10.1007/s40095-014-0086-4

Life cycle assessment of residual forestry biomass chips at a power plant: a Portuguese case study

HTML PDF
  • José V. Ferreira*1,
  • Helder Viana1,
  • Bruno Esteves1,
  • Luísa P. Cruz Lopes1,
  • Idalina Domingos1,
  1. Centro de Estudos em Educação, Tecnologia e Saúde, ESTGV, Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Viseu, 3504-510, PT
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2014-04-01

How to Cite

Ferreira, J. V., Viana, H., Esteves, B., Cruz Lopes, L. P., & Domingos, I. (2014). Life cycle assessment of residual forestry biomass chips at a power plant: a Portuguese case study. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5(2-3 (July 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-014-0086-4
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 30

PDF views: 101

Abstract

Abstract The residual forest biomass (RFB) sector has been experiencing strong development at European level and particularly in Portugal mainly due to the increase of energy production from renewable sources. The aim of this study is to assess the environmental impacts of eucalyptus RFB chips production chain in Portugal. The environmental and economic impact comparison of the processes included in the production chain is presented as well. The environmental impacts were calculated by the life cycle assessment approach described in the ISO 14040 series of standards. The production chain assessed included all processes from eucalyptus forest until the delivery of RFB chips at the power plant. The main conclusion of this study is that eucalyptus wood production is the process that presents the greatest environmental impact through the product life cycle. Considering only emissions and depletion of energy resources, RFB chipping is the process that presents the higher environmental impact followed by transport of RFB by truck and trailer and transport of RFB by forwarder. These operations are responsible for approximately 81 % on “Respiratory inorganic” and 87 % on “Fossil fuels” which are the two most significant normalized impact categories. In economic terms, the transport of RFB by truck and trailer presents the highest cost followed by chipping and processing of trees. These three operations are responsible for approximately 80 % of total costs. A sensitivity analysis showed that a 32 % increase in the transport distance from the forest to the power plant would cause an 8 % increase in “Climate change”.

Keywords

  • Forestry,
  • Life cycle assessment,
  • Renewable energy,
  • Residual forestry biomass,
  • Wood energy
HTML PDF

References

  1. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC
  2. Directorate General for Energy and Geology (DGEG): Renewable, rapid statistics (in Portuguese), n° 103, September 2013
  3. Institute for Nature Conservation and Forestry (ICNF): IFN6, Land use areas and forest species of Portugal. Preliminary results (in Portuguese), pp. 34, Lisboa (2013)
  4. Netto, C: Potential of residual forest biomass for energy purposes of three municipalities in the district of Santarém (in Portuguese). Dissertation, New University of Lisbon (2008)
  5. National Directorate of Forestry Ranks: Forestry Energy Crops—First Approach Survey of the Current Situation (in Portuguese).
  6. http://www.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/fileiras/biomassa-solid/resource/docs/biomassa-texto-gtce-junho-2010-v30-06-2010
  7. (2010). Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  8. Campilho, P: Quantification of biomass from the forestry sector with potential use for bioenergy sector (in Portuguese). Working report, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2006)
  9. Biomass Center For Energy (CBE): Optimization of Forestry Operations, Collection, Packaging, Transport and Primary Transformation of Waste for Energy Production (in Portuguese), Miranda do Corvo (2004)
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Science Applications International Corporation: LCAccess—LCA 101.
  11. http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/lcaccess/lca101.htm
  12. (2001). Accessed 22 January 2013
  13. Werner, F., Althaus, H., Kunninger, T., Richter, K., Jungbluth, N.: Life Cycle Inventories of Wood as Fuel and Construction Material. Ecoinvent report No 9, EMPA Duebendorf Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, CH (2007)
  14. Berg and Lindholm (2005) Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden (pp. 33-42) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.09.015
  15. Michelsen et al. (2008) Environmental impacts and added value in forestry operations in Norway 120(1) (pp. 69-81) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00008.x
  16. International Standard Organisation (ISO) (eds): Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—ISO 14040 (2006); ISO 14044 (2006)
  17. Wegener et al. (2008) Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000 (pp. 227-240) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.09.040
  18. Ferreira, J., Domingos, I.: Life cycle inventory of Hardwood (Eucaliptus) production in the Portuguese forest. In: Proceeding of the Abstracts of the Ecowood 5th International Conference on Environmentally-Compatible Forest Products, Fernando Pessoa University, Porto, Portugal, 5–7 September 2012
  19. Kellenberger, D., Althaus, H., Kunninger, T., Jungbluth, N., Lehmann, M., Thalmann, P.: Life cycle inventories of building products. Ecoinvent report No 7, EMPA Duebendorf Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, CH (2007)
  20. PE INTERNATIONAL. ELCD database 2.0. Articulated lorry Transport; Euro 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 mix; 40 t total weight, 27 t max payload.
  21. http://elcd.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/resource/processes/b444f4d0-3393-11dd-bd11-0800200c9a66?format=html&version=03.00.000
  22. . Accessed 19 Jan 2013
  23. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. US Life Cycle Inventory Database (USLCI).
  24. https://www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search
  25. (2012). Accessed 20 Jan 2013
  26. PRé Consultants: Introduction to LCA with SimaPro 7, Report version: 4.5.
  27. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/manuals/SimaPro7IntroductionToLCA.pdf
  28. (2010). Accessed 10 Jan 2013
  29. PRé Consultants: SimaPro Database Manual—Methods library, Report version: 2.4.
  30. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/DatabaseManualMethods_oct2010.pdf
  31. (2010). Accessed 10 Jan 2013