10.57647/fomj.2026.0701.03

Contour-Based Video Inpainting using Neutrosophic Sets

  1. Department of Technical and Engineering, Ayandegan University, Tonekabon, Iran
  2. Department of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  3. Department of Applied Mathematics, Ayandegan University, Tonekabon, Iran

Received: 2026-01-05

Revised: 2026-02-25

Accepted: 2026-03-27

Published in Issue 2026-03-30

How to Cite

Ghanbari Talouki, A., Koochari, A., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2026). Contour-Based Video Inpainting using Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal (FOMJ), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/fomj.2026.0701.03

PDF views: 14

Abstract

Image and video inpainting represent critical challenges within the domain of visual information processing, serving pivotal roles in tasks such as restoration, reconstruction, and occlusion removal. The fundamental objective in these applications is to seamlessly restore missing or corrupted regions without introducing perceptible artifacts or structural inconsistencies. While image inpainting operates within a spatially static framework, video inpainting must additionally contend with temporal continuity, necessitating rigorous preservation of motion coherence and inter-frame consistency. This study presents an advanced inpainting methodology grounded in Neutrosophic logic, a mathematical framework adept at modeling uncertainty and indeterminacy within both spatial and intensity domains. By leveraging Neutrosophic-based segmentation, the proposed approach effectively isolates uncertain regions and guides the subsequent restoration process with enhanced precision. The primary objective of this research is to propose a novel approach for constructing an optimal contour database, which serves as a foundation for achieving superior foreground completion. This method aims to enhance the accuracy and visual coherence of the inpainting process by leveraging precise contour information, ultimately improving the overall quality of video restoration. Comprehensive experimental evaluations validate the efficacy of the proposed method, demonstrating notable improvements in perceptual quality and structural fidelity when benchmarked against state-of-the-art alternatives. Nonetheless, certain limitations persist, particularly in processing scenes characterized by high semantic complexity and rapidly changing backgrounds, which constitute promising directions for future investigation.

Keywords

  • Video inpainting,
  • Video Segmentation,
  • Hole Filling,
  • Neutrosophic Sets,
  • Indeterminacy

References

  1. Yang S, Gu Z, Hou L, Tao X, Wan P, Chen X, and Liao J. Mtv-inpaint: Multi-task long video in-painting. 2025; arXiv:2503.11412. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2503.11412
  2. Xie C, Han K, and Wong KYK. VipDiff: Towards coherent and diverse video inpainting via training-free denoising diffusion models. IEEE/CVF Win-ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vi-sion (WACV) 2025 :2411–20. doi: 10.1109/ WACV61041.2025.00240
  3. Koochari A and Soryani M. Exemplar-based video inpainting with large patches. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE C (Computers & Electronics) 2010; 11:270–7. doi: 10.1631/jzus.C0910308
  4. Wu X and Liu C. DiTPainter: Efficient video inpainting with diffusion transformers. 2025; arXiv:2504.15661:245–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.15661
  5. Abraham AR, Prabhavathy AK, and Shree JD. A survey on video inpainting. International Journal of Computer Applications 2012; 56(9):43–7. doi: 10.5120/8923-2761
  6. Talouki AG, Koochari A, and Edalatpanah SA. Ap-plications of neutrosophic logic in image process-ing: a survey. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI) 2022; 10(1):243–
  7. 58. doi: 10.22061/jecei.2021.8069.474
  8. Talouki AG and Majdi M. Improvement in video inpainting in presence of moving subjects. Interna-tional Journal of Research in Industrial Engineer-ing 2019; 8(4):325–38. doi: 10.22105/riej.2020.
  9. 215689.1116
  10. Koochari A and Soryani M. Video object in-painting: a scale-robust method. Imaging Sci-ence Journal 2012; 60(5):272–84. doi: 10.1179/1743131X11Y.0000000047
  11. Li X, Xue H, Ren P, and Bo L. Diffueraser: A diffusion model for video inpainting. 2025; arXiv:2501.10018. Available from: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10018
  12. Talouki AG, Majdi M, and Edalatpanah SA. An introduction to various algorithms for video com-pletion and their features: a survey. Journal of Com-puter Sciences and Applications 2017; 5(1):1–10. doi: 10.12691/jcsa-5-1-1
  13. Bertalmio M, Bertozzi AL, and Sapiro G. Navier-stokes, fluid dynamics, and image and video in-painting. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer So-ciety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2001. doi: 10.1109/CVPR. 2001.990497
  14. Ravi S, Pasupathi P, Muthukumar S, and Krishnan N. Image in-painting techniques-A survey and anal-ysis. 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT) 2013 :36–41. doi: 10.1109/Innovations.2013.6544390
  15. Wu Z, Chen K, Li K, Fan H, and Yang Y. BVINet: Unlocking blind video inpainting with zero annota-tions. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2025 :14017–27. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.01181
  16. Bian Y, Zhang Z, Ju X, Cao M, Xie L, Shan Y, and Xu Q. Videopainter: Any-length video inpainting and editing with plug-and-play context control. Pro-ceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference 2025 :1–12. doi: 10.1145/3721238.3730673
  17. Talouki AG and Soryani M. Contour-based video inpainting. 7th Iranian Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing 2011 :1–5. doi: 10.1109/IranianMVIP.2011.6121586
  18. Nilsson D and Sminchisescu C. Semantic video segmentation by gated recurrent flow propagation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018 :6819–28. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.08871
  19. Wang P, Cai Z, Yang H, Swaminathan A, Man-matha R, and Soatto S. Scaling up image segmentation across data and tasks. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference 2025:4573-83. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.00431
  20. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965; 8(3):338–53. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  21. Smarandache F. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic proba-bility, set, and logic: analytic synthesis & synthetic analysis. 1998; American Research Press. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.57726
  22. Zhang X, Jian M, Sun Y, Wang H, and Zhang C. Improving image segmentation based on patch-weighted distance and fuzzy clustering. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2020; 79(1):633–57. doi: 10.1007/s11042-019-08041-x
  23. Afful-Dadzie E, Oplatkova ZK, and Prieto LAB. Comparative state-of-the-art survey of classical fuzzy set and intuitionistic fuzzy sets in multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 2017; 19(3):726–38. doi: 10.1007/ s40815-016-0204-y
  24. Talouki AG, Koochari A, and Edalatpanah SA. Image completion based on segmentation using neutrosophic sets. Expert Systems with Applications 2024; 238:121769. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121769
  25. Zivkovic Z. Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2004 :28–31. doi: 10.1109/ICPR.2004.1333992- Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/ d/1RJM7ty3oYnxo-tpbmI Cm2EuXHiJCASC/ view?usp=drive link - Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/182ruC2X1vBZeVDvOicKAIRekMDvdXxis/view?usp=sharing
  26. Ardis PA, Brown CM, and Singhal A. Inpainting quality assessment. Journal of Electronic Imaging 2010; 9(1):11002–8. doi: 10.1117/1.3267088
  27. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, and Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2004; 13(4):600–12. doi: 10.1109/TIP. 2003.819861
  28. Wang J, Xuan H, and Wu Z. Semantic-guided com-pletion network for video inpainting in complex urban scene. Chinese Conference on Pattern Recog-nition and Computer Vision (PRCV) Singapore 2023; Springer:224–36. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8552-418