The STMO Model for Balancing Growth and Conservation in Juneau, Alaska
- School of Computer Engineering, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou 510800, Guangdong, China
- School of International Business, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou 510800, Guangdong, China
- Engineering Institute, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou 510800, Guangdong, China
Copyright (c) 2024 Jinyu Wang, Zeren Yu, Jing Li, Yunpeng Shang, Hongjun Lin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PDF views: 9
Abstract
Juneau, Alaska, faces rapidly increasing visitor numbers, generating substantial economic gains while intensifying environmental pressures and social tensions. To address these challenges, this study develops a dynamic multi-objective optimization model that jointly considers economic revenue, ecological degradation, and social carrying capacity. The model integrates feedback loops and reinvestment strategies, demonstrating how visitor caps, tax policies, and targeted expenditures influence long-term system outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and simulation results identify the parameters most critical to sustainable tourism management, including infrastructure efficiency, environmental mitigation rates, and community development investment. Although Juneau serves as the case study, the framework is generalizable and can be adapted to other overtourism destinations by calibrating site-specific constraints and priorities. The findings highlight actionable pathways for balancing growth and conservation, while offering methodological and policy insights that extend to the field of overtourism research globally. Although the literature on overtourism has examined economic, social, and environmental impacts, it lacks a dynamic, multi-objective framework capable of capturing feedback loops and long-term trade-offs. Existing models are largely static or single-dimensional, leaving destinations without tools to understand how economic, social, and environmental outcomes interact over time. This study fills that gap by introducing a dynamic optimization model integrating revenue generation, ecological degradation, and social carrying capacity, offering a comprehensive structure for long-term sustainable tourism planning.
Keywords
- Sustainable tourism,
- Overtourism,
- Juneau,
- Multi-objective optimization,
- Dynamic feed-back,
- Sensitivity analysis,
- Reinvestment strategies,
- Tourism management
References
- O’Reilly AM (1986) Tourism Carrying Capacity: Concept and Issues. Tourism Management, 7:254 258.
- Forrester JW (1961) Industrial Dynamics. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
- Gössling S, Peeters P, Hall CM, Ceron JP, Dubois G, Lehmann LV, Scott D (2012) Tourism and Water Use: Supply, Demand, and Security. An International Review. Tourism Management, 33:1–15.
- McCool SF, Lime DW (2001) Tourism Carrying Capacity: Tempting Fantasy or Useful Reality? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9:372–388.
- Budeanu A, Miller G, Moscardo G, Ooi C-S (2016) Sustainable Tourism, Progress, Challenges and Opportunities: An Introduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111:285–294.
- Juneau Economic Development Council (JEDC) (2018) 2018 Juneau and Southeast Alaska Economic Indicators Report. Juneau, Alaska, USA. Available at: https://www.jedc.org/sites/default/files/2018-Indicators-Final-with-cover-letter.pdf
- United States Census Bureau Population Estimates. Washington, D.C., USA. Available at:
- https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/tables/
- Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Washington, D.C., USA. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/lau/
10.57647/ijeee.2024.1502.10