10.1007/s40095-019-00321-4

Experimental investigations on thermal performance characteristics of a solar cavity receiver

HTML PDF
  • Santosh B. Bopche*1,
  • Shobhit Kumar1,
  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, NIT Hamirpur, Government of India, Hamirpur, HP, IN
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2019-09-17

How to Cite

Bopche, S. B., & Kumar, S. (2019). Experimental investigations on thermal performance characteristics of a solar cavity receiver. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 10(4 (December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-00321-4
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 51

PDF views: 102

Abstract

Abstract The experimentation is carried out to examine the influence of receiver aperture/opening ratio (receiver’s aperture diameter to the maximum diameter ratio, d/D ), glass cover thickness and inclination angle of cavity receiver on its collection efficiency for various flow rates of ordinary water as a working fluid. Experimental tests have been conducted at lower incident energy, i.e., at lower cavity wall temperatures (less than 200 °C). The aperture ratio examined encompasses values as 0.46, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.93 for water flowing at flows of 0.8, 0.65, 0.5, and 0.4 LPM that corresponds to Reynolds numbers ( Re ) of 1880, 1525, 1175, and 938, respectively. The glazing thicknesses of 6, 4, and 2 mm were provided at an aperture. A modified cavity-type receiver is made inclined at angles 90°, 60°, 45°, and 30° (with 90° as down-facing receiver opening and 30° as close to sideway-facing of receiver opening). The tests have been conducted for cavity surface temperatures ranging from 90° to 180 °C. It is observed that an aperture ratio of 0.6 demonstrates maximum receiver performance for the values of Reynolds number studied, while the receiver performance exhibited reducing trend with reduction in receiver tilting angle from 90° to 30°.

Keywords

  • Modified cavity receiver,
  • Aperture/opening ratio,
  • Collection efficiency,
  • Inclination
HTML PDF

References

  1. Shuai et al. (2008) Radiation performance of dish solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems 82(1) (pp. 13-21) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2007.06.005
  2. Daabo et al. (2016) The effect of receiver geometry on the optical performance of a small-scale solar cavity receiver for parabolic dish applications (pp. 513-525) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.025
  3. Chongzhe et al. (2017) Design and optimization of a high-temperature cavity receiver for a solar energy cascade utilization system (pp. 478-489) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.11.044
  4. Tan et al. (2014) Experimental investigation on heat loss of semi-spherical cavity receiver (pp. 576-583) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.080
  5. Clausing (1983) Convective losses from cavity solar receivers comparisons between analytical predictions and experimental results 105(1) (pp. 29-33) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3266342
  6. Prakash et al. (2010) Determination of stagnation and convective zones in a solar cavity receiver (pp. 680-691) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.06.015
  7. Wu et al. (2010) Convection heat loss from cavity receiver in parabolic dish solar thermal power system: a review (pp. 1342-1355) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.008
  8. Ngo et al. (2015) Three-dimensional analysis and numerical optimization of combined natural convection and radiation heat loss in solar cavity receiver with plate fins insert (pp. 757-766) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.061
  9. Zhang, J.J., Pye, J.D., Hughes, G.O.: Active air flow control to reduce cavity receiver heat loss. In: ASME 2015 9th International Conference on Energy Sustainability Collocated with the ASME 2015 Power Conference and 13th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science Engineering Technology and the ASME 2015 Nuclear Forum, San Diego, California, June 28–July 2, pp. 1–10 (2015)
  10. Reddy et al. (2016) Effect of wind speed and direction on convective heat losses from solar parabolic dish modified cavity receiver (pp. 183-198) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.039
  11. Prakash et al. (2009) Investigations on heat losses from a solar cavity receiver 83(2) (pp. 157-170) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.07.011
  12. Reddy and Kumar (2008) Combined laminar natural convection and surface radiation heat transfer in a modified cavity receiver of solar parabolic dish 47(12) (pp. 1647-1657) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.12.001
  13. Sauceda, D., Velazquez, N., Beltran, R., Quintero, M.: Thermal analysis of a conical receiver in a paraboloid dish to be used as generator in an advanced solar thermal cooling system. In: Proceedings of ANES/ASME Solar Joint 2006 XXXth Mexican National Solar Energy Week Conference, Veracruz, Mexico, 2–6 October, pp. 1–7 (2006)
  14. Bakari et al. (2014) Effect of glass thickness on performance of flat plate solar collectors for fruits drying https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/247287
  15. Lopez-Herraiz et al. (2017) Effect of the optical properties of the coating of a concentrated solar power central receiver on its thermal efficiency (pp. 66-72) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.031
  16. Prakash et al. (2012) Numerical study of natural convection loss from open cavities (pp. 23-30) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.08.012
  17. Abbasi-Shavazi et al. (2015) Investigation of heat loss from a solar cavity receiver (pp. 269-278) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.031
  18. Taumoefolau et al. (2004) Experimental investigation of natural convection heat loss from a model solar concentrator cavity receiver (pp. 801-807) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1687403
  19. Reddy and Kumar (2009) An improved model for natural convection heat loss from modified cavity receiver of solar dish concentrator (pp. 1884-1892) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.07.001
  20. Reddy and Kumar (2009) Convection and surface radiation heat losses from modified cavity receiver of solar parabolic dish collector with two-stage concentration (pp. 363-373) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-008-0440-2
  21. Kumar and Reddy (2010) Investigation of convection and radiation heat losses from modified cavity receiver of solar parabolic dish using asymptotic computational fluid dynamics 31(7) (pp. 597-607) https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630903425890
  22. Paitoonsurikarn et al. (2011) Numerical investigation of natural convection loss from cavity receivers in solar dish applications https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003582
  23. Beltran et al. (2012) Mathematical model for the study and design of a solar dish collector with cavity receiver for its application in Stirling engines 26(10) (pp. 3311-3321) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0801-0
  24. Hernandez et al. (2012) Conical receiver for a paraboloidal concentrator with large rim angle (pp. 1053-1062) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.09.008
  25. Reddy and Kumar (2014) Estimation of convective and radiative heat losses from an inverted trapezoidal cavity receiver of solar linear Fresnel reflector system (pp. 48-57) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.01.022
  26. Flesch et al. (2015) On the influence of wind on cavity receivers for solar power towers: An experimental analysis (pp. 724-735) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.059
  27. Shen et al. (2016) Numerical study of wind effects on combined convective heat loss from an upward-facing cylindrical cavity (pp. 294-309) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.021
  28. Shen et al. (2017) Effect of aperture size on free convection and radiation heat transfer in isoflux upward facing cylindrical cavities (pp. 1-14) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.04.026
  29. Shewale et al. (2016) Heat loss investigation from spherical cavity receiver of solar concentrator 30(11) (pp. 5233-5238) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1040-6
  30. Wu et al. (2015) Experimental investigation and uncertainty analysis on combined heat losses characteristics of a cylindrical cavity with only bottom wall heated at constant heat flux (pp. 539-552) https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2014.939040
  31. Strumpf et al. (1982) High temperature ceramic heat exchanger element for a solar thermal receiver (pp. 305-309) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3266322
  32. Ngo et al. (2016) Numerical investigation of natural convection of cavity receiver for low power application https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2016.1161628
  33. Feng, H., Zhang, Y., Zou, C.: A 3-D model simulation of high temperature solar cavity receiver. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Power Conference Joint with ICOPE-17, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, 26–30 June 2017, pp. 1–7.
  34. https://doi.org/10.1115/POWER-ICOPE2017-3307
  35. (2017)
  36. Loni et al. (2018) Numerical investigation of a solar dish concentrator with different cavity receivers and working fluids (pp. 1013-1030) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.075
  37. Gonzalez et al. (2012) Numerical study of heat transfer by natural convection and surface thermal radiation in an open cavity receiver (pp. 1118-1128) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.01.005
  38. Pavlovic et al. (2018) Comparative study of spiral and conical cavity receivers for a solar dish collector (pp. 111-122) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.030
  39. Caijun, S., Liping, P., Liwei, Z.: The effect of the tube diameter on the performance of the two stage receiver. In: International Conference on Renewable Power Generation (RPG 2015), Beijing, China,17–18 October 2015.
  40. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2015.0397
  41. . ISBN: 978-1-78561-040-0 (2015)
  42. Kumar and Bopche (2017) (pp. 57-78) Springer
  43. Jaffe (1984) Solar tests of aperture plate materials for solar thermal dish collectors (pp. 408-415) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3267619
  44. Cui et al. (2013) Study on combined heat loss of a dish receiver with quartz glass cover (pp. 690-696) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.007
  45. Karimi et al. (2018) A detailed mathematical model for thermal performance analysis of a cylindrical cavity receiver in a solar parabolic dish collector system https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.015
  46. Fang et al. (2018) Numerical Investigation of the tube layout effects on the heat losses of solar cavity receiver https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036792
  47. Kribus et al. (2001) Performance of the directly-irradiated annular pressurized receiver (DIAPR) operating at 20 bar and 1200°C (pp. 10-17) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1345844
  48. Howell (1982) McGraw Hill Book Company
  49. Modest (2003) Academic Press https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012503163-9/50023-0