10.57647/ccd.2026.0902.12

Analyzing and Evaluating Smart City Indicators Toward Achieving a Justice-Oriented Smart City (Case Study: Mashhad City)

  1. Department of Geography, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Received: 2025-11-08

Revised: 2026-01-04

Accepted: 2026-02-08

Published in Issue 2026-05-27

How to Cite

Mohammadzadeh AllahverdiKhani, J., Alizadeh, K., & Jafari, H. (2026). Analyzing and Evaluating Smart City Indicators Toward Achieving a Justice-Oriented Smart City (Case Study: Mashhad City). Creative City Design. https://doi.org/10.57647/ccd.2026.0902.12

PDF views: 2

Abstract

Aims: Despite the widespread adoption of smart city initiatives, growing evidence indicates that technology-driven urban development does not inherently lead to spatial justice and, in some contexts, may intensify existing socio-spatial inequalities. This challenge is particularly evident in rapidly expanding metropolitan cities, where uneven access to smart urban services reflects deeper governance, design, and infrastructural imbalances. Addressing this critical gap, the present study examines how smart city dimensions influence urban justice outcomes in Mashhad, Iran, with particular attention to spatial disparities across urban districts.

Methodology: Based on survey data collected from 384 residents using a multi-stage cluster sampling method, urban justice is conceptualized as equitable spatial access to smart urban services, opportunities, and quality-of-life components across different socio-economic areas. From a creative city design perspective, smart city initiatives should be understood not merely as technological upgrades, but as spatial and institutional design interventions that shape everyday urban experiences, access, and justice. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) were employed to assess the relationships between six smart city dimensions and urban justice.Also Spatial dependencies were assessed with Global Moran’s I.

Finding: The results reveal that Smart governance had the largest direct effect on spatial justice (β = 0.33, t = 6.48, p < 0.001), followed by smart people justice (β = 0.30, t = 5.87, p < 0.001) and smart living justice (β = 0.28, t = 5.22, p < 0.001). MGA revealed significant spatial inequalities: the effects of smart governance, smart living, and smart mobility were markedly stronger in affluent districts than in deprived ones, indicating persistent gaps in governance capacity, infrastructure provision, and spatial quality. Global Moran’s I test show significant positive spatial clustering for Smart Governance (I = 0.421, p = 0.003), Smart People (I = 0.312, p = 0.014), and Smart Mobility (I = 0.355, p = 0.007).

 Conclusion: These findings suggest that achieving justice-oriented smart cities requires moving beyond technology-centered approaches toward spatially sensitive governance, inclusive urban design, and equity-driven policy interventions. By empirically linking smart city dimensions with spatial justice outcomes, this study contributes to creative city design and planning debates and offers actionable insights for urban designers and policymakers seeking to reduce socio-spatial inequalities in smart city transformations.

Keywords

  • Smart City,
  • Spatial Justice,
  • Smart Governance,
  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM),
  • Multi-Group Analysis (MGA),
  • Mashhad City

References

  1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Goal 11 Make Cities and Human Settlements Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable.(2022).https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11 (accessed September 22, 2022). #
  2. Bibri SE, Krogstie J. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable cities and society. 2017 May 1;31:183-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016#
  3. Komninos N. Smart Cities and Connected Intelligence: Platforms, ecosystems and network effects. Routledge; 2019 Dec 5. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429268197#
  4. Taylor L. What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society. 2017 Oct;4(2):2053951717736335.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335#
  5. Dadashpour, H., & Alvandi-Pour, N. Review of research related to spatial justice in Iran at the urban scale (2004–2015). Urban Ecology Research Journal, (2018). 9(2), 61–86. https://grup.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_4456.htm#
  6. Dadashpour, H., & Alvandi-Pour, N. Spatial justice at the urban scale in Iran: A meta-study of theoretical frameworks in the existing literature. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urbanism, (2016). 21(3), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2016.61
  7. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities (Final report). Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology (2007). http://www.smartcities.eu/download/city_ranking_final.pdf#
  8. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, (2015). 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092#
  9. Kitchin, R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, (2014).79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8#
  10. Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, AThe “actually existing smart city”. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, . (2015). 8(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026# https://fava.mashhad.ir/
  11. . Gracias, J. S., Parnell, G. S., Specking, E., Pohl, E. A., & Buchanan, R. Smart cities—a structured literature review. Smart Cities, . (2023). 6(4), 1719-1743. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040080#
  12. . Khamsi, A. Green book: A practical guide for municipalities, smart cities. Center for Urban and Rural Planning Studies. (2021). https://urbanism.blogsky.com/1392/02/24/post-83/#
  13. . Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, (2011). 18(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117#
  14. Soja, E. W. Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press. Yigitcanlar, T., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2018). Does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities? Land Use Policy, (2018). 73, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.034#
  15. Ullah, A., Anwar, S. M., Li, J., Nadeem, L., Mahmood, T., Rehman, A., & Saba, T. Smart cities: The role of Internet of Things and machine learning in realizing a data-centric smart environment. Complex & Intelligent Systems, . (2024). 10(1), 1607-1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01175-4#
  16. Nurbatsin, A., Kireyeva, A., Gamidullaeva, L., & Abdykadyr, T. Spatial analysis and technological influences on smart city development in Kazakhstan. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, (2024). 8(2), 3012-3124. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i2.3012#
  17. Ye, X., Newman, G., Lee, C., Van Zandt, S., & Jourdan, D. (2023). Toward Urban artificial intelligence for developing justice-oriented smart cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 43(1), 6-7. https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/11165
  18. Pourahmad, A., Zangeneh-Sagharaki, S., & Saberi, A. Spatial justice analysis in access to urban services: A case study of Yasuj city. Geography & Development, (2023). 21(71), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.22111/GDIJ.2023.7588#
  19. Rezapour Ghatbi, K., Ezzatpanah, B., & Bigh Babaei, B. Assessing the feasibility of smart city indicators in accordance with contemporary urban fabric in Iranian cities: A case study of Babol. Geographical Spatial Planning, (2022). 13(2), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.30488/GPS.2023.375355.3602#
  20. Namdar Ardakani, M. J., Shokoor, K., & Bakht, A. A. City and spatial justice: An analysis of the distribution of sustainable development indicators in the spatial justice of Shiraz city. Geography and Urban & Regional Studies, (2022). 11(43), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1001.1.20087845.1401.11.43.9#
  21. Harvey, D. Social justice and the city. Johns Hopkins University Press. Hosseini(2009). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Social+justice+and+the+city.+Johns+Hopkins+University+Press.+Hosseini+&btnG=#
  22. Mashhad Municipality. (2024). Mashhad electronic city strategic plan. Mashhad Municipality, Development and Technology Deputy.
  23. Sharma, N. K., Hargreaves, T., & Pallett, H. (2023). Social justice implications of smart urban technologies: An intersectional approach. Buildings & Cities, 4(1), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.290
  24. Anabestani, A., Kalantari, M., & Niknami, N. (2023). Explaining key drivers affecting the establishment of IoT-based smart cities: A case study of Mashhad metropolis. Economics and Urban Planning, 4(1), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2023.390907.1346#
  25. Buttazzoni, A., Veenhof, M., & Minaker, L. (2020). Smart city and high-tech urban interventions targeting human health: An equity-focused systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7),2325.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072325#
  26. Donadio, T. (2023). Theorising social justice within the smart city: expanding urban paradigms by the notion of the right to the city. Public Policy Portuguese Journal, 8(1), 10-20 . http://hdl.handle.net/10451/57206#
  27. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072100#
  28. Hanaei T, Seyedalhosseini SM. The impact of using participatory planning in residential neighborhoods to achieve smart growth (case study: Isargaran neighborhood of mashhad). Creative City Design. 2020 Apr 1;3(1):18-29. https://oiccpress.com/crcd/article/view/7626
  29. Akbari A, Hasanpour M. Practical Strategies and Smart City Solutions to Promote Women's Security in Public Areas (Case Study: Tehran District 16). Creative City Design. 2020 Oct 1;3(2):126-40. https://oiccpress.com/crcd/article/view/7646