10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0804.22

AI-Simulated Visual Tracking of Structural Order Perception in Urban Facades: A Case Study from Mashhad, Iran

  1. Department of Urbanism, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
  2. Department of urban development, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2025-06-18

Revised: 2025-08-14

Accepted: 2025-09-22

Published in Issue 2025-12-31

How to Cite

Motamedinezhad, M., Ostadi, M., Mohammadniay gharaei, F., & Zarabadi, Z. S. S. (2025). AI-Simulated Visual Tracking of Structural Order Perception in Urban Facades: A Case Study from Mashhad, Iran. Creative City Design, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0804.22

PDF views: 30

Abstract

Aims: In urban design, the structural order of building facades plays a pivotal role in shaping human perception and experience. This study investigates the implicit visual recognition of structural order using subliminal visual tracking analysis.
Methodology: Visual Attention Software (VAS) was employed to analyze observers’ visual attention patterns toward diverse façade typologies, including historical and contemporary urban facades in Mashhad, Iran.
Findings: Our findings indicate that observers’ subliminal perceptions align with the three-part rules of structural order: contrasting elements on a micro-scale, reduced entropy and connection between micro and macro scales, and a hierarchical connection between levels. Here, we show that observers readily perceive structural similarities on a micro-scale and the totality of forms on a macro-scale, but struggle with perceiving the hierarchical connection between these levels.
Conclusion: This study underscores the critical role of multi-scale coherence in façade design across scales and provides insights for enhancing the visual quality and coherence of urban facades.

Keywords

  • structural order,
  • urban façade,
  • subliminal attention,
  • visual perception,
  • visual attention software

References

  1. Mehaffy MW, Salingaros nA. A New Pattern Language for Growing Regions: Places, Networks, Processes: Sustasis Press; 2020.
  2. Mahdi KS, Boujari P. Analyzing the heritage of Tehran’s urban façades in the recent century. City, Territory and Architecture. 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00166-1
  3. Alan b. working memory: looking back and looking forward. nature reviews | NEUROSCIENCE. 2003; 4.
  4. lavdas AA. Eye-Tracking Applications in Architecture and Design. Encyclopedia. 2024; 4(3): p. 1312-1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4030086
  5. Misiak H, Virginia Staudt S. History of psychology: an overview New York: Grune & Stratton; 1966.
  6. Mirabi E, Nasrollahi. Urban Facade Geometry on Outdoor Comfort Conditions: A Review. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2020; 9: p. 655-677. doi:10.25105/urbanenvirotech.v4i1.7151
  7. Ali-Toudert F, Mayer H. Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate. Building and environment. 2006; 2(41): p. 94-108.
  8. Hollander JB, Anderson C. Theimpact of urban façade quality on affective feelings. Archnet-IJAR. 2019; 14(2):
  9. p. 219 - 232. doi:10.1108/ARCH-07-2019-0181
  10. Krier L. Architecture of Community Washington: Island Press; 2009.
  11. Kalaga W. Face/Façade: The Visual and the Ethical. Urbanistika ir architektūra. 2010; 34(3): p. 120-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2010.12
  12. Mehaffy MW, Salingaros, NA. Design for a Living Planet Portland: Sustasis Press; 2015.
  13. Amoruso G. The Relief-Perspectives of Bitonti and Borromini: Design and Representation of the Illusory Space. In Handbook of Research on Visual Computing and Emerging Geometrical Design Tools. United States of America; 2016. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0029-2.ch018
  14. Alexander C. The Nature of Order, Book 1: The Phenomenon of Life Berkeley, California: Center for Environmental Structure; 2001.
  15. Salingaros NA. A Theory of Architecture: Intercollegiate Studies Institute; 2006.
  16. Salingaros AN. The Structure of Pattern Languages. Archit ect ural Research Quart erly. 2000; 4: p. 149-161.
  17. Mokhtarianpour M. Process Model for Designing Islamic-Iranian Model of Progress. Iranian pattern of progress. 2017; 4(8): p.9-30. doi:20.1001.1.23295599.1395.4.8.1.7
  18. colegrave S. The spirit of valley: Virago Press Ltd; 1979.
  19. Trochim W. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2007. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243783609_Th e_Research_Methods_Knowledge_Base
  20. Lavdas AA, Salingaros NA. Architectural Beauty: Developing a Measurable and Objective Scale. challenges. 2022. doi.org/10.3390/challe13020056
  21. Lavdas AA, Salingaros , Sussman. Visual Attention Software: A New Tool for Understanding the “Subliminal” Experience of the Built Environment. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11: p. 61-97. doi:https://doi.10.3390/app11136197
  22. Brielmann AA, A. Salingaros N, H. Buras N, P. Taylor R. What Happens in Your Brain When You Walk Down the Street? Implications of Architectural Proportions, Biophilia, and Fractal Geometry for Urban Science. Urban Science. 2022; 6(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010003
  23. Corporation: 3. 3M VAS. [Online].; 2020. Available from:https://vas.3m.com/
  24. Lavdas AA, Salingaros NA, Sussman. Visual Attention Software: A New Tool for Understanding the “Subliminal” Experience of the Built Environment. Applied sciences. 2021; 11(13).
  25. Itti L, Koch C. Computational Modelling of Visual Attention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001;: p. 194–203. doi:doi:10.1038/35058500
  26. Salingaros NA, Sussman A. A. Biometric Pilot-Studies Reveal the Arrangement and Shape of Windows on a Traditional Façade to Be Implicitly “Engaging”, Whereas Contemporary Façades Are Not. Urban Sci. 2020. From doi:10.3390/urbansci4020026
  27. Sussman A, Hollander, JB. Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment; 2021.
  28. Salingaros NA. Rules for Urban Space: Design Patterns. Journal of Urban Research and Development. 2021; 2[1]. From https://ojs.emu.edu.tr/
  29. Jalali M, Kormi-Nouri , Hassanabadi , Hatami. A 4-component scale of working memory: Developing the Persian version and valuating the validity of it in 4-6 grades children (WM-4CSC). Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2021; 23[1]: p. 13-25.
  30. Baddeley DA, Hitch G. WORKING MEMORY. 1974.
  31. Baddeley AD, Hitch ,G. Development of working memory: should the pPasculaleone and the Baddeley and Hitch Models be merged? Experimental Child Psychology. 2000; 77: p. 128-137.
  32. Sodan AC. Yin and Yang in Computer Science. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM. 1998; 41(4).
  33. Xinru W. A novel jigsaw game with eye-tracking: A multimodel interaction based on psycholinguistics for ADHD therapeutic. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds. 2023; 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.2214
  34. Zhang LM, Zhang RX, Jeng TS, Zeng ZY. Cityscape protection using VR and eye tracking technology. , 199, 103810. Visual Communication and Image Representation. 2019; 64. From https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.102639
  35. Franěk M, Petružálek J, Šefara. Eye movements in viewing urban images and natural images in diverse vegetation periods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2019; 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126477
  36. Liao H, Wendi , Zhang C, Dong. Detecting individuals' spatial familiarity with urban environments using eye movement data. Computers Environment and Urban Systems. 2022; 93(9). doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101758
  37. Huble DH. Eye, Brain, and Vision New York: Scientific American Library; 1988.
  38. Mansouri H, Rezvani A, Sahragard , Sarvari. Prioritization The Elements and Components of The Facade Structure Based on Its Impact on The Audience's Visual Perception. Creative city design. 2023; 6(2): p. 1-14. DOI: 10.30495/CCD.2023.698973