10.1007/s40095-019-00318-z

Assessing the duality of thermal performance and energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot arid climate of Laghouat, Algeria

  1. ETAP Laboratory, Architecture and Urbanism Institute, Saad Dahleb University, Blida, DZ
  2. SREML Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Ammar Telidji University, Laghouat, DZ
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2019-09-10

How to Cite

Bencheikh, D., & Bederina, M. (2019). Assessing the duality of thermal performance and energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot arid climate of Laghouat, Algeria. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 11(1 (March 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-00318-z

HTML views: 153

PDF views: 126

Abstract

Abstract Thermal comfort is the main driver of buildings energy consumption; it has been classified by building occupants to be of greater importance compared with visual and acoustic comfort. To respond correctly and quickly to the increase in energy price and pollution, thermal regulations and comfort approaches have emerged. This paper compares the thermal performances and energy demand of a vernacular and a low-income modern dwelling using two major thermal comfort approaches (Givoni’s approach and adaptive thermal comfort recommended by The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers in ASHRAE standards 55-2010) and the energy professional’s method presented in the French Thermal Regulations RT2012. It shows the effectiveness of bioclimatic and passive strategies in reducing energy demand, increasing the thermal comfort level for the buildings, and therefore reducing greenhouse emissions. The results show that the vernacular house was comfortable during the warm day, which approved a 100% cooling energy efficiency (the thermal comfort has been achieved in a passive way), contrary to the contemporary dwelling, in which the use of air-conditioning modern systems was essential to meet the occupant needs in terms of thermal comfort. The difference between the houses’ energy performances was estimated, including a 39% reduction in energy demand.

Keywords

  • Vernacular dwelling,
  • Low-income modern house,
  • Thermal comfort,
  • Building simulation,
  • Building energy demand,
  • Hot arid climate

References

  1. Abdul Tharim and Abdul Samad (2016) A review on sustainable design and indoor thermal comfort of a green building 11(6) (pp. 3712-3717)
  2. Albatayneh et al. (2018) The impact of the thermal comfort models on the prediction of building energy consumption https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103609
  3. ARIEFF, A.: Algeria: current issues. CRS report, prepared for a members and comities of congress. Congressional Research Service (2013).
  4. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21532.pdf
  5. . Accessed 6 Jan 2019
  6. Bencheikh, D., Bederina, M.: The Rehabilitation effects on the thermal behavior of Algerian earthen built heritage. MATEC Web of Conferences 149-02049 (2018)
  7. Besagni and Marco (2018) The determinants of residential energy expenditure in Italy 165, Part A(15) (pp. 369-386) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.108
  8. Brounen et al. (2012) Residential energy use and conservation: economics and demographics (pp. 931-945) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.007
  9. Burmana et al. (2014) Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings (pp. 153-163) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.102
  10. CBE: Thermal comfort tool for ASHRAE-55 (2019).
  11. http://comfort.cbe.berkeley.edu/
  12. . Accessed 05 Jan 2019
  13. Chaer, I.: Estimation of cooling energy demand and carbon emissions from urban buildings using a quasi-dynamic model (2014).
  14. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1978.3685
  15. CNERIB: Document technique réglementaire DTR C3-T (2011)
  16. De Angelis et al. (2017) A simple method for the comparison of bioclimatic design strategies based on dynamic indoor thermal comfort assessment for school buildings (pp. 870-880) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.248
  17. De Dear et al. (1998) Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference/discussion
  18. Doat, P., Hayes, A., Houben, H., Matuk, S., Vitoux, F.: Construire en terre. Paris.La Harmattan, p. 281 (1979)
  19. EnergyPlus Manual (2008) Documentation version 3.0. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
  20. ETP 2017: Iea.Org (2019).
  21. https://www.iea.org/etp/etp2017/
  22. . Accessed 15 Dec 2018
  23. Fathy (1986) The University of Chicago Press
  24. Fiaschi et al. (2012) A case study for energy issues of public buildings and utilities in a small municipality: investigation of possible improvements and integration with renewables (pp. 101-114) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.008
  25. FMDJ: Fiche méthode Degrés Jours. sur le site meteo.fr de Météo France(2018).
  26. http://climatheque.meteo.fr/Docs/DJC-methode.pdf
  27. Frontczak and Wargocki (2011) Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments 46(4) (pp. 922-937) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021
  28. Galvin and Sunikka-Blank (2013) Economic viability in thermal retrofit policies: learning from ten years of experience in Germany (pp. 343-351) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.044
  29. Unknown (2012) Cambridge University Press
  30. Givoni, B.: L’homme l’architecture et le climat. Paris, le moniteur, 460 p (1987)
  31. Gong and Song (2015) Life cycle building carbon emissions assessment and driving factors decomposition analysis based on LMDI: a case study of Wuhan City in China 7(12) (pp. 16670-16686) https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215838
  32. Großmann et al. (2014) Energetische Sanierung: Sozialräumliche Strukturen von Städten berücksichtigen 23(4) (pp. 309-312) https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.4.5
  33. Hajat et al. (2010) Health effects of hot weather: From awareness of risk factors to effective health protection 375(9717) (pp. 856-863) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61711-6
  34. Harris et al. (2013) Wiley-Blackwell
  35. Herero (2010) Energy poverty indicators: A critical review of methods 26(7) (pp. 1018-1031) https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X17718054
  36. Houben and Guilaud (1989) Parenthèses
  37. IEA (2019) The global exchange for energy efficiency policies, data and analyses. Energy Access Outlook.
  38. https://www.iea.org/topics/energyefficiency/
  39. . Accessed 27 Apr 2019
  40. Khledj, S., Bencheikh, H.: impact of a retrofitting project on thermal comfort and energy efficiency of a historic school in Miliana, Algeria. Int. J. Archit. Herit. (2019).
  41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1621960
  42. Kolokotsa et al. (2009) Decision support methodologies on the energy efficiency and energy management in buildings 3(1) (pp. 121-146) https://doi.org/10.3763/aber.2009.0305
  43. Unknown (2011) Friends of the Earth and the Marmot Review Team
  44. Matari, N. et al.: Effet de l’enveloppe du bâtiment sur le confort thermique. Application au climat aride”. Congrès Français de Thermique SFT 2015, La thermique de l’habitat et de la ville, La Rochelle, pp. 1–8 (2015)
  45. Massimo and Pachauria (2004) Residential energy expenditures and elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households (pp. 429-436) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00314-2
  46. Michelsen and Müller-Michelsen (2010) Energieeffizienz im Altbau: Werden die Sanierungspotenziale überschätzt? Ergebnisse auf Grundlage des ista-IWH-Energieeffizienzindex (pp. 447-455)
  47. Ministère de l’habitat: Recommandation architecturales. Ed ENAG, Alger (1993)
  48. NF EN ISO 8894-1: Refractory materials: determination of thermal conductivity-part1: hot-wire methods (cross-array and resistance thermometer). Matériaux réfractaires (2010)
  49. NF P94-064: Soils: investigation and testing. Density of a dehydrated rock sample. Hydrostatic weighing method. Sols: reconnaissance et essais (1993)
  50. Nussbaumer et al. (2013) Global insights based on the multidimensional energy poverty index (MEPI) 5(5) (pp. 2060-2076) https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052060
  51. Oliver (2006) Architectural Press
  52. ONM (2017) office national de la météorologie. Données climatiques journalières
  53. Pérez-Lombard et al. (2008) A review on buildings energy consumption information 40(3) (pp. 394-398) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007
  54. PPSMVSS: Plan permanent de sauvegarde et de mise en valeur du secteur sauvegardé; Le vieux ksar de Laghouat No. 11-141 du 28 mars 2011/JO No. 20 du 30/03/2011 (2011)
  55. Ravero (2003) Arles
  56. Ritchie, H., Max, R.: CO
  57. 2
  58. and other greenhouse gas emissions. Our World In Data (2019).
  59. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions
  60. . Accessed 12 May 2019
  61. RT 2012 Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement. La Règlementation Thermique Grenelle de l’Environnement (2012).
  62. http://www.infoenergie.eu/riv+ener/LCU_fichiers/LT-RT2012.pdf
  63. Singh et al. (2011) Review of life-cycle assessment applications in building construction 17(1) (pp. 15-23) https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000026
  64. Spitz, C.: Analyse de la fiabilité des outils de simulation et des incertitudes de métrologie appliquée à l’efficacité énergétique des bâtiments. Thèse du doctorat, Université de Grenoble, France (2012)
  65. Unknown (1997) Cold exposure and winter mortality from ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, and all causes in warm and cold regions of Europe 1997(349) (pp. 1341-1346)
  66. Wolff et al. (2016) Risiko energetische Sanierung? (pp. 611-634) Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
  67. Xu (2012) Analysis on the causes of the slow development of city low-carbon construction (pp. 51-53)
  68. Yang et al. (2014) Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications: a review (pp. 164-173) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.062
  69. Ying-Ming (2017) Improvement of ventilation and thermal comfort using the atrium design for traditional folk houses-fujian earthen building 11(4) (pp. 469-477)