10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0801.06

Citizens’ perception of urban form indicators from sustainable development point of view; Case Study: 1st district of Tabriz

PDF
  • Amin Hamidi1,
  • Dariush Sattarzadeh*2,
  • Nima Valizadeh3,
  • Lida Balilan3,
  1. Department of Art & Architecture, Tabriz Branch (International Campus), Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
  2. Department of Art and Architecture, Tabriz Branch (International Campus), Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
  3. Department of Art & Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Received: 2024-02-02

Revised: 2024-08-12

Accepted: 2024-11-11

Published in Issue 2025-03-01

Copyright (c) -1 Amin Hamidi, Dariush Sattarzadeh, Nima Valizadeh, Lida Balilan (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Hamidi, A., Sattarzadeh, D., Valizadeh, N., & Balilan, L. (2025). Citizens’ perception of urban form indicators from sustainable development point of view; Case Study: 1st district of Tabriz. Creative City Design, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0801.06
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 219

Abstract

Aims: Urban form plays a crucial role in sustainable development by influencing environmental quality, social equity, and economic efficiency. Understanding citizens’ perceptions of urban form indicators provides valuable insights for urban planners to develop strategies that align with local needs. This study examines the significance of urban form indicators for sustainable development in District 1 of Tabriz, Iran, aiming to assess how residents perceive and importance of prioritize these indicators.

Methodology: A mixed-method quantitative approach was employed, using a structured survey to collect data from 384 residents of District 1, selected through random sampling. A questionnaire was designed based on urban form indicators identified from prior research. Statistical analyses, including the Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests, were conducted to evaluate differences in the perceived importance of indicators.

Findings: The results revealed that access to public transportation, building age, and sky visibility factor (SVF) were the most significant indicators for sustainable urban development. Public transportation accessibility ranked highest, with a mean score of 3706.75, followed by building age (2971.75) and SVF (2650.52). The Wilcoxon test confirmed significant differences among the indicators (p < 0.05), highlighting the need for prioritization in urban planning. The Kruskal-Wallis test further demonstrated disparities in residents’ perceptions across various urban form elements, emphasizing the necessity for participatory approaches in urban development policies.

Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of integrating citizen perceptions into sustainable urban planning. The findings suggest that transport accessibility, materıals, and building characteristics are critical factors in achieving sustainable development. Policymakers should incorporate these insights to formulate data-driven urban strategies that enhance livability, environmental resilience, and social inclusivity. Future research should explore the intersection of urban form, social equity, and climate adaptation to create more sustainable and adaptive urban environments.

Keywords

  • Sustainable urban form,
  • Citizen perception,
  • Urban planning policy,
  • Urban form indicators
PDF

References

  1. Masnavi M.R.,sustainable development and the new urban paradigms,Journal of environmental studies,2003,volume29,isue31,p89, https://doi.org/20.1001.1.10258620.1382.29.31.8.8
  2. Mahdi Gharakhloo ,Sayyed Hadi Hoseini, Indicators of urban sustainable development, Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 2003,Year 4, Number 8, pp. 157-177, https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v5i8.4231
  3. Große J.,Urban structure and sustainable transport – Exploring the relationship between urban structure and travel behaviour and the role of urban planning in Northern Europe. PhD thesis, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen,september 2017, 172 pp, https://soeg.kb.dk/permalink/45KBDK_KGL/fbp0ps/alma99121966125605763
  4. Hamidi A.,Sattarzadeh D.,Valizadeh N.,Balilan Asl L., Investigation of the components and zoning of urban morphology based on sustainable development; Case study: District one of Tabriz,journal of geography and planning, 2023,Volume 27, Issue 85 , October, Pages 39-55, https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2022.52249.3019
  5. Sareminia H.,Mohammadniay Gharaei F.,Saeidi Mofrad S.,Ghahramani S.,Identifying the Dimensions and Components of the Health-oriented Urban Form with An Emphasis on the Epidemic Disease: A systematic scoping review; Creative city design,2023, Vol. 6, No. 2, 27-38,DOI:10.30495/ccd.2023.1976669.1181
  6. Kates R. W., Parris T. M., Leiserowitz A. A., WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT? GOALS, INDICATORS, VALUES, AND PRACTICE,
  7. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development ,2012,p8-21, https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
  8. Jatayo A.,Zahara S, Measuring Levels of Infrastructure Development and its Impact on Regional Growth - Insights from Indonesia.IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2024.P8, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1353/1/012011
  9. Larco, N. Sustainable Urban Design—A (Draft) Framework. Journal of Urban Design,2016, 21, 1-29, https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1071649
  10. Cervero R.,Kockelman K., Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment Volume 2, Issue 3, September 1997(EPA2002), Pages 199-219, https://web.mit.edu/11.s946/www/readings/Cervero_1997.pdf
  11. Zarrabi A,Alizadeh J,Ranjbarnia B,Kamelifar M. J.,Ahmadian M,Evaluation the Rate of Citizen Satisfaction from the Quality of Urban Environment (Case study: 10 Zones of Tabriz City). Journal of Geography and Planning,2015, Volume 19,Pages 193-219, https://geoplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_3443.html?lang=en
  12. Sadeghi A.,Panahi N.,Zareh P., Explaining the environmental qualities that affect citizens' participation in the fields Urban public as a social dimension of sustainable development (Study case: Shiraz city).sustainable architecture and urban design,2018,2nd autmn and fall,17-33, https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2016.01.03.003.
  13. Prozan I, Karkehabadi Z.,Abbas َ.,Analysis of the sustainability of urban neighborhoods based on sustainable development indicators (case study of Mahabad city).New Perspectives in Human Geography (Human Geography), 2017,9(2), https://www.magiran.com/p2352644
  14. Oliveira V., Urban morphology : an introduction to the study of the physical form of cities ,2016,Tehran university,41-111, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0
  15. Mashaikhi H. R.,Alavi S. A.,Qaed Rahmati S. , Analysis of Smart Indicators in Reducing the Physical Vulnerability of Urban Housing (Case Study: District 1 of Tehran). Geography and Urban Space Development,2019, 06 December, https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v6i1.66357
  16. Hajipour KH,Foroozan N,Study of the Urban Form Effect on Operational Energy Consumption; the Case of Shiraz, Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning,2016,Volume 19, Issue 4-4,November,Pages 17-26,https://DOI.ORG/10.22059/jfaup.2015.55692
  17. Dixit K.، M.، H. Culp، C.، Lavy، S. and Fernandez-Solis، J. ، Recurrent embodied energy and its relationship with service life and life cycle energy: A review paper,2014, Facilities، Vol. 32 No. ، pp. 160-181, https://doi.org/10.1108/F-06-2012-0041
  18. Yüksek، Izzet., The Evaluation of Building Materials in Terms of Energy Efficiency. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering.2015, 59, DOI:10.3311/PPci.7050
  19. Sathre، R.، Gustavsson L, Effects of energy and carbon taxes on building material competitiveness.Energy and Buildings،2007,39(4)،488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.09.005
  20. Latha P.K. ، Darshana Y., Venugopal V.,Role of building material in thermal comfort in tropical climates. A review، Journal of Building Engineering،2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.06.003
  21. Smith،Claire، Levermore، Geoff ,Designing urban spaces and buildings to improve sustainability and quality of life in a warmer world. Energy Policy، 2008,36(12)، 4558-4562, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.011
  22. Waresi H.,akbari maham A.,study of earthwuake resistance in urban residential buildings(case study:Hamedan city),haft hesar journal of environmental studies,2015,volume 1,issue 1,p45-60 , https://sid.ir/paper/238644/en
  23. Mirktoli J., Bargahi, R, Aghili, Sayeda Z.,Explaining the dimensions of using fractal geometry in the analysis of geography and urban planning,Geoghraphical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal، 2014,Vol: 4، p71, https://Explanation of Fractal Geometry in Geography and Urban Planning
  24. Purevtseren، M.، Tsegmid B.، Indra M.، Sugar M..The Fractal Geometry of Urban Land Use: The Case of Ulaanbaatar City، Mongolia. Land،2018, 7(2)، 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020067
  25. Koshesh V., Muhammad A., ,Study of land surface temperature concerning land-use in Tabriz city using the Landsat 8 data, economic geography research,,2021,volume2
  26. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.27173747.1400.2.1.4.0
  27. Pierer، Carl & Creutzig، Felix. , Star-shaped cities alleviate trade-off between climate change mitigation and adaptation. Environmental Research Letters,2019,p14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2081.
  28. Bokaie M.، Zarkesh M. K.، Arasteh P. D. Hosseini A. ,Assessment of Urban Heat Island based on the relationship between land surface temperature and Land Use. Land Cover in Tehran. Sustainable Cities and Society،2019, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2016.03.009
  29. Svensson، M.,Sky view factor analysis – implications for urban air temperature differences. Meteorological Applications، 2004,11(3)، 201-211. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S1350482704001288
  30. Dirksen M. , Ronda R.J. , Theeuwes Natalie , Pagani G. , Sky view factor calculations and its application in urban heat island studies. Urban Climate.2019, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100498.
  31. Lyu، T.، Buccolieri، R.، & Gao، Z. , A Numerical Study on the Correlation between Sky View Factor and Summer Microclimate of Local Climate Zones. Atmosphere,2019, 10(8)، 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080438
  32. Mohammadpour S., Sarafi M., Tavakolinia J., An analysis of travel demand management towards sustainable urban transportation (case study: Tehran metropolis). Quarterly Journal of Regional Planning, 2016,6(21), 103-116, https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22516735.1395.6.21.8.6
  33. Gao، Ya & Wang، Zhanyong & Liu، Chao & Peng، Zhong-Ren.. Assessing neighborhood air pollution exposure and its relationship with the urban form. Building and Environment,2019,15-24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.044
  34. Kondo، M. C.، Fluehr، J. M.، McKeon، T.، & Branas، C. C. , Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018، Vol. 15، Page 445، 15(3)، 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH15030445
  35. Aram، F.، Higueras García، E.، Solgi، E.، & Mansournia، S. (2019). Urban green space cooling effect in cities. Heliyon، 5(4)، e01339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E01339
  36. Park، J.، Kim، J. H.، Lee، D. K.، Park، C. Y.، & Jeong، S. G. (2017). The influence of small green space type and structure at the street level on urban heat island mitigation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening، 21، 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2016.12.005
  37. Zhang، Y.، Murray، A. T.، & Turner، B. L. , Optimizing green space locations to reduce daytime and nighttime urban heat island effects in Phoenix، Arizona. Landscape and Urban Planning،2017, 165، 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2017.04.009
  38. Atashi Golestan S.,Golabchi M., Investigation the Role of Green Roof and Walls in the Thermal Performance of Urban Buildings based on Sustainable Architecture (A Case Study in Mashhad-Iran).Creative City Design ,2019, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1-8. https:// https://oiccpress.com/crcd/article/view/7612
  39. Esmaeilpour N., Karamooz E.,Fakharzadeh Z.,Assessment of Mixed Use Status in Urban Street and Strategies for It's Promote (Case Study: Kashani Street in Middle Texture of Yazd City),geographical researches,2015,Volume 30, Issue 3, http://georesearch.ir/article-1-94-fa.html
  40. Khaksari A.,Azimi M. ,Khaki E. ,The Impact of Land Use Mixing on Travel Production in Urban Neighborhoods (Case Study: Neighborhoods 1 and 2 of Baneh City); Urban and Regional Development Planning,september 2020,Volume 3, Issue 5,Pages 1-27, https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2020.48589.1171
  41. khaliq A.,siami Q., The effect of mixing uses on the production of sustainable trips in urban neighborhoods (case example: Miyad, Tarbiat and Hashemi neighborhoods in Mashhad ;New attitudes in human geography,2016,Number 3,P65-78, https://doi.org/20.1001.1.66972251.1396.9.3.16.1
  42. Naghsh mohit Consulting Engineers. (1390). Master plan of Tabriz