10.1007/s40095-014-0093-5

Modeling of a membraneless single-chamber microbial fuel cell with molasses as an energy source

HTML PDF
  • Bunpot Sirinutsomboon*1,
  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, TH
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2014-04-04

How to Cite

Sirinutsomboon, B. (2014). Modeling of a membraneless single-chamber microbial fuel cell with molasses as an energy source. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5(2-3 (July 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-014-0093-5
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 76

PDF views: 96

Abstract

Abstract Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a novel bio-electrochemical system that can use various organic substances as energy source. Computational models of MFC are needed for prediction and optimization of the MFC performance. A comprehensive computational modeling of a membraneless single-chamber MFC, in which bacteria consumed molasses as a substrate, is reported here. The simulated cathode had a layer of polytetrafluoroethylene, which allowed oxygen molecules to diffuse through to take part in the reduction reaction. The substrate molecules diffused through the biofilm, which deposited on the anode surface, and were oxidized by the bacteria localized within the film. The simulation program accepted inputs such as the initial amount of molasses, thickness of the biofilm layer, and dimensions of the MFC chamber. Some outputs of the program include concentration profiles of molasses and oxygen as functions of time and location, and the open-circuit voltage of the MFC as a function of time. As the cathode thickness decreased or the biofilm increased, the voltage increased. To obtain a higher voltage, increasing the biofilm thickness was more effective than decreasing the cathode thickness when the initial COD levels were >5,000 mg/L.

Keywords

  • Microbial fuel cell,
  • Simulation,
  • Molasses,
  • Single chamber,
  • Air cathode,
  • Biofilm
HTML PDF

References

  1. Logan et al. (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology 40(17) (pp. 5181-5192) https://doi.org/10.1021/es0605016
  2. Pant et al. (2010) A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production 101(6) (pp. 1533-1543) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.017
  3. Liu and Logan (2004) Electricity generation using an air–cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane 38(14) (pp. 4040-4046) https://doi.org/10.1021/es0499344
  4. Binkley et al. (1953) Composition of cane juice and cane final molasses (pp. 291-314) Academic Press
  5. Kato Marcus et al. (2007) Conduction-based modeling of the biofilm anode of a microbial fuel cell 98(6) (pp. 1171-1182) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21533
  6. Picioreanu et al. (2007) A computational model for biofilm-based microbial fuel cells 41(13) (pp. 2921-2940) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.009
  7. Zeng et al. (2010) Modelling and simulation of two-chamber microbial fuel cell 195(1) (pp. 79-89) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.101
  8. Merkey and Chopp (2012) The performance of a microbial fuel cell depends strongly on anode geometry: a multidimensional modeling study 74(4) (pp. 834-857) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-011-9690-0
  9. Olbrich (1963) Biotechnologie-Kempe GmbH (2006)
  10. Zielke, EA.: Numerical analysis of a one dimensional diffusion equation for a single chamber microbial fuel cell using a linked simulation optimization (LSO) technique. In: E521: Advanced Numerical Methods. (2006)
  11. Torres et al. (2010) A kinetic perspective on extracellular electron transfer by anode-respiring bacteria 34(1) (pp. 3-17) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00191.x
  12. Stewart (2003) Diffusion in biofilms 185(5) (pp. 1485-1491) https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.5.1485-1491.2003
  13. Torres et al. (2008) Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode-respiring bacteria 100(5) (pp. 872-881) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21821
  14. Rharbi et al. (1999) A method for measuring oxygen diffusion and oxygen permeation in polymer films based on fluorescence quenching 71(22) (pp. 5045-5053) https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990193c
  15. Thauer et al. (1977) Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria 41(1) (pp. 100-180)
  16. van Niel et al. (2003) Substrate and product inhibition of hydrogen production by the extreme thermophile Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus 81(3) (pp. 255-262) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10463
  17. Conte, S.D., de Boor, C.: The solution of linear system by elimination. In: Elementary Numerical Analysis: An Algorithmic Approach, pp. 147–157. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
  18. Lee et al. (2009) Effects of substrate diffusion and anode potential on kinetic parameters for anode-respiring bacteria 43(19) (pp. 7571-7577) https://doi.org/10.1021/es9015519
  19. Sevda et al. (2013) High strength wastewater treatment accompanied by power generation using air cathode microbial fuel cell (pp. 194-206) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.037