10.57647/ccd.2026.0901.04

Deciphering the Hidden Geometry of the Hasht Behesht Palace Plan (Isfahan): An Analytical Study Based on the Square-Growth System

  1. Department of Architecture, Shk.C., Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

Received: 2025-07-24

Revised: 2025-11-01

Accepted: 2025-11-23

Published in Issue 2026-03-31

How to Cite

Almasi, F., Abbasi, N., & Taghipour, S. (2026). Deciphering the Hidden Geometry of the Hasht Behesht Palace Plan (Isfahan): An Analytical Study Based on the Square-Growth System. Creative City Design, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/ccd.2026.0901.04

PDF views: 2

Abstract

Aims: Architectural design in every era relies on precisely planned geometry to achieve compositional unity. In Iran, the Safavid dynasty emphasized geometric principles and proportional systems, embedding them into architectural layouts. Hasht Behesht Palace in Isfahan, the only remaining Safavid palace, features a unique plan that diverges from its contemporaries. Its design logic remains unexplored. To date, no specific research has been conducted to decode the concealed geometric system underlying the palace’s planimetric. This study is essential to uncover the architectural principles governing the palace’s planimetric organization and to investigate the relationship between theoretical geometry and Safavid-era architecture. This study explores the geometric framework of the palace to demonstrate how its Planimetric order is structured through a system of geometric proportions, the square-growth system. After introducing the organizing principles, it conducts a planimetric analysis of the palace to reveal the underlying logic of its geometric composition.

Methodology: The research adopts a historical-analytical approach, integrating literature review, historical maps, field observations, and planimetric analysis using AutoCAD. The study examines the spatial logic of the palace plan through the 1:√2 proportional system.

Finding: The findings demonstrate that the palace plan is organized using a square-growth system based on concentric squares and the recurrent 1:√2 ratio. These findings confirm that the palace's planimetric divisions, including the central hall and porticos, resulted from conscious design and geometric reasoning, establishing geometry as a fundamental organizing principle in Safavid architecture.

Conclusion: This insight deepens understanding of how mathematical precision informed the architectural structure and Planimetric order of the Safavid era.

Keywords

  • Geometric System,
  • Proportions,
  • Square Growth,
  • Physical Structure,
  • Hasht Behesht Palace (Isfahan)

References

  1. Al Farabi AN. Ihsa al-Ulum (Enumeration of the Sciences). Translated by H. Khadivjam. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publishing; 2011.
  2. Al Farabi AN. Ihsa al-Ulum. Introduction, commentary, and annotation by A. Bou Malham. Beirut: Dar wa Maktabat al Hilal; 1996.
  3. Aristotle. The Metaphysics. Translated by H. Lawson-Tancred. Penguin Classics; 1999.
  4. Zehni Tehrani MJ. Al Lubab (Persian Commentary on Khulaṣat al Hisab by Shaykh Bahaei). Nashr e Ketabi Nejafi; 1992.
  5. Ameri A. I‘lam bi-Manaqib al-Islam. Translated by A. Shari‘ati and H. Manouchehri. Tehran: Center for Academic Publishing; 1988.
  6. Kendi Yaqub ebn eshaq. Rasa’il al Kindi al Falsafiyya (Philosophical Treatises). Dar al Fikr al Arabi, Cairo; 1950.
  7. Taheri J. Mathematician in Architecture. Journal for the History of Science. 2011; 9(1):39-65. https://jihs.ut.ac.ir/article_29084.html?lang=en
  8. Saliba G. Artisans and mathematicians in medieval Islam. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 1999; 119(4): 637–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/604839
  9. Holod R. Text, plan and building: On the transmission of architectural knowledge. In: Ševčenko MB, editor. Theories and Principles of Design in the Architecture of Islamic Societies. Cambridge, MA: Aga Khan Program; 1988. p. 1–11.
  10. Özdural A. Mathematics and arts: Connections between theory and practice in the medieval Islamic world. Historia Mathematica . 2000;27(2):171–201. https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1999.2274
  11. Özdural A. Omar Khayyam and architecture. Farhang. 2001; (39–40):189–252. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/266379
  12. Necipoglu G. The topkapi scroll Geometry and ornament in Islamic architecture, with an essay on the geometry of the muqarnas. Oxford University Press; 1996.
  13. Chorbachi WK. In the Tower of Babel: Beyond symmetry in Islamic design. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 1989; 17(4–6): 751–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(89)90260
  14. Mankovskaia LIu. Towards the Study of Forms in Central Asian Architecture at the End of the Fourteenth Century: The Mausoleum of Khvaja Aḥmad Yasavi. Iran. 1985; 23(1): 109-127.
  15. Bulatov MS. Geometric Harmonization in the Architecture of Central Asia from the 9th to the 15th Centuries. Nauka Publishing House, Moscow; 1978.
  16. Anvari Fayzi M, Jabbari MR. Social symbols of Shiism in the age of presence: Linguistic symbols. Ayene-ye Pazhouhesh. 2011; 8(29): 137–164. https://www.magiran.com/p949582
  17. Coste P. Monuments modernes de la Perse mesures, dessines et decrits. Edited by Morel, A. Paris Press; 2011.
  18. ShayestehFar M. Shi‘a Themes in the Architectural Inscriptions of Safavid‑Era Isfahan. In Proceedings of the Isfahan School Conference. Tehran: Academy of Arts.; 2009. p. 123–143.
  19. Honarfar L. Hasht Behesht of Isfahan. Honar va Mardom (Art and People). 1972; (117): 2–16. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/68616
  20. Mojtahedzadeh R, Namavar Z. Golden section in the Persian Islamic architecture: Case study of Hasht Behesht Palace, Isfahan, Iran. Mathematics Interdisciplinary Research. 2019; 4(1): 107–127. https://doi.org/10.22052/mir.2019.195272.1157
  21. Babur ZM. Baburnama. Translated by Wheeler M. Thackston. Washington, DC/New York: Freer Gallery of Art and Oxford University Press; 1996.
  22. Golombek L, Holod R, Wilber D. The Timurid architecture of Iran and turan. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996.
  23. Ferrante M. Le pavilion des Hasht Bihisht à Ispahan: Relevés et problèmes s'y rattachant. In: Zander, G. (ed.), Travaux de restauration de monuments historiques en Iran. Rome: IsMEO; 1968. p. 399–420.
  24. Babaei S. Isfahan and Its Palaces: Statecraft, Shi'ism and the Architecture of Conviviality in Early Modern Iran, c2008. Translated by Mostafa Amiri. Tehran: Farhang-e Javid; 2021.
  25. Shirazi KZAABN. Jannat al‑Athmar/ Zinat al‑Awraq/ SahIfa al‑Ikhlas. Edited by A.F. Rahim‑Af. Moscow: Academy of Sciences, Soviet Azerbaijan; 1979.
  26. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Hasht Behesht Palace (Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran) Anticipated Nomination for World Heritage Inscription. UNESCO World Heritage Centre; 2024. https://whc.unesco.org/en. Accessed 1 January 2025
  27. DarrehZereshki MH, Omidvari S, Bigzadeh Shahraki HR, Yazdi AR. Three Dimensional Aspects of Geometry (Physical Perceptual Semantic). 4th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. 2016; Tehran.
  28. Bemanian MR, Okhovat H, Baghaei P. Application of Geometry and Proportions in Architecture. Tehran: Helleh/Tahan Publications; 2011.
  29. Abbasi N, Ghasemi Sichani M, Valibeig N, Saadvandi M. Evaluation of The Viewpoints of Muslim Mathematicians (2-11 Centuries AH) about The Concept of Geometry in Architecture. Journal of Architectural Thought. 2019; 3(5), 84-105. https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2019.10296.1141
  30. Taheri J, Nadimi H. The Hidden Dimension in Persian Islamic Architecture. Soffeh. 2014; 24(2):5-24. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1393.24.2.1.2
  31. Hejazi M. Sacred Geometry in Nature and Iranian Architecture. Journal of History of Science. 2008; 7: 17– 44. https://jihs.ut.ac.ir/article_22386.html?lang=en
  32. Nejad Ebrahimi A, Aliabadi M. The role of mathematics and geometry in formation of Persian architecture. Asian Culture and History. 2015; 7(1): 220–239.
  33. Moussa A. Arabic sciences and philosophy. The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers. 2011; 21(1):1–56.
  34. Selin H. Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non Western Cultures. Springer; 1997.
  35. Al-Buzjani AW. Kitab fima yahtaju ilayhi al-sani min a'mal al-handasa [Ms. Persan 169, Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris]. Jazbi A, editor. Tehran: Soroush Press; 1990.
  36. Wiedemann E. Aufsätze zur Arabischen Wissenschaftsgeschichte. G. Olms; 1970.
  37. Ikhwan al Safa. Rasail. Beirut: Khayr al Din Press; 1928.
  38. Nikmaram A, Nejad Ebrahimi A. A Study of Iranian Architecture for Understanding the Mathematical and Geometrical Relations in Its Formation. Memari Shenasi (Architecturology). 2022; 5(23): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v7n1p220
  39. Farshchian AH, Nejad Ebrahimi A, Gharehbaglou M. Islamic Architects and Islamic Mathematicians Artistics Meeting, To Utilize Geometry in Architecture The period under study is the fourth to the eleventh AH. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture. 2022; 10(4): 82-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jria.10.4.3
  40. AmirAshayeri S, Balilan Asl L, Satarzadeh D, Habib F. Analyzing the role of practical and perceptible geometry in the architecture of the Soltanieh Dome. Islamic Art Studies. . 2022; 19(45):27–49. https://doi: 10.22034/ias.2022.313809.1791
  41. Taheri J. Mathematical knowledge of architecture in the works of Kashani. Nexus Network Journal. 2008; 11(1): 77–88.
  42. Özdural A. Omar Khayyam, mathematicians, and “conversazioni” with artisans. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 1995; 54(1): 54–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/991025
  43. Denny W, Necipoglu G, al-Asad M. The Topkapi scroll: Geometry and ornament in Islamic architecture. Speculum. 1998; 73(2): 566.
  44. Burckhardt T. The Perennial Values of Islamic Art. In: Foundations of Sacred Art (Translated by S.H. Nasr; Edited by A. Tadjdini). Tehran: Daftar-e Motale‘at-e Dini-ye Honar; 1997.
  45. Necipoglu G. Geometric design in Timurid/Turkmen architectural practice. In: Golombek L, Subtelny M, editors. Timurid Art and Culture. Leiden: Brill; 1992. p. 48–66.
  46. Avicenna. The Book of Healing. Translated by I. Bayoumi. Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Najafi Library; 1996.
  47. Hillenbrand R. Architectural Aspects of the Timurid Period in Central Asia. Translated by D. Tabaei. Golestan e Honar. 2008; 4(4): 65–82. https://www.magiran.com/p2198673
  48. Rostami MR. Decorative Designs. Tehran: Fakhrakia; 2008.
  49. El-Said I, Parman A. Geometric Concepts in Islamic Art. Dale Seymour Publications; 1976.
  50. Ikhwan al Safa. Encyclopedia of the Brethren of Purity. Basra, Iraq; 1993.
  51. Azar Khordad F, Hashemi Zarj Abad H, Zarei A. Recognition of Parameters and Applied Geometric Patterns in the Timurid Architecture (Case study of Ghayyasi Kharjer School). Khorasan e Bozorg Journal. 2018; 9(30): 81–96. https://dor.isc.ac/20.1001.1.22516131.1397.8.30.6.6
  52. Abbasi N, Valibeig N. Retrieving the hidden geometric secret in the design of the Naghsh e Jahan Square based on congruent rotated squares. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning . 2023; 33(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.524
  53. Pirniya MK. Stylistics of Iranian Architecture. Edited by Gholamhossein Memarian. Tehran: Soroush Danesh Publications; 2022.
  54. Mehrdad J, Roshan M. Geometric Patterns of Iranian Architecture and the Study of these Patterns from the Emergence of the First Civilizations of Contemporary Times. Journal of Architecture (Architecturology). 2019; 2(13): 1-11.
  55. Ansari M, Okhovat H, Taghvaei AA. Historical survey of proportional systems in architecture: Functional and aesthetic considerations. Book Monthly Art. 2011; 151: 46–57.
  56. Krier R. Architectural proportions. New York: Rizzoli Publishing; 1988.
  57. Hejazi M. Geometry in nature and Persian architecture. Building and Environment. 2005; 40(10): 1413–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.007
  58. Ardalan N, Bakhtiar L. The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture. Chicago: Kazi Publications; 2000.
  59. Sheykhi M, Momeni K, Vathiq B. Geometric Analysis and Iranian Gold and Zarin Proportions in Mir Gholam Hashemi Castle. A scientific journal of ilam culture. 2023; 23 (76-77): 23-38. https://doi.org/10.22034/farhang.2023.169592
  60. Zakeri SMH, Ghahremani A, Shehnazi D, Bazyar Hamzehkani I. Module and Iranian Golden Rectangle Theory in Historical Houses of Qajar Era in Shiraz City. JRIA. 2016; 1:16-30. https://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-426-en.html
  61. Bemanian MR. Introduction to the Role of Peymon (Module) in Iranian Architecture. Modares e Honar. 2002; 1. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/34944
  62. Omranifar S, Balilan Asl L, Narouzborazjani V. Investigating Geometric Proportions in The Design of Mausoleums in Contemporary Iran. Creative City Design. 2024; 7(1), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.71619/crcd-2024-7726
  63. Javadi Noodeh M, Shahcheraghi A, Andalib A. An Investigation of the Golden Proportions and Geometric Principles Derived from Nature in the Structural Components of the Traditional Houses (Case Study: Qajar Houses in Ardabil). Bagh‑e Nazar: Journal of Art and Architecture Research. 2022; 19(110): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.295674.4973
  64. Rezazadeh M, Etessam I. Geometrical Model of Relations among Patterns in Iranian Architecture. Creative City Design. 2020; 3(1), 30-47. https://oiccpress.com/crcd/article/view/7627
  65. Hashemi Zarjabad H, Ziaei Nia MH, Ghorbani HR. Re reading the Geometric Basics and Golden Ratio of Showkateyeh School. Archaeological Research of Iran. 2016; 5(9): 207-222. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_1296.html?lang=en
  66. Rezazadeh Ardabili M, Sabet Fard M. Recognition of The Application of Geometric Principles in Traditional Architecture Case Study: Qasre Khorshid and Its Hidden Geometry. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning. 2013; 18(1): 29-44. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2013.36355
  67. Fathel Khalil K, Wahid J. Proportional relations systems of architecture. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2013; 3(1): 1–12. https://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-1301.php?rp=P13577
  68. Dabbour LM. Geometric proportions: The underlying structure of design process for Islamic geometric patterns. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning. 2012; 1(4): 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.08.005
  69. Feizollah Beigi A, Golabchi M, Reza Zadeh M. An investigation in Geometry and Proportion in relation with Structural System in Buildings with Discontinuous Double Shell Domes in Tafresh Region. Soffeh. 2021; 31(3): 21-42. https://doi.org/10.52547/sofeh.31.3.21
  70. Feizollah Beigi A, Golabchi M, Reza Zadeh M. Analysis of theoretical and practical geometry of Abbasi jame Mosque's discontinuous double shell dome. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning. 2019; 24(4): 35-48. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2020.279322.672253
  71. Haji Ghasemi K. Hidden Geometry in the Elevation of Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque. Soffeh. 1996; 21–22, 28–33.
  72. Durand JNL. Précis of the Lectures on Architecture. Pritt, translator; 2000.
  73. Wojtowicz J, Fawcett W. Architecture: Formal Approach. London: Wiley-Academy; 1986.
  74. Krier R. The Morphology of Urban Spaces. Translated by Khosrow Hasheminejad. Isfahan: Soil; 2007.
  75. Memarian GH. A Journey in the Theoretical Foundations of Architecture. Tehran: Soroush-e Danesh; 2019.
  76. Tabatabaei M. Theoretical Foundations of Architecture. Tehran: Fatemi; 2014.
  77. Hasani K, Norouz-Borazjani V, Nasirsalami M. Re-read of Court’s Form and Related Spaces with Shape Grammar Case Study: 100 Houses of Qajar Dynasty in Kashan City. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Baghe Nazar. 2017; 44:65-76. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_42148.html?lang=en
  78. Seyedian S, Alinia S, Heidar Nattaj V. The Typology of Urban Façade Texture (in an approach to shape scrutiny) (Case study of Imam Khomeini Square in Tehran). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. 2017; 53:15-32. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_51265_en.html
  79. Hosseinian H, Soheili J, Alborzi F. Study of identifying formation process in recognizing the" Geometric pattern of Naqsh-e Jahan Square and surrounding building in point of view of formalisms. JRIA. 2023; 11:1-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jria.11.1.8
  80. Heydari S. An Introduction to Architectural Research. Tehran: Fekr‑e No Publishing; 2014.
  81. Karamkhani J, Alimadad Z. Proposal writing in research. Tehran: Negarestan e Gharb; 2016.
  82. Chardin J. Voyages du Chevalier Chardin en Perse. Vol. Legare Street Press; 2023. p. 39–43.
  83. Kaempfer E. Am Hofe des Persischen Grosskonigs (1684–1685). Translated by Hinz, W. Tubingen: H. Erdmann; 1977.
  84. Honarfar L. Isfahan. Tehran: Franklin Publishing Institute; 1969.
  85. Moshtaghian S. The history and principles.(theoretical and practical) restoration of architectural decoration in Esfahan's Hasht Behesht. [Master’s thesis]. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Central Branch; 2014.
  86. Nasirnatari J, Tilab Sh. Research Methodology. Tehran: Pishgam Publishing; 2017.
  87. Dieulafoy J. Iran, Kullahdh and Susa. Translated by A.M. Farhoushi. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 1992.
  88. Chardin J. The travels of Sir John Chardin into Persia and the East Indies: the first volume, containing the author's voyage from Paris to Ispahan, to which is added, The coronation of this present king of Persia, Solyman the Third. London: Printed for Moses Pitt; 1978.
  89. Mehdinejad J, Gholipour S. The Palaces of Safavid Isfahan (Case Study: Outward Facing Palaces). In: 2nd National Conference on Documentation of Natural and Cultural Heritage, Isfahan; 2018.
  90. SafiyanEsfahani MR. Encyclopaedia of the Isfahan School of Architecture. Vol. 1. Tehran: Taraneh Pedram; 2017.
  91. Mehravaran S. Visual Examination of Safavid and Qajar palace Decorations (Case Study: Eight Paradise Palace, Emarat Masoudieh, Chehel Souton palace of Qazvin, Golestan Palace). [MA thesis]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2016.
  92. Bina MJ, Etezadi L. Hasht Behesht Pavilion Isfahan Its Study as a Viewpoint. Soffeh. 2015; 25(3): 35-64. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1394.25.3.3.3
  93. Tafazzoli, S. 2012. Interpretation of Hashtbehesht (Eight Paradises) palace, emphasizing on the recipients perception. [Master’s thesis]. Supervisor: Mohammadreza Bemanian. Isfahan: University of Art; 2012.
  94. Yavari H, Bavafa R. Isfahan: The Garden of Heaven A Study in the Philosophy of Islamic Architecture and Its Decorative Arts in the Safavid Era (With Emphasis on Islamic Architecture in Isfahan). Tehran: Simaye Danesh, Azar; 2011.
  95. Fereshtenejad SM. Dictionary of Architecture and Architectural Conservation (Vol. 1). Tehran: Arkan e Ketab Publishing; 2010.
  96. Taghvaei V. Re reading the Form of Hasht Behesht Palace in Isfahan. Nameh ye Memari va ShahrSazi. 2010; 5(3):149–161. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2011.187
  97. Esmaeili A, Mokhtari R. The Art of Isfahan Through Travelers' Eyes (From Safavid to Qajar Era). Tehran: Matn Cultural Institute; 2006.
  98. Shayesteh MR, Mansour G. Esfahan: A Small but Earthly Paradise. Tehran: Nakhshe Khorshid Publishing; 2004.
  99. Dari A, Taleisichi G. Explaining the transparency of spatial structure in Iranian architecture during the Safavid period: Case study of Hasht Behesht Pavilion and Imam Mosque of Isfahan. Journal of Iranian-Islamic City Studies. 2017; 27:5–41. https://sid.ir/paper/177421/en
  100. Babbie ER. The practice of social research. Cengage; 2020.
  101. Abbasi N, Valibeyg N, Arya N. A Comparative Study of the Entrance Circulation of Abbasi Jame’ Mosque and Seyyed Jame’ Mosque in Isfahan from the Perspective of the Persian Geometric Proportion in an Architectural Plan. Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism. 2021; 6 (1) :39-51. https://doi.org/10.52547/ciauj.6.1.39
  102. Al-Buzjani AW. Iranian Geometry: Practical Applications of Geometry. Translated by Seyed Alireza Jazbi. Tehran: Soroush Publications; 2022.
  103. Mehdinejad J, Sadeghi Habibabad A. Geometry with Naghsh Jahan Square. In International Conference on Engineering, Art and Environment; 2015. p. 1-12.
  104. Lawlor R. Sacred Glometry: Philosophy and Practice. Translated by H. Me’iri. Tehran: Institute for Cultural Studies and Research; 1989.
  105. Sudheer S. Geometry in Islamic art and architecture. Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Dubai ; 2019. p. 1–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340923042
  106. Sajjadi Naeini M. History of Isfahan. Isfahan: Cultural and Recreational Organization of Isfahan Municipality; 2008.
  107. Abbasi N. Analysis of Theoretical Geometry in the Entryway Elements of Isfahan`s Mosques and Schools on the Historical Cultural, Tourism Axis in the City of Isfahan (From Toghchi Gate to Hassanabad Gate), with a Special looking at the Geometric Golden Ratio. Ph.D. Dissertation. Isfahan: Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch; 2020.
  108. Omoumi M. Architecture: Pattern and Order. Tehran: Khak Publishing; 2008.
  109. Aj S, Khodarahmi MF, Fahimifar AA. Decoration wisdom and geometry of motifs in Islamic art. Honar-e Elahi J. 2020; 14:99–118. https://el.itaihe.ac.ir/article_46200
  110. Bolkhari H. The cosmological position of the circle and square in the holy architecture (Islamic). Honarha-ye Ziba. 2005; 24: 5-14. https://jhz.ut.ac.ir/article_13876.html
  111. Navaei K, Haji Ghasemi K. An Interpretation of Iranian Islamic Architecture. Tehran: Sooroush; 2020.
  112. Broug E. Islamic geometric patterns. London: Thames & Hudson; 2008.
  113. Du Mans R. Etat de la Perse en 1660. Edited by Schefer C. Paris: E. Leroux; 1890.
  114. Molavi B, Qasemzadeh M. Exploring the Use of Geometry in Iranian Past Architecture (Islamic Period). Tehran: Building and Housing Research Center; 2002.
  115. Ching FD. From, space, and orderArchitecture. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
  116. Mousavi F. A Perspective on the Golden Ratio Phi. Nasha ye Elm. 2016; 7(1): 39–52.
  117. Livio M. The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World’s Most Astonishing Number. New York: Broadway Books; 2008.
  118. Rafie Sarshaki B, Rafizadeh N, Ranjbar Kermani AM. Descriptive dictionary of Persian architecture. Tehran: Building and Housing Research Center; 2002.
  119. Marzban P, Marouf H. Illustrated Dictionary of Visual Arts (2nd ed.). Tehran: Soroush Publishing; 1992.
  120. Shekhawat K. Why golden rectangle is used so often by architects: A mathematical approach. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.012
  121. Barratt K. Logic and Design in Art, Science and Mathematics. London: The Herbert Press; 1980.
  122. Ayatollahi H. The Theoretical Bases of Plastic Arts. Tehran: SAMT Publications; 2022.
  123. Abolghasemi L. Iranian Architecture Islamic Period. In: Kiani, M.Y. (ed.), Iranian Architecture: Islamic Period. Tehran: SAMT Publications; 2020. p. 361.
  124. Madden C. Fib and Phi in Music: The Golden Proportion in Musical Form. High Art Press; 2005.
  125. Ramzy N. The dual language of geometry in Gothic architecture: The symbolic message of Euclidian geometry versus the visual dialogue of fractal geometry. Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture. 2015; 5(2): 135–172. https://digital.kenyon.edu/perejournal/vol5/iss2/7
  126. Elam K. Geometry of Design: Studies in Proportion and Composition. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 2001.
  127. Izadpanah H. Drawing methods and Application of regular polygon in Islamic mathematics (Correction, translation, and commentary on Abd al Rahman al Sufi's treatise “On the Construction of Equilateral Figures”). Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2016.
  128. Taheri J. An Introduction to the Knowledge of Mathematics in the Islamic Period: An Inquiry into the Theoretical and Practical Foundations of the Relationship Between Mathematics and the Art of Islamic Architecture (2nd–11th cent. AH). [PhD dissertation]. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University; 2009.
  129. Kostovskii AN, Sneddon IN. Geometrical Constructions with Compasses Only. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1961.
  130. Honsberger R. Ingenuity in Mathematics. New York: Random House/ Singer School Division; 1970.
  131. Isfahan Cultural Heritage Documentation Center. Technical Activities of the National Organization for the Preservation of Antiquities of Iran: Repair Report of Hasht Behesht Palace, Project No. 1679. Isfahan; 1978.
  132. Ranjbar M. Introduction to Iranian Measure. Tehran: Iranian Mehrz Society; 2003.
  133. Kamyar M. Geometric pattern in Safavid carpet. Journal of Scientific Society of carpet. 2009; 11. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20082738.1387.4.11.16. 1
  134. Langhein J. On the path to a general proportion theory – Research perspective for the 21st century. Design Community. 2002. https://www.designcommunity.com/students/4563.html Accessed 16 July 2025
  135. Mascheroni L. La geometria del compasso. Milan: Era nova; 1901.