10.57647/ijeee.2024.1501.s05

Steam Gasification of Biochar Obtained from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches Using Peridotite as Catalytic Bed Material

PDF
  • David A. Echeverri1,
  • Otto A. Ortiz1,
  • Helen C. Inciarte1,
  • Luis A. Rios*1,
  1. Procesos Químicos Industriales, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA; Calle 70 No.52-21, Medellín, Colombia

Copyright (c) 2025 David A. Echeverri, Otto A. Ortiz, Helen C. Inciarte, Luis A. Rios (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Echeverri, D. A., Ortiz, O. A., Inciarte, H. C., & Rios, L. A. (2024). Steam Gasification of Biochar Obtained from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches Using Peridotite as Catalytic Bed Material. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 15(01 (March 2024). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijeee.2024.1501.s05
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 131

Abstract

Oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) is considered a recalcitrant agricultural waste due to the hard-to-digest structure of lignin. In this  study, peridotite, a waste rock from the mining industry, was valorized as a suitable and cheap bed material for the gasification of OPEFB biochar. Besides, the effectiveness of three kinetic models on the representation of gasification was investigated. The gasification experiments were carried out in a stainless-steel fixed bed reactor at three temperatures: 700◦C, 760◦C, and 830◦C, using sand and
calcined peridotite as bed materials. The experimental data were fitted using three kinetic models: volume reaction model (VRM), grain model (GM), and random pore model (RPM). The calcination of peridotite caused structural and surface changes in the material, such as sintering and the formation of ????-Fe2O3 and forsterite (Mg2SiO4). The maximum biochar conversions were higher with peridotite in comparison to sand. The predictive capacity of the tested models followed this order: RPM>VRM>GM. The activation energies (Ea) obtained with all models were lower for the gasifications with peridotite. The results proved a significant catalytic effect of peridotite for the OPEFB gasification in comparison to sand.

Keywords

  • Gasification,
  • Kinetic Modelling,
  • Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch,
  • Peridotite,
  • Biochar
PDF

References

  1. Safarian, S., Unnþórsson, R., Richter, C.: A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 110, 378–391 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2019.05.003
  2. Saghir, M., Rehan, M., Nizami, A.-S.: Recent trends in gasification based waste-to-energy. In: Gasification for low-grade feedstock. p. 288 (2018)
  3. Zhang, Y., Wan, L., Guan, J., Xiong, Q., Zhang, S., Jin, X.: A Review on Biomass Gasification: Effect of Main Parameters on Char Generation and Reaction. Energy and Fuels. 34, 13438–13455 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.0C02900/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/EF0C02900_0008.GIF
  4. Cay, H., Duman, G., Yanik, J.: Two-step Gasification of Biochar for Hydrogen-Rich Gas Production: Effect of the Biochar Type and Catalyst. Energy and Fuels. 33, 7398–7405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.9B01354/SUPPL_FILE/EF9B01354_SI_001.PDF
  5. He, X., Liu, Z., Niu, W., Yang, L., Zhou, T., Qin, D., Niu, Z., Yuan, Q.: Effects of pyrolysis temperature on the physicochemical properties of gas and biochar obtained from pyrolysis of crop residues. Energy. 143, 746–756 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2017.11.062
  6. Kusworo, T., Widayat, W., … A.M.-P.P., 2020, undefined: Bio-oil and fuel gas production from agricultural waste via pyrolysis: a comparative study of oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) and rice husk. pp.bme.huTD Kusworo, W Widayat, AF Mahadita, D Firizqina, DP UtomoPeriodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 2020•pp.bme.hu.
  7. Yu, J., Sun, L., Berrueco, C., Fidalgo, B., Paterson, N., Millan, M.: Influence of temperature and particle size on structural characteristics of chars from Beechwood pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 130, 127–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAP.2018.01.018
  8. Tojo, S., Hirasawa, T.: Research Approaches to Sustainable Biomass Systems. Elsevier Academic Press, Tokyo, Japan (2014)
  9. Chang, S.H.: An overview of empty fruit bunch from oil palm as feedstock for bio-oil production. Biomass Bioenergy. 62, 174–181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2014.01.002
  10. Obada, D.O., Kekung, M.O., Levonyan, T., Norval, G.W.: Palm oil mill derived empty palm fruit bunches as a feed stock for renewable energy applications in Nigeria: A review. Bioresour Technol Rep. 24, 101666 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2023.101666
  11. Montoya, J., Valdés, C., Chaquea, H., Pecha, M.B., Chejne, F.: Surplus electricity production and LCOE estimation in Colombian palm oil mills using empty fresh bunches (EFB) as fuel. Energy. 202, 117713 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2020.117713
  12. Rep. Miller-Meeks, M. [R-I.-1]: Text - H.R.1645 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): Biochar Research Network Act of 2023. (2023)
  13. Biochar Europe, https://www.biochareurope.eu/resources/reach-regulation-and-biochar-a-complete-compliance-guide
  14. Aprianti, N., Faizal, M., Said, M., Nasir, S.: Valorization of Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Waste for Syngas Production Through Gasification. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 21, 17–26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/125461
  15. Chuayboon, S., Abanades, S.: Carbon-neutral synfuel production via continuous solar H2O and CO2 gasification of oil palm empty fruit bunch. Energy. 281, 128212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2023.128212
  16. Detchusananard, T., Wuttipisan, N., Limleamthong, P., Prasertcharoensuk, P., Maréchal, F., Arpornwichanop, A.: Pyrolysis and gasification integrated process of empty fruit bunch for multi-biofuels production: Technical and economic analyses. Energy Convers Manag. 258, 115465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2022.115465
  17. Mohd Salleh, M.A., Kisiki, N.H., Yusuf, H.M., Wan Ab Karim, W.A.: Gasification of Biochar from Empty Fruit Bunch in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. Energies (Basel). 3, 1344–1352 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/EN3071344
  18. Nzihou, A., Stanmore, B., Sharrock, P.: A review of catalysts for the gasification of biomass char, with some reference to coal. Energy. 58, 305–317 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2013.05.057
  19. Lu, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, S., Zhang, X., Guo, L.: Behavior of nickel catalysts in supercritical water gasification of glucose: Influence of support. Biomass Bioenergy. 67, 125–136 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2014.04.038
  20. Yang, Z., Hu, J., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Qian, K., Yang, H., Chen, H.: Catalytic steam gasification of Mengdong coal in the presence of iron ore for hydrogen-rich gas production. Journal of the Energy Institute. 92, 391–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOEI.2017.12.005
  21. Aranda, G., Van Der Drift, A., Vreugdenhil, B.J., Visser, H.J.M., Vilela, C.F., Van Der Meijden, C.M.: Comparing direct and indirect fluidized bed gasification: Effect of redox cycle on olivine activity. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 33, 711–720 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/EP.12016
  22. Rapagnà, S., Jand, N., Kiennemann, A., Foscolo, P.U.: Steam-gasification of biomass in a fluidised-bed of olivine particles. Biomass Bioenergy. 19, 187–197 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00031-3
  23. Green, D.H.: Conditions of melting of basanite magma from garnet peridotite. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 17, 456–465 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(73)90214-8
  24. Gonçalves, C.M., Fabris, J.D., Serrano, W.A.P.: Chemical and mineralogical analyses of a weathering mantle developing on peridotite of the mining area for nickel in Cerro Matoso, Colombia. Hyperfine Interact. 122, 171–176 (1999)
  25. Castrillón, A., Pi-Puig, T., Guerrero, J., Nuñez-Useche, F., Rodriguez, A., Canet, C.: Clay mineralogy and texture of deep-sea hydrothermal mudstone associated with the Cerro Matoso peridotite in accreted oceanic crust from Colombia. J South Am Earth Sci. 117, 103886 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMES.2022.103886
  26. Mohamed, A., … Z.H.-A.M., 2014, undefined: The effects of process parameters on the pyrolysis of empty fruit bunch (EFB) using a fixed-bed reactor. Trans Tech PublAR Mohamed, Z Hamzah, MZM DaudAdvanced Materials Research, 2014•Trans Tech Publ.
  27. Rauch, R., Hofbauer, H., Courson, C.: Comparison of different olivines for biomass steam gasification. (2004)
  28. Zaman, S.A., Ghosh, S.: A generic input–output approach in developing and optimizing an Aspen plus steam-gasification model for biomass. Bioresour Technol. 337, 125412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125412
  29. Mutlu, Ö.Ç., Zeng, T.: Challenges and Opportunities of Modeling Biomass Gasification in Aspen Plus: A Review. Chem Eng Technol. 43, 1674–1689 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000068
  30. Marias, F., Letellier, S., Cezac, P., Serin, J.P.: Energetic analysis of gasification of aqueous biomass in supercritical water. Biomass Bioenergy. 35, 59–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.030
  31. Hussain, M., Tufa, L.D., Azlan, R.N.A.B.R., Yusup, S., Zabiri, H.: Steady State Simulation Studies of Gasification System using Palm Kernel Shell. Procedia Eng. 148, 1015–1021 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.523
  32. Cortazar, M., Lopez, G., Alvarez, J., Arregi, A., Amutio, M., Bilbao, J., Olazar, M.: Experimental study and modeling of biomass char gasification kinetics in a novel thermogravimetric flow reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal. 396, 125200 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.125200
  33. Molina, A., Mondragón, F.: Reactivity of coal gasification with steam and CO 2. Fuel. 77, 1831–1839 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00123-9
  34. Izaharuddin, A.N., Paul, M.C., Yoshikawa, K., Theppitak, S., Dai, X.: Comprehensive Kinetic Modeling Study of CO2 Gasification of Char Derived from Food Waste. Energy & Fuels. 34, 1883–1895 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ENERGYFUELS.9B03937
  35. Prabhakar, A., Kumar Gupta, A., Kumar Sadhukhan, A., Gupta, P.: Estimation of gasification kinetics of coal char fines in steam ambience. Mater Today Proc. 68, 905–909 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.07.072
  36. Gao, X., Zhang, Y., Li, B., Zhao, Y., Jiang, B.: Determination of the intrinsic reactivities for carbon dioxide gasification of rice husk chars through using random pore model. Bioresour Technol. 218, 1073–1081 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.07.057
  37. Shahabuddin, M., Kibria, M.A., Bhattacharya, S.: Gasification kinetics of Barapukurian coal char using carbon dioxide and steam reactants. Chemical Papers. 76, 4459–4470 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11696-022-02186-0/FIGURES/14
  38. Alias, N., Ibrahim, N., Procedia, M.H.-E., 2014, undefined: Pyrolysis of empty fruit bunch by thermogravimetric analysis. ElsevierNB Alias, N Ibrahim, MKA HamidEnergy Procedia, 2014•Elsevier.
  39. Devi, L., Craje, M., Thüne, P., Ptasinski, K.J., Janssen, F.J.J.G.: Olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: Catalyst characterization. Appl Catal A Gen. 294, 68–79 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATA.2005.07.044
  40. Christodoulou, C., Grimekis, D., Panopoulos, K.D., Pachatouridou, E.P., Iliopoulou, E.F., Kakaras, E.: Comparing calcined and un-treated olivine as bed materials for tar reduction in fluidized bed gasification. Fuel Processing Technology. 124, 275–285 (2014). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.012
  41. Meng, J., Wang, X., Zhao, Z., Zheng, A., Huang, Z., Wei, G., Lv, K., Li, H.: Highly abrasion resistant thermally fused olivine as in-situ catalysts for tar reduction in a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier. Bioresour Technol. 268, 212–220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2018.07.135
  42. Akinnawo, O.O., Nurhafizah, M.D., Abdullah, N.: Pyrolysis kinetic study of the thermal degradation of pre-treated empty fruit bunches. Mater Today Proc. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.03.512
  43. Nyakuma, B.B., Wong, S.L., Oladokun, O., Bello, A.A., Hambali, H.U., Abdullah, T.A.T., Wong, K.Y.: Review of the fuel properties, characterisation techniques, and pre-treatment technologies for oil palm empty fruit bunches. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2020 13:1. 13, 471–497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-020-01133-X
  44. Sahoo, S.S., Vijay, V.K., Chandra, R., Kumar, H.: Production and characterization of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of pigeon pea stalk and bamboo. Clean Eng Technol. 3, 100101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLET.2021.100101
  45. Hidayat, W., Riniarti, M., Prasetia, H., Niswati, A., Hasanudin, U., Banuwa, I.S., Yoo, J., Kim, S., Lee, S.: Characteristics of biochar produced from the harvesting wastes of meranti (Shorea sp.) and oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) empty fruit bunches. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 749, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/749/1/012040
  46. Chantanumat, Y., Phetwarotai, W., Sangthong, S., Palamanit, A., Abu Bakar, M.S., Cheirsilp, B., Phusunti, N.: Characterization of bio-oil and biochar from slow pyrolysis of oil palm plantation and palm oil mill wastes. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 13, 13813–13825 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13399-021-02291-2/FIGURES/6
  47. Xin, Y., Cao, H., Yuan, Q., Management, D.W.-W., 2017, undefined: Two-step gasification of cattle manure for hydrogen-rich gas production: effect of biochar preparation temperature and gasification temperature. Elsevier.
  48. Sattar, A., Leeke, G., Hornung, A., bioenergy, J.W. and, 2014, undefined: Steam gasification of rapeseed, wood, sewage sludge and miscanthus biochars for the production of a hydrogen-rich syngas. ElsevierA Sattar, GA Leeke, A Hornung, J Woodbiomass and bioenergy, 2014•Elsevier.
  49. Siwal, S., Zhang, Q., Sun, C., Thakur, S., … V.G.-B., 2020, undefined: Energy production from steam gasification processes and parameters that contemplate in biomass gasifier–A review. ElsevierSS Siwal, Q Zhang, C Sun, S Thakur, VK Gupta, VK ThakurBioresource technology, 2020•Elsevier.
  50. Zuo, H., Geng, W., Wang, G., Zhang, J.: Catalytic Effect of Fe2O3, MnO2 and MgO on the Gasification Reaction of Biomass Char. TMS 2015 144th Annual Meeting & Exhibition. 849–854 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48127-2_103
  51. Tian, H., Hu, Q., Wang, J., Liu, L., Yang, Y., Bridgwater, A. V.: Steam gasification of Miscanthus derived char: the reaction kinetics and reactivity with correlation to the material composition and microstructure. Energy Convers Manag. 219, 113026 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2020.113026
  52. Lopez, G., Alvarez, J., Amutio, M., Arregi, A., Bilbao, J., Olazar, M.: Assessment of steam gasification kinetics of the char from lignocellulosic biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor. Energy. 107, 493–501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2016.04.040
  53. González-Vázquez, M.P., García, R., Gil, M. V., Pevida, C., Rubiera, F.: Unconventional biomass fuels for steam gasification: Kinetic analysis and effect of ash composition on reactivity. Energy. 155, 426–437 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2018.04.188