. Bhaktapur, NP
  2. Department of Applied Science and Chemical Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Kathmanu, NP
  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Kathmanu, NP

Published in Issue 2020-06-19

How to Cite

Prajapati, B. R., Sharma, R. K., & Amatya, I. M. (2020). Effect of reduced gas pressure on yield of biogas and other physicochemical parameters. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12(1 (March 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-020-00351-3

Abstract

Abstract The internal gas pressure is one of the major parameters affecting the microclimate of the anaerobic digester. The effect can be described by Henry’s Law and Ideal Gas law. In this experiment, the effect of reduced gas pressure on the yield of biogas and its composition was observed. The pressure of gas was reduced by displacement of a piston connected to the balancing weight, to maintain constant reduced pressure. As the piston is displaced to its maximum point due to gas generation, then the gas is transferred to the gas storage tank for further analysis. The gauge pressure applied was 0, -100\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-100$$\end{document} , and -200\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-200$$\end{document}  mmHg for systems A, B, and C, respectively. The specific gas yield of systems A, B and C was 26.09, 70.41, and 246.5 L/kg (on dry basis). The production of methane was increased with a decrease in internal gas pressure. The corresponding average methane content of systems A, B and C was 38.33, 44 and 63.97%. The BOD5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\hbox{BOD}_{5}$$\end{document} removal efficiencies were 6.25, 33.33 and 70.83% for systems A, B, and C, respectively. The pH of the substrate was stable in the system C. The rate of Total Solid (TS) reduction was high in System C. The TS reduction efficiency of systems A, B, and C was 14.7, 16.64, and 22.19%, respectively. The reduction in internal gas pressure can be a new effective and efficient process control strategy. The reduced-pressure system reduces the chemical cost incurred by the addition of alkalinity to maintain the pH.

Keywords

  • Reduced Pressure,
  • Anaerobic Digestion,
  • BOD5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\hbox{BOD}}_{5}$$\end{document},
  • pH,
  • Total Solid

References

  1. Benefield and Randall (1980) Prentice-Hall
  2. Chhokar et al. (2004) Sage Publications India Pvt, Ltd https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132101901
  3. Deublein and Steinhauser (2008) Wiley-VCH https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527621705
  4. García and Pérez (2013) Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and sewage sludge: influence of composition and temperature (pp. 8-15)
  5. Gerardi (2003) Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/0471468967
  6. Hamad et al. (1983) Rural biogas technology: effect of digester pressure on gas rate and composition (pp. 49-57)
  7. He et al. (2008) Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production (pp. 2775-2781) https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8000967
  8. Jedrzejewska et al. (2005) Effect of reduced pressure on anaerobic blood biodegradation (pp. 87-93)
  9. Karki et al. (2005) BSP Nepal
  10. Keanoi et al. (2014) Effect of with/without agitation of agricultural waste on biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion-a small scale (pp. 74-85) https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2014.74.85
  11. Kellner, E., Baird, A.J., Oosterwoud, M.: Effect of temperature and atmospheric pressure on methane ebullition from near surface peat. Geophys Res Lett (2006).
  12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027509
  13. Lam and ter Heegde (2010) University of Oldenburg
  14. Monnet, F.: An introduction to anaerobic digestion of organic wastes. In: Technical Reports on Remade Scotland (2003)
  15. Naik and Tiwari (2005) Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd
  16. Ngumah et al. (2013) Effects of initiating anaerobic digestion of layer hen poultry dung at sub-atmospheric pressure (pp. 33-42)
  17. Palmowski and Müller (2000) Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion (pp. 155-162) https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0067
  18. Rao and Datta (1987) Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd
  19. Satyanarayan, S., Kaul, S.N., Badrinath, S.D.: Biogas from human waste. In: Biogas from Human Waste, pp. 9–23. Consortium for Rural Technology (1987)
  20. Tchobanoglous et al. (2003) Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd
  21. Tokida, T., Miyazaki, T., Mizoguchi, M.: Ebullition of methane from peat with falling atmospheric pressure. Geophys. Res. Lett.
  22. 32
  23. , L13823 (2005)
  24. UNDP: Energy for development, Kosovo human development report. In: Technical Reports on United Nation (2007)
  25. Werner, U., Stöhr, U., Hees, N.: Biogas plants in animal husbandry. In: GATE/GTZ Gmb (1989)
  26. Zhang, T., Liu, L., Song, Z.: Biogas production by co-digestion of goat manure with three crop residues. PLoS ONE
  27. 8
  28. (6), e66845 (2013).
  29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066845
  30. Zweifel et al. (2017) Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53022-1