10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0803.14

Formulating a Conceptual Framework for Behavior Resulting from the Perception of Participants in Behavioral Settings, with an Emphasis on Barker's Theory

PDF
  • Saeed Sharifkazemi1,
  • Farah Habib *1,
  • Maryam Ghalambor Dezfuly2,
  1. Department of Urban Development, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  2. Department of Urban Development, Par.C., Islamic Azad University, Pardis, Iran

Received: 2024-11-25

Revised: 2025-01-10

Accepted: 2025-02-03

Published in Issue 2025-11-05

Copyright (c) 2025 Saeed Sharifkazemi, Farah Habib , Maryam Ghalambor Dezfuly (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Sharifkazemi, S., Habib , F., & Ghalambor Dezfuly, M. (2025). Formulating a Conceptual Framework for Behavior Resulting from the Perception of Participants in Behavioral Settings, with an Emphasis on Barker’s Theory. Creative City Design, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0803.14
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 75

Abstract

Aims: Environmental psychology has increasingly examined the subtle ways, in which perception influences human behavior in specific behavioral environments. This study builds upon Roger Barker’s theory of behavioral regulation, particularly the concept of isomorphism, which highlights the coordination between the environment and behavior. The research aims to develop a comprehensive framework integrating sensory perception with behavioral regulation, analyze how multisensory dimensions shape human actions and emotions, and provide practical strategies for designing inclusive and sustainable urban spaces. By addressing the interaction between human needs, sensory landscapes, and environmental factors, this study bridges the communication gap between perceptual research and its practical implications for urban design.

Methodology: This study employs a systematic review methodology, evaluating 74 filtered sources from an initial set of 396 articles retrieved from Scopus and Google Scholar, along with 27 categorized articles from 110 research papers obtained from six Iranian academic databases, including SID and Civilica. The PRISMA framework was used to ensure methodological transparency, applying clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria such as relevance, recency, and citation credibility. The extracted data underwent qualitative content analysis to identify dominant themes, interpret patterns, and establish connections between perception and behavior in urban settings.

Findings: The findings highlight the crucial role of sensory perception comprising vision, hearing, touch, smell, and taste in shaping behavior and emotional responses in shared spaces. Spatial design factors, such as territoriality, inclusiveness, and environmental cues, play a major role in fostering social cohesion and user engagement. The study underscores how urban planning strategies can leverage sensory elements to enhance well-being and social interactions.

Conclusion: This research presents a conceptual framework outlining how environmental perception translates into behavioral responses, demonstrating the impact of sensory landscapes on urban interactions. By integrating sensory, spatial, and behavioral elements, the study offers a foundation for urban designers to create inclusive and sustainable environments. Future research should explore these dynamics in the context of technological advancements and evolving urban landscapes to develop innovative approaches for enhancing urban livability.

Keywords

  • Behavioral Settings,
  • Ecological Psychology,
  • Multisensory Landscape,
  • Perception,
  • Behavior
PDF

References

  1. D. Agapito, P. Valle, and J. Mendes. “The sensory dimension of tourist experiences: Capturing meaningful sensory-informed themes in Southwest Portugal.”. Tourism Management, 42: 224-237, 2014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261517713002094
  2. E. Ahmadi, and A. Gheiyoorfar. “Understanding the meanings of the Persian garden from the perspective of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of sensory perception.”. Shebak, 8(6): 41-50, 2022. https://www.sid.ir/paper/1059573/fa
  3. C. Alexander, S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein. “A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction.”. Oxford University Press, 1977.
  4. I. Altman. “The environment and social behavior.”. Brooks-Cole, 1975.
  5. M. Asgari, and N. Nazarnajad. “Phenomenology of sensory perception in virtual space based on Maurice Merleau-Ponty's views.”. Semiannual Journal of Being and Cognition, 4(1): 61-82, 2017. https://www.sid.ir/paper/519287/fa
  6. R. Askarizad, and H. Safari. “The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran).” . Cities, 101: 102687, 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275119302732
  7. PH. Schoggen. “Behavior Settings: A revision and extension of roger G. Barker’s Excological psychology.”. Standford University Press, 1989.
  8. R. G. Barker. “Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior.”. Stanford University Press, 1968.
  9. R. G. Barker “Prospecting in environmental psychology.”. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1413–1432). Wiley, 1987.
  10. Barker R. G. “Habitats, environments, and human Behaviour: Studies in ecological psychology and eco-behavioral science from the midwest psychological field station, 1947-1972.”. Jossey-Bass, 1978.
  11. R. G. Barker, and H. F. Wright. “Behavior settings: A revision of ecological psychology.”. In G. E. Swanson, T. W. Thomas, & A. R. Jones (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 69–86). Harcourt, 1955.
  12. H. Barrie, K. McDougall, K. Miller, and D. Faulkner. “The social value of public spaces in mixed-use high-rise buildings.”. Buildings & Cities, 31: 4(1), 2023. https://journal-buildingscities.org/articles/10.5334/bc.339
  13. A. S. Barwich. “Up the nose of the beholder? Aesthetic perception in olfaction as a decision-making process.”. New Ideas in Psychology, 47: 157-165, 2017. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732118X16300721
  14. R. B. Bechtel, and A. Churchman. “Handbook of environmental psychology.”. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  15. R. Bechtel, T. McCallum, and J. Poynter. “Environmental psychology and Biosphere 2. In S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto, & T. Takahashi (Eds.).”. Handbook of Japan-United States environment-behavior research: Toward a transactional approach (pp. 235–244). Plenum Press, 1997.
  16. A. Booth, M. S. James, M. Clowes, and A. Sutton. “Systematic approaches to a successful literature review.”. 2021. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5282271
  17. M. I. Borer. “Being in the City: The Sociology of Urban Experiences.”. Sociology Compass, 7(11): 965-983, 2013. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soc4.12085
  18. E. Brunswick. “Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments.”. University of California press, 1956.
  19. J. Cao, and J. Kang. “A Perceptual Structure of Soundscapes in Urban Public Spaces Using Semantic Coding Based on the Grounded Theory.”. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20(4): 2932, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2932
  20. O. Dezhdar, G. Talischi, and R. Rouhi Dehkordi. “Rethinking the concept of behavioral settings, with an analytical review of Schoggen’s text.”. Haft Hesar, 1(1): 13-20, 2012. https://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-27-fa.html
  21. S. Ebrahim, S. Alsaadani, Z. El Sayad, and A. Elseragy. “Exploring Multi-Sensory Designed Architectural Spaces.”. International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial and Environmental Design, 12(4): 15-24, 2018. https://www.proquest.com/openview/8162e6842394dd8f9bce7cc4466c2c33/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=5528233
  22. H. Ebrahimi Asl, S. Panahi, and M. Foroutan. “Understanding the parallax component and tracing it in Steven Holl’s philosophy (Case study: Helsinki Museum, inner explorations, and time tesseract).”. Bagh-e Nazar, 14(50): 65-74, 2017. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_48677.html
  23. SH. Feli, F. Habib, & A. Shahcheraghi. “Identification of Components Affecting Synomorphy and Utilization Of It In Planning Educational Spaces (Cas: Faculties Of Art and Architecture of Tehran).”. Space Ontology International Journal, 9(4): 43-56, 2021. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/soij/Article/938492
  24. J. Gehl. “Life between buildings: Using public space.”. Island Press, 2011.
  25. J. Gehl. “Cities for people.”. Island Press, 2013.
  26. J. J. Gibson. “The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition.”. Psychology Press, 2014.
  27. R. Gifford. “Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.).”. Optimal Books, 2013.
  28. M. J. Grant, and A. Booth. “A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.”. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2): 91-108, 2009. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  29. A. HajiAhmadi Hamadani, H. Majedi, and L. Jahanshahloo. “Investigating the criteria influencing increased women's activity in urban spaces (Case study: Golestan Street, Poonak neighborhood, Tehran).”. Urban Studies, (14): 47-60, 2015. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_13007.html
  30. E. T. Hall. “The hidden dimension.”. Doubleday, 1966.
  31. S. Y. Hashemi, and Z. Kashkoli. “Examining the behavioral pattern of pedestrians in urban spaces.”. CHASHMANDAZ-E-ZAGROS, 12(43): 53-71, 2019. https://journals.iau.ir/article_673926.html
  32. L. Hashemian, M. Beigom, and M. Armaghan. “Explaining synomorphy in behavioral settings based on lifestyle in rural local houses through a reading of climatic-literary fiction (Case study: "Khoundasht" by Nasser Vahdati).”. Rural Researches, 12(3): 608-631, 2021. https://jrur.ut.ac.ir/article_82910.html
  33. H. Heft. “Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism.”. Psychology Press, 2001.
  34. H. Hekmatnia, S. R. Mirmehdi, and R. Mokhtari Malekabadi. “An analysis of the role of environmental psychology in achieving sustainability in urban spaces (Case study: Marginalized areas of Yazd).”. Urban Social Geography, 9(2): 1-23, 2022. https://www.sid.ir/paper/1361155/fa
  35. M. Hemmati, and P. Saboonchi. “The perceiver, the perceived, the product of perception (Evaluating experts' interpretations of landscape definition components).”. Manzar, 13(56): 14-29, 2021. https://www.manzar-sj.com/article_130683.html
  36. T. Higgins Jpt, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, and V. A. Welch. “Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022).”. Cochrane, 2022.
  37. J. L. Higuera-Trujillo, C. Llinares, and E. Macagno. “The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: A scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches.”. Sensors, 21(6): 2193, 2021. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/6/2193
  38. R. Ho, and W. T. Au. “Scale development for environmental perception of public space.”. Frontiers in psychol., 11: 596790, 2020. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596790/full
  39. S. B. Hosseini, and S. Razaghi Asl. “Movement and time in urban landscapes: Design concepts and ideas.”. International Journal of Engineering Sciences, 19(6): 83-88, 2008. https://www.sid.ir/paper/65463/fa
  40. K. Hosseinzadeh Dalir, M. Mousavi, N. Bayramzadeh, and H. Pashachini. “Investigating the impact of urban spaces on citizens' behavioral patterns (Case study: Imam Street, Urmia).”. Geography and Urban Development, 9(2): 37-53, 2022. https://jgusd.um.ac.ir/article_40512.html
  41. H. I. Jo, and J. Y. Jeon. “Perception of urban soundscape and landscape using different visual environment reproduction methods in virtual reality.”. Science Direct, 186: 1-44, 2022. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003682X21005922
  42. M. M. Kamali, A. Shahgoli, and J. Parsaei. “The role of the body in the emergence of intellectual perceptions from the perspective of Avicenna and Mulla Sadra.”. Hekmat Sinavi, 25(65): 133-152, 2021. https://ap.isu.ac.ir/article_75866.html
  43. A. Kamvar Shalmani, and S. Hanachi. “Investigating the impact of visual factors in urban spaces on citizens' behavioral patterns (Case study: Municipality Square, Rasht).”. Hoviat-E-Shahr, 24(9): 65-78, 2015. https://www.sid.ir/paper/154714/fa
  44. M. J. Koohsari, T. Sugiyama, S. Mavoa, K. Villanueva, H. Badland, B. Giles-Corti, and N. Owen. “Street network measures and adults' walking for transport: Application of space syntax.”. Health & place, 38: 89-95, 2016. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1353829216000125
  45. A. Liberati, D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gøtzsche, J. P. Ioannidis, ... and D. Moher. “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.”. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4): 36-65, 2009. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
  46. S. M. Lyman, and M. B. Scott. “Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension. In People and buildings (pp. 65-82).”. Routledge, 2017.
  47. K. Lynch. “The image of the city.”. MIT Press, 1960.
  48. R. Ma, Y. Luo, and K. Furuya. “Gender Differences and Optimizing Women’s Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Visual Behavior While Viewing Urban Park Landscapes in Tokyo, Japan.”. Sustainability, 15(5): 2-14, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/3957
  49. S. A. Majdzadeh, R. Mirzaei, S. M. Madahi, M. R. Mabhoot, and A. Heidari. “Identifying and Assessing the Semantic and Visual Perception Signs in the Identification of Fahadan Neighborhood of Yazd.”. Creative City Design, 4(3): 55-68, 2021. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/919415
  50. A. Majouni. “Influencing Factors on Performance of Social Behavior Settings at Parks and Green Spaces of Tabriz.”. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, (2): 199-215, 2018. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=727070
  51. S. Mansournia, F. Geraati, and B. Bahrami. “Behavioral mapping: An approach for evaluating the responsiveness of urban spaces (Case study: Leisure space by Zaribar Lake, Marivan).”. Urban Studies, 18: 77-90, 2016. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_32062.html
  52. K. McClelland. “Social structure and control: Perceptual control theory and the science of sociology.”. In The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory (pp. 229-297). Academic Press, 2020.
  53. I. McKinnon. “Co-creating Inclusive Public Spaces: Learnings from Four Global Case Studies. Journal of Public Space.”. Retrieved from https://www.journalpublicspace.org, 2021.
  54. A. Mehrabian. “An approach to environmental psychology.”. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1974.
  55. V. Mehta. “The street: A quintessential social public space.”. Routledge, 2013.
  56. V. Mehta, and B. Mahato. “Designing urban parks for inclusion, equity, and diversity.”. International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 14(4): 457-489, 2021. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17549175.2020.1816563
  57. S. M. Mojtabavi, G. Matlabi, and H. Ghodousifar. “The impact of sensory richness components on creating place attachment (A comparative study of traditional markets and modern commercial centers).”. Manzar, 14(61): 60-75, 2023. https://www.manzar-sj.com/article_162946.html
  58. M. H. Mokhtari. “Sensory perception from the perspective of Aristotle and Mulla Sadra.”. Kheradnameh Sadra, 99: 31-40, 2020. http://kherad.mullasadra.org/ar/Article/13990331237862
  59. G. Moser, and D. Uzzell. “Environmental psychology.”. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 419–445). John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
  60. H. Mousavi Fatemei, F. Habib, and P. Shahabian. “Scenario planning for urban landscape ecological network integration based on an improved gravity model (Northeast Tehran area).”. Sustainability, Development, and Environment, 4(1): 35-51, 2023. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/846728?FullText=FullText
  61. S. Mousavian. “Formation of place identity through sensory perceptions in the Persian garden.”. National Studies, 20(4): 115-134, 2018. https://www.sid.ir/paper/88878/fa
  62. P. Navarrete-Hernandez, A. Vetro, and P. Concha. “Building safer public spaces: Exploring gender difference in the perception of safety in public space through urban design interventions.”. Landscape Urban Plann., 24: 187-214, 2021. https://gap.hks.harvard.edu/building-safer-public-spaces-exploring-gender-difference-perception-safety-public-space-through#:~:text=Removal%20of%20solid%20walls%20was,women%20(estimate%20%3D%201.136%2C%20S.D.
  63. E. Paikan, and M. Rafieian. “In search of an integrated framework for spatial perception in interactive studies of humans and the environment.”. Armanshahr, 12(28): 125-138, 2019. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_97367.html
  64. N. Paknejad, and G. Latifi. “Explaining and evaluating the impacts of environmental components on the formation of behavioral patterns in urban spaces (From theory to practice: Case study of Tajrish Square).”. Bagh-e Nazar, 15(69): 51-63, 2018. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_82313.html
  65. J. Pallasmaa. “The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses.”. John Wiley & Sons, 2024.
  66. M. Paydar. and A. Kamani Fard. “The impact of legibility and seating areas on social interaction in the neighbourhood park and plaza.”. Archnet-IJAR., 15(3): 571-588, 2021. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/arch-07-2020-0146/full/html
  67. S. Pink. “An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making.”. Ethnography, 9(2): 175-196, 2008. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1466138108089467
  68. M. Qiu, J. Zhang, H. Zhang, and C. Zheng. “Is looking always more important than listening in tourist experience?.”. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(7): 869-881, 2018. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10548408.2018.1445064
  69. S. Qu, and Ma. “Exploring Multi-Sensory Approaches for Psychological Well-Being in Urban Green Spaces: Evidence from Edinburgh’s Diverse Urban Environments.”. Land, 13(9): 1536, 2024. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1536
  70. R. H. Price, and R. K Blashfield. “Explorations in the taxonomy of behavior settings Analysis of Dimensions and Classification of Settings.”. American Journal of Community Psychology, 3(4): 149-172, 1975. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007/BF00880776
  71. S. P. Robinson,and T. A. Judge. “Organizational behavior (18th ed.).”. Pearson, 2018.
  72. P. Rodaway. “Sensuous geographies: body, sense and place.”. Routledge, 2002.
  73. J. A. Russell. “An approach to environmental psychology.”. MIT Press, 1974.
  74. F. Sadeghzadeh Ghamsari. “Common sense and its perceptual roles according to Aristotle and Avicenna.”. Hekmat va Falsafeh, 5(4): 33-51, 2009. https://www.sid.ir/paper/123503/fa
  75. S. Sarmadi, A. Shahcheraghi, and L. Karimi Fard. “The process of landscape perception based on sensory and intellectual perceptions.”. Bagh-e Nazar, 17(88): 27-38, 2020. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_113205.html
  76. L. Scannell, and R. Gifford. “Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework.”. Journal of Environmental Psychol., 30(1): 1-10, 2010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494409000620
  77. R. M. Schafer. “The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world.”. Destiny Books, 1993.
  78. A. Shahcheraghi. “Analysis of the process of environmental perception of the Persian garden based on ecological psychology theory.”. Hoviat-E-Shahr, 3(5): 71-84, 2009. https://www.sid.ir/paper/154660/fa
  79. A. Sharghi, M. Sharif, and S. Asadi. “Analyzing the role of risk perception on environmental behavior during earthquakes in the Ganjali Khan Complex and Kerman Bazaar.”. Islamic Iranian City, 7(28): 77-85, 2017. https://www.sid.ir/paper/504947/fa
  80. M. Sheets-Johnstone. “The Primacy of Movement.”. John Benjamins Publishing, 2011.
  81. E. Sheikh Milani, A. Abdollahzadeh Taraf, M. Faramarzi Asl, and A. Saghaffi Asl. “Evaluating the sustainability of the urban landscape of Imam Street, Tabriz, based on human-oriented landscape components (Saa’at Square - University Circle).”. Sustainability, Development and Environment, 2(3): 61-83, 2021. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jsde/Article/846561
  82. C. Spence. “Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind, Cognitive research: Princ.”. Implic., 5(1): 21-46, 2020. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
  83. L. Steg, and J. I. M. de Groot. “Environmental psychology: An introduction.”. Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.
  84. F. Steiner. “Landscape ecological urbanism: Origins and trajectories.”. Landscape and urban plann., 100(4): 333-337, 2011. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169204611000570
  85. S. Tafakkor, A. Shahcheraghi, and F. Habib. “Revisiting synomorphy theory in the architecture of local Iranian markets (Case study: Tajrish Bazaar, Tehran).”. Nameh Memari va Shahrsazi, 13(28): 93-113, 2020. https://www.sid.ir/paper/359501/fa
  86. Q. H. Tan. “Smell in the City: Smoking and Olfactory Politics.”. Urban Studies, 50(1): 55–71, 2013. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042098012453855?download=true&journalCode=usja
  87. M. Taylor. “The Powers of Perceptual Control: An Inquiry into Language, Culture, Power, and Politics.”. Retrieved in July, 2022. From https://www.iapct.org/publications/books/powers-of-perceptual-control/, 2019.
  88. N. Thrift. “Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum.”. Geogr., 86(1): 57-78, 2004. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
  89. A. M. Townsend. “Smart cities: big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia.”. W.W. Norton & Company, 2013.
  90. UN Women. “Safe cities and safe public spaces for women and girls.”. Retrieved from https://www.unwomen.org/en, 2020.
  91. D. L. Uzzell. “Environmental Psychology and the Environmental (Design) Professions - a Comment on Gärling and Hartig.”. Newsletter of the International Association of Applied Psychology, 121(1): 32-34, 2000. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/0471264385.wei0517
  92. VerywellMind.com. “How perception works: The sensory experience of the world.”. Retrieved from verywellmind.com, 2023.
  93. SH. Wang, and A. Li. “Demographic Groups Differences in Restorative Perception of Urban Public Spaces in COVID- 19.”. Buildings, 12(7): 869-880, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/7/869
  94. K. Wankhede, and A. Wahurwagh. “The sensory experience and perception of urban spaces.”. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 7(1): 741-744, 2016. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Sensory-Experience-and-Perception-of-Urban-Wankhede-Wahurwagh/731d481e769aeb5a0ad7b400686e5f9643ff1c02
  95. D. D. Waskul, and P. Vannini. “Smell, odor, and somatic work: Sense-making and sensory management.”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(1): 53-71, 2008. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20141818
  96. W. H. Whyte. “The social life of small urban spaces.”. Project for Public Spaces, 1980.
  97. A. W. Wicker. “Behavior settings reconsidered: Temporal stages, resources, internal dynamics, context.”. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 613–653). Wiley, 1987.
  98. J. Xiong, N. H. Hashim, and J. Murphy. “Multisensory image as a component of destination image.”. Tourism Management Perspectives, 14: 34-41, 2015. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211973615000215
  99. L. Zhang, S. Liu, and S. Liu. “Mechanisms underlying the effects of landscape features of urban community parks on health-related feelings of users.”. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18(15): 7888, 2021. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7888
  100. H. Zheng, M. Luo, Y. Wang, and Y. Wei. “Multi-Sensory Interaction and Spatial Perception in Urban Microgreen Spaces: A Focus on Vision, Auditory, and Olfaction.”. Sustainability, 16(20): 8809, 2024. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8809
  101. R. Zhu, and R. Mehta. “Sensory experiences and consumer creativity.”. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(4): 472-484, 2017. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/693161
  102. M. Zia, M. Ghasemi, M. Moeuni, and M. Norouzi. “Explaining Components of Synomorphy in the Outdoor Behavior Setting of Residential Complexes: A Case Study of Kerman Residential Complexes.”. Creative City Design, 2(2): 46-55, 2019. https://journals.iau.ir/article_676378.html
  103. S. Zuboff. “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power.”. edn. PublicAffairs, 2019.
  104. S. Zukin. “Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places.”. Oxford University Press, 2009.
  105. Ebrahem, S.; Alsaadani, S.; El Sayad, Z.; Elseragy, A. (2018). Exploring Multi-Sensory Designed Architectural Spaces . International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial and Environmental Design. https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/exploring-multisensory designed-architectural-spaces