10.57647/ccd.2026.0901.05

Evaluation of Building Density Criteria in Urban Development Plans Based on Development Capacities with an Emphasis on the Balance Between Social and Economic Components, a Case Study of District 9 of Mashhad City

PDF
  • Neda Dadkhah1,
  • Seyed Moslem Seyed Al-Hosseini*1,
  • Maryam Daneshvar1,
  1. Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Received: 2024-04-28

Revised: 2024-09-27

Accepted: 2024-11-09

Published in Issue 2026-03-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Neda Dadkhah, Seyed Moslem Seyed Al-Hosseini, Maryam Daneshvar (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Dadkhah, N., Seyed Al-Hosseini, S. M., & Daneshvar, M. (2026). Evaluation of Building Density Criteria in Urban Development Plans Based on Development Capacities with an Emphasis on the Balance Between Social and Economic Components, a Case Study of District 9 of Mashhad City. Creative City Design, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/ccd.2026.0901.05
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 16

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the physical dimension of construction, particularly Floor Area Ratio (FAR), in residential neighborhoods of Mashhad with an emphasis on sustainable development. The research seeks to identify how a balanced approach between economic and social development can be achieved in determining building density regulations within urban development plans.

Methodology: The research adopts a mixed-method approach combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. Data were collected through both library research and field studies. Field data collection included semi-structured interviews with urban planning experts and a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were analyzed using Atlas.ti 7 software, while quantitative findings were statistically examined to assess the effectiveness of density-related policies. The Vakil Abad neighborhood in Mashhad was selected as the case study.

Finding: The findings indicate that despite policies aimed at increasing building density in Mashhad’s urban development plans, spatial expansion of the city has continued alongside declining effective density. This pattern contradicts the principles of sustainable development, particularly in achieving balance between population distribution and residential land use. Furthermore, evaluation based on LUI standards reveals deficiencies in useful open spaces, leisure spaces, and parking facilities within the studied neighborhoods. The results suggest that sustainable neighborhood development indicators have not been adequately incorporated into FAR regulations.

Conclusion: The study concludes that current FAR regulations in Mashhad’s urban development plans lack alignment with sustainable development principles. A more integrated and balanced framework considering social and economic capacities is necessary to ensure sustainable residential neighborhood development.

Keywords

  • Urban development plan,
  • Floor Area Ratio (FAR),
  • Sustainable neighborhood development,
  • Building density regulations,
  • Mashhad
PDF

References

  1. Ramezani,Y. Determining appropriate method for distribution of building density: Case study of Region 1 of Municipality of Mashhad (Master’s thesis). Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, 2009.
  2. Suezi,A., Ghafari,M., Saadat,E. Evaluation of optimal urban density indicators using the AHP model (Case example: Development and Villagers neighborhood, Zarinshahr, Lanjan, Isfahan Province). National Conference on Architecture, Civil and Modern Urban Development, Tabriz, Iran, 2013.
  3. Mashoudi,S. Building and community density in cities. Mezinani Publishing House, Tehran, 2009.
  4. Nikpour,A., Rizki,F., Safai,M. Spatial analysis of Babylon city form based on building density. Geographical Urban Planning Research, 2017. 6(2), pp.235.215. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2018.206995.530
  5. Azizi,M.M., Arasteh,M. Explanation of urban sprawl based on building density index (Case study of Yazd city).Creative City Design, 2013. 5(8).
  6. Rahnama,M.R., Abbaszadeh,G. A comparative study of measuring the degree of dispersion/compression in Sydney and Mashhad metropolises. Geography and Regional Development, 2016. (6), pp.128.101.
  7. Fulton,W. Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Smart Growth America, Washington, DC, 2002.
  8. Pourdihimi,S., Madani,R., Mousavinia,S.F. Physical factors affecting the perception of density in residential environments: Case example of residential areas of Mashhad. Iranian Architectural Studies, 2016. (11), pp.61.43.
  9. Vahidi,G. Optimal urban density (Bachelor’s thesis). Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran, 2005.
  10. Adeb Khah,M., Pourjafar,M.R., Taqvai,A.A. Investigation of the situation of building density and presentation of the proposed model for determining FAR according to the road network (Case study of Elahieh neighborhood of Tehran). Geographical Urban Planning Research, 2019.
  11. Sholeh,M. Explaining the concept of density as a tool of urban planning in housing projects.). Creative City Design, 2017. (21), pp.44.35.
  12. Yazdinejad,S., Mahdavi,A. Planning of building density organization (Case study: area near Kerman market). Specialized Scientific Quarterly of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research, 2017. 1(3).
  13. Asgari,A. Urban transport and percentage fluctuations of building density. Traffic Updates Magazine, 2005.
  14. Williams,K., Burton,E., Jenks,M. Achieving sustainable urban form. Spon Press, London, 2006.
  15. Choguill,C.L. Developing sustainable neighborhoods. Habitat International, 2008. 32, pp.48.41.
  16. Rapoport,A. Toward a redefinition of density. Environment and Behavior, 1975. 7(2), pp.152.133. https://doi/org/10.1177/001391657500700202
  17. Alexander,E.R. Density measures: A review and analysis. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1993. 10(3), pp.202.181.
  18. Khodakarami,L., Pourmanafi,S., Mokhtari,Z., Soffianian,A.R., Lotfi,A. Urban sustainability assessment at the neighborhood scale: Integrating spatial modellings and multi-criteria decision making approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023. 97, 104725.
  19. Asghari Zamani,A., Alizadeh,S. Evaluating the reciprocal relationship between building lifespan and increased building density in Tabriz: Case study of Zaferanieh neighborhood. Journal of Urban Environmental Planning,2021. 10(2), pp.62.45