10.1186/2251-6832-4-1

Evaluation of food waste disposal options in terms of global warming and energy recovery: Korea

HTML PDF
  • Mi Hyung Kim*1,
  • Han Byul Song2,
  • Yuleum Song3,
  • In Tae Jeong4,
  • Jung Wk Kim1,
  1. Department of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, Sillim-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, KR
  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Soongsil University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-743, KR
  3. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, US
  4. Carbon Management Office, Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute, Bulgwang-dong, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 122-706, KR
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2013-01-09

How to Cite

Kim, M. H., Song, H. B., Song, Y., Jeong, I. T., & Kim, J. W. (2013). Evaluation of food waste disposal options in terms of global warming and energy recovery: Korea. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 4(1 (December 2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-1
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 50

PDF views: 135

Abstract

Abstract This study is aimed to evaluate and compare environmental impacts of various food waste management systems: anaerobic digestion, co-digestion with sewage sludge, and volume reduction using a garbage dryer followed by incineration from generation to final disposal. An environmental credit using life cycle assessment was employed to compare by-products. The entire disposal process, namely discharge, collection, transportation, treatment, and final disposal, was included in the system boundary. The functional unit was 1 tonne of food waste from households for each treatment option. Global warming potential of the category indicator was selected to assess the environmental impact of food waste disposal options. The net global warming potential (environmental credit) of the options (wet based) was 33 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 -eq) for anaerobic digestion and −315 kg of CO 2 -eq for incineration by renewable energy production as electricity, thermal energy, and primary materials avoided. We found that dryer-incineration option was an available alternative for food waste recycling in a metropolitan area in Korea.

Keywords

  • Food waste,
  • Life cycle assessment,
  • Global warming potential,
  • Renewable energy,
  • Environmental impact
HTML PDF

References

  1. Pandyaswargo et al. (2012) Energy recovery potential and life cycle impact assessment of municipal solid waste management technologies in Asian countries using ELP model https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-28
  2. Anglani and Muliere (2008) The impact of renewable energy and energy efficient technologies, what to choose in case of limited supportive actions: a case study 2(4) (pp. 83-94)
  3. Zhang et al. (2007) Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion 98(4) (pp. 929-935) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.039
  4. Lai et al. (2009) Potentials of food wastes for power generation and energy conversion in Taiwan 34(8) (pp. 1913-1915) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.007
  5. Khoo et al. (2010) Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective 408(6) (pp. 1367-1373) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.072
  6. Murphy et al. (2004) Technical/economic/environmental analysis of biogas utilization 77(4) (pp. 407-427) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2003.07.005
  7. Nam et al. (2008) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock and food wastes co-digestive biogas production system 27(4) (pp. 406-412) https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2008.27.4.406
  8. Gómez et al. (2006) Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludgy and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes: Conditions for mixing and evaluation of the organic loading rate 31(12) (pp. 2017-2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.09.029
  9. Kabouris et al. (2009) Methane recovery from the anaerobic codigestion of municipal sludge and FOG 100(15) (pp. 3701-3705) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.024
  10. Lundie and Peters (2005) Life cycle assessment of food waste management options 13(3) (pp. 275-286) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.020
  11. Zhao et al. (2009) Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China 407(5) (pp. 1517-1526) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.007
  12. Eddine and Salah (2012) Solid waste as renewable source of energy: current and future possibility in Algeria https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-17
  13. Eggleston et al. (2006) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
  14. Unknown (1998) Ministry of Environment
  15. Unknown (2008) Ministry of Environment
  16. Unknown (2000) 2000(E), Geneva
  17. Korres et al. (2010) Is grass biomethane a sustainable transport biofuel? 4(3) (pp. 310-325) https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.228
  18. Unknown (1998) 1998(E), Geneva
  19. Ekvall and Finnveden (2001) Allocation in ISO 14041 - a critical review 9(3) (pp. 197-208) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4
  20. Lee and Park (2005) Estimation of the environmental credit for the recycling of granulated blast furnace slag based on LCA 44(2) (pp. 139-151) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.11.004
  21. Kim and Kim (2010) Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery 408(19) (pp. 3998-4006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.049
  22. Unknown (2006)
  23. Unknown (2006)
  24. McDougall et al. (2001) Blackwell Science Inc https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999677
  25. Guinée (2002) Kluwer Academic Publishers
  26. Kim et al. (2011) Evaluation of food waste disposal options by LCC analysis from the perspective of global warming: Jungnang case, South Korea (pp. 2112-2120) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.019