10.57647/j.fomj.2025.0602.11

Fuzzy logic approach in the evaluation of radiation shielding behaviour of borided Co-Cr-Mo alloy

  1. sdu

Received: 2025-04-09

Revised: 2025-06-16

Accepted: 2025-06-30

Published in Issue 2025-08-23

How to Cite

Ucar, A. O. (2025). Fuzzy logic approach in the evaluation of radiation shielding behaviour of borided Co-Cr-Mo alloy. Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal (FOMJ), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.fomj.2025.0602.11

PDF views: 115

Abstract

The present study investigates the radiation shielding behaviour of borided Co-Cr-Mo alloys. The investigation is conducted by utilising a fuzzy logic model, which is employed to analyse the relationship between the boriding temperature and boron content of the boriding powder. In order to achieve this objective, the linear attenuation coefficients of borided alloys were measured as a function of boriding temperature and boron content. Subsequently, a fuzzy logic model was applied to these measured values. The findings demonstrated that the outcomes derived from the measured and fuzzy logic methods exhibited strong concordance. The linear attenuation coefficient is contingent upon the boriding temperature and the boron content. Furthermore, the variation of the linear attenuation coefficient with boriding temperature is more significant than its variation with the boron content. It was concluded that the fuzzy logic model can be used to predict the radiation shielding behaviour of borided Co-Cr-Mo alloys without the need for further experimentation, even under conditions that have not yet been tested. The present study will contribute to the selection and development of radiation shielding materials by demonstrating practical applications of fuzzy logic.

Keywords

  • Fuzzy logic model,
  • Boriding,
  • Radiation shielding,
  • Boron powder,
  • Co-Cr-Mo alloy

References

  1. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets, Infor. Contr., 8 (1965) 338-353.
  2. Goguen, J., The Logic of Inexact Concepts, Synthese, 19, 3–4 (1969) 325–373.
  3. Lakoff, G., A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8 (1972) 183-228.
  4. Dubois, D and Prade, H., Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Theory and Applications. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 47, 3 (1982) 702-703.
  5. Lin, G., Yang, J., Sun, H., Li, H., Liu, W and Zhu, Q., Optimization of energy management strategy with fuzzy logic control and low-pass filtering for hydrogen production system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 116 (2025) 473–485.
  6. Ozsahin, D. U., Uzun, B., Ozsahin, I., Taiwo, M. M and Sani,M., Fuzzy logic in medicine, Editor(s): Walid Zgallai, In Developments in Biomedical Engineering and Bioelectronics, Biomedical Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Academic Press 2020, 153–182.
  7. Zhang, R., Sun, Y and Chen, Y., Enhancing targeted tumor treatment: A novel fuzzy logic framework for precision drug delivery strategy selection, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 180 (2024) 109008.
  8. Mahmud, E., Aziz, A and Parvin, F., Fabrication of PLA bio-composite reinforced with jute fiber and ESP fillers and optimization of mechanical properties via fuzzy logic approach, Results in Materials, 26 (2025) 100684.
  9. Rathour, L., Singh, V., Sharma, M. K., Dhiman, N and Mishra, V. N., A review of fuzzy logic analysis in COVID-19 pandemic and a new technique through extended hexagonal intuitionistic fuzzy number in analysis of COVID-19, Reults in Control and Optimization, 17 (2024) 100496.
  10. Hamd, Z. Y., Almohammed, H. I., Lashin, M. M. A., Yousef, M., Aljuaid, H., Khawaji, S. M., Alhussain, N. I., Salami, A. K., Alsowayan, R. A., Alshaik, F. A., Alshehri, T. K., Aldossari, D. M., Albogami, N. F and Khandaker, M. U., Artificial intelligence-based fuzzy logic systems for predicting radiation protection awareness levels among university population, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 208 (2023) 110888.
  11. Akkurt, I., Basyigit, C., Kilincarslan, S and Beycioglu, A., Prediction of photon attenuation coefficients of heavy concrete by fuzzy logic, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 347 (2010) 1589–1597.