10.1007/s40095-018-0295-3

Effect of building shape, orientation, window to wall ratios and zones on energy efficiency and thermal comfort of naturally ventilated houses in tropical climate

HTML PDF
  • Shakila Pathirana*1,
  • Asanka Rodrigo2,
  • Rangika Halwatura1,
  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, LK
  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, LK
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2019-01-03

How to Cite

Pathirana, S., Rodrigo, A., & Halwatura, R. (2019). Effect of building shape, orientation, window to wall ratios and zones on energy efficiency and thermal comfort of naturally ventilated houses in tropical climate. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 10(1 (March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-018-0295-3
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 128

PDF views: 1206

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the effect of building shape, zones, orientation and window to wall ratio (WWR) on the lighting energy requirement and the thermal comfort in the naturally ventilated houses in tropical climate. The lighting electricity and the adaptive thermal discomfort hours (ASHRAE 55 80% acceptability) of 300 different models of two-storey houses were obtained using Design Builder simulation software. The models were developed for three building shapes (square, rectangle and L-shaped) and the orientation of each model was changed for 24 orientations and four window to wall ratios. Results indicate that the rectangular shape with staircase positioned in the middle of the house will provide higher thermal comfort for WWR of 20 and for other WWRs the L-shaped models provide higher thermal comfort when the staircase is positioned at the short corner or middle. The square-shaped houses with staircase at the middle have the highest lighting electricity and the L shape has the lowest lighting electricity. Further, WWR changes the thermal comfort by 20–55% and the percentage change in lighting electricity due to WWR is only 1.5–9.5%. Therefore, thermal comfort should receive more attention in deciding the WWR. Moreover, the results show an effect when the zone sizes and location change.

Keywords

  • Energy efficiency,
  • Thermal comfort,
  • Building energy performance,
  • Building shape,
  • Orientation,
  • Window to wall ratio
HTML PDF

References

  1. Wang et al. (2007) Facade design optimization for naturally ventilated residential buildings in singapore 39(8) (pp. 954-961) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.10.011
  2. Besagni and Borgarello (2018) The determinants of residential energy expenditure in italy (pp. 369-386) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.108
  3. Galvin and Sunikka-Blank (2013) Economic viability in thermal retrofit policies: learning from ten years of experience in germany (pp. 343-351) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.044
  4. Wolff et al. (2017) Risiko energetische Sanierung? (pp. 611-634) Springer VS https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11723-8_23
  5. Großmann et al. (2014) Energetische sanierung: Sozialräumliche strukturen von städten berücksichtigen 23(4) (pp. 309-312)
  6. Michelsen and Müller-Michelsen (2010) Energieeffizienz im altbau: Werden die sanierungspotenziale überschätzt? ergebnisse auf grundlage des ista-iwh-energieeffizienzindex 16(9) (pp. 447-455)
  7. Brounen et al. (2012) Residential energy use and conservation: economics and demographics 56(5) (pp. 931-945) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.007
  8. Longhi (2015) Residential energy expenditures and the relevance of changes in household circumstances (pp. 440-450) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.018
  9. Filippini and Pachauri (2004) Elasticities of electricity demand in urban indian households 32(3) (pp. 429-436) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00314-2
  10. Ahsan and Svane (2010) Energy efficient design features for residential buildings in tropical climates : the Context of Dhaka, Bangladesh (pp. 183-202)
  11. Mirrahimi et al. (2016) The effect of building envelope on the thermal comfort and energy saving for high-rise buildings in hot-humid climate (pp. 1508-1519) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.055
  12. Gago et al. (2015) Natural light controls and guides in buildings. Energy saving for electrical lighting, reduction of cooling load (pp. 1-13) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.002
  13. Tavares and Martins (2007) Energy efficient building design using sensitivity analysisa case study 39(1) (pp. 23-31) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.04.017
  14. Roetzel and Tsangrassoulis (2012) Impact of climate change on comfort and energy performance in offices (pp. 349-361) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.002
  15. Yıldız and Arsan (2011) Identification of the building parameters that influence heating and cooling energy loads for apartment buildings in hot-humid climates 36(7) (pp. 4287-4296) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.04.013
  16. Cheung et al. (2005) Energy-efficient envelope design for high-rise apartments 37(1) (pp. 37-48) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.002
  17. Ochoa and Capeluto (2008) Strategic decision-making for intelligent buildings: comparative impact of passive design strategies and active features in a hot climate 43(11) (pp. 1829-1839) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.018
  18. Porritt et al. (2011) Adapting dwellings for heat waves 1(2) (pp. 81-90) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2011.02.004
  19. Ihm and Krarti (2012) Design optimization of energy efficient residential buildings in tunisia (pp. 81-90) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.012
  20. Florides et al. (2002) Measures used to lower building energy consumption and their cost effectiveness 73(3) (pp. 299-328) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00119-8
  21. Ourghi et al. (2007) A simplified analysis method to predict the impact of shape on annual energy use for office buildings 48(1) (pp. 300-305) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.04.011
  22. Caruso and Kämpf (2015) Building shape optimisation to reduce air-conditioning needs using constrained evolutionary algorithms (pp. 186-196) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.04.046
  23. Depecker et al. (2001) Design of buildings shape and energetic consumption (pp. 627-635) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00044-5
  24. AlAnzi et al. (2009) Impact of building shape on thermal performance of office buildings in Kuwait 50(3) (pp. 822-828) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.033
  25. Alwetaishi (2017) Impact of glazing to wall ratio in various climatic regions: a case study https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2017.03.001
  26. Gomez-Mejia et al. (2007) Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture 23(7) (pp. 635-648)
  27. Oral and Yilmaz (2002) The limit U values for building envelope related to building form in temperate and cold climatic zones 37(11) (pp. 1173-1180) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00102-0
  28. Oral and Yilmaz (2003) Building form for cold climatic zones related to building envelope from heating energy conservation point of view 35(4) (pp. 383-388) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00111-1
  29. Marks (1997) Multicriteria optimisation of shape of energy-saving buildings 32(4) (pp. 331-339) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(96)00065-0
  30. Jedrzejuk and Marks (2002) Optimization of shape and functional structure of buildings as well as heat source utilization. Basic theory 37(12) (pp. 1379-1383) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00101-9
  31. Mangkuto et al. (2016) Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: a case study of buildings in the tropics (pp. 211-219) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.046
  32. Hachem et al. (2011) Parametric investigation of geometric form effects on solar potential of housing units 85(9) (pp. 1864-1877) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.04.027
  33. Bichiou and Krarti (2011) Optimization of envelope and HVAC systems selection for residential buildings 43(12) (pp. 3373-3382) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.031
  34. Bambrook et al. (2011) Design optimisation for a low energy home in Sydney 43(7) (pp. 1702-1711) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.013
  35. Bre et al. (2016) Residential building design optimisation using sensitivity analysis and genetic algorithm (pp. 853-866) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.025
  36. Department of Census and Statistics, “Census of Population and Housing,” tech. rep., (2012)
  37. Halwatura (2013) Effect of turf roof slabs on indoor thermal performance in tropical climates: a life cycle cost approach (pp. 1-10) https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/845158
  38. Neufert and Neufert (2000) Blackwell Science Ltd
  39. Udawattha, C., Arooz, R., Halwatura, R.: Energy content of walling materials-a comparison of mud concrete blocks, bricks cabook and cement blocks in tropics. In: 7th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 7, pp. 30–42, (2016)
  40. Jayasinghe and Attalage (1999) Passive techniques for residential buildings in low altitudes of Sri Lanka 29(2) (pp. 18-27)
  41. CIBSE, Lighting Guide 9: Lighting for communal residential buildings. (2013)
  42. U.S. Green Building Council, “LEED BD+C: Homes | v4 - LEED v4,” (2018)
  43. ASHRAE, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010, vol. 2010, p. 42 (2010)
  44. Yao et al. (2009) A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort-adaptive predicted mean vote (apmv) 44(10) (pp. 2089-2096) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.014
  45. Mishra and Ramgopal (2015) An adaptive thermal comfort model for the tropical climatic regions of India (Köppen climate type A) (pp. 134-143) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.006
  46. Edwards, C.: Design rules of thumb for naturally ventilated office buildings in Canada. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia (2001)
  47. Aflaki et al. (2015) A review on natural ventilation applications through building facade components and ventilation openings in tropical climates (pp. 153-162) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.033
  48. Walker (2016) National Renewable Energy Laboratory