10.57647/j.fomj.2025.0604.20

Two novel distance functions for interval-valued trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers  and their applications in decision-making

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Shohadaye Hoveizeh Campus of Technology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Dasht-e Azadegan, Khuzestan, Iran
  2. Department of Mathematics‎ and Statistics, ‎Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology‎, ‎Behbahan‎, ‎Khuzestan‎, ‎Iran

Received: 2025-10-28

Revised: 2025-12-19

Accepted: 2025-12-25

Published in Issue 2025-12-30

How to Cite

Farnam, M., & Darehmiraki, M. (2025). Two novel distance functions for interval-valued trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers  and their applications in decision-making. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal (FOMJ), 6(4). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.fomj.2025.0604.20

PDF views: 27

Abstract

Despite the extensive application of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs) in modeling uncertainty within complex decision-making problems, distance measurement for their important subclass, interval-valued trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVTraIFNs), suffers from conceptual and computational limitations. Existing distance measures often rely on discrete features or neglect the continuous geometry and surface structure of these numbers, leading to information loss and inadequate discrimination between alternatives. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel surface-area-based distance measurement framework designed explicitly for IVTraIFNs. We propose two new distance functions, a Euclidean and a Manhattan measure, derived from the integration of areas under the left and right curves of the continuous membership and non-membership functions. A conceptual parametric framework for representing continuous IVTraIFNs is first established, and the mathematical properties of the proposed measures, including compliance with distance metric axioms and the triangle inequality, are formally proven. Explicit, practical formulas for these measures for IVTraIFNs are then developed. To demonstrate practical efficacy, the new measures are systematically integrated into two established multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) methods: TOPSIS and CODAS. A comprehensive numerical example in the context of investment project selection, supported by sensitivity analysis on the weight parameter and standard validity tests, confirms the effectiveness, robustness, and advantages of the proposed approach compared to some existing methods. The results indicate that the surface-based distance measures provide more appropriate discrimination between alternatives while offering flexibility through a parameter that weights the membership and non-membership components, remaining consistent with existing decision-making schemes.

Keywords

  • Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set, Interval-valued trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy number, Distance measure, Multi-criteria group decision-making.

References

  1. L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8:338–353, 1965.
  2. K. Atanassov. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20:87–96, 1986.
  3. K. Atanassov and G. Gargov. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31(3):343–349, 1989.
  4. D. Joshi and S. Kumar. Improved accuracy function for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multi-attributes group decision making. Cybernetics and Systems, 49:64–76, 2018.
  5. H. Liao, J. Wang, M. Tang, and A. Al-Barakati. An overview of interval analysis techniques and their fuzzy extensions in multi-criteria decision-making: What’s going on and what’s next? International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2023.
  6. B. Liu, Y. Chen, and Y. Shen. A complex multi-attribute large-group decision making method based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model. Soft Computing, 18:2149–2160, 2014.
  7. F. Meng and X. Chen. Entropy and similarity measure for Atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 15:75–101, 2016.
  8. J. Priyadharsini and P. Balasubramaniam. Multi-criteria decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Analysis, 27:259–276, 2019.
  9. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager. Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 8:123–139, 2009.
  10. T. Y. Chen, H. P. Wang, and Y. Y. Lu. A multicriteria group decision making approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a comparative perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 38:7647–7658, 2011.
  11. Z. Wang and K. Li. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi attribute group decision making framework with incomplete preference over alternatives. University of Windsor, Windsor, 2012.
  12. G. Wei, X. Zhao, and H. Wang. An approach to multiple attribute group decision making with interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy information. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(2):317–330, 2012.
  13. J. Wu and Y. Liu. An approach for multiple attribute group decision making problems with interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66:311–324, 2013.
  14. T. Maoying and L. Jing. Some aggregation operators with interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Advances in Modeling and Optimization, 15(2):201–213, 2013.
  15. J. Ye. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cosine similarity measures for multiple attribute decision-making. International Journal of General Systems, 42(8):883–891, 2013.
  16. E. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, S. Hajiagha, and S. Hashemi. Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF). Applied Soft Computing, 24:1013–1021, 2014.
  17. G. Wei. Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 17(3):484–489, 2015.
  18. J. Ye. Generalized Dice measures for multiple attribute decision making under intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Neural Computing and Applications, 30:3623–3632, 2018.
  19. S. Veeramachaneni and H. Kandikonda. An ELECTRE approach for multicriteria interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy group decision making problems. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2016:1956303, 2016.
  20. J. Qiu and L. Li. A new approach for multiple attribute group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Soft Computing, 61:111–121, 2017.
  21. P. Vishnukumar, G. Sivaraman, and M. E. A. Raj. A new similarity measure on interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its validation through applications. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 5:44–52, 2019.
  22. S. Salimian and S. M. Mousavi. A multi-criteria decision-making model with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for evaluating digital technology strategies in COVID-19 pandemic under uncertainty. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48:7005–7017, 2023.
  23. M. Akram and A. Habib. A novel Pythagorean fuzzy PERT approach to measure criticality with multi-criteria in project management problems. Granular Computing, 9(2):36, 2024.
  24. X. Hu and X. Zhang. Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making and their application to evaluating the cluster network competitiveness of SMEs. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 28:975–981, 2015.
  25. L. Wu, H. Gao, and C. Wei. VIKOR method for financing risk assessment of rural tourism projects under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37:2001–2008, 2019.
  26. J. H. Park, I. Park, Y. Kwun, and X. Tan. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35:2544–2556, 2011.
  27. S. Liu, F. Yu, W. Xu, and W. Zhang. New approach to MCDM under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 4:771–782, 2013.
  28. M. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and J. Antucheviciene. A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3):25–44, 2016.
  29. M. Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas, R. Hooshmand, and J. Antucheviciene. Fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria market segment evaluation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(1):1–19, 2017.
  30. F. B. Yeni and G. Özçelik. Interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method for multi criteria group decision making problems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 28(2):433–452, 2019.
  31. J. Roy, S. Das, S. Kar, and D. Pamučar. An extension of the CODAS approach using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set for sustainable material selection in construction projects with incomplete weight information. Symmetry, 11(3):393, 2019.
  32. S. Seker. A novel interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method. Soft Computing, 24:10211–10224, 2020.
  33. S. Seker and N. Aydin. Sustainable public transportation system evaluation: A novel two-stage hybrid method based on IVIF-AHP and CODAS. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22:257–272, 2020.
  34. K. Deveci, R. Cin, and A. Kağizman. A modified interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method and its application to multi-criteria selection among renewable energy alternatives in Turkey. Applied Soft Computing, 96:106660, 2020.
  35. Z. Xu. On similarity measures of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to pattern recognitions. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 27(1):139–143, 2007.
  36. S. P. Wan. Multi-attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number. Control and Decision, 26:857–860, 2011.
  37. M. Ma, M. Friedman, and A. Kandel. A new fuzzy arithmetic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 108(1):83–90, 1999.
  38. R. Abbasi Shureshjani and M. Darehmiraki. A new parametric method for ranking fuzzy numbers. Indagationes Mathematicae, 24:518–529, 2013.
  39. B. Shakouri, R. Abbasi Shureshjani, B. Daneshian, and F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi. A parametric method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to solve intuitionistic fuzzy network data envelopment analysis models. Complexity, 2020:6408613, 2020.
  40. X. Wang and E. Triantaphyllou. Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 36(1):45–63, 2008.
  41. C. Mallika and V. Sireesha. An interval-valued trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS approach for decision-making problems. SN Computer Science, 4:327, 2023.