10.1007/s40095-014-0090-8

Practical use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in improving the efficiency of domestic ventilation waste heat recovery systems

HTML PDF
  • Adam Kyte*1,
  1. Plymouth University, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, GB
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2014-04-04

How to Cite

Kyte, A. (2014). Practical use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in improving the efficiency of domestic ventilation waste heat recovery systems. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5(2-3 (July 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-014-0090-8
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 81

PDF views: 98

Abstract

Abstract Efficiency of domestic ventilation waste heat recovery systems (WHRS) depends not only on the amount of waste heat recovered, but also on the energy involved in running fans to drive air through the system. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be a powerful tool for analysing WHRS losses (thus predicting fan energy usage), but the computational effort involved can limit the value of CFD as a practical design tool. This study presents a range of assumptions and simplifications that can be applied to reduce the computational effort associated with the CFD analysis of a WHRS. The importance of experimental validation to assess the effect of errors introduced by the simplifying assumptions is discussed. In an example case, application of the methods presented have allowed total pressure losses (excluding the fixed losses through the heat exchanger) to be reduced by over 50 % in comparison with an initial prototype design, with proportional reduction in fan energy usage. This highlights the value of sufficiently simplified CFD analyses within a typical WHRS product development cycle.

Keywords

  • CFD,
  • Computational fluid dynamics,
  • Waste heat recovery,
  • Efficiency
HTML PDF

References

  1. Roulet et al. (2001) Real heat recovery with air handling units (pp. 495-502) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00104-3
  2. Flodberg et al. (2012) Low-energy office buildings using existing technology: simulations with low internal heat gains 3(1) (pp. 1-9) https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-19
  3. Chen and Treado (2013) Development of a simulation platform based on dynamic models for HVAC control analysis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.016
  4. Zhai and Chen (2003) Solution characters of iterative coupling between energy simulation and CFD programs (pp. 493-505) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00156-1
  5. Kays and London (1998) Krieger
  6. SAS IP, Inc: ANSYS 13.0 Help (2010) Modeling guide: 5.3.4 GGI (General Grid Interface) connections, Canonsburg, PA
  7. SAS IP, Inc: ANSYS 13.0 Help (2010) Modeling guide: 1.3.2.2.1 isotropic and directional loss models, Canonsburg, PA
  8. SAS IP, Inc: ANSYS 13.0 Help (2010) Reference guide: 14.1 CEL mathematical functions, Canonsburg, PA
  9. SAS IP, Inc: ANSYS 13.0 Help (2010) Theory guide: 2.2.2.1. The
  10. k
  11. –epsilon model in ANSYS CFX, Canonsburg, PA
  12. SAS IP, Inc: ANSYS 13.0 Help (2010) Theory guide: 2.3. Reynolds Stress Turbulence models, Canonsburg, PA
  13. SAS IP, Inc: ANSYS 13.0 Help (2010) Theory guide: 2.2.2.6. The Shear Stress Transport (SST), Canonsburg, PA
  14. Versteeg and Malalasekera (2007) Pearson
  15. Launder and Spalding (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows (pp. 269-289) https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
  16. Launder et al. (1975) Progress in the development of a Reynolds–stress turbulence closure 68(3) (pp. 537-566) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075001814
  17. Menter (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications (pp. 1598-1605) https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149